Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:49:48 +0100 "Dave F." wrote: > On 08/09/2015 00:07, Lester Caine wrote: > > On 07/09/15 23:16, Dave F. wrote: > >> I'm not sure there's been a discussion as you've mostly ignored the > >> basic comment made - it it's deleted in the real world it

[Talk-cz] Odborník na cyklotrasy v iD

Ahoj, není tady nějaký odborník na iD, který by poradil nováčkovi na fóru? http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=37875 Díky, Marián ___ Talk-cz mailing list Talk-cz@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-cz

Re: [Talk-at] Busse temporär "deaktivieren"

On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 03:49:48 +0200 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Friedrich Volkmann wrote: > > Immer wieder löschen und neu anlegen halte ich für keine gute Idee, weil > > ja die Anwender nicht immer auf die aktuellen Daten zugreifen, sondern da > > gibt es einen zeitlichen

Re: [Talk-it] santelle, croci, crocefissi, ecc.

Ecco la mia mappatura Nota: non utilizzo mai denominazione=catholic perché la maggior parte di questi oggetti è anche considerato da altre denominazioni christiane. > > historic=wayside_cross > man_made=cross (mi sembra più simile a una

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

sent from a phone > Am 08.09.2015 um 01:49 schrieb Dave F. : > > I don't believe anyone's advocating the removal of existing entities. > In your viaduct case above, keep the viaduct entity, remove the > railway=abandoned tag, use the historical tag to describe the past

Re: [Talk-it] santelle, croci, crocefissi, ecc.

voschix wrote > Scusa, non sono io a decidere > :-) > Ho solo scritto come avrei fatto io. > Direi di aspettare altre reazioni. Certo ;-) per carità. Scusami te, volevo soltanto capire bene il tuo orientamento. Grazie! --enrico -- View this message in context:

Re: [Talk-cz] Odborník na cyklotrasy v iD

Odborníci nepoužívaju iD ale JOSM ;-) 2015-09-08 8:15 GMT+02:00 Marián Kyral : > Ahoj, > není tady nějaký odborník na iD, který by poradil nováčkovi na fóru? > > http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=37875 > > Díky, > Marián > >

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 8/09/2015 7:00 PM, Fabian Schmidt wrote: On 09/08/2015 12:16 AM, Dave F. wrote: I fail to understand why railways are singled out as a special case. If roads, buildings or woods get demolished, they get deleted. please have a look at the tag definition in the wiki: "where the rails have

Re: [Talk-it] problema svolte - casello Piovene-Rocchette

Il problema rimane. A me quella relazione sembra giusta. Boh ... io non capisco, se qualcuno riesce può sistemare? Grazie Davide -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/problema-svolte-casello-Piovene-Rocchette-tp5853719p5854190.html Sent from the Italy General

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 7 Sep 2015 15:31:02 - Russ Nelson wrote: > We should map everything that doesn't move, and maybe a few things > that do. And completely destroyed railways are fitting neither category as things that are not existing neither move nor do not move. In addition - there

Re: [Talk-at] Busse temporär "deaktivieren"

> Auch ein fieses Beispiel ist übrigens der 39A. Da fahren im Sommer einige > Kurse (einer pro Stunde tagsüber) von der normalen Endstation Sievering > weiter über die Agnesgasse (Haltestelle Ährengrubenweg) zur Haltestelle > Agnesgasse am Kreisverkehr (der als Schleife dient). Im

Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza edifici a Torino

ho trovato grosse mancanze anche a Roma (es fiumicino quasi non esiste come palazzi o trastevere nn è finito), Napoli, Firenze. Speravo che i dati degli edifici fossero più completi in OSM :( Per Torino: Al momento l'unico modo da me trovato è quello da WMS server del catasto della Regione

Re: [Talk-it] santelle, croci, crocefissi, ecc.

Scusa, non sono io a decidere :-) Ho solo scritto come avrei fatto io. Direi di aspettare altre reazioni. 2015-09-08 9:58 GMT+02:00 demon.box : > voschix wrote > > historic=wayside_cross > > religion=christian > > (perché sulla tua foto sembra un crocefisso) > > ...sì c'è

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 08/09/15 07:01, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >> I don't believe anyone's advocating the removal of existing entities. >> > In your viaduct case above, keep the viaduct entity, remove the >> > railway=abandoned tag, use the historical tag to describe the past of >> > the viaduct (which exists) but

Re: [Talk-at] Gleisbaustelle Hütteldorf (49)

Danke für die Nachricht. Werde den N49 wieder anpassen. MfGRobinD ___ Talk-at mailing list Talk-at@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-at

Re: [Talk-it] santelle, croci, crocefissi, ecc.

voschix wrote > historic=wayside_cross > religion=christian > (perché sulla tua foto sembra un crocefisso) ...sì c'è un crocefisso. Quindi allora la distinzione è, se crocefisso (cioè con Gesù) historic=wayside_cross Mentre TUTTE le altre croci (senza Gesù e non di vetta) sono man_made=cross ?

Re: [Talk-cz] Odborník na cyklotrasy v iD

-- Původní zpráva -- Od: Martin Ždila Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 8. 9. 2015 9:46:41 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Odborník na cyklotrasy v iD " Odborníci nepoužívaju iD ale JOSM ;-) " To tady asi většina, ale

[Talk-cat] Hangout per a preparar jornada

Que us sembla quedar demà a les 17:00 per a fer un Hangout (G+). Així podem agilitzar el tema dels preparatius per al 3 d'octubre. -- *Carlos Sánchez*About.me ___ Talk-cat mailing list Talk-cat@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-es] consulta sobre uso

Hola: Estamos desarrollando una aplicación web para la gestión de tareas y gestión de posicionamiento de trabajadores de una empresa, de algún modo relacionados con el transporte o viajes: comerciales, paquetería, transporte de mercancías, etc. No necesitaríamos la instalación de ningún

Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza edifici a Torino

2015-09-08 10:15 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > > ho trovato grosse mancanze anche a Roma (es fiumicino quasi non esiste > come palazzi o trastevere nn è finito), Napoli, Firenze. Speravo che i dati > degli edifici fossero più completi in OSM :( > > è un lavoro in

Re: [Talk-it] OSMIT 2015

Buongiorno a tutti. Proporrei di fare una nuova riunione per discutere dell'iniziativa. Vi riporto gli aggiornamenti per quanto riguarda gli sponsor istituzionali e gli spazi messi a disposizione. Ho creato un doodle per raccogliere le vostre disponibilità:

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 8/09/2015 6:07 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: sent from a phone Am 08.09.2015 um 01:49 schrieb Dave F. : I don't believe anyone's advocating the removal of existing entities. In your viaduct case above, keep the viaduct entity, remove the railway=abandoned tag,

Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza edifici a Torino

Il giorno 8 settembre 2015 09:53, Marco De Nadai ha scritto: > ho trovato grosse mancanze anche a Roma (es fiumicino quasi non esiste > come palazzi o trastevere nn è finito), Napoli, Firenze. Speravo che i dati > degli edifici fossero più completi in OSM :( > > > Per Torino: Al

Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza edifici a Torino

sent from a phone > Am 08.09.2015 um 09:53 schrieb Marco De Nadai : > > ho trovato grosse mancanze anche a Roma (es fiumicino quasi non esiste come > palazzi o trastevere nn è finito), Napoli, Firenze. Speravo che i dati degli > edifici fossero più completi in OSM :( è un

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 09/08/2015 12:16 AM, Dave F. wrote: I fail to understand why railways are singled out as a special case. If roads, buildings or woods get demolished, they get deleted. please have a look at the tag definition in the wiki: "where the rails have been removed but the route is still visible

Re: [OSM-talk] old_name

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 14:26:59 +0200 Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > > sent from a phone > > > Am 08.09.2015 um 13:58 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny > > : > > > > Historical data should not be added and if present - removed. > > > > what do you mean

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 08/09/2015 10:00, Fabian Schmidt wrote: On 09/08/2015 12:16 AM, Dave F. wrote: I fail to understand why railways are singled out as a special case. If roads, buildings or woods get demolished, they get deleted. please have a look at the tag definition in the wiki: "where the rails have

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

sent from a phone > Am 08.09.2015 um 13:58 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny : > > Historical data should not be added and if present - removed. what do you mean with "historical data", where do you draw the line? What about the old_name tags, do you advocate to remove them?

Re: [Talk-it] problema svolte - casello Piovene-Rocchette

voschix wrote > Sembra apposto anche formalmente, utilizzando il plugin "graphview" JOSM. > Potrebbe trattarsi di un errore della routing engine. > > Volker mi veniene da pensare così anche a me ma il problema lo fa sia osrm che mapquest -- View this message in context:

Re: [Talk-cz] Pomoc se clankem pro casopis

Díky za tipy. Seznam na wiki znám, taky ho asi odkážu. Ovšem předvýběr s osobní zkušeností je důležitější. Pavel út 8. 9. 2015 v 11:10 odesílatel Petr Schönmann napsal: > Co tenhle seznam ? > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Software > > Dne 7. září 2015 21:20

Re: [Talk-cl] ¿Un practicante TI para OSMChile?

Es una muy buena idea. Yo preguntaba si existe una lista de esos proyectos interesantes que podrían abordarse. Tanto para alumnos en práctica, como para nosotros mismos enfocarnos en las cosas que podrían tener un mayor impacto para OSM en Chile. Algo así como un conjunto de links a lo que se está

[Talk-de] A Year of edits Liste

Hi, Ich suche nach einer Liste mit "A Year of Edits" Videos. MfG MonkZ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

[OSM-talk-be] adressen

wat is er misgegaan met de adressen 2950,2040,2030,2930,2940 enz openen niet volledig --- Dit e-mailbericht is gecontroleerd op virussen met Avast antivirussoftware. https://www.avast.com/antivirus ___ Talk-be mailing list Talk-be@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-it] problema svolte - casello Piovene-Rocchette

Sembra apposto anche formalmente, utilizzando il plugin "graphview" JOSM. Potrebbe trattarsi di un errore della routing engine. Volker 2015-09-08 11:37 GMT+02:00 dvdzero : > Il problema rimane. > A me quella relazione sembra giusta. > > Boh ... io non capisco, se qualcuno

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Next Meetup - Sat 12th Sept

Can someone update: http://www.openstreetmap.ie/events/ ? On 08/09/2015, Daniel Cussen wrote: > Did not see it mentioned here, but the request to use TOG is approved. > > There is even a blog post here: > http://www.tog.ie/2015/09/osm-mapjam-saturday-12th-sept/ > > On 03/09/2015,

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 08/09/15 12:58, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: >> The historical tag can be used to indicate that the viaduct was >> > previously used as a railway. It should be used in conjunction with >> > other tags such as man_made. > Is there anything **currently** making clear (or at least indicating) > that

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

sent from a phone > Am 08.09.2015 um 11:35 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > Buildings that are in ruin have the tag ruin=yes > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:ruins this is discouraged tagging, similar to disused=yes etc. cheers Martin

Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza edifici a Torino

Sisi, sono a conoscenza di questa pagina :) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines Il giorno 8 settembre 2015 10:52, Simone Cortesi ha scritto: > > 2015-09-08 10:15 GMT+02:00 Martin Koppenhoefer : > >> > ho trovato grosse mancanze anche

Re: [OSM-talk-be] adressen

Hey, 2015-09-07 13:19 GMT+00:00 Marc Gemis : > Berkenlaan_WI is Berkenlaan, Wilrijk. Er is ook Berkenlaan_AN vermoed ik > voor Antwerpen. Volgens Ben A is Antwerpen de enige stad waar straatnamen > meerdere keren voorkomen (weliswaar met verschillende postcodes). > Is een

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

sent from a phone > Am 08.09.2015 um 11:29 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > The tag bridge=viaduct is not restricted to railways and highways! > > https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:bridge%3Dviaduct > > Viaducts are also used for waterways... !

Re: [OSM-talk-be] adressen

Hmm, blijkbaar was ik een "git add" vergeten, waardoor nieuwe straten niet toegevoegd waren (en ze een error gaven bij het lezen). Dit moet nu opgelost zijn. Op 8 september 2015 11:56 schreef Louis van Boeckel : > wat is er misgegaan met de adressen 2950,2040,2030,2930,2940

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 12:05:30 +0100 "Dave F." wrote: > On 08/09/2015 07:01, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:49:48 +0100 > > "Dave F." wrote: > > > >> > >> I don't believe anyone's advocating the removal of existing > >>

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 08/09/2015 12:58, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: Is there anything **currently** making clear (or at least indicating) that it is constructed as a railway bridge? Is there any difference? Historical data should not be added and if present - removed. If it's a sub-tag of an existing entity, then

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > that it is constructed as a railway bridge? Is there any difference? > > Historical data should not be added and if present - removed. If anyone can add descriptive attributes of present features on present-in-osm objects, they shouldn't be deleted. A tag saying "this

Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza edifici a Torino

Non ci sono i WFS degli edifici però :( Il giorno 8 settembre 2015 10:08, Stefano ha scritto: > > > Il giorno 8 settembre 2015 09:53, Marco De Nadai ha > scritto: > >> ho trovato grosse mancanze anche a Roma (es fiumicino quasi non esiste >> come palazzi o

[Talk-GB] OSM Central South

Hi, Was wondering whether people in the Hampshire area (including neighbouring counties) would be up for a monthly regular OSM meet? London, the Midlands and Nottingham all do well in this respect but might be good to have one in this area. Basically Hampshire, south-east Wiltshire, west

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 08/09/2015 07:01, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 00:49:48 +0100 "Dave F." wrote: I don't believe anyone's advocating the removal of existing entities. In your viaduct case above, keep the viaduct entity, remove the railway=abandoned tag, use the

Re: [Talk-es] consulta sobre uso

IMNAL pero la respuesta facil es si a todo El Dimarts 08 Setembre 2015, a les 09:50:07, Adrián Brañas Castro va escriure: > 1) ¿Podríamos utilizar las APIs de OSM y comercializar nuestro software? Si. Pero hay limitaciones para evitar el abuso (no usar los servidores de OSM como backend para tu

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 08/09/2015 09:07, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: I believe you are oversimplifying things by just looking at the tracks and if they are there it is some kind of railway and in absence of tracks it has nothing more to do with railway. First of all, we don't currently know a tag for a viaduct

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

sent from a phone > Am 08.09.2015 um 13:05 schrieb Dave F. : > > slightly OT > man_made=bridge only appears to render when it is an enclosed way, but not a > linear one. yes, IMHO this is the desired behavior. Also buildings don't render when mapped as linear

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 08/09/2015, Fabian Schmidt wrote: > On 09/08/2015 12:16 AM, Dave F. wrote: >> I fail to understand why railways are singled out as a special case. If >> roads, buildings or woods get demolished, they get deleted. > > please have a look at the tag definition

[OSM-talk] List of "A year of edits" videos

Hi, I'm seeking a list of "A Year of Edits" videos. MfG MonkZ signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [Talk-GB] Rail maxspeeds being converted

Hi, On 09/05/2015 03:36 PM, Lester Caine wrote: > Anything else is simply incorrect, so these changes should be reverted > back to the correct data? Done, and suggest that the next persion to fancy mass-changing (the OSM represenation of) the UK rail network discuss that here beforehand.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] relation "D xx"

La perte de valeur est bien ce qui est signifié, ce qui rend le terme approprié. en aucun cas je n'ai dit que "is_in" est obsolète, ce qui a un sens bien plus fort. Déprécié signifie juste que sa valeur est amoindrie, pas qu'elle est nulle, puisqu'on est conscient des cas où il reste encore

Re: [Talk-us] Another road classification disagreement (this time with HFCS in Kansas)

On 2015-09-06 01:24, Toby Murray wrote: This user has also upgraded a lot of unpaved county roads in eastern Kansas to secondary because of HFCS which also strikes me as wrong. You can clearly see where he has done this at zoom level 9 [6]. When I started mapping in San Jose, CA, after years

[Talk-de] Nächstes Karlsruher Hack-Weekend am 17/18 Oktober

Hallo, das nächste Karlsruher Hack-Weekend ist am 17./18. Oktober im Geofabrik-Büro. Hier die übliche Wikiseite: https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Karlsruhe_Hack_Weekend_October_2015 Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09" E008°23'33"

Re: [OSM-talk] old_name

On 08/09/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> Am 08.09.2015 um 17:58 schrieb moltonel 3x Combo : >> >> It would >> be a silly thing to do, as these names definitely are not a current >> property of Dublin. > > I would bet most of them can still be found

Re: [Talk-de] A Year of edits Liste

Am 08.09.2015 um 14:49 schrieb MonkZ: Ich suche nach einer Liste mit "A Year of Edits" Videos. eine Liste habe ich nicht, aber such mal bei Vimeo, IIRC sind dort die meisten Videos gelandet. Grüße, Michael. ___ Talk-de mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Next Meetup - Sat 12th Sept

Sure, is that OK? On Tuesday 08 September 2015 12:45:20 Daniel Cussen wrote: > Can someone update: > http://www.openstreetmap.ie/events/ > ? ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

[OSM-ja] Holux Utility 、うまく動いています?

GPSロガー M-241 を使ってGPSログを取ったのですがHolux Utilityが まともに動いてくれません。 1) 添付されているドライバはWindows32ビット用。64ビット環境では動かない。 2) サイトから64ビットドライバをインストールするとデバイスは見えるようになる。 3) Holux UtilityでM-241に接続するが、途中でハングアップ。 ハングアップするのはM-241本体。USB接続状態のままになってしまう。 電源を切らないと戻らない。 で、代替としてmtkbabelを使いました。こちらはopenSUSE 13.2上で正常に動いて

Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza edifici a Torino

sent from a phone > Am 08.09.2015 um 10:52 schrieb Simone Cortesi : > > e CMQ, ricordiamo sempre, che gli import vanno fatti con ESTREMA CAUTELA, non > sono operazioni da prendere sottogamba. > > vanno documentati e discussi prima di essere avviati. grazie Simone, va

[Talk-co] [SFDBogota- 10 Años] Invitados a participar y postular charlas y talleres

Buenas a todos El evento de software libre mas esperado por todos cumple 10 años, y en su décimo aniversario, por primera vez se realizará durante 3 días distintos en 3 sitios diferentes, para que puedan disfrutar mas de este evento, el cual promociona, comparte y difunde las tecnologías libres y

Re: [Talk-es] consulta sobre uso

Buenas, Yo tengo otra pregunta relacionada. Si tengo una aplicación web, cuyo backend hace llamadas puntuales al API de OSM, ¿está permitido? La gran mayoría de datos los guardo en mi propia base de datos, pero de vez en cuando hago alguna llamada. Sergio, -BEGIN PGP PUBLIC KEY BLOCK-

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 15:44:16 +0300 Lauri Kytömaa wrote: > Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > that it is constructed as a railway bridge? Is there any difference? > > > > Historical data should not be added and if present - removed. > > If anyone can add descriptive attributes of

[OSM-talk] Railways yet again (was "THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject")

May I respectfully suggest that before anyone sends yet another reply to this thread that they ask "Has this point of view been put forward already?". Everyone is well aware that there is disagreement (and sometimes even disagreement over what to disagree over), but people are rarely won over

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 14:22:01 +0100 "Dave F." wrote: > On 08/09/2015 13:56, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 13:37:47 +0100 > > "Dave F." wrote: > > > >> This is one reason I believe linear ways tagged as man_made=bridge > >> should

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 08/09/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> Am 08.09.2015 um 13:58 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny : >> >> Historical data should not be added and if present - removed. > > what do you mean with "historical data", where do you draw the line? What > about

Re: [OSM-talk] old_name

W dniu 08.09.2015 14:46, Mateusz Konieczny napisał(a): Certainly not all - in many situations old names are still widely used. Sometimes multiple old names are used - possibly even in different languages, which is easier (old_name:de=*). But I don't know how to tag just "oldname1" and

Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza edifici a Torino

Il giorno 8 settembre 2015 15:31, Martin Koppenhoefer < dieterdre...@gmail.com> ha scritto: > > > sent from a phone > > > Am 08.09.2015 um 10:08 schrieb Stefano : > > > > Il problema è che nessuno ci si è mai messo e chi ci ha provato è stato > demotivato o bloccato dai vari

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:16:17 +0100 Lester Caine wrote: > On 08/09/15 12:58, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > >> The historical tag can be used to indicate that the viaduct was > >> > previously used as a railway. It should be used in conjunction > >> > with other tags such as

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Next Meetup - Sat 12th Sept

http://www.openstreetmap.ie/events/ is now updated. Thanks all. ___ Talk-ie mailing list Talk-ie@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-ie

Re: [Talk-es] consulta sobre uso

On Tue, Sep 8, 2015 at 2:58 PM, Sergio García Villalonga wrote: > Buenas, > > Yo tengo otra pregunta relacionada. Si tengo una aplicación web, cuyo > backend hace llamadas puntuales al API de OSM, ¿está permitido? La gran > mayoría de datos los guardo en mi propia base de

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 08/09/2015 13:44, Lauri Kytömaa wrote: Mateusz Konieczny wrote: that it is constructed as a railway bridge? Is there any difference? Historical data should not be added and if present - removed. A tag saying "this was a railway" is not historical (i.e. "gone"), but part of the life story

[OSM-talk-be] Notes in Brussel.

Ik hou Brussel binnen de kleine ring in het oog en probeer met foto's de zaak op te klaren.Met veertig notes is dat niet in het oog te houden.Ik heb dan maar vier verweesde notes geresolved. Er zijn echter dertig notes bijgekomen met namen van stripfiguren, waarschijnlijk de fantasie

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

sent from a phone > Am 08.09.2015 um 14:37 schrieb Dave F. : > > This is one reason I believe linear ways tagged as man_made=bridge should be > rendered: > man_made=bridge > bridge=* > historical=railway that's not a reason, you could draw an area just like in any

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 13:37:47 +0100 "Dave F." wrote: > This is one reason I believe linear ways tagged as man_made=bridge > should be rendered: > man_made=bridge > bridge=* > historical=railway Please, see definition of man_made=bridge on the wiki.

[Talk-gb-thenorth] Maptime Durham

Hello North GB! I've started a Maptime chapter in Durham, if you're nearby then pop along and join us. http://maptime.io/durham/ Maptime isn't specifically OpenStreetMap, but it could be a great place to discuss the mapping we do and meet the usernames improving the map together. Welcome to all

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

Dave F. wrote: > A 'life story' is historical. Historical doesn't mean 'gone'. Then that data shouldn't be 'gone' but just with a different key/tag, especially as long as the not-gone object exists. -- alv ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

El martes, 8 de septiembre de 2015, Mateusz Konieczny escribió: > On Tue, 8 Sep 2015 13:16:17 +0100 > Lester Caine > wrote: > > > On 08/09/15 12:58, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > > >> The historical tag can be used to indicate that the viaduct

Re: [OSM-talk] Railways yet again (was "THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject")

I'm loving the irony of Andy's criticism of people repeating themselves by repeating himself not once, or twice, but three times. In the same message. (& no, I don't believe it was done intentionally for comic effect). Dave F. (bored of people in OSM thinking they're somehow superior to

Re: [Talk-us] USDA Innovation Challenge, Food Security, OSM!

Mikel, I've been wanting to contact local FFA and 4H to partner in solving the problem of our poor rural map data. Here in Washington State, we also have the problem with wildfires. They seem like a natural partner. I was inspired by a demo the from a local FFA group of their robotic submersibles.

Re: [OSM-talk] old_name

On 08/09/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: >> Am 08.09.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny : >> But I would not add old_name that is currently completely unused. > > there's one area where old names will be used for sure: old documents, > books,

Re: [OSM-talk] old_name

sent from a phone > Am 08.09.2015 um 14:46 schrieb Mateusz Konieczny : > > I would be careful and avoid removing > anything. > +1, me too. I believe this is an important statement > > But I would not add old_name that is currently completely unused. there's one

Re: [Talk-br] Transmissão da SOTM LatAm

Talvez tenha em https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCiqdu6D4hj16NtLOyV5JXIg, mas me disseram que na minha palestra não tinha audio na transmissão... On 05-09-2015 19:23, Alexandre Magno Brito de Medeiros wrote: Tem gravação de sua palestra sobre o osmcha

Re: [Talk-GB] Rail maxspeeds being converted

Could you do the same for this user: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/30979060 From a discussion with him he appears to have misinterpreted ORM's wiki page: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap/Tagging#Switches (search page for maxspeed) This page needs clarifying. Dave

[OSM-talk] The wki pages ... for the mapper? or the render? or both?

The some of the wiki pages appear to be written for the renders, while others look to be written for the mappers. This is confusing! I believe there should be two versions of the wiki pages - one for mappers who need simple descriptions of the tag/s and another for renders that give

Re: [OSM-talk] Railways yet again (was "THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject")

Frederik Ramm wrote: > But what if I have said the same thing five times already and the > others STILL don't see that I'm RIGHT Please try not to bring OSMF board meeting conventions onto the talk list. cheers Richard -- View this message in context:

Re: [OSM-talk-ie] Next Meetup - Sat 12th Sept

Apologies, working late last night when I got the word, thanks for passing the word On 8 Sep 2015 14:09, "Daniel Cussen" wrote: > http://www.openstreetmap.ie/events/ > is now updated. Thanks all. > > ___ > Talk-ie mailing list >

[Talk-us] USDA Innovation Challenge, Food Security, OSM!

http://usdaapps.devpost.com/ Can imagine all sorts of cool things using OSM ... mapping food distribution network into local farmer's markets?  * Mikel Maron * +14152835207 @mikel s:mikelmaron___ Talk-us mailing list Talk-us@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Railways yet again (was "THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject")

Hi, On 09/08/2015 03:12 PM, Andy Townsend wrote: > * written entirely in the personal capacity of someone who is fed up of > reading the same mailing list posts by several people repeating > different sides of the same argument ad nauseam. But what if I have said the same thing five times

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 08/09/2015 13:56, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: On Tue, 08 Sep 2015 13:37:47 +0100 "Dave F." wrote: This is one reason I believe linear ways tagged as man_made=bridge should be rendered: man_made=bridge bridge=* historical=railway Please, see definition of

Re: [Talk-it] Mancanza edifici a Torino

sent from a phone > Am 08.09.2015 um 10:08 schrieb Stefano : > > Il problema è che nessuno ci si è mai messo e chi ci ha provato è stato > demotivato o bloccato dai vari burocrati. non mi sembrano ottime condizioni per la manutenzione di ciò che adesso si spera di poter

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On 08/09/2015 14:39, Lauri Kytömaa wrote: Dave F. wrote: A 'life story' is historical. Historical doesn't mean 'gone'. Then that data shouldn't be 'gone' but just with a different key/tag, especially as long as the not-gone object exists. Yes. Please see my previous replies. Dave F. ---

Re: [OSM-talk] old_name

sent from a phone > Am 08.09.2015 um 17:58 schrieb moltonel 3x Combo : > > It would > be a silly thing to do, as these names definitely are not a current > property of Dublin. I would bet most of them can still be found in today's city, e.g. in pub names or other

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Test carte Police/Justice...

Le zonage police gendarmerie me parait assez utile dans les zones de campagne où on ne sait pas forcément de qui on dépend (par exemple dans le cantal). Autrement un zonage qui me parait encore plus intéressant c'est celui des paroisses religieuses/sous divisions équivalentes. Là aussi, il y a

Re: [OSM-talk] Abandoned Rails

Mateusz Konieczny writes: > And "abandoned railway" that was not noticed by somebody in his/her > own back yard seems to be a good example of object that should not be > mapped in OSM. Oh, and he didn't notice the railroad bridge about 90m east of his property either. This bridge:

Re: [Talk-cz] Odborník na cyklotrasy v iD

-- Původní zpráva -- Od: Petr Holub Komu: 'OpenStreetMap Czech Republic' Datum: 9. 9. 2015 7:20:02 Předmět: Re: [Talk-cz] Odborník na cyklotrasy v iD "> Co jsem tak hledal, tak http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/ o práci s

Re: [OSM-talk] The wki pages ... for the mapper? or the render? or both?

sent from a phone > Am 09.09.2015 um 05:18 schrieb Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > > this list a number of what a mapper would call an object (bridge, tunnel, > cutting) > but a render associates with another object to render it correctly and thus > calls it a property. these are

Re: [OSM-talk] THIS is the kind of enthusiasm some would reject

On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 8:55 AM, Ian Dees wrote: > Show him OSM for the abandoned rails that he can see and point him to > OpenHistoricalMap for the historical, no-longer-present rails if he's > excited about that. > Sigh. You present OHM like it's a vibrant project that gets

Re: [Talk-cz] Odborník na cyklotrasy v iD

Ahoj, > Co jsem tak hledal, tak http://learnosm.org/en/beginner/id-editor/ o práci s > relacemi nic > nepíše a po lehkém průzkumu možností iD editoru to vypadá, že umožňuje pouze > práci stylem > jeden objekt, jedna akce. Označit více cest jde, ale jediné co s tím jde > dělat, je spojit je >

  1   2   >