On 15/09/2023 10:43, Paul Norman wrote:
They have edited it back with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141281494. I've left a
changeset discussion comment asking why, and asking for a link to the
required documentation and consultation.
Maybe I'm being over-cynical, but I suspect that
Hi,
aside from these apparently being undocumented bot edits, I'm also
somewhat skeptical of their "healthcare:speciality" tag. It sounds
terribly like advertising. It essentially covers everything you would
expect a dentist to do - so why is healthcare=dentist not sufficient?
Bye
Frederik
They have edited it back with
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141281494. I've left a changeset
discussion comment asking why, and asking for a link to the required
documentation and consultation.
On 2023-09-14 12:36 a.m., Cj Malone wrote:
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 15:06 +0200, Snusmumrike
Is there a bot that does this or is someone prepared to write one?
--
Andrew
From: Robert Whittaker (OSM lists)
Sent: 14 September 2023 10:39
To: talk@openstreetmap.org
Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] When two bots go to war
Maybe there should be a general good
Maybe there should be a general good-practice recommendation / policy
that bots running in this fashion to keep things in sync should only
automatically add/update/remove a tag that they've previously set if
the current state/value in OSM is unchanged from the last state/value
that the bot set. Thi
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 15:06 +0200, Snusmumriken via talk wrote:
> My speculation is that Distriktstandvården (a chain of dental
> clinics)
> has taken "ownership" of "their" nodes and once a day check that the
> values in osm database correspond to that of their internal database.
I've added a mor
On Tue, 2023-09-12 at 11:42 +0200, Maarten Deen wrote:
> There seems to have been an automated edit to add
> opening_hours:covid19=same.
>
> I'm a bit curious how this can be an automated edit. Or does the bot
> take external data of objects where the covid19 opening hours are the
> same?
>
Le 12.09.23 à 11:42, Maarten Deen a écrit :
does the bot take external data of objects where the covid19 opening
hours are the same?
looking at the created_by, it import external data into osm
I have posted a comment to resquest the link to the wiki page
about it
There seems to have been an automated edit to add opening_hours:covid19
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:opening%20hours:covid19?uselang=en-GB=same.
I'm a bit curious how this can be an automated edit. Or does the bot take
external data of objects where the covid19 opening hours are the
Le 12.09.23 à 10:49, Mateusz Konieczny via talk a écrit :
Sep 12, 2023, 10:41 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
Le 12.09.23 à 08:23, Snusmumriken via talk a écrit :
I recently happen to witness an edit war between two bots, that
changed
a tag on an object back and forth onc
Sep 12, 2023, 10:41 by marc_m...@mailo.com:
> Le 12.09.23 à 08:23, Snusmumriken via talk a écrit :
>
>> I recently happen to witness an edit war between two bots, that changed
>> a tag on an object back and forth once a day
>>
>
> id of the object ?
>
https://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/141
Le 12.09.23 à 08:23, Snusmumriken via talk a écrit :
I recently happen to witness an edit war between two bots, that changed
a tag on an object back and forth once a day
id of the object ?
Shouldn't they be amended with something like; "A bot should
not edit the same object twice"
the bots
Sep 12, 2023, 09:45 by talk@openstreetmap.org:
> Well, this one came to light only because it happened in a big city
> where a local mapper happened to notice it. Who knows if there are
> other bot wars going on in Siberia or elsewhere where there are very
> few local mappers.
>
To be less cryp
Well, this one came to light only because it happened in a big city
where a local mapper happened to notice it. Who knows if there are
other bot wars going on in Siberia or elsewhere where there are very
few local mappers.
And I don't mean that a bot never should be allowed to edit an object a
sec
I think we can rely on reason and logic here instead of extra guidelines.
This was obviously not intentional and we don't need to write guidelines
against it.
(Re-sent because I accidentally replied privately instead of to the mailing
list)
Op di 12 sep 2023 om 08:30 schreef Snusmumriken via talk
15 matches
Mail list logo