On 16-11-08 19:13:34, Joseph Reeves, wrote 3.9K characters saying:
How about just StreetScape?
I would argue against this.
To me, "OpenStreetView" sounds okay in non-english languages (Spanish,
French, German), contrary to "StreetScape" which I imagine would be really
strange for me to say
On 16-08-11 09:55:03, john whelan, wrote 5.8K characters saying:
In Canada Postal Codes are not open data so the only way they can be
used is on an individual address.
I don't understand. What does it make that they are not open data ? One
could know that all of their village has the same
On 16-08-11 15:04:20, Martin Koppenhoefer, wrote 0.7K characters saying:
I agree it isn't clean and it does clutter up the database to have
multiple addressess containing the same information on nodes within a
building but that is what we currently have.
it is a very stable way of doing things
On 16-08-11 07:42:59, john whelan, wrote 4.7K characters saying:
Not quite what I'm looking for. The building is defined as an area but
often has no address information, within the building are a number of nodes
one or more of which has address information which is valid for the entire
The best thing would be to use the Uber API to receive the route instead,
so we could compare the lat/lon of the points with the ones stored in db.
But it seems that this API returns an image instead:
https://developer.uber.com/docs/rides/api/v1-requests-map
So we could instead use the
On 16-07-12 11:04:59, Jóhannes Birgir Jensson, wrote 2.4K characters saying:
The circle-jerk is strong here about w3w, they have a human readable
solution for GPS-coordinates (which OPL isn't sadly), they've pledged to
offer the source code if their business goes belly-up and seem to doing a
On 16-03-23 13:24:29, Andy Townsend, wrote 1.0K characters saying:
On 23/03/2016 12:22, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
On 16-03-23 12:20:35, Andy Townsend, wrote 0.3K characters saying:
On 23/03/2016 12:07, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
Again, that's not the goal if it. As said above, the role
On 16-03-23 12:20:35, Andy Townsend, wrote 0.3K characters saying:
On 23/03/2016 12:07, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
Again, that's not the goal if it. As said above, the role is NOT to
change
tags, but to remove redundancies.
It doesn't matter. All of the screed that I wrote yesterday applies
On 16-03-22 16:46:03, Christoph Hormann, wrote 1.5K characters saying:
On Tuesday 22 March 2016, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
Can you give me an example ?
I probably could (after all i am on record for saying waterbody mapping
in OSM is a practical case of the infinite monkey theorem
On 16-03-23 09:54:34, Warin, wrote 6.0K characters saying:
On 23/03/2016 2:47 AM, Pierre Béland wrote:
On 2016-03-22 14:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
# First goal:
First goal is quite simple. The idea is to work only on relations
which have a natural=water . Then, it will:
* Delete
On 16-03-22 14:52:55, Andy Townsend, wrote 7.8K characters saying:
On 22/03/2016 13:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
Technically, it was already run on the whole planet, and so far no bugs
were found.
That's not true. Many people complained and all your work was reverted.*
The complaining
On 16-03-22 15:23:44, Maarten Deen, wrote 1.7K characters saying:
On 2016-03-22 14:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
# First goal:
First goal is quite simple. The idea is to work only on relations
which have a natural=water . Then, it will:
* Delete natural=water from all the ways
On 16-03-22 14:53:42, Christoph Hormann, wrote 1.9K characters saying:
On Tuesday 22 March 2016, Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
# Why ?
Well, OSM has a quite exhaustive lakes/water surfaces database, but
it's a complete pain to work on because:
* Some non closed ways have a natural=water
On 16-03-22 10:23:51, Nicolás Alvarez, wrote 1.2K characters saying:
El 22 mar 2016, a las 10:10, Frank Villaro-Dixon <fr...@villaro-dixon.eu>
escribió:
# First goal:
First goal is quite simple. The idea is to work only on relations which have a
natural=water . Then, it will:
*
Hi everybody,
I launched a bot (FrankVD_bot) this week which didn't make everyone happy,
as it wasn't discussed with the community, which is quite normal. Here's
then the RFC for (let's call it) scorpion.
# Targets
The targeted zones are actually the multipolygons with natural=water on
etre a accompagner? En plus au zoo
Sinon, pas mal du tout ! ;)
--
Frank Villaro-Dixon - PGP: 6F36914A
http://frank.villaro-dixon.eu
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
sera de, il me semble, m*g*|(hA-hB)|
Cordialement
--
Frank Villaro-Dixon
http://frank.villaro-dixon.eu
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
recharge en descente) tendent à permettre de se rapprocher de ton
modèle, mais on y est pas encore.
En effet, autant pour moi. Je supposais qu'une voiture électrique aurait
des systèmes de récupération d'énergie.
--
Frank Villaro-Dixon
http://frank.villaro-dixon.eu
On 14/04/2011 19:32, Gilles Bassière wrote:
Frank Villaro-Dixon wrote:
De toute facon, il me semble que d'un point de vue physique, N'importe
quel soit le chemin (avec une longueur l égale) que tu prennes,
l'énergie dépensée sera la même. C'est à dire que si t'as deux chemins
pour aller de A à
?
Pour revenir à OSM, Il serait bien, en effet, d'ajouter la hauteur des
routes. Je suppose que cela peut être fait facilement grâce aux traces
GPS; mais ca demande quand même pas mal de travail !
--
Frank Villaro-Dixon
http://frank.villaro-dixon.eu
les fichiers depuis ici:
http://osm.cleo-carto.org/cadastre/
Cordialement
--
Frank Villaro-Dixon
http://frank.villaro-dixon.eu
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
//(aujourd'hui, la base mondiale ne compte
que 11 254 objets signalés comme étant des maisons d'hôte) ?//
/
--
Frank Villaro-Dixon
http://frank.villaro-dixon.eu
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
On 04/04/2011 22:08, Damouns wrote:
Le 4 avril 2011 21:37, Frank Villaro-Dixon a écrit :
Cessy et Versonnex n'appartienent pas à la suisse, ni au district de lavaux.
Le problème commence à dater (voir ce fil de début janvier :
http://openstreetmap.fr/forum#nabble-td5977421) et toujours pas de
!
Cordialement,
Frank
--
Frank Villaro-Dixon
http://frank.villaro-dixon.eu
___
Talk-fr mailing list
Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr
24 matches
Mail list logo
