Hi,
OSMCha started posting comments to changesets a few days ago when a user
marks a changeset as good or bad.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/wille/diary/43101
I would like to ask the author(s) of OSMCha to disable this feature.
We expect to read all mappers incoming message (personal message
I love this feature, and I hope Wille keeps it in.
The message is very well written, and it’s not spam if the user asks for their
changeset to be reviewed and then somebody actually does it.
Thanks Bryan
> On Jan 12, 2018, at 9:07 AM, Michael Reichert wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> OSMCha started postin
Hi,
Am 2018-01-12 um 15:13 schrieb Bryan Housel:
> I love this feature, and I hope Wille keeps it in.
> The message is very well written, and it’s not spam if the user asks for
> their changeset to be reviewed and then somebody actually does it.
It should be optional to post a changeset comment.
On 1/12/2018 9:13 AM, Bryan Housel wrote:
I love this feature, and I hope Wille keeps it in.
The message is very well written, and it’s not spam if the user asks for their
changeset to be reviewed and then somebody actually does it.
I haven't used this yet because I wanted to add my own deta
On 2018-01-12 15:07, Michael Reichert wrote:
Hi,
OSMCha started posting comments to changesets a few days ago when a
user
marks a changeset as good or bad.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/wille/diary/43101
I would like to ask the author(s) of OSMCha to disable this feature.
We expect to re
On Fri, 12 Jan 2018 15:07:11 +0100
Michael Reichert wrote:
> If third-party tools start to post comments to lots
> of changesets automatically
In that case that would be clearly wrong.
But if I understand
> From now on, when we review a changeset in OSMCha, a comment will be
> posted in the
On 12/01/2018 14:07, Michael Reichert wrote:
Hi,
OSMCha started posting comments to changesets a few days ago when a user
marks a changeset as good or bad.
https://www.openstreetmap.org/user/wille/diary/43101
I would like to ask the author(s) of OSMCha to disable this feature.
The example give
Yes, I agree the feature could be improved.
Helpful:
- "I think it should be more clear that clicking the button will add a
changeset comment”
- “I think localization could be improved and I’d love to help with this”
- “I would like the opportunity to customize the message or see it before it is
On 12/01/2018 14:52, Bryan Housel wrote:
- “To European eyes the comments look like they were written by a six-year-old”
Be nice everyone!
Bryan, this is "being nice" in English. It's a reply that incorporates
a certain amount of humour (quotes around sarcasm, link to
not-entirely-serious
On 12.01.2018 15:39, Andy Townsend wrote:
> More seriously, any automatic use of OSM messages is problematical
> because it devalues the messages that we want people to actually read -
> the ones that are composed by and sent be a human, and have actual
> useful information in them
I agree. Right
Hi,
Am 2018-01-12 um 17:01 schrieb Tobias Knerr:
> On 12.01.2018 15:39, Andy Townsend wrote:
>> More seriously, any automatic use of OSM messages is problematical
>> because it devalues the messages that we want people to actually read -
>> the ones that are composed by and sent be a human, and ha
2018-01-12 17:01 GMT+01:00 Tobias Knerr :
> I agree. Right now, messages and comments sent via OSM channels tend to
> be written by humans for a specific individual recipient, which gives
> them a very good signal-to-noise ratio.
Interesting discussion to me because I'm working on a tool that
enha
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 9:59 AM, Stefan Keller wrote:
> I would even go further by refering to policies about automated reply
> mails and/or chat bots. I can't find an authoritative source but I
> think there's at least a netiquette saying that communications to
> humans generated from machines s
I don't think "a comment generated by" is the correct description. It is a
comment generated -through- OSMcha. A human decided the changeset was good,
that's nice to know for mappers. I guess it would be better if the reviewer
can decide not to send this message, or have the option to chose which k
On 13.01.2018 11:02, joost schouppe wrote:
> - a reviewer in OSMcha can adapt the message to his own personal message
> or an ad hoc message
[...]
> - a reviewer can choose to not send a message if they feel like they're
> spamming
Those would be steps in the right direction, but I wonder why it's
sent from a phone
> On 12. Jan 2018, at 15:25, Michael Reichert wrote:
>
> Ideally, this comment should be localized. If a user uses the German
> locale of his editor, he should the receive the comment in German if the
> reviewer also uses a German locale (it is then very likely that they
> wo
On 1/13/2018 5:02 AM, joost schouppe wrote:
If we agree it's a problem that users get a message everytime someone
reviews one of their changesets, then maybe we need a separate database
for reviewing status. OSMcha has that, but we might integrate the
reviewing status into OSM.org
There hav
sent from a phone
> On 12. Jan 2018, at 16:41, Andy Townsend wrote:
>
> Bryan, this is "being nice" in English.
Andy, this might be nice for British natives, but it certainly bears a high
risk of being perceived as offending by non-native speakers, even if it was in
quotation marks and wi
Hi
> correctly then it is not automatic. It is posted from other tool/site
> but allowing this is a purpose of API.
>
> Is there any evidence that these
> comments are spammy or used in de-facto automatic fashion? Os its it
> really automatic and I misunderstand situation.
>
I just tried it mys
Agree with you, I don't really like this feature, mainly for two reasons:
1) I see myself as a quite experienced mapper and I guess pretty much
99% of my edits improved the map, I think it's nice to see that someone
double checks some of my edits using osmcha or achavi, but I also think
there'
Hi,
On 17.01.2018 09:28, Marco wrote:
> It's like clapping
> your hands to the supermarket cashier every time he/she prints you the
> receipt.
I had to smile at that one.
I think users should either be able to opt out of automatically
generated changeset comments, or perhaps such changeset comme
On 17/01/18 09:46, Frederik Ramm wrote:
It's like clapping
your hands to the supermarket cashier every time he/she prints you the
receipt.
I had to smile at that one.
Reminds me off the developers lists where there is more traffic of the
'I like that' than actual constructive contributions.
On 17/01/18 09:28, Marco wrote:
2) I've always been using the "changesets w/comments" line of the HDYC
page to double check suspicious mappers.
Have you considered filtering out changesets with comments and
`review_requested=yes`? IMO if someone requests a review, they *want* a
comment, even if
23 matches
Mail list logo