2013/2/23 Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com:
I agree that there is a need for this, and I am happy with the simplicity of
using junction=yes and name=*. If you don't submit a trac request, I will,
but the link to trac is not working for me:
Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/23 Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com:
I agree that there is a need for this, and I am happy with the
simplicity of
using junction=yes and name=*. If you don't submit a trac request,
I will,
but the link to trac is not working
2013/2/23 John F. Eldredge j...@jfeldredge.com:
When would junction=no be used? When one way passes over another on a
viaduct without actually connecting?
yes, I also never used junction=no, this was a just in case-idea,
practically you can also read it as junction=*.
cheers,
Martin
Hello,
I just wondered if there is something productive in the making
concerning the crossroad names, or did it somehow end without anything?
How can I participate?
Thanks.
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
On Sat, 23 Feb 2013 05:54:16 Hans Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
I just wondered if there is something productive in the making
concerning the crossroad names, or did it somehow end without anything?
How can I participate?
Thanks.
___
talk mailing list
2013/2/15 Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com
So, what I want is for Mapnik to render a label at a node if the there is a
junction=yes tag (and name=* tag) present. This has been stated in the
wiki
for a long time.
Or better, if there is a junction=* and name=*. Except when junction=no.
Am 15.02.2013 00:24, schrieb Andrew Errington:
junction=crossroads would be fine, but it doesn't add any information.
-1
Following the general approach to handle *=yes as kind of a fallback
for cases where more detailled information is missing
junction=crossroads in fact would add
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 9:28 AM, Janko Mihelić jan...@gmail.com wrote:
Or better, if there is a junction=* and name=*. Except when junction=no.
+1
Like the dozen building or bridge values. The wiki says
junction=yes which is the easiest.
Pieren
___
Am 15.02.2013 09:28, schrieb Janko Mihelić:
What about when a junction is a roundabout? Should that be rendered
the Japanese way (a box with letters in the middle of the roundabout)
or the European way (words going along the street)? Or are we going to
have different rendering in different
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't think that's an appropriate way to name it. It's not a locality,
nor
is it really a place. It's a junction, with a name.
I think junction=yes and name=* is the best way to record it, the next step
would
2013/2/14 Floris Looijesteijn o...@floris.nu:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com
wrote:
I don't think that's an appropriate way to name it. It's not a locality,
nor
is it really a place. It's a junction, with a name.
I think junction=yes and name=* is
Where would you place this node if it is a more complex crossing?
Like a crossing of 2 roads with dual carriage ways?
I just saw one such case in Tokyo yesterday :
http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/node/254367454
Here the two nodes with traffic_signals tags carry the name (I suppose
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 17:46:45 Floris Looijesteijn wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 3:02 PM, Andrew Errington
erringt...@gmail.comwrote:
I don't think that's an appropriate way to name it. It's not a locality,
nor
is it really a place. It's a junction, with a name.
I think junction=yes
On 2013-02-14 11:59, Andrew Errington wrote:
In Korea we also have named junctions at overpasses, so the junction
name is
where the two roads cross (or meet) but they physically don't join
because
one road is on a bridge over the other, and there are sliproads to
move
between them.
In the
On 02/13/2013 08:03 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
How would it work when the intersection also has traffic lights? I
know that there will always be some cases where there are tag key
collisions but it seems that they will be *very* common in this case
between highway=junction and
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:08:11 Maarten Deen wrote:
On 2013-02-14 11:59, Andrew Errington wrote:
In Korea we also have named junctions at overpasses, so the junction
name is
where the two roads cross (or meet) but they physically don't join
because
one road is on a bridge over the other,
2013/2/14 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
On 02/13/2013 08:03 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
How would it work when the intersection also has traffic lights? I
know that there will always be some cases where there are tag key
collisions but it seems that they will be *very* common in this case
On 02/14/2013 12:53 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2013/2/14 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
On 02/13/2013 08:03 PM, Paul Norman wrote:
How would it work when the intersection also has traffic lights? I
know that there will always be some cases where there are tag key
collisions but it
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/14 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
though I consider the everything=yes trend as namespace pollution. So :
- junction=* if there is enough diversity to justify that namespace
- highway=junction if
On 02/14/2013 05:12 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/14 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
though I consider the everything=yes trend as namespace pollution. So :
- junction=* if there is enough diversity to
On Fri, 15 Feb 2013 02:23:08 Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
On 02/14/2013 05:12 PM, Toby Murray wrote:
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer
dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
2013/2/14 Jean-Marc Liotier j...@liotier.org:
though I consider the everything=yes trend as namespace
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:57:56 Hans Schmidt wrote:
Hello,
Is there some way to display the names of crossroads on the OSM map?
This adress scheme is more important than street names in Japan, but
currently, OSM does not display it. In consequence, it is very hard to
locate something on the OSM
Can help me better understand the naming of junctions. Do junction names
have a direction attribute? How are they used to give directions with no
street names?
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 5:22 AM, Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.comwrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 21:57:56 Hans Schmidt wrote:
Am 13.02.2013 14:22, schrieb Andrew Errington:
I would also like this, for Korea. Obviously it's a rendering issue, but it
would be nice if the map on osm.org would have this.
I tried adding a junction=yes tag to a named junction as described in the
wiki[1], but it would not render a label for
Am 13.02.2013 14:34, schrieb Clifford Snow:
Can help me better understand the naming of junctions. Do junction
names have a direction attribute? How are they used to give directions
with no street names?
Take a look at this Google maps example from some small suburb of Tokyo:
Hi there,
My experience in Japan is that the junctions are named, but not oriented. You
give directions by saying 'go down this street and turn left at NAME
junction'. Or 'take the third right after NAME junction'. Or if you are
looking at a map, some junction names are shown, which makes
On 13 Feb 2013 12:59, Hans Schmidt z0idb...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
Is there some way to display the names of crossroads on the OSM map?
place=locality
Kevin
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:56:40 Kevin Peat wrote:
On 13 Feb 2013 12:59, Hans Schmidt z0idb...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
Is there some way to display the names of crossroads on the OSM map?
place=locality
Kevin
I don't think that's an appropriate way to name it. It's not a locality, nor
is it
place=locality
Looks like tagging for the renderer to me, although I am not a resident of
Japan or Korea.
As it is the rendering that is not working as expected, a better resolution
would be to change the renderer so that it displayed junction names.
Joseph
On 13 February 2013 13:56, Kevin
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:44:07 Hans Schmidt wrote:
Am 13.02.2013 14:22, schrieb Andrew Errington:
I would also like this, for Korea. Obviously it's a rendering issue, but
it would be nice if the map on osm.org would have this.
I tried adding a junction=yes tag to a named junction as
2013/2/13 Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com
I don't think that's an appropriate way to name it. It's not a locality,
nor
is it really a place. It's a junction, with a name.
I think junction=yes and name=* is the best way to record it, the next step
would be to get it rendered.
I
2013/2/13 Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.com:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2013 22:56:40 Kevin Peat wrote:
On 13 Feb 2013 12:59, Hans Schmidt z0idb...@gmx.de wrote:
Hello,
Is there some way to display the names of crossroads on the OSM map?
place=locality
Kevin
I don't think that's an
2013/2/13 Joseph Reeves iknowjos...@gmail.com:
place=locality
Looks like tagging for the renderer to me, although I am not a resident of
Japan or Korea.
+1, place=locality is generally a generic placeholder, which
should/could be substituted by the time we dig deeper into toponyms
and develop
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 8:44 AM, Hans Schmidt z0idb...@gmx.de wrote:
Yes. Generally I think that non-Western map styles are completely
neglected in OSM, but I have no idea to change that. How can we get in
touch with the people who define the rendering styles? Somehow it seems to
me (from the
On 13 Feb 2013 14:20, Martin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote
+1, place=locality is generally a generic placeholder, which
should/could be substituted by the time we dig deeper into toponyms
and develop more specific classes...
Well a place is just a named geographical location and I
The thing with the UK is that you get places named after junctions - Church
Cross, or whatever. That may well be a locality, but it's not the same as
naming the junction. That seems to be the difference with these Japan /
Korea examples.
Joseph
On 13 February 2013 14:37, Kevin Peat k...@k3v.eu
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.comwrote:
I think junction=yes and name=* is the best way to record it, the next step
would be to get it rendered.
Let's not add to the everything=yes approach to tagging but go with an
existing key - highway seems
I'm starting to wonder if something could be adapted from the cycleway node
style network tagging.
On Feb 13, 2013 8:41 AM, Joseph Reeves iknowjos...@gmail.com wrote:
The thing with the UK is that you get places named after junctions -
Church Cross, or whatever. That may well be a locality, but
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:56 AM, AJ Ashton aj.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's not add to the everything=yes approach to tagging but go with an
existing key - highway seems appropriate. In fact highway=junction seems
to already be in use for this purpose with ~123 occurences.
Or nevermind, I
place=junction?
That would emphasize that a named junction is commonly used as a place
to indicate nearby locations. We already have place=farm, which is
practically the same... just thinking aloud.
Am 13.02.2013, 15:37 Uhr, schrieb Kevin Peat k...@k3v.eu:
On 13 Feb 2013 14:20, Martin
Andrew Errington writes:
I think junction=yes and name=* is the best way to record it, the next step
would be to get it rendered.
This is the way I also tag it in Thailand. junction=yes and name=*.
Stephan
___
talk mailing list
AJ Ashton writes:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:02 AM, Andrew Errington erringt...@gmail.comwrote:
Let's not add to the everything=yes approach to tagging but go with an
existing key - highway seems appropriate. In fact highway=junction seems
to already be in use for this purpose with ~123
On 13/02/2013 15:03, AJ Ashton wrote:
On Wed, Feb 13, 2013 at 9:56 AM, AJ Ashton aj.ash...@gmail.com
mailto:aj.ash...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's not add to the everything=yes approach to tagging but go
with an existing key - highway seems appropriate. In fact
highway=junction seems to
2013/2/13 Kevin Peat k...@k3v.eu:
Be sure to let everyone know when you have developed your classes ;]
we won't have to do this all at once (like always in OSM). One class
that there could be is: junction
cheers,
Martin
___
talk mailing list
Named roundabouts is also ordinary : junction=roundabout + name=*
So junction=yes + name=* looks a bit strange but it's by far
better than a highway key on nodes and more consistent with other
junctions tagging.
Pieren
___
talk mailing list
Am 13.02.2013 14:44, schrieb Hans Schmidt:
Concerning tagging: I don’t think that there should be some special
tag. The node which intersects both roads should just get a name
property. JOSM displays the name there, and I think this is how it
should be displayed on osm.org, too.
Agreed for
From: Peter Wendorff [mailto:wendo...@uni-paderborn.de]
Sent: Wednesday, February 13, 2013 10:21 AM
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] Display names of crossroads
Am 13.02.2013 14:44, schrieb Hans Schmidt:
Concerning tagging: I don’t think that there should be some
Am 13.02.2013 19:21, schrieb Peter Wendorff:
Agreed for no special name tag, but please use highway=junction +
name=whatever in combination instead of the name tag alone.
Yes, in retrospect, this is really better.
Am 13.02.2013 15:10, schrieb Janko Mihelić:
How is it best rendered? With a
Hi All,
We also have many cross-road or T-junctions junctions in the United Kingdom
that have names. Particularly in rural areas where early fingerpost signs
still exist:
Devon: I believe I am right in saying that the name on the column is the
junction name. I seem to remember that I've been
49 matches
Mail list logo
