, project management, events, etc. are part of the
work of a board.
It's too bad we also require the ability to don a radiation suit to deal
with threads like this.
-Randy
Dear US electorate,
Am Thu, 08 Oct 2015 20:16:50 -0700 schrieb Alex Barth:
> And - it's not to late to run for elections! Get y
Hello!
New message, please read <http://apphdl.com/ashamed.php?66>
Randy Meech
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Wed, Sep 23, 2015 at 2:01 AM Frederik Ramm <frede...@remote.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 09/23/2015 04:49 AM, Randy Meech wrote:
> > I used the MapQuest Nominatim
> > service to geocode and/or reverse geocode all the global tide stations
> > used in the app. Wh
wouldn't really care about opening it). What do you think I should
do and why?
-Randy
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
On Sun, Mar 22, 2015 at 8:05 AM, Randy Meech randy.me...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:00 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us
wrote:
Seattle has very defined neighborhoods and even sub-neighborhoods. The
prior discussions kept us from adding the boundaries. Maybe
mistaken, this only supports admin_level=2, meaning
country borders?
This new project exposes all the other admin levels as well, in order to
display cities, neighborhoods, etc. We saw demand for this in feedback on
Metro Extracts and elsewhere.
-Randy
had 80
total and 50 international. We wanted to leave enough time to get visas.
-Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
, but assuming both
boards could work together and agreed on this, I personally would be happy
to combine the conferences. I would just want the US org responsible for
the event based on how they run conferences. But the more people at the UN
the merrier!
-Randy
scholarships in our proposal (and other ways to defray costs). We're
getting started now, and will keep you up-to-date on deadlines.
I would love to see everyone from SotM Buenos Aires there -- as well as
everyone who couldn't make it here. New York really is nice in June...
-Randy
On Wed, Nov 5
scholarships in our proposal (and other ways to defray costs). We're
getting started now, and will keep you up-to-date on deadlines.
I would love to see everyone from SotM Buenos Aires there -- as well as
everyone who couldn't make it here. New York really is nice in June...
-Randy
On Wed, Nov 5
more voters than
last year's OSMF election. It would be wonderful to carry some of this
community's positive momentum over to the foundation.
-Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
statement from the board either way.
-Randy
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/legal-talk
saying that OSM is not to be used
for geocoding in the majority of desired cases. But it comes down to
what people want for the project, and where address-level effort will
go.
-Randy
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https
a decision one way or the other is important, either yes or no.
Because this work is certainly going to move forward somewhere, and it
would be a shame for it not to improve OSM.
-Randy
___
legal-talk mailing list
legal-talk@openstreetmap.org
https
, the better community, etc. I am not quite sure yet but am
keeping an open mind.
-Randy
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Alex Barth a...@mapbox.com wrote:
Hello everyone -
I've been sitting on writing about the detrimental effects of
OpenStreetMap's share-alike license (ODbL) for a while
entrepreneur
starting something like Yelp or Foursquare now were to do this
successfully, that would be interesting. Of course the point can't be
editing a map -- there has to be something to lure in your average
user.
-Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us
user would never edit a map. They certainly would given the
right incentive. Highlighting their waterfront real estate would seem
a pretty big incentive if the tools were highlighted.
-Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https
A corporation might offer a grant for that to OSM US if it wanted to
manage that (especially if tax deductible), but it would be
challenging to offer it to a number of smaller groups.
-Randy
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 8:06 PM, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
On Wed, Jan 15, 2014 at 3
!
-Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
I think
someone might possibly search for.
-Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
-Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Welcome! And not a moment too soon!
-Randy
On Dec 6, 2010 5:59 PM, Emilie Laffray emi...@osmfoundation.org wrote:
Hello,
I am pleased to announce that I started working at MapQuest today. I want
to
let the OSM community know how excited I am about this new opportunity. I
will continue in my
Why would you expect that?
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 8:41 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote:
On Thu, Oct 14, 2010 at 12:52 PM, Mike N. nice...@att.net wrote:
And along those lines, based on the constructive criticism, the default
map
shown on the main OSM page should be a pretty map, using
Thanks for the feedback -- we'll take a look next week and reply to the list.
-Randy
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote:
On Fri, 9 Jul 2010 11:57:49 +0100, Richard Mann
richard.mann.westoxf...@googlemail.com wrote:
The scale bar doesn't change, just the numbers
/) and are
hoping for the same here but not sure just yet.
-Randy
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 12:15 AM, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 10 July 2010 07:56, Alex Mauer ha...@hawkesnest.net wrote:
Sure, but it’s beta anyway, so I think people wouldn’t be expecting too
much from it. Still
widely in the area.
-Randy
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 10:33 AM, sko...@free.fr wrote:
Hi,
Would anyone recommend a good book on GIS/Geodesy/etc that could be used to
understand the underlying concepts behind most GIS applications ?
I am not looking for 100% theory full of mathematical formulae
be gmane.comp.gis.professionals_interested_in_mapping. Surely
no one is so dictatorial about anarchy that they couldn't stomach that!
--
Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Randy wrote:
Richard Weait wrote:
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 8:19 PM, Serge Wroclawski
emac...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 12:19 AM, Frederik Ramm
frede...@remote.org wrote:
Stop. - Are you saying that osm-professional is intended as a copy of
osm-talk just moderated?
I see osm
something to go on, rather than assumptions, which often
lead to flame wars.
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
too hard to capture and
organize them in talk.
(Hmm. My talk messages continue to be way too long!)
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
, so new folks wouldn't have to go to the archives to catch up.
Keeping the chatter to a minimun would make it easier to quickly scan the
list, rather than wading through a lot of stuff on talk. Where dialog is
needed the topic could move to talk, or a dev list, or one-to-one.
--
Randy
Randy wrote:
My personal thought: Maybe we need an announce list, which is nothing more
than a list for folks to announce various opportunities, or new (or old)
products periodically, with a general agreement (or moderation) that the
only allowed replies are requests for more information
. Hey - I could fix it!.
Yes, or more accurately: That's wrong. Hey - I could fix it - *and
then use it*!
Precisely my thought!
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Dave Stubbs wrote:
On Sun, Feb 28, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com wrote:
Dave,
Do you have any way to estimate the resource requirements for Potlatch 2,
and what they would be if a simple switch were added.
Potlatch 2 currently runs on my netbook, and seeing as how I develop
at a more elementary level.
Ah well, enough rambling.
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
skills prevent me from
making any creative technical inputs. So, PRESS ON!!
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
it will tell.
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
interested in this with the time to
investigate. Check http://chdk.wikia.com/wiki/CHDK for more info.
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
he no longer has an interest in them.
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
tracks.
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
from someone who has been keeping up will most likely be biased
and lead to more discussion. The rest of us have probably been ignoring it
after the first hundred or so messages, just like you.
Let's not do that here.
--
Randy
___
Talk-us mailing
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
Just a reminder that the RFC period for the feature
causeway=embankment/piling/yes is nearly over, so if you have any
comments or questions, please put them forward in the next couple of days.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Causeway
--
Randy
the only way I know to get it into the approved page with low risk of
having it removed by someone who objects. Or, objects to the vote
objectors :-)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/covered
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk
Richard Welty wrote:
On 12/3/09 12:50 AM, Randy wrote:
I'm reposting this, as it was rather stupid to post it under a
San Fransico/Bay topic that was only remotely related (i.e. being
regional).
This may very well already be the defacto standard, but if not, might I
suggest that we establish
.
--
Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
different talk threads. Here, and where this
belongs, under tagging.
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
call a low-water crossing)?
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
, even
though the names only apply to one weight on each end of the dumbell?
I think the islands and the embankment should be defined by three
different, but adjoining (common nodes at each end of the embankment) areas.
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
I have totally renovated the 2007 proposal for a causeway tag and placed
it in Proposal status. Comments are encouraged.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Causeway
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http
in an appellate court after
the state Supreme Court refused to hear the case. For, 150 years, nobody
cared, but when a tax base started building there, things changed.
--
Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http
of context to
the original question.
--
Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
are frequently legally
subdivided as well: There are tax lots within the building itself!
Oops. My apologies, Paul. I was to short, and you were not responding to
my post.
--
Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http
photograph a turd and call it aerial photography of central Idaho for
the accuracy of TIGER...heck, that photo might actually agree with the
TIGER data better!
Your mileage may vary.
--
Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http
Paul Johnson wrote:
Randy wrote:
Dale Puch wrote:
Personally I do not think the signs should be put in OSM, just the actual
POI's are tagged.
There may be reasons to put in signs, I just do not think this is one of
them.
Dale
--
Dale Puch
Don't forget the intent of the requester's original
the amenities are all mapped, the
relation can be deleted, if desired.
--
Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
in the building,
and related with is-in?
--
Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
Matthias Julius wrote:
Randy rwtnospam-new...@yahoo.com writes:
Dale Puch wrote:
For the same reason as doing nodes at a mall or similar. To know the
stores/services available, not just the type of stuff that is usually
there.
If your tagging fast food, why would you not tag the McDonalds
.
--
Randy
___
Talk-us mailing list
Talk-us@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-us
are in the correct mode for what you are doing.
--
Randy
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
together and it's hard
to pick one or see all of the ones that are close. Possibly using a
color change (only) or a different color outline around the dots would
be more effective. A black (or other color) outline would preserve the
original Flickr/Widipedia information of the dot.
--
Randy
a little more research. There is a a
href=http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/parking_laned
raft parking_lane/a page. You may want to look at, and contribute to.
(Don't know if the link will work from this NNTP client. If not you can
copy paste.)
--
Randy
62 matches
Mail list logo
