On Sun, 7 Oct 2018 at 23:11, john whelan wrote:
> JAVA has a number of problems. Many corporations ban its installation
> citing security issues which restricts the machines that can use JOSM with
> all its nice tools.
>
Is this an actual problem you, or people you know, encounter? If so, is
On 15 March 2018 at 19:57, Mike Thompson wrote:
> I am trying to use the "Strava Cycling and Running Heatmap" in JOSM but I am
> getting a "Error HTTP error 403 when loading tiles."
According to the Dutch forum, the following URLs should work:
On 19 February 2018 at 16:46, Ilya Zverev wrote:
> Checked out the latest OSM Carto 3.x style
Cool work! If you run osm2pgsql with '--hstore' and
'--tag-transform-script openstreetmap-carto.lua', I'd expect that the
4.0 branch of OSM carto will also work.
-- Matthijs
contributor.
For a full list of commits, see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/compare/v4.5.0...v4.6.0 .
As always, we welcome any bug reports at
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues .
Kind regards,
Matthijs Melissen
On 26 November 2017 at 20:26, Simon Poole wrote:
> Exactly the other way around: people love to create wiki pages and put
> some outlandish claims on them that have nothing to do with reality,
> leading to people that actually believe the nonsense to be frustrated
> (in this case
On 21 November 2017 at 14:47, Darafei "Komяpa" Praliaskouski
wrote:
> "I'm worried about this. I have not performed a technical review." as a
> blocker for PR merge:
> https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/2939
>
> Basically, most of wide ~2011 dev community
On 24 September 2017 at 23:01, Matthijs Melissen
<i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote:
> I would like to ask for your opinion on the choice of language used in
> the Default map on openstreetmap.org.
Thank you all for your contributions to the discussion. It seems that
the current choic
On 25 September 2017 at 13:21, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> Frederik Ramm wrote:
>> I'd invest the available brainpower in steps needed to achieve
>> this goal, even if it's a year or two in the future.
>
> Which means vector tiles... which we should be looking at anyway.
>
>
on this issue can be found on Github:
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/803
I'm looking forward to your opinions.
Kind regards,
Matthijs Melissen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org
On 3 August 2017 at 23:07, Simon Poole wrote:
> The LWG would like to start a period of public review and consultation on
> our draft trademark policy, that we intend to bring forward to the OSMF
> board for adoption as a formal policy, please see the text here:
The proposed
Dear all,
Today, v3.3.1 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet (the default
stylesheet on openstreetmap.org) has been released.
This version includes a single change:
* Fix a regression in intermittent waterways
For a full list of commits, see
On 4 May 2017 at 16:30, Jochen Topf wrote:
> The old-style multipolygon relations are history! In not even two months
> the OSM community cleaned up all of the nearly a quarter million
> relations. You can see the it here:
>
On 19 March 2017 at 20:55, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
> However, just because I no longer spend my time batting back and forth to
> every post on the lists, that does not mean I have the right to ignore the
> same community guidelines which everyone else follows.
Can you show
2017-02-18 15:33 GMT+01:00 Philippe Casteleyn :
> Iedereen spreekt altijd over lokale kennis, maar verkiest toch
buitenlandse
> inmenging.
Een kleine opheldering, met 'lokale kennis' wordt bedoeld kennis van iemand
die ter plaatse is geweest om te kijken hoe de
On 15 February 2017 at 23:10, Brian Prangle wrote:
> I don't understand what there is to sort out. We don't want to delete the
> node and its naptan data just the bus_stop tag which the naptan:Status=DEL
> indicates. If we delete the node entirely it's difficult to recover if
On 15 February 2017 at 17:58, Brian Prangle wrote:
> I've just removed the highway=bus_stop tag from any NaPTAN node that after
> yesterdays' refresh carried the tag naptan:Status=DEL. There were 237 cases.
> The nodes are still there, just not rendered so if there are any
2017-02-13 13:49 GMT+01:00 joost schouppe :
> Ik had bij de laatste meetup in Brussel bij drie van die Notes info
> toegevoegd om ze te kunnen sluiten.
Sorry, die waren er tussendoor geglipt, dat doe ik normaal inderdaad
wel. Ik heb ze nu alsnog verwerkt.
-- Matthijs
Beste Philippe,
Allereerst zou ik je willen vragen je toon aan te passen. Je komt erg
onbeleefd en agressief over, dat lijkt me niet nuttig voor een
productieve discussie. Ik snap ook niet niet wat mijn woonplaats met
de rest van de discussie te maken heeft; die is in elk geval zeker
niet geheim,
On 3 February 2017 at 19:29, Stuart Reynolds <
stu...@travelinesoutheast.org.uk> wrote:
> Also, there is often some confusion about what name goes into which fields
> - people will insist on compounding names, for example, because that’s what
> their consuming system wants, rather than getting
Hi Brian,
Great to see this going forward! Some technicalities:
> Process overview
This is not very clear to me. I think this section either needs more
detail, or less (with the detail moved to the individual steps). Also, what
do you mean with opening a csv in JOSM?
> Each chunk will create a
On 11 December 2016 at 01:15, Jean-Marc Liotier wrote:
> But participants
> in the thread were mostly experienced with French-speaking Africa - so I
> cannot rule out the existence of a living street legal classification in
> other locales.
At least South Africa seems to have
On 14 November 2016 at 02:22, Matthijs Melissen
<i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote:
> I have now added support to taginfo for showing an example rendering in
> the taglists on the wiki.
I have included some TagList templates now on the main Map Features
page, as well on the individual
On 6 November 2016 at 12:52, Jochen Topf wrote:
> I have now added support to taginfo for showing an example rendering in
> the taglists on the wiki.
I enabled this functionality now on
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Template:Map_Features/man_made .
We now have TagList
On 6 November 2016 at 12:52, Jochen Topf wrote:
> I have now added support to taginfo for showing an example rendering in
> the taglists on the wiki.
Thanks, that's great!
> Note that the "osmcarto-rendering-size" setting in the infobox is not used.
> That setting is really
On 21 September 2016 at 09:25, Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org> wrote:
> On Mi, Sep 21, 2016 at 01:33:28 +0200, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
>> On 1 September 2016 at 15:04, Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org> wrote:
>> > So, if somebody adds the rendering to the infobox (and
On 21 September 2016 at 09:53, François Lacombe
wrote:
> You deal with pages like Template:Map_Features/XXX but power template is
> currently known as Template:Map_Features:power
> Have we to rename the template to Template:Map_Features/Power ?
Yes, for the moment it
On 1 September 2016 at 10:01, Matthijs Melissen
<i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote:
> As a firs step, I included the list here on the Geological map features page:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geological
> it seems to work well there.
We now have TagList templates for the
On 1 September 2016 at 15:04, Jochen Topf wrote:
> So, if somebody adds the rendering to the infobox (and tells me about it),
> I'll pull that data from taginfo and can put it in the taglist tables.
I added it to the infobox as osmcarto-rendering.
It is currently only used in
On 1 September 2016 at 15:05, Jochen Topf wrote:
> What are the problems with translations?
I didn't realise the non-English Map Features templates include the
English Map Features template. Nothing we can't fix, but simply
putting TagLists in the English
On 1 September 2016 at 10:01, Matthijs Melissen
<i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote:
> As a firs step, I included the list here on the Geological map features page:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geological
> it seems to work well there.
As there are some problems with t
On 1 September 2016 at 09:01, Jochen Topf wrote:
> And feel free to tell me if you need anything more or different. What it
> does at the moment is what I thought might be useful and doable. That
> doesn't mean this is the best solution.
As a firs step, I included the list
On Thursday, 1 September 2016, Jochen Topf <joc...@remote.org> wrote:
> On Do, Sep 01, 2016 at 12:42:10 +0200, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
> > We have currently a Map Features page on the wiki:
> > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
> >
> > The page
Hi,
We have currently a Map Features page on the wiki:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Map_Features
The page also contains definitions for all features. We therefore
store the definitions now in two places: in the map features tables
and in the infoboxes on the pages themselves.
Duplication
Hi all,
Recently, a new tool was created by Martin Raifer (@tyrasd) to
generate graphs of the usage of tags over time. This is a great tool
that gives us more insight in what drives the choice of tags by
mappers. The tool can be found at http://taghistory.raifer.tech/.
I wrote an OSM diary to
On 31 August 2016 at 18:32, Andy Townsend wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something, but a web search of e.g. "something
> site:https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk/; finds relevant posts?
> Is there something I'm not understanding here?
You're right, something must have
Hi,
The mailing list archives at
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/ are currently not indexed
by Google. I suppose this is caused by the tag that is included in every page of the
archive.
Would it be possible to remove this tag? I think it would be very
useful if the mailing list
://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues.
Kind regards,
Matthijs Melissen
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk
On 26 July 2016 at 01:51, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> I can't speak to the qualities of Go Map! but I think your review should
> also mention the fact that this is proprietary software - it doesn't
> cost anything but you can't look at the source. In that, it is different
> from
Hi all,
I always used to be quite sceptical about mobile mapping applications.
Due to the small screen size and lack of a mouse pointer, mobile
mapping seemed clumsy and error-prone. For me, collecting data in the
field and then adding it on a personal computer with JOSM was the way
to go.
On 14 July 2016 at 21:16, Pierre Béland wrote:
> Michal, you might have seen my OSMCompare slider map where I use the FOSM
> layer for comparison.
>
> http://pierzen.dev.openstreetmap.org/hot/leaflet/OSM-Compare-before-after.html#10/27.9083/85.5286
Nice work, inspired on this
On 11 July 2016 at 01:08, Frederik Ramm wrote:
> The automated edits code of conduct is there for a reason; had user
> Test360 complied with it, then his edit would likely not have been
> faulty
My main issue with the AEcoc is that it is nearly impossible to comply
with,
On 10 July 2016 at 23:26, Éric Gillet wrote:
> What are your thoughts ?
I fully agree with all your points. I think a wider community
discussion on the current guidelines is necessary.
-- Matthijs
___
talk mailing list
Dear all,
Today, v2.40.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet (the default
stylesheet on openstreetmap.org) has been released and rolled out to
the openstreetmap.org servers. It might take a couple of days before
all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* More consistent size of icon
Dear all,
Yesterday, v2.38.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
still take a couple of days before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Add rendering for natural=shoal, and natural=reef.
* Change of
On 29 January 2016 at 17:37, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> "but that's not much to do with tagging diversity" - I would dispute
> it, from my personal experience. Tagging diversity IS one of real
> problems in using OSM data.
+1.
-- Matthijs
On 28 January 2016 at 20:16, David Marchal wrote:
> On a GitHub issue
> (https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/2027#issuecomment-174443685),
> I've been told that Wiki tagging votes are only advisory and that the
> community is only invited, neither required
Dear all,
Today, v2.37.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
still take a couple of days before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Improved admin boundaries and labels on low zoom levels
* New
On 31 October 2015 at 03:09, Lester Caine wrote:
> new indistinguishable rendering primary routes and motorways
For my information, could you take the test on
http://enchroma.com/test/instructions/ and tell me what it says? It's
ok if you prefer to respond off-list.
--
Dear all,
Today, v2.36.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
still take a couple of days before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Major rewrite of road and railway rendering, as part of Mateusz
On 30 October 2015 at 22:01, Matthijs Melissen <i...@matthijsmelissen.nl> wrote:
> - shop=pharmacy (use office=pharmacy)
This should be amenity=pharmacy instead of office=pharmacy, of course.
-- Matthijs
___
talk mailing list
talk@openstre
On 17 October 2015 at 10:45, Lester Caine wrote:
> On 17/10/15 09:03, nebulon42 wrote:
>> I don't know an ETA of this change on the tile servers yet as it is a
>> quite major change. Others may be able to comment on that.
>
> Is this ACTUALLY a 'done deal'? I though there was
Hi Andy,
I hope you and everyone in Birmingham are doing fine.
There seems to be a little ditch here:
https://www.google.nl/maps/@52.5295575,-1.7850049,3a,65.9y,127.32h,61.97t/data=!3m6!1e1!3m4!1s1KvjUmlAex9LK-Faj3LTxw!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
Could that be related?
-- Matthijs
On 11 October 2015
On 25 September 2015 at 14:56, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Does anyone know whether the alignment of the platforms under the concourse
> is based on anything other than pure guesswork? The alignment at either end
> where they can be seen in Bing doesn't look right either. I'm
On 25 September 2015 at 14:56, Brian Prangle wrote:
> Does anyone know whether the alignment of the platforms under the concourse
> is based on anything other than pure guesswork? The alignment at either end
> where they can be seen in Bing doesn't look right either. I'm
Hi Henk,
On 22 September 2015 at 12:43, henk van der laan wrote:
> Over the past couple of month some big changes in the rendering of the
> map have been made.
> These changes do not improve the readabillity of the map, and despite
> it's good intentions do not seem to take
Dear all,
Today, v2.35.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
still take a couple of days before all tiles show the new rendering.
Changes include:
* Add new icon for ford
* Stop rendering of landuse=conservation
*
On 16 September 2015 at 23:30, Tom Hughes <t...@compton.nu> wrote:
> On 16/09/15 21:59, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
>
>> Today, v2.35.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
>> released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers. It might
>> still take a c
On 31 August 2015 at 11:00, Mateusz Konieczny wrote:
> See
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Mateusz_Konieczny/surface%3Dsoil_to_surface%3Ddirt
>
> I plan to change surface=soil to surface=dirt. surface=soil is a clear
> duplicate of surface=dirt. It is
On 18 Aug 2015 03:56, Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no interest to do this in the OSM standard style because it is
abundantly clear that any new attempts at changes that make rural
navigation possible* in OSM-carto would be rejected based on the ones that
already have been over
On 18 August 2015 at 10:20, Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 18/08/2015 07:43, Matthijs Melissen wrote:
On 18 Aug 2015 03:56, Andy Townsend ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
There's no interest to do this in the OSM standard style because it is
abundantly clear that any new attempts
On 16 August 2015 at 21:06, ajt1...@gmail.com ajt1...@gmail.com
That makes some sense, but OSM-Carto's biggest problem is that a number of
the changes over the last year have been dedicated to making well-mapped
central European urban areas look nice at the expense of the rest of the
planet.
On 16 August 2015 at 22:57, ajt1...@gmail.com ajt1...@gmail.com wrote:
Until I provided a counter-example there, the only example on
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/pull/747 was of a
well-mapped central European city. If there is evaluation of the results in
both rural and
On 15 August 2015 at 17:14, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
The obvious question is that given tilemill is not longer being
maintained, what are the preferred alternatives?
Depending on what you need exactly, Kosmtik might be an alternative:
https://github.com/kosmtik/kosmtik
--
On 8 August 2015 at 22:55, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
What is the best way of cloning the existing style setup for a UK tile
server?
Some useful resources:
https://switch2osm.org/serving-tiles/manually-building-a-tile-server-14-04/
On 27 July 2015 at 09:06, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote:
With the discussion on a more self contained 'UK' group I'd like to
highlight one area that is becoming perhaps more urgent for some of us,
the idea of a UK style tile set.
I also think it's a good idea for the UK to create there
On 16 July 2015 at 15:22, Karl-Philipp Richter rich...@richtercloud.de wrote:
Is there an issue tracker for http[s]://www.openstreetmap.org or have
there ever been any plans for such a useful and straightforward way of
introducing improvements (it'd be not exposed in a mail list archive
On 13 July 2015 at 14:13, Philip Barnes p...@trigpoint.me.uk wrote:
I think this, and blue motorways, is a good argument for why we need a
UK render of the map.
I agree a UK-specific rendering would be very useful, especially now
the Default style is getting less and less UK-centric.
--
On 13 July 2015 at 09:53, Andy Mabbett a...@pigsonthewing.org.uk wrote:
I don't want fudge things to just tag for the renderer, but is there
a relevant tag missing, or should we change the rendering styles to
show such objects?
You might be interested in this PR which is currently under
On 14 May 2015 at 00:34, pmailkeey . pmailk...@googlemail.com wrote:
On 13 May 2015 at 21:32, Dave F. dave...@madasafish.com wrote:
There already is an icon for shop=bicycle.
There's already an icon for amenity=courthouse
Thanks for the corrections Dave and Mike, shop=bicycle and
Dear all,
Today, v2.30.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been rolled
out to the openstreetmap.org servers.
This version includes the following changes:
* New wetland rendering, including differentiation based on the wetland key.
* Added rendering for amenity=bicycle_parking.
* Added
On 12 May 2015 10:57, Bob Kerr openstreetmapcraigmil...@yahoo.co.uk
wrote:
On residential roads where there has been a ref= added is being
rendered on Mapnik. Is this something new since I have not been checking
recently.
No, rendering has not changed in this respect.
Maybe the tag
Hi all,
I added my Bromsgrove survey to the map.
I surveyed the High Street:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.33483/-2.05912
and the businesses in the industrial estates at Aston Fields:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=17/52.31863/-2.05871
-- Matthijs
On 5 May 2015 at 11:19, Andy
Locator name issues.
He also reminded me about postboxes.
Cheers
Andy
-Original Message-
From: Matthijs Melissen [mailto:i...@matthijsmelissen.nl]
Sent: 07 May 2015 01:43
To: talk-gb-westmidlands
Subject: Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] May Meeting (Disabilty Kurb Project)
Brian
Is anyone planning to map the shops in the high street? I think it
would be useful if they were added, but personally I'd prefer to come
by bike and do some of the suburbs and the industrial estate.
I'll also do some tracing in advance.
-- Matthijs
On 5 May 2015 at 11:19, Andy Robinson
, Matthijs Melissen i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote:
Is anyone planning to map the shops in the high street? I think it
would be useful if they were added, but personally I'd prefer to come
by bike and do some of the suburbs and the industrial estate.
I'll also do some tracing in advance
On 26 April 2015 at 16:11, colliar colliar4e...@aol.com wrote:
Nice work so far, but are the any plans on carto side and on the wiki
side to support the taginfo feature projects ?
From the carto side not at the moment, see
https://github.com/gravitystorm/openstreetmap-carto/issues/961 .
It is
On 20 April 2015 at 13:27, Wuzzy wuz...@mail.ru wrote:
I have created a wiki page about the Standard layer found on
www.openstreetmap.org
Here it is:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Standard_tile_layer
Thanks for that!
I think Andy was also trying to create an updated map key, but I'm
Good idea, I support this proposal.
-- Matthijs
On 17 Apr 2015 02:14, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
See http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Bryce_C_Nesbitt
The tag recycling:excrement is used 55 times, and has at least four
distinct meanings.
I propose to use
Hi Brian,
I will be abroad, so I won't be able to make it.
-- Matthijs
On 26 March 2015 at 14:18, Brian Prangle bpran...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi everyone
Just a reminder that we're meeting in the Black Eagle Factory Road (nearest
Metro Stop Soho Benson Road) probably from about 8 pm onwards so
On 18 March 2015 at 21:43, Clifford Snow cliff...@snowandsnow.us wrote:
Paul,
Since you are involved with updating the rendering, can you tell us the
process to decide what should be rendered? I realize that part of it must be
stylistic, but what outside influences cause you to include a tag
On 1 March 2015 at 21:04, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
This is now a formal proposal to mechanically remove:
denotation=cluster
fixme=set␣better␣denotation
From 200,000+ nodes. See
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Mechanical_Edits/Bryce_C_Nesbitt
I support this proposal.
On 27 February 2015 at 14:30, JB jb...@mailoo.org wrote:
On http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-notes-overview, I prefer the first
graph, showing how the notes db is already getting clustered
I find the page in fact a bit hard to read (but apart from that very
useful). What is the difference
On 26 February 2015 at 12:39, Severin Menard severin.men...@gmail.com wrote:
I would like to know where is the good door to knock on to report an issue
with the OSM standard rendering. For a few months, it became totally fuzzy
regarding the countries boundaries, almost preventing to distinguish
On 26 February 2015 at 13:56, Severin Menard severin.men...@gmail.com wrote:
Do the people in charge of the rendering plan to solve this? The UI is
improving more and more, would be great if the standard map becomes fully
understandable.
Yes, we're planning to solve this (it is bothering me
On 16 February 2015 at 19:20, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Congratulations to all those who were involved in getting directions/routing
on openstreetmap.org :-)
A large step forward, thanks to Richard Fairhurst and all others who
made this possible!
-- Matthijs
On 10 February 2015 at 12:19, Jo Walsh metaz...@fastmail.net wrote:
I wish to float this draft page for discussion and possibly future
approval!
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/How_We_Map
I welcome this page, I think it is very useful.
One small comment - I oppose the following sentence:
Dear all,
Yesterday, v2.28.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been released
and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers.
This version includes the following changes:
* The tags amenity=dentist and amenity=townhall are now rendered.
* The tag natural=lake, which has fallen in disuse,
I will be there this Thursday (hopefully not on my own).
-- Matthijs
On 3 February 2015 at 09:24, Andy Robinson ajrli...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi folks, its first Thursday of the month this week. Unfortunately I have a
prior engagement but hope you all have a good meet up. At the Bull??
Cheers
Dear all,
Today, v2.27.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers.
Changes include:
* The following tags are now rendered: amenity=food_court,
amenity=doctors, natural=scree, natural=shingle, natural=bare_rock,
leisure=water_park,
On 24 January 2015 at 20:33, SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk wrote:
However, there are names where the name in OSM is what the local authority
uses, and what local people would agree that it is called, but there's no
sign on the ground. How do we reflect that?
I just wanted to add that
Hi all,
Some suggestions:
- In Coventry there's always a lot to do, and there are not so many
local mappers, so I'd suggest to revisit Coventry.
- The Black Country also has gotten less attention than other places.
It's probably best to meet somewhere along the railway or tramway.
Would Tipton
Dear all,
Today, v2.26.1 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been released
and rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers.
This version only includes one change:
* Areas tagged with amenity=place_of_worship and no building tag are
rendered again.
For a full list of commits, see
on the list, I wouldn't be able to write a single line of
code. I hope I'm striking the right balance.
Kind regards,
Matthijs
On 27 November 2014 at 01:16, Matthijs Melissen
i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote:
Dear all,
We are considering to change the colour of buildings in
openstreetmap-carto
On 27 November 2014 at 01:16, Matthijs Melissen
i...@matthijsmelissen.nl wrote:
We are considering to change the colour of buildings in
openstreetmap-carto, the default rendering on openstreetmap.org.
Because this change has a significant effect on the looks of the map,
we would like
Dear all,
Today, v2.26.0 of the openstreetmap-carto stylesheet has been
released. It will be rolled out to the openstreetmap.org servers soon.
Changes include:
* Buildings are now rendered in a much lighter colour
* Airport labels are rendered in a different colour
* The tag natural=mud is
Dear all,
Happy new year to all of you!
I'm not sure if we decided anything about the monthly meeting in the Bull
tonight? I suppose because of the New Year and our meeting this Saturday we
won't meet tonight, but just wanted to verify.
-- Matthijs
On 1 January 2015 at 16:50, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Are you sorted for Saturday or do you need a lift?
I arranged for Jerry to pick me up from Burton.
-- Matthijs
___
Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list
On 21 December 2014 at 12:33, SomeoneElse li...@atownsend.org.uk wrote:
I'd be tempted to add OSM notes for these containing a link to the problem
node or way since http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1117527074 hasn't been
touched for four years; it's likely that other shops have changed hands
On 29 December 2014 at 17:42, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Also if anyone wants to do some mapping from home before we head out there's
quite a bit to be done aligning roads, mapping landuse and/or tracing
buildings.
I have traced the buildings in Hanbury.
-- Matthijs
On 29 December 2014 at 17:42, Rob Nickerson rob.j.nicker...@gmail.com wrote:
Also if anyone wants to do some mapping from home before we head out there's
quite a bit to be done aligning roads, mapping landuse and/or tracing
buildings.
I have traced the buildings in Hanbury.
-- Matthijs
1 - 100 of 226 matches
Mail list logo