On 31/08/10 19:17, Magnus Bäck wrote:
In the Skånetrafiken public transport network in southmost Sweden, bus
stops are identified not only by name but also by a capital letter that
identifies this particular platform (or stop position, if you will). In
most cases you have an A platform for one
maybe these private orgs / foundations / charities can be temporarily
classified all under NGO classification (or a more general term).
not all foundations / NGO's are charitable. Maybe, charity should just be
a sub-category of foundation or NGO(?)
Charitable institutions are most likely a
Hmmm... I guess we can declare this coastline correction task complete?
There are still red spots in the webmap but I think these are all residual
errors and I'm guessing there are no more SRTM-based coastlines remaining. I
think all are now based on Landsat or PGS (which has small sawtooth coasts
hi all!
i'm doing a trip pre-planning to Sta. Cruz, Ilocos Sur with a
highly-probable side-trip to Vigan and noticed OSM needs some sort of
a Vigan mapping party. the tourist place needs lots of mapping works
to do; I expected the opposite though. I remember the calesa route
merely circled the
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 1:12 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1 September 2010 07:21, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I think that most people would say that's a feature, not a problem.
But you aren't asking most people since you don't want to know the true
answer.
2010/8/31 Dirk-Lüder Kreie osm-l...@deelkar.net
Am 31.08.2010 12:30, schrieb Liz:
I was referring to user-mapped data. Imports have to fit the license,
not the other way around.
At the time of import the data imported fitted the licence.
Perhaps you had better look back at the archives
You would have had more luck sticking to one alias (Jane Smith), now
you're just making it obvious as to your goals.
I suppose I shouldn't be surprised that some are now stooping to
questionable tactics, but it just re-enforces the fact that I no
longer have any faith in those that are pushing
On 1 September 2010 16:16, Jane Smith janesmith...@gmail.com wrote:
But we know that his boks should be burnt. How can we allow Fredderik to
spread the gospel in his books when we know the 'new license' should be
brought down?
Tip for next time, be less overt, it allows the ruse to go on for
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:55 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
You would have had more luck sticking to one alias (Jane Smith), now
you're just making it obvious as to your goals.
John you are correct. The more we use our aliases the better.
But no I am not 80n or 80 m.
The
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:59 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1 September 2010 16:16, Jane Smith janesmith...@gmail.com wrote:
But we know that his boks should be burnt. How can we allow Fredderik to
spread the gospel in his books when we know the 'new license' should be
On 1 September 2010 17:00, Jane Smith janesmith...@gmail.com wrote:
The longer we keep our secret about BigTinCan John
Oh goody a juicy secret... do tell, or should be have a sleep over and
play truth or dare?
___
legal-talk mailing list
On 1 September 2010 17:06, Jane Smith janesmith...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to gt my Dinner here in Sydney, but back later!
Did you have a good flight from Germany?
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:09 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1 September 2010 17:00, Jane Smith janesmith...@gmail.com wrote:
The longer we keep our secret about BigTinCan John
Oh goody a juicy secret... do tell, or should be have a sleep over and
play truth or dare?
But
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:10 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1 September 2010 17:06, Jane Smith janesmith...@gmail.com wrote:
I need to gt my Dinner here in Sydney, but back later!
Did you have a good flight from Germany?
Yar I ist eating mine fritter John.
can you
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
On 1 September 2010 16:04, Jane Smith janesmith...@gmail.com wrote:
John Smith and I know the Truth. Frederik's books should be burnt. He is an
Apostle of the 'new license'.
I would have said apostle of the CT because I highly doubt he'll be
content with the license...
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:35 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 September 2010 17:30, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
only the most presumptuous person would believe that a license they choose
today will automatically be the best license for the project for all time.
On 1 September 2010 17:58, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
That you claim that Frederik, or LWG, or OSMF Board are are trying to
speak for both people now and people in the future in the very same
breath is bold. You know perfectly well that term three gives the
decision on future
Hi,
John Smith wrote:
On 1 September 2010 17:30, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
only the most presumptuous person would believe that a license they choose
today will automatically be the best license for the project for all time.
The sheer arrogance of all this is astounding, you
On 1 September 2010 18:03, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I think it is nothing but selfish. You don't even know if you'll be in OSM
As I've stated in the past, which you conveniently keep ignoring, over
looking or misunderstanding...
You are putting end users of the data ahead of
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:35 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com
wrote:
On 1 September 2010 17:30, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
only the most presumptuous person would believe that a license they
choose
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:01 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 September 2010 17:58, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
That you claim that Frederik, or LWG, or OSMF Board are are trying to
speak for both people now and people in the future in the very same
breath is
On 09/01/2010 09:15 AM, 80n wrote:
Nobody is saying that CC-BY-SA is perfect.
But they are saying that it is unsuitable.
It isn't but it works. Look at how quickly Waze reacted. Not bad for
a broken license, eh?
Rely on people's good intentions is not a general solution.
The great
On 1 September 2010 18:30, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Still in OppositeLand, JohnSmith?
Can't figure out any better insults?
The Contributor Terms trust future OSM contributors to make the right
choices for future OSM licenses. Do you trust current and future OSM
At least be
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:15 AM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote:
Frederik's argument that we cannot predict what future generations will want
is quite fallacious.
Really? What will future generations want, 80n? I predict that
future generations will want Flying cars sure, but we were promised
On 1 September 2010 18:46, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On the other hand, six-ish years ago there was no concern that we
would have to be compatible with OS data. Now, they publish open data
And how compatible will the CTs be with OS data exactly?
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:37 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, we contributors are being treated with contempt alright, besides
not being asked what we contributors want, since this whole thing
started it's been nothing but dirty tricks to try and get the license
changed.
On 1 September 2010 19:07, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
If you don't want the effects of a PD OSM for geodata, ODbL is a better way
of ensuring this than BY-SA
The devil you know is better than the devil you don't
At this stage I have every reason to believe the CT and now possible
the
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:12 AM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:37 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, we contributors are being treated with contempt alright, besides
not being asked what we contributors want, since this whole thing
started
On 1 September 2010 19:12, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Every time OSM contributors have been asked, they have supported ODbL
Is this like all the laywers that think the ODBL is great too?
about 12,500 contributors make up about 99% of the data, how many of
those agree with your point
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010 05:12:21 -0400, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com
wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:37 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, we contributors are being treated with contempt alright, besides
not being asked what we contributors want, since this whole thing
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29
A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception
within an online community.
The rash of posts by Jane Smith and 80 m are examples sockpuppetry
at its worst. If you care for this kind of thing, take it elsewhere.
It's not
On 1 September 2010 09:53, Mikel Maron mikel_ma...@yahoo.com wrote:
PLEASE
Indeed.
Emilie Laffray
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 10:31 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 September 2010 19:22, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
And wage a campaign of reverting pages on the wiki[1], or hiding major
Shhh don't mention the thread on the tagging list about this, it might
On 1 September 2010 10:36, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sockpuppet_%28Internet%29
A sockpuppet is an online identity used for purposes of deception
within an online community.
The rash of posts by Jane Smith and 80 m are examples sockpuppetry
at its
On 1 September 2010 19:38, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
Please, stop being so childish about all this. Most people would be
mortified if they realised how much trouble they were causing, even
inadvertently. Whereas you seem to be relishing it, and egging
yourself on to annoy
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 09:22:12PM +0200, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com wrote:
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Albertas Agejevas a...@pov.lt wrote:
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 01:12:16AM +0200, jamesmikedup...@googlemail.com
wrote:
Want an example of a use case DB integration? Consider
On 1 September 2010 19:59, Andy Allan gravityst...@gmail.com wrote:
My comments have nothing to do with the debate or any issues you
Then perhaps you should have used another thread with a more
appropriate subject line to avoid confusion?
My comments are intended to address your disruptive
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Richard Weait wrote:
The OSMF are
OpenStreetMap contributors.
However
OpenStreetMap contributors != OSMF
because OSMF is a subset of contributors
(although being a contributor is not a prerequisite, so this may not be
completely true).
Anthony schrieb:
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 11:00 AM, Robert Kaiserka...@kairo.at wrote:
Actually, IMHO, it's was wrong of the OSM project to do neither a copyright
assignment nor a license that has a clear clause on automatic possibility of
upgrade to a newer license in the same spirit (i.e. and
Francis Davey schrieb:
Agreeing with the person you assign to that they will only use the
copyright in certain ways won't protect you against a subsequent
assignee of the copyright (eg OSMF assigns to XXX Ltd), subject to
certain exceptions.
While that may be true, anyone not trusting the
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:30 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
Contrary to what John seems to believe, I would be quite content with the
new license - not exactly in love with it, but content is a good word I
think
When did you come to that conclusion, and why? Weren't you opposed
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:03 AM, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
I think there may be a misunderstanding here. The clause 3 in the
contributor terms is precisely there because we want to *avoid* speaking for
people in the future. Anyone arguing against that basically says: Well of
John,
there's hardly a single message of yours in which I fail so find
something inappropriate.
For example this:
John Smith wrote:
On 1 September 2010 21:21, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
The devil is in the details.
CT+ODBL has a lot of fine print...
is just unsuitable for a
On 1 September 2010 20:52, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I don't see how CC-By-SA 3.0 explicitly does not apply to
databases more than 2.0. It explicitly applies to things like maps
however (possibly this only means maps as images though)
It is my understanding that they
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 3:55 PM, Emilie Laffray emilie.laff...@gmail.com wrote:
On 1 September 2010 20:52, andrzej zaborowski balr...@gmail.com wrote:
Also I don't see how CC-By-SA 3.0 explicitly does not apply to
databases more than 2.0. It explicitly applies to things like maps
however
On Sep 1, 2010, at 3:17 PM, Liz wrote:
The complete lack of any arguments left in the brains of the pro-ODbL lobby
shows in the complete falling apart of any discussion on this list, with
previously thoughtful people concentrating on personal attacks on others,
mostly claiming that they
Well we try to answer questions as quickly as possible. Some answers
depend on further meetings, others depend on replies from busy
professionals. Some answers get lost in the mundane reality of day to
day life.
Here are a couple of answers for questions that were asked a few weeks
back. Not
On 1 September 2010 22:41, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
I'm not even sure what maps as images means. If a map is described in
XML (say, as an svg file), would that file be a map as an image?
Let's assume any of the individually copyrightable graphics (like
On 09/01/2010 10:17 PM, Liz wrote:
1. From where does OSMF get the mandate to choose the licence? OSMF mandate is
to own and run the servers . I got that from the OSMF website.
The OSMF's Memorandum of Association, which is the legal expression of
the Foundation's purpose, states:
3. The
On 2 September 2010 05:14, Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote:
there's hardly a single message of yours in which I fail so find
something inappropriate.
I've made several comments that you do like wise, you keep claiming
this change is needed to make OSM more free, but that's dishonest
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
maps are expressly treated as artistic works by s.4(2)(a) of the
Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (to give a UK perspective).
Pretty much the same thing in the US. pictorial, graphic, and
sculptural works are included
On 2 September 2010 03:25, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:04 PM, Francis Davey fjm...@gmail.com wrote:
maps are expressly treated as artistic works by s.4(2)(a) of the
Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 (to give a UK perspective).
Pretty much the same thing in the
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 5:59 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote:
Also proceeding is the discussion of exactly what edits should be
treated in what way during the license change[1]. So if you care one
way or the other if a spell-check 'bot that changes tag spelling
should be considered
On Sep 1, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Anthony wrote:
If ODbL were CC-BY-SA for databases, I'd be in favor of it.
+1
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
Hi,
One of my sources(source=*) that I use for streets are geotagged photos,
which I link to directly at the website where they are hosted. Sometimes
when I see that the photo geoposition isn't the way I want it(knowing
that the street sign in my city is on the corner of a building usually),
I
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:10 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.comwrote:
On 1 September 2010 16:04, Jane Smith janesmith...@gmail.com wrote:
John Smith and I know the Truth. Frederik's books should be burnt. He is
an
Apostle of the 'new license'.
I would have said apostle of the CT
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 10:00 PM, Aun Yngve Johnsen
li...@gimnechiske.orgwrote:
I believe if you are the owner of the data,
But what is an owner? Ownership is the lash of the bourgoise. What you own
is owned by us all. Properety is theft.
Therefore those who steel the map from us the mappers
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a
more modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report
myself - very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but
functional to get a breakdown of tag usage. I figured someone else
might like to
Noam,
I am curious to know why you don't simply give OSM attribution and
carry on using the maps?
PY
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 4:04 AM, Julio Costa Zambelli
julio.co...@openstreetmap.cl wrote:
Noam,
Thank you for taking this as seriously as it needs, and solving the
whole issue this fast.
On Wednesday 01 September 2010 09:05:18 paul youlten wrote:
I am curious to know why you don't simply give OSM attribution and
carry on using the maps?
If you read the blog post carefully, you'll find a hint:
We are huge fans of OSM and hope to collaborate with OSM through the new
license
But what a shame that so much crowd generated data had
to be erased because of a stupid license !
Nobody of the OSMF board thought of that ?
Regards,
Gert Gremmen
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org]
Namens Iván
You seem to be misunderstanding something here. No data has been deleted.
Waze is looking forward to use OSM data after the license change,
because the current one doesn't allow them to use the OSM data (even
including attribution) the way they do.
Claudius
Am 01.09.2010 11:13, ce-test,
On Wed, 1 Sep 2010, Richard Weait wrote:
Every time OSM contributors have been asked, they have supported ODbL
(or license change before ODbL had a name). All the way back to SotM
Manchester. And all the way forward through polls and surveys and more
SotM conferences. All the time,
On 1 September 2010 20:33, Claudius claudiu...@gmx.de wrote:
You seem to be misunderstanding something here. No data has been deleted.
Waze is looking forward to use OSM data after the license change, because
the current one doesn't allow them to use the OSM data (even including
attribution)
Hi,
I just downloaded josm-latest.jar and got the following errors:
Exception in thread main java.lang.UnsupportedClassVersionError: Bad
version number in .class file
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass1(Native Method)
at java.lang.ClassLoader.defineClass(ClassLoader.java:676)
Niklas Cholmkvist towardsoss at gmail.com writes:
Hello,
When I map, sometimes I add sources to my contributions. It could be a
bus route relation where I may add the GPS trace I took while riding the
bus as the source for the route. Other times if I name a street I may
use a
Claudius,
You seem to be misunderstanding something here. No data has been deleted.
Waze is looking forward to use OSM data after the license change,
because the current one doesn't allow them to use the OSM data (even
including attribution) the way they do.
[GG] Citation:
On 1 September 2010 21:06, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
OSM: go to shame ourselves.
Most OSM software is GPL'd are you telling those authors they should
be ashamed of themselves for not publishing under a BSD license
instead?
This is a direct consequence of OSM not being PD !
From our Homepage:
The project (OSM) was started because most maps you think of as free
actually have legal or technical restrictions on their use, holding back
people from using them in creative, productive, or unexpected ways.
This is
On 09/01/2010 10:14 AM, John Smith wrote:
On 1 September 2010 19:07, Rob Myersr...@robmyers.org wrote:
If you don't want the effects of a PD OSM for geodata, ODbL is a better way
of ensuring this than BY-SA
The devil you know is better than the devil you don't
The devil is in the details.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 01-09-10 13:14, John Smith schreef:
On 1 September 2010 21:06, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert
Gremmen g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
OSM: go to shame ourselves.
Most OSM software is GPL'd are you telling those authors they should
be
On 1 September 2010 21:21, Rob Myers r...@robmyers.org wrote:
The devil is in the details.
CT+ODBL has a lot of fine print...
But going from these reasonable objections to accusing the actions of the
part of the community that you don't agree with of being dishonest, immoral
and detrimental
On 1 September 2010 21:26, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
GPL is not the problem here. None of the software has to be distributed
to the end user. No distribution = No license violation.
http://svn.openstreetmap.org/LICENSE
___
talk mailing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
Op 01-09-10 13:33, John Smith schreef:
On 1 September 2010 21:26, Stefan de Konink ste...@konink.de wrote:
GPL is not the problem here. None of the software has to be distributed
to the end user. No distribution = No license violation.
John Harvey j...@johnharveyphoto.com wrote:
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a
more modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report
myself - very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but
functional to get a breakdown of tag
Hi.
Since end of July JOSM requires Java 6.
Perhaps that's the reason for the exception.
I would say: check your Java version ;)
regards
Peter
On 01.09.2010 12:41, maning sambale wrote:
Hi,
I just downloaded josm-latest.jar and got the following errors:
Exception in thread main
John Harvey j...@johnharveyphoto.com wrote:
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. ...
Am Mittwoch, 1. September 2010, 13:40:23 schrieb Pierre-Alain Dorange:
In cas you don't know it, there is tagstat, a little bit slow but more
accurate and with updated data :
Thanks Peter.
I switched to JAVA 6. All is fine.
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 7:52 PM, Peter Wendorff
wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote:
Hi.
Since end of July JOSM requires Java 6.
Perhaps that's the reason for the exception.
I would say: check your Java version ;)
regards
Peter
On
On 01/09/2010 12:56, Jörg Ehrichs wrote:
And just to get a full list.
There is also the older, but still working and updated Tagwatch
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tagwatch
http://tagwatch.stoecker.eu/
I maybe missing something, but is there a search facility?
Cheers
Dave F.
Hi,
take the coordinates from Google
Earth/Maps.
I will not. That is a non-free source, the same reason I do not
look/consider Wikimapia(google maps based) or any other proprietary
maps.
OSM may currently be the freest data collection that exists (since
CC-BY-SA-3.0 is legally invalid for OSM
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a more
modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report myself -
very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but functional to
get a breakdown of tag usage. I figured someone else might like to read
On 09/01/2010 12:30 PM, John Smith wrote:
On 1 September 2010 21:21, Rob Myersr...@robmyers.org wrote:
The devil is in the details.
CT+ODBL has a lot of fine print...
So does BY-SA. And you should see GNU's GPL/copyright waiver/copyright
assignment combination. They are all trying to be
Am 01.09.2010 15:15, schrieb Lars Francke:
OSMDoc is great - it's a shame it's a year out of date. I needed a more
modern breakdown of tag statistics so I decided to write a report myself -
very quick and dirty (no where near as cool as OSMDoc), but functional to
get a breakdown of tag usage.
Jane Smith schrieb:
The longer we keep our secret about BigTinCan John, the longer we can
disrupt things!
Thanks for stating in a very obvious way what you are here for.
And what this community needs is collaboration, not disruption, so
either try working together with everyone else or go
2010/9/1 Peter Körner osm-li...@mazdermind.de:
What is the problem in running the import, that you did once, again,
completely replacing the outdated data.
he wrote on the German ML that he lost the program which did the import.
cheers,
Martin
___
On 01/09/2010 14:15, Lars Francke wrote:
Well thank you very much.
Cheers,
Lars (author of OSMdoc)
Hi Lars
The search facility appears to only search the key tag not the values
tag. Is there a way to overcome this?
For instance - parking. It doesn't list amenity=parking or any other
On 1 September 2010 14:42, Robert Kaiser ka...@kairo.at wrote:
Francis Davey schrieb:
Agreeing with the person you assign to that they will only use the
copyright in certain ways won't protect you against a subsequent
assignee of the copyright (eg OSMF assigns to XXX Ltd), subject to
certain
On 09/01/2010 03:05 PM, Francis Davey wrote:
Bear in mind that OSMF may cease to exist and its assets be
transferred to someone else who you may trust less. I'm not saying it
will happen or is even likely to happen, but I'm afraid as a lawyer
I'm inclined to be cautious about the far future.
Hi,
Because I'm curious to read how new users see openstreetmap when they
register (and also a curious chance to see the new contributor
terms :) ) I went to the registration page of openstreetmap
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/new .
Why does that page load scripts from ethnio.com? Those
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 6:44 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm curious as to what specifically is stopping them with the current
license, because the current license hasn't stopped MS or MapQuest
from using OSM's data...
It's that pesky ShareAlike part, I'm sure. When looking
On 01/09/2010 10:22, Andy Allan wrote:
...leading to simply unbelievable volumes of email[3].
Too whinge purely because you can't deal with a few emails is
childishness in itself.
Dave F.
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-t...@openstreetmap.org
I don't know why this script is included and when the target shows up,
but it targets (whenever) to
https://ethnio.com/remotes/62786/edit?
May be anyone knows what's the reason for putting ethnio-recruting
service on the page
Marco
Am 01.09.2010 16:07, schrieb Niklas Cholmkvist:
Hi,
Because
On 01/09/10 15:07, Niklas Cholmkvist wrote:
Because I'm curious to read how new users see openstreetmap when they
register (and also a curious chance to see the new contributor
terms :) ) I went to the registration page of openstreetmap
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/new .
Why does that
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 8:59 AM, Niklas Cholmkvist towards...@gmail.com wrote:
Someone wrote:
take the coordinates from Google
Earth/Maps.
I will not. That is a non-free source, the same reason I do not
look/consider Wikimapia(google maps based) or any other proprietary
maps.
OSM may
What is the problem in running the import, that you did once, again,
completely replacing the outdated data.
he wrote on the German ML that he lost the program which did the import.
Thank you Martin.
He is correct. I don't have the script anymore that did the import and
it didn't work very
I just noticed that someone changed some time ago the rules for voting.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_featuresaction=historysubmitdiff=424831oldid=422949
I cannot remember that there was any discussion about this. I believe
that RFC and voting-announcements should go to
On 01/09/2010 17:12, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I just noticed that someone changed some time ago the rules for voting.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_featuresaction=historysubmitdiff=424831oldid=422949
I cannot remember that there was any discussion about this. I
Martin wrote:
I cannot remember that there was any discussion about this. I
believe
that RFC and voting-announcements should go to [talk], while
[tagging]
is for discussions about tags and tagging schemes.
Perhaps I'm a bit jaded at the moment, but I think [tagging] is a
better choice. If
On 08/30/2010 10:41 AM, Graham Jones wrote:
I think we might need some finer grained assessment of c, because as
my son gets bigger (or I get older!) I am finding I give up on more
tracks than I used to...
Does anyone know if there is such a scheme in use already, or would we
need to invent a
2010/9/1 Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com:
On 01/09/2010 17:12, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
I just noticed that someone changed some time ago the rules for voting.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/w/index.php?title=Proposed_featuresaction=historysubmitdiff=424831oldid=422949
I cannot remember
1 - 100 of 312 matches
Mail list logo
