[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering issue with *_link roads

2012-05-04 Thread Maarten Deen
I finally found out what the issue is with this [1] situation. My issue with it is that IMHO it is not good to see the unclassified road rendered on top of the primary_link road. I made a test here [2] where the left primary is a primary_link and the right primary is a primary proper.

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering issue with *_link roads

2012-05-04 Thread Richard Mann
Logically, you need to know the lower of the two classifications being linked, and it may also be useful to know the higher of the two being linked. So I record that information in links_lower and links_higher tags. Then it can be rendered very neatly. But I got flamed last time I proposed this

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering issue with *_link roads

2012-05-04 Thread AJ Ashton
On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote: Is this behaviour of mapnik wanted? As I said: IMHO it is not pleasing to the eye to see the unclassified road rendered on top of the primary_link road. In order of priority, a *_link road is just below its * counterpart but

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering issue with *_link roads

2012-05-04 Thread Richard Mann
That's why you need to know the lower of the two classifications being linked (so you can put the link just under the lower one) On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 4:11 PM, AJ Ashton aj.ash...@gmail.com wrote: On Fri, May 4, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Maarten Deen md...@xs4all.nl wrote: Is this behaviour of mapnik

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-30 Thread Anthony
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:15 AM, Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote: On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: +1.  While I'd rather see these objects go away altogether, I think a tag of name=Melbourne;Geelong;South-Central NSW Area;Central Victoria Area on a

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-30 Thread Lester Caine
Anthony wrote: Sounds good. I don't think storing these in OSM, with the non-overlapping tags, is harmful. While I'd love to see them in a separate database or at least a separate layer, the fact of the matter is that separate database and/or separate layer hasn't yet really been implemented.

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-30 Thread Anthony
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 3:36 AM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote: Anthony wrote: Sounds good.  I don't think storing these in OSM, with the non-overlapping tags, is harmful.  While I'd love to see them in a separate database or at least a separate layer, the fact of the matter is that

[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-29 Thread Steve Bennett
I'm not sure if this is a recent change (or I've just noticed it), but it seems that tags that don't contain anything recognisable to mapnik other than a name are getting rendered: http://osm.org/go/uG42g@6EB-- That Melbourne;Geelong... label is on a way that defines the edge of the Nearmap

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-29 Thread Tom Hughes
On 29/08/11 09:44, Steve Bennett wrote: I'm not sure if this is a recent change (or I've just noticed it), but it seems that tags that don't contain anything recognisable to mapnik other than a name are getting rendered: http://osm.org/go/uG42g@6EB-- It's always been the case that names

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-29 Thread SomeoneElse
On 29/08/2011 09:44, Steve Bennett wrote: I'm not sure if this is a recent change (or I've just noticed it), but it seems that tags that don't contain anything recognisable to mapnik other than a name are getting rendered: http://osm.org/go/uG42g@6EB-- It's not a new thing, I don't think - in

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-29 Thread yvecai
Maybe it is something for osm2pgsql to deal with ? Yves SomeoneElse li...@mail.atownsend.org.uk a écrit : On 29/08/2011 09:44, Steve Bennett wrote: I'm not sure if this is a recent change (or I've just noticed it), but it seems that tags that don't contain anything recognisable to mapnik

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-29 Thread Steve Bennett
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: It's always been the case that names sometimes get rendered for objects that haven't been rendered, because the names are produced by separate rendering rules and trying to attach to those rules a set of filters which match the

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-29 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2011/8/29 Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: Thanks for the explanation. So I guess we should avoid using name=* on anything which should not be rendered. +1, IMHO it is also generally disputable to keep coverage-polygons of

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-29 Thread Tom Hughes
On 29/08/11 16:00, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2011/8/29 Steve Bennettstevag...@gmail.com: On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:03 PM, Tom Hughest...@compton.nu wrote: Thanks for the explanation. So I guess we should avoid using name=* on anything which should not be rendered. +1, IMHO it is also

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-29 Thread Steve Bennett
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Stephen Hope slh...@gmail.com wrote: Particularly in this specific case, as nearmap coverage can't be used to derive OSM objects any more. The same mechanism is used for Yahoo, Bing etc coverage. Yes, it's debatable whether meta-objects should be stored in the

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-29 Thread Ian Sergeant
Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote on 30/08/2011 11:14:32 AM: The same mechanism is used for Yahoo, Bing etc coverage. Yes, it's debatable whether meta-objects should be stored in the OSM database, but that debate would also extend to meta-tags (note=*, fixme=*) When I encounter these

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-29 Thread Anthony
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 9:22 PM, Ian Sergeant iserg...@hih.com.au wrote: Steve Bennett stevag...@gmail.com wrote on 30/08/2011 11:14:32 AM: The same mechanism is used for Yahoo, Bing etc coverage. Yes, it's debatable whether meta-objects should be stored in the OSM database, but that debate

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering labels for unrecognised tags

2011-08-29 Thread Steve Bennett
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:07 PM, Anthony o...@inbox.org wrote: +1.  While I'd rather see these objects go away altogether, I think a tag of name=Melbourne;Geelong;South-Central NSW Area;Central Victoria Area on a closed way implies that this closed way represents an area called

[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of nature reserve is very, very bad

2010-08-20 Thread Vladimir Vyskocil
Hi, For example, look at this : http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=16.3229lon=-61.5603zoom=13layers=M The green overlay with NR letter cover almost everything, lands and sea ! It is hard to even distinguish what is the sea around the island. Can't this be fixed ? Prehaps make it render like

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of nature reserve is very, very bad

2010-08-20 Thread pavithran
On 20 August 2010 14:53, Vladimir Vyskocil vladimir.vysko...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, For example, look at this : http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=16.3229lon=-61.5603zoom=13layers=M The green overlay with NR letter cover almost everything, lands and sea ! It is hard to even distinguish what

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of nature reserve is very, very bad

2010-08-20 Thread Liz
On Fri, 20 Aug 2010, pavithran wrote: Re: NR for natural reserve . IMHO using names for landuses doesn't look good . Replacing it with some other art work which converys the same meaning would be a better idea. I agree with your point - as soon as we consider users of non-Latin scripts and

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of nature reserve is very, very bad

2010-08-20 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
2010/8/20 pavithran pavithra...@gmail.com: On 20 August 2010 14:53, Vladimir Vyskocil vladimir.vysko...@gmail.com wrote: Hi, For example, look at this : http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=16.3229lon=-61.5603zoom=13layers=M The green overlay with NR letter cover almost everything, lands

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of nature reserve is very, very bad

2010-08-20 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/8/20 Peteris Krisjanis pec...@gmail.com: Anyway, I agree that rendering NR should be more like administrative zone with special rules, not current green overlay. At least not for default osm.org map. +1 maybe also with different linetypes/colours for different protection grades and light

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-18 Thread Vladimir Vyskocil
Count me as a complainer... I was wondering about that blue dashed line too - it does not fit well with the surrounding estuary and open sea. I'm in the process of mapping a marina and I spontaneously only tagged as a leisure=marina the water portion that is occupied by the harbour. I

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-18 Thread Jonas Häggqvist
On 17-04-2010 14:38, Patrick Kilian wrote: Hi all, Count me as a complainer... I was wondering about that blue dashed line too - it does not fit well with the surrounding estuary and open sea. I'm in the process of mapping a marina and I spontaneously only tagged as a leisure=marina the

[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-17 Thread Dave F.
Hi Is there a reason why Mapnik's rendering of leisure=marina has change from a blue area to a dashed border line? http://osm.org/go/eukhlr0la-- Cheers Dave F. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-17 Thread Patrick Kilian
Hi all, Is there a reason why Mapnik's rendering of leisure=marina has change from a blue area to a dashed border line? IIRC there was a discussion in #osm which basically went like this: Does leisure=marina cover the land portion or the water portion of the marina hm, well don't know. wiki

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-17 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
Dave F. wrote: Patrick Kilian wrote: Which forum do you mean by #osm? Thats certainly the IRC channel on OFTC : irc://irc.oftc.net #osm ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-17 Thread Patrick Kilian
Hi, IIRC there was a discussion in #osm which basically went like this: Which forum do you mean by #osm? The IRC channel #osm in the oftc network. (The one mentioned in http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/IRC#IRC) HTH, Patrick Petschge Kilian ___

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-17 Thread Jean-Marc Liotier
Patrick Kilian wrote: Is there a reason why Mapnik's rendering of leisure=marina has change from a blue area to a dashed border line? IIRC there was a discussion in #osm which basically went like this: [..] ok lets make it a blue dashed line and see who complains. Count me as a

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-17 Thread David James
Patrick Kilian wrote: Hi all, IIRC there was a discussion in #osm which basically went like this: Hi Which forum do you mean by #osm? IRC channel I'd guess. -- David James ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-17 Thread Patrick Kilian
Hi all, Is there a reason why Mapnik's rendering of leisure=marina has change from a blue area to a dashed border line? IIRC there was a discussion in #osm which basically went like this: [..] ok lets make it a blue dashed line and see who complains. Count me as a complainer... I was

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-17 Thread Richard Weait
On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Patrick Kilian o...@petschge.de wrote: Hi all, Is there a reason why Mapnik's rendering of leisure=marina has change from a blue area to a dashed border line? IIRC there was a discussion in #osm which basically went like this: [..] ok lets make it a blue

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-17 Thread Dave F.
David James wrote: Patrick Kilian wrote: Hi all, IIRC there was a discussion in #osm which basically went like this: Hi Which forum do you mean by #osm? IRC channel I'd guess. Sorry, brain fade! ___ talk mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of Marinas changed

2010-04-17 Thread Dave F.
Richard Weait wrote: On Sat, Apr 17, 2010 at 8:38 AM, Patrick Kilian o...@petschge.de wrote: Hi all, Is there a reason why Mapnik's rendering of leisure=marina has change from a blue area to a dashed border line? IIRC there was a discussion in #osm which basically went

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-11 Thread Ciarán Mooney
Hi, I noticed the blisteringly fast rendering the other day, it had started rendering before I'd even finished my editing session. Means I will need to hone my JOSM skills so that I'm not the slowest part of the system! Thanks Sys Admin Ninja's, we love you all. :) Ciarán

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-11 Thread Peteris Krisjanis
2009/9/11 Roman Neumüller r.neumul...@gmail.com: I don't know whether I have missed something, or else am just lucky, but mapnik is rendering the things I am editing super-fast. Two new and different renders of an area in about 30 minutes. Now the renderer is sucking up to the cartographers?

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-11 Thread Hillsman, Edward
I'd noticed the increased speed as well. Thank you to all involved in making it happen. Ed Edward L. Hillsman, Ph.D. Senior Research Associate Center for Urban Transportation Research University of South Florida 4202 Fowler Ave., CUT100 Tampa, FL  33620-5375 813-974-2977 (tel) 813-974-5168

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-11 Thread Mike N.
I'd noticed the increased speed as well. Thank you to all involved in making it happen. I noticed this also. That's a great help - Thanks! ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-11 Thread Valent Turkovic
On Fri, 11 Sep 2009 09:07:01 -0400, Mike N. wrote: I noticed this also. That's a great help - Thanks! Thank you all, it is blindingly fast! -- pratite me na twitteru - www.twitter.com/valentt http://kernelreloaded.blog385.com/ linux, blog, anime, spirituality, windsurf, wireless

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-11 Thread Jon Burgess
On Fri, 2009-09-11 at 07:48 +0300, Roman Neumüller wrote: I don't know whether I have missed something, or else am just lucky, but mapnik is rendering the things I am editing super-fast. Two new and different renders of an area in about 30 minutes. Now the renderer is sucking up to the

[OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-10 Thread Steve Chilton
I don't know whether I have missed something, or else am just lucky, but mapnik is rendering the things I am editing super-fast. Two new and different renders of an area in about 30 minutes. STEVE ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-10 Thread Richard Weait
On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Steve Chiltons.l.chil...@mdx.ac.uk wrote: I don't know whether I have missed something, or else am just lucky, but mapnik is rendering the things I am editing super-fast. Two new and different renders of an area in about 30 minutes. Now the renderer is

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-10 Thread Shaun McDonald
On 10 Sep 2009, at 19:40, Richard Weait wrote: On Thu, Sep 10, 2009 at 2:34 PM, Steve Chiltons.l.chil...@mdx.ac.uk wrote: I don't know whether I have missed something, or else am just lucky, but mapnik is rendering the things I am editing super-fast. Two new and different renders of

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-10 Thread Lennard
Shaun McDonald wrote: It's really old news, that tile.openstreetmap.org is using the minutely diffs. But Steve was out at a conference when we switched over to the new tile server. Which is fast enough that it doesn't drop any render requests any more. -- Lennard

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-10 Thread Steve Chilton
] Sent: Thu 10/09/2009 22:45 To: Shaun McDonald Cc: Richard Weait; talk@openstreetmap.org; Steve Chilton Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering Shaun McDonald wrote: It's really old news, that tile.openstreetmap.org is using

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering

2009-09-10 Thread Roman Neumüller
I don't know whether I have missed something, or else am just lucky, but mapnik is rendering the things I am editing super-fast. Two new and different renders of an area in about 30 minutes. Now the renderer is sucking up to the cartographers? It's really old news, that

[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering export has only coastline

2009-04-08 Thread Ben Ward
Hi, I thought I'd do some editing in Inkscape on an SVG/PDF version of a map, and discovered Openstreetmap.org's export tab. Unfortunately, though I get a result from the Osmarender option, the Mapnik output doesn't work. http://badgertrack.com/images/swindon-oxford.png (roughly

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering export has only coastline

2009-04-08 Thread Richard Fairhurst
Ben Ward wrote: This looks like a bug/problem with the Openstreetmap Mapnik Export rendering. Can anyone confirm, or fix? Mapnik export doesn't work on Wednesdays while the database is reloaded. I believe there's an intention to fix this in the medium term (help welcome no doubt). Meanwhile

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering export has only coastline

2009-04-08 Thread Chris Hill
Richard Fairhurst wrote: Ben Ward wrote: This looks like a bug/problem with the Openstreetmap Mapnik Export rendering. Can anyone confirm, or fix? Mapnik export doesn't work on Wednesdays while the database is reloaded. I believe there's an intention to fix this in the medium

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering export has only coastline

2009-04-08 Thread Tom Hughes
Chris Hill wrote: Richard Fairhurst wrote: Ben Ward wrote: This looks like a bug/problem with the Openstreetmap Mapnik Export rendering. Can anyone confirm, or fix? Mapnik export doesn't work on Wednesdays while the database is reloaded. I believe there's an intention to fix this

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering export has only coastline

2009-04-08 Thread Simon Ward
On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:54:30PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: Maybe we should remove the Export tab when it is out of commision? Yes, because the users of all the other export modes that aren't dependent on the mapnik database would love that. There’s nothing like a bit of dry sarcasm to

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering export has only coastline

2009-04-08 Thread Jon Burgess
On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 21:54 +0100, Simon Ward wrote: On Wed, Apr 08, 2009 at 08:54:30PM +0100, Tom Hughes wrote: Maybe we should remove the Export tab when it is out of commision? Yes, because the users of all the other export modes that aren't dependent on the mapnik database would

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-06 Thread Ulf Lamping
Martijn van Oosterhout schrieb: On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:47 PM, sylvain letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I know there are strong oppositions on this list to that way of doing, some guys that have the power by the fact they own the renderer might be unappy of changes they have to do on

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-06 Thread Ed Loach
Nathan wrote: Maybe the answer is to modify the map features table and add columns for mapnik, osmarender, cyclemap, etc. Maybe getting rid of the generic rendering column and making it rendering for each of the viewers. What do you think? If someone does modify Map Features to add

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-06 Thread sylvain letuffe
If someone does modify Map Features to add extra columns to the tables then the perl script which automatically parses the page to highlight the Not in Map Features items in the Maplint layer will also need amending. Whaou, I wasn't aware of that ! Doesn't it looks like a bit strange that a

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-06 Thread Ed Loach
Since there is a maybe need wouldn't it be a good idea (or maybe someone allready does ?) to create an xml version of the map feature ? That is sort of what the perl script does, or tries to, I think. Once it has the XML file the program can see whether a given feature is in that file or not.

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-06 Thread Pieren
On Thu, Nov 6, 2008 at 2:54 AM, Nathan Mixter The Map Features is edited manually, means that we have to accept the fact that the list of all key/values supported by all OSM applications will never be complet and up-to-date in this wiki page. Map Features is a great page and very usefull for

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-06 Thread Sebastian Spaeth
Ulf Lamping wrote: Come on. There is no the renderer, you can set up your own if you like. Anyone can. Of course, I could climb on the top of the mount everest - in theory. In practise I would need a lot of time to learn how to do that. Yes so what? I learned how osmarender styles worked

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-05 Thread Gustav Foseid
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 3:46 PM, Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: in that case we better find another solution which can tell what tags programs will try to support. Actually, a page like map features which documented such things would be good. But the current craze on the wiki is to

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-05 Thread sylvain letuffe
I wish we could have a wiki page that describes tags which are supported by at least one of the major renderers (main mapnik, osmarender, cyclemap) A column in the map feature saying which renderer is using it ? generally not rendered (path). osmarender does As it is now, I think map

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-05 Thread Martijn van Oosterhout
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 8:47 PM, sylvain letuffe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Yeah, I know there are strong oppositions on this list to that way of doing, some guys that have the power by the fact they own the renderer might be unappy of changes they have to do on their styles and software and I

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-05 Thread Nathan Mixter
Maybe the answer is to modify the map features table and add columns for mapnik, osmarender, cyclemap, etc. Maybe getting rid of the generic rendering column and making it rendering for each of the viewers. What do you think? I think there is a wysiwyg media wiki plugin that might make

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-04 Thread Dave Stubbs
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Johnny Rose Carlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't there a description of highway=path on Map Features page? Ahahahahahahaha. So what? Are you saying Map Features is useless?, in that case we better find another

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-04 Thread Frederik Ramm
Hi, Igor Brejc wrote: Anyway, I checked Tagwatch for Germany and it has some 17,000 paths, so it's not totally unused. I checked a random sample. Of 10 highway=path objects I checked, 8 had been highway=footway before someone decided to change it. One was a highway=residential before. One

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-04 Thread Andy Allan
On Tue, Nov 4, 2008 at 2:28 PM, Johnny Rose Carlsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't there a description of highway=path on Map Features page? Ahahahahahahaha. So what? Are you saying Map Features is useless? No, it's not useless. But there's no point

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-04 Thread Johnny Rose Carlsen
Andy Allan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Isn't there a description of highway=path on Map Features page? Ahahahahahahaha. So what? Are you saying Map Features is useless?, in that case we better find another solution which can tell what tags programs will try to support. Best regards, -

[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-03 Thread Igor Brejc
Hello, This question has come up several times (from what I could Google out), but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to render highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it would be nice to have paths rendered (they can be rendered the same as footways, as far

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-03 Thread Tom Hughes
Igor Brejc wrote: This question has come up several times (from what I could Google out), but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to render highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it would be nice to have paths rendered (they can be rendered the same as

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-03 Thread Steve Chilton
] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Igor Brejc Sent: 03 November 2008 16:14 To: talk@openstreetmap.org Subject: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general Hello, This question has come up several times (from what I could Google out), but let me ask it again: when can we

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-03 Thread Igor Brejc
Tom Hughes wrote: Igor Brejc wrote: This question has come up several times (from what I could Google out), but let me ask it again: when can we expect Mapnik OSM layer to render highway=path? Nevermind the path or footway debate - it would be nice to have paths rendered (they can be

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering of paths + place=locality in general

2008-11-03 Thread Andy Allan
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 4:49 PM, Igor Brejc [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Aren't we constantly reiterating the fact that tagging is democratic? I think democratic is the wrong word. You can do what you like. There's no tyranny of the masses, for a start - minorities and majorities are both on equal

[OSM-talk] mapnik rendering or tagging issue?

2008-10-06 Thread Stefan Monnier
If you look at http://openstreetmap.org/?lat=45.52lon=-73.59zoom=8layers=B000FTFT you should see an urban island labelled Laval and Longueil. If you zoom out, only Laval is left, while if you zoom in you'll discover that this is really the island of Montreal. Is this a problem in mapnik or is it

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering or tagging issue?

2008-10-06 Thread Ed Loach
Stefan asked: Is this a problem in mapnik or is it a problem with the OSM data? If the latter, how can I fix it? It looks like the data is OK. All three are cities, and each is tagged as such. I suspect that the lowzoom Mapnik tiles just happen to decide that rendering the outer two cities

Re: [OSM-talk] mapnik rendering or tagging issue?

2008-10-06 Thread Andy Allan
On Mon, Oct 6, 2008 at 5:28 PM, Ed Loach [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Stefan asked: Is this a problem in mapnik or is it a problem with the OSM data? If the latter, how can I fix it? It looks like the data is OK. All three are cities, and each is tagged as such. I suspect that the lowzoom

[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering missing off the last part of some ways

2008-03-22 Thread Andy Robinson
I edited an area yesterday afternoon/evening which has been rendered overnight on the Mapnik layer. Great to see the quicker turnaround which I assume is using the daily diff? Anyway, I spotted two busts with what had been rendered. Both appear to be the last segment (section to the last node)

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering missing off the last part of some ways

2008-03-22 Thread Jon Burgess
On Sat, 2008-03-22 at 09:25 +, Andy Robinson wrote: I edited an area yesterday afternoon/evening which has been rendered overnight on the Mapnik layer. Great to see the quicker turnaround which I assume is using the daily diff? No, it was done with another full dump and import which was

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik: rendering forest or wood

2008-02-23 Thread Igor Brejc
Karl Eichwalder wrote: I think the mapnik rendering of forests could be improved. ATM, landuse=forest is not distinguishable from recreation_ground. Even if forest are often used as places for recreation in Germany, rendering both areas the same way is not optimal. For outside activities

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik: rendering forest or wood

2008-02-23 Thread Guilhem Bonnefille
Beautiful! Good work! I vote for. :-) 2008/2/23, Daniel Schmidt [EMAIL PROTECTED]: I think the mapnik rendering of forests could be improved. Thus I'd like to propose to render both landuse=forest and natural=wood the same way in a darkish green. That's also how osmarender deals

[OSM-talk] Mapnik: rendering forest or wood

2008-02-22 Thread Karl Eichwalder
I think the mapnik rendering of forests could be improved. ATM, landuse=forest is not distinguishable from recreation_ground. Even if forest are often used as places for recreation in Germany, rendering both areas the same way is not optimal. For outside activities you want where wood or forest

[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering problem (was: Cycle route improvements)

2008-02-06 Thread Ben Laenen
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Chris Jones wrote: For mapnik see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Mapnik For sections of the planet see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/index.php/Planet.osm#Extracts Thanks, it was also possible by just downloading an area with JOSM. Anyway, my Mapnik

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering problem (was: Cycle route improvements)

2008-02-06 Thread Artem Pavlenko
On 6 Feb 2008, at 17:17, Ben Laenen wrote: On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Artem Pavlenko wrote: OK, good. Probably something wrong with your styles. Post your *.xml file and I'll have a look. It's the original one from svn, but if you want to have a look... I can't see anything wrong with

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering problem (was: Cycle route improvements)

2008-02-06 Thread Ben Laenen
On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Artem Pavlenko wrote: Are you using template ? You should have replaced all occurrences of %params% with real things I don't have to do that manually, do I? I just enter the variables in set-mapnik-env, call customize-mapnik-map which replaces all %param% in

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering problem (was: Cycle route improvements)

2008-02-06 Thread Artem Pavlenko
On 6 Feb 2008, at 19:29, Ben Laenen wrote: On Wednesday 06 February 2008, Artem Pavlenko wrote: Are you using template ? You should have replaced all occurrences of %params% with real things I don't have to do that manually, do I? I just enter the variables in set-mapnik-env, call

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering update

2008-01-30 Thread Artem Pavlenko
On 29 Jan 2008, at 23:40, Jon Burgess wrote: On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 23:28 +, Jon Burgess wrote: On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 22:35 +, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Burgess wrote: | Once this first pass of the rendering is complete the

[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering artifacts

2008-01-30 Thread Karl Newman
I'm seeing faint gray lines on the main site slippy map Mapnik base layer, and I'm at a loss to explain their source. At first I thought they were state borders, but I'm seeing the lines running through the middle of states, too (here

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering artifacts

2008-01-30 Thread Artem Pavlenko
On 30 Jan 2008, at 12:41, Karl Newman wrote: I'm seeing faint gray lines on the main site slippy map Mapnik base layer, and I'm at a loss to explain their source. At first I thought they were state borders, but I'm seeing the lines running through the middle of states, too (here http://

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering update

2008-01-29 Thread Jon Burgess
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 23:28 +, Jon Burgess wrote: On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 22:35 +, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Burgess wrote: | Once this first pass of the rendering is complete the mod_tile setup | will have all the existing

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering update

2008-01-27 Thread Joerg Ostertag (OSM Munich/Germany)
On Freitag 25 Januar 2008, Gervase Markham wrote: Jon Burgess wrote: There is a major update to the way tiles are rendered occurring at the moment, let me explain... snip Makes perfect sense. Thanks for the update, and your hard work. I look forward to seeing the shiny new map next

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering update

2008-01-26 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Burgess wrote: | On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 22:35 +, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote: | -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- | Hash: SHA1 | | Jon Burgess wrote: | | Once this first pass of the rendering is complete the mod_tile setup | | will have all the

[OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering update

2008-01-25 Thread Gervase Markham
Anyone know why Mapnik still hasn't rendered the data I put here: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=54.6134lon=-2.6175zoom=12layers=B0FT over a week ago? Osmarender has it fine. I've tried using the rerender command on informationfreeway. (Is that Osmarender only?) I've tried waiting until next

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering update

2008-01-25 Thread Jon Burgess
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 17:49 +, Thomas Wood wrote: I believe the mapnik tile server has been a little overloaded recently - queuing of new tiles was disabled for a time. Rerender on ifw is for osmarender only (and isn't really required much, now that changed-tiles is being run to pick up

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering update

2008-01-25 Thread Jon Burgess
On Fri, 2008-01-25 at 22:35 +, Robert (Jamie) Munro wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Burgess wrote: | Once this first pass of the rendering is complete the mod_tile setup | will have all the existing tiles fully rendered with the current planet | dump and

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering update

2008-01-25 Thread Robert (Jamie) Munro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Jon Burgess wrote: | Once this first pass of the rendering is complete the mod_tile setup | will have all the existing tiles fully rendered with the current planet | dump and current map style. At that point I will switch over the URLs on | the server

Re: [OSM-talk] Mapnik rendering update

2008-01-25 Thread Thomas Wood
I believe the mapnik tile server has been a little overloaded recently - queuing of new tiles was disabled for a time. Rerender on ifw is for osmarender only (and isn't really required much, now that changed-tiles is being run to pick up data changes) On Jan 25, 2008 5:36 PM, Gervase Markham