Sorry, I was thinking of gas as a product (as in natural gas), not a
state of matter.
Confusing, so I proposed natural_gas for natural gas.
I was thinking of substance=* as a category (water, fuel, oil, gas,
coolant, etc etc
I think we need (as often as possible) to tag separately nature and
John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:
Substance=gas
Substance:detailed:multiphase_gas
Substance:state=multi
That is not coherent. Do you mean that (substance=gas) is for mainly
gas or gas-only?
If it is gas only (substance=gas), it can be multiple gaseous
products. But it is not multiphase.
And
Is there some decision on helping it all in one tag -
Btw - isn't it states of matter?
Substance:state= solid liquid gas (plasma?) multi
would a pneumatic garbage pipe be gas or solid, since it moves solid stuff (and
implies pneumatic or such ?)
Substance=gas
On Jan 30, 2015, at 6:51 PM, althio althio.fo...@gmail.com wrote:
John Willis jo...@mac.com wrote:
Substance=gas
Substance:detailed:multiphase_gas
Substance:state=multi
That is not coherent. Do you mean that (substance=gas) is for mainly
gas or gas-only?
If it is gas only
2015-01-29 5:41 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com:
if this is the proper term used for pipelines, then this would be the
right one,
Otherwise, =multi (like sports) would be the best.
but you would not need such a tag, since it would be
substance=gas
substance:detailed=multiphase_gas
if you
Am 29.01.2015 um 10:59 schrieb Martin Koppenhoefer:
2015-01-29 5:41 GMT+01:00 johnw jo...@mac.com mailto:jo...@mac.com:
if this is the proper term used for pipelines, then this would be
the right one,
Otherwise, =multi (like sports) would be the best.
but you would not need such a tag,
Throwing out my ideas...
Disclaimer:
These are generic proposals for pipeline sub-tagging with example values
for illustration.
I do not want to derail this towards water/drinking_water and multi-values
(semicolon or namespaced). ;)
I propose 3 keys: use/purpose (as main subtag), state/phase and
I'd like to repeat once again that substance doesn't seem to be a nice
key descriptor for values like ...
during the draft stage, I (we) couldn't come up with an expression that
covered everything that might one day be transported in a pipeline.
content ... too static
medium ... too spooky
On Thu, Jan 29, 2015 at 4:07 PM, Rainer Fügenstein r...@oudeis.org wrote:
during the draft stage, I (we) couldn't come up with an expression that
covered everything that might one day be transported in a pipeline.
fluid?
___
Tagging mailing list
and what exactly is a neutron bean?
correction: should read neutron beam
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 30/01/2015 5:07 AM, Rainer Fügenstein wrote:
I'd like to repeat once again that substance doesn't seem to be a nice
key descriptor for values like ...
during the draft stage, I (we) couldn't come up with an expression that
covered everything that might one day be transported in a pipeline.
On 29/01/2015 3:41 PM, johnw wrote:
substance=fuel
substance:detailed=drinking_water
isn't it just as error prone as
substance=fuel
fuel=drinking_water
?
As the error is on one line it is easier for a human to pick up, either
as it is made or on checking.
An error that is a relation
On 28/01/2015 10:57 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
if you want the liquid information, use
aggregate_state=liquid
IMHO for pipelines it would be more interesting to tag the pressure
and the inner diameter of the tube.
Agreed in part.
If 'we' tag what we see at the site .. then the pipe
On 29 January 2015 at 22:54, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
On 30/01/2015 5:07 AM, Rainer Fügenstein wrote:
I'd like to repeat once again that substance doesn't seem to be a nice
key descriptor for values like ...
content ... too static
medium ... too spooky
product ... is sewage a
2015-01-28 13:06 GMT+01:00 SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk:
grey water has a specific meaning (waste water that isn't sewage and can
be further used for e.g. irrigation). If that's what you mean - great. If
you just mean water that you can't drink, then just use something that
describes
Hello Warin,
Wednesday, January 28, 2015, 8:48:16 AM, you wrote:
W Request For Discussion
W http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:substance
thanks for picking up thus topic. I have to leave in a few minutes for
a 6 week assignment, therefore only just a few words:
- my intention impression
2015-01-28 12:01 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
So for natural gas worked out to that basic level, as one example, that
would be
substance = gas
gas=fuel
fuel=natural_gas
I believe this is pointlessly complicated and semantically incorrect, why
not tag:
substance=natural_gas
On 28/01/2015 11:43, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2015-01-28 8:48 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com
mailto:61sundow...@gmail.com:
Unfortunately this does not have a tag for non drinking water ..
possible values could be
non-potable_water
grey_water
I like grey_water
On 28/01/2015 8:41 PM, Rainer Fügenstein wrote:
Hello Warin,
Wednesday, January 28, 2015, 8:48:16 AM, you wrote:
W Request For Discussion
W http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:substance
thanks for picking up thus topic. I have to leave in a few minutes for
a 6 week assignment, therefore
2015-01-28 8:48 GMT+01:00 Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com:
Unfortunately this does not have a tag for non drinking water .. possible
values could be
non-potable_water
grey_water
I like grey_water
According to taginfo the values in decreasing use are water (30%), gas,
heat, sewrage,
hi,
first, I wouldn't use the value of substance=* as key for the detailed
level, because in this case we would introduce a new key (i.e. fuel=)
whenever a new substance is introduced (i.e. substance=fuel).
second, I'd stick with two levels (general, detailed), otherwise we'd
eventually end
On Jan 28, 2015, at 8:01 PM, Warin 61sundow...@gmail.com wrote:
Oh.. 'multiphase' is a mixture of gas, fuel and water as it comes out of some
well heads
if this is the proper term used for pipelines, then this would be the right
one,
Otherwise, =multi (like sports) would be the best.
Request For Discussion
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:substance
Pipe lines currently exist for non drinking water in various part of the
world. And have done for some time. They are becoming more numerous as
efforts to save water and reduce environmental impacts increase.
23 matches
Mail list logo
