The correct tagging seems to be straight forward:
tourism=alpine_hut indicates that there is a "Permanent human presence during
the opening period from staff to provide services"
(http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:tourism%3Dalpine_hut).
tourism=wilderness_hut means that there are sleepin
If the path exists then shouldn't it be tagged access=no + foot=yes?
From:"fors...@ozonline.com.au"
Date:Thu, 30 Jul, 2015 at 11:53
Subject:Re: [talk-au] Unauthorised bike trails in national parks
Thanks for the replies
The track exists and is mappable. It is not blocked off.
Parks Vic prefe
After much head scratching, reading the wiki and tagging mail-list the best I
could come up with is:
type = restriction
restriction:conditional= no_left_turn @ length > 19
See: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Conditional_restrictions
However I can see two problems:
1. There are only 11 restrict
> At 220 km/h average speed you would need to pull over and wait some 5 minutes
> 13.04 seconds to be 'safe' (from a fine).
If you are driving a car you don't even need to bother to wait. Currently in
NSW point-to-point cameras are only used to check heavy vehicle speeds. ___
I'd prefer going with access rather than opening_hours for a couple of reasons:
1. Opening_hours is more geared towards POIs whereas access applies to ways
(which is what the wiki entry for opening_hours hints at).2. Putting in
opening_hours="Closed during Total Fire Ban days" causes the JOSM va
I'm an eejit; JOSM only complains if you don't escape the comment in the
opening_hours value with quotation marks. So your tag will quite happily
survive.
On Friday, 25 September 2015, 16:16, Andrew Davidson
wrote:
I'd prefer going with access rather than open
You might as well clean it up as somebody is eventually going to find it here:
http://keepright.ipax.at/report_map.php?schema=50&error=56568170
and do it anyway.
On Wednesday, 30 September 2015, 19:31, Andrew Harvey
wrote:
Currently Melbourne Airport appears in the database twice,
It's easier to go with the WMS versions by choosing add WMS and pointing at:
http://maps.six.nsw.gov.au/arcgis/services/public/NSW_Imagery/MapServer/WMSServer?request=GetCapabilities&service=WMS
for the aerial imagery.
http://maps.six.nsw.gov.au/arcgis/services/public/NSW_Base_Map/MapServer/WMSServ
Rather ironically I'm about half a dozen suburbs from completing Sydney. When
I started other people had done about 25% of the suburbs and I carried on with
their approach of using the existing OSM map features that corresponded to the
boundaries which are mostly streets, property boundaries an
Having done a bit of reading I think it may be more polite to use the TMS
version of the layers. It would appear that the WMS version requires processing
on the server side where as the TMS version is just pointing to pre-rendered
images.
The base map address is below in Cam's email. The corres
Can we have something simplier, like map.lpi.nsw.gov.au or
imagery.lpi.nsw.gov.au? If people want to import the vector data then we'd have
to tag that differently (and go through the import process).
The date is a bit of a problem as it's going to be any date after now. If you
tag your changese
-au] NSW LPI layers in JOSM was Re: Explicit Permission to use NSW Land
and Property Info...[talk-au] NSW LPI layers in JOSM was Re: Explicit
Permission to use NSW Land and Property Information data in JOSM Andrew
Davidson u887 at yahoo.com Sun Dec 6 09:22:17 UTC 2015 |
| |
| View on lists.opens
Attribution/New South Wales Government Data/FullLetter - OpenStreetMap Wiki
| |
| | | | | |
| Attribution/New South Wales Government Data/FullLetter - OpenStreetMap
WikiReturn-Path: Received: from compute2.internal
(compute2.nyi.internal [10.202.2.42]) by sloti37d2t06 (Cyrus
3.0.0-be
>Something is wrong with my mailing program... :-[
>I have just checked on the talk_au archive on the web ...
>I am missing a few messages .. one of which makes Andrews' position
>clear. Apologises to those concerned!
It's not just your mail program, I'm finding that not all of the list messa
It has been pointed out to me (see OpenStreetMap | Changeset: 33674611) that we
don't have explicit permission to use any of the Vic Data products. I've tried
contacting them without any success. It would appear that others have managed
to get them to respond (see this thread [OSM-legal-talk] An
You're not likely to get much of a response from the editors you contacted. The
Barrington Tops boundary was drawn in by a user that hasn't edited for 5 years.
http://osm.mapki.com/history/way.php?id=25968044
An the Myall edits about 2 years old.
The Blue Mountains boundary dates back to 2012:
As Prof. Farnsworth would say: Good news people.
It seems that some time in mid-December Australia was added to the
countries being analysed by Osmose:
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/errors/?country=australia&item=
The map is here:
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/map/
It's interesting
The short answer is no.
The longer answer is that there currently doesn't seem to be one
method that has been accepted:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Indoor_Mapping
Early last year I started looking into this to see if it was a way of
fixing all of the impossible oneways, almost connects,
If you tag a way highway=footway you're indicating that bicycles
can't use it. In OSM defaults that apply to a country seem to be
allowed (ie: drive on the left, roundabouts go clockwise),
unfortunately bicycle access is a state-by-state thing so we probably
should tag for it.
You can go overboar
Looking at the old Parish map it would appear that it used to be part
of the State Forest until they built the Mangrove Creek Dam at which
point it became reserved for water conservation purposes.
I suppose you could tag it:
boundary=protected_area protect_class=12
Not sure what name you'd give i
a single
area (of water)... if there was no water there .. then yes it would
drain to a single point.)
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/catchment
regards
m
On Fri, Jan 15, 2016 at 12:06 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
On 15/01/2016 2:19 PM, Andrew Davidson wr
On 16/01/16 11:47, Nev Wedding wrote:
Though I don’t know the area you refer to, I feel landuse=water_catchment is an
excellent choice and is the correct tag for an area that has a capture of water
as specific defined use as already stated on
https://www.wyong.nsw.gov.au/getmedia/7ca695e8-748d
of an
> import and/or the current LPI layers unsuitable for the tracing
> process.
>
> Some links to where to find more info on this topic would be
> appreciated. ___
> Talk-au mailing list
> Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
> http
or the current LPI layers unsuitable for the tracing
process.
Some links to where to find more info on this topic would be
appreciated. _______
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
--
Andrew Davidson
Links:
--
[1] mailto:u.
However you may want to upload one, provide a link to it and then
see what others think.
Cheers
Ross
On 22 Jan 2016, at 11:36 PM, Andrew Davidson <
[5]u...@internode.on.net [6]> wrote:
You can extract the geometries from the database directly, you don't
have to scan t
y 393301771 and see if I can reduce
>> its size.
>>
>> On 24/01/2016 4:46 PM, Nev Wedding wrote:
>
> Your work flow using the geometries has worked very well for me with the LPI
> data and the last bit regarding the merging each item separately into the
> exis
border=protected_area is the way to go. The protect_class 1 to 6 are based on
the IUCN categories so you can use this:
https://www.environment.gov.au/land/nrs/science/capad/2014
to figure out which one to use.
For example Livingstone SCA is IUCN II so it's protect_class=2.
This will make you
I think it's more a case of tuning the threshold for what gets reported.
The hard part is trying to figure out exactly what is being used as the
measure. I guess another look at the code may be required...
Is there a forum or mailing list where people can ask questions about
what Osmose is pro
The one example I can remember is Frost Lane:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-33.70979/150.37546
Which is "First Lane" on the LPI map but the street sign at the end disagrees.
On 22 Feb 2016 12:35, Mark Pulley wrote:
>
> Someone (thanks) has sent me a couple of links including Google
>
There was an import of NSW places from the GNB database done back in
2008 with a helpful wiki page ;-)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NSW_Geographic_Names_Import
I'm proposing to review these to see what's changed in the last 8 years
but I've run into a number of problems:
1. It would se
On 7/4/16 11:43, Ian Sergeant wrote:
Hi,
What are you actually trying to achieve here?
As I understand, the purpose of the original GNB update was slot in
GNB names where OSM didn't already have coverage.
If there is already a town/village/suburb/locality in OSM, and it is
already well locat
ded again.
On 7 April 2016 at 11:30, Andrew Davidson mailto:u...@internode.on.net>> wrote:
There was an import of NSW places from the GNB database done back in
2008 with a helpful wiki page ;-)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/NSW_Geographic_Names_Import
I'm proposing
een imported to begin with and certainly
shouldn't be added again.
On 7 April 2016 at 11:30, Andrew Davidson mailto:u...@internode.on.net>> wrote:
There was an import of NSW places from the GNB database done back in
2008 with a helpful wiki page ;-)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/
I've just noticed that this user:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/aaronsta
has been busily importing a number of Landgate data sets into OSM.
The problem is that these are licenced under these terms:
http://slip.landgate.wa.gov.au/Documents/SLIPTransactionPersonalUseLicence.pdf
Which strict
If you are going to bring in any more administrative boundaries can we
please do them as a formal import. If there was one thing that I learnt
from the experience of doing the NSW ones is that bringing them in
manually is a massive PITA.
On 26/06/16 10:11, cleary wrote:
Thanks to Simon and An
Just a gentle reminder that there is a list of steps that you have to go
through before you start importing data into OSM*:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
*Yeap I realise I'm being a terrible hypocrite here. I think we managed
to achieve two out of the five steps require
a. Do the import guidelines apply to all data from other sources
even when only individual items are being added to OSM at any one time?
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016, at 03:22 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
Just a gentle reminder that there is a list of steps that you have to go
through before you start impo
but after that
it was an import.
On 11/07/16 18:35, Warin wrote:
By this definition opening bing imagery and 'importing' a single
roundabout, a track, a building outline etc would each need to be
compliant with the import guidelines.
On 7/11/2016 5:27 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
From t
Is the problem CC 4.0 or is it the riders that have been added? I'm just
wondering if this is a general problem with the other data sets on
data.gov.au.
On 10/07/16 14:06, cleary wrote:
Feedback from the legal-talk list is that the reply from the Department
of Prime Minister and Cabinet is not
It's interesting because it highlights one of the foundation myths of
OSM; which is that it uses the "WGS84" co-ordinate system. This is a
convenient myth and if you're talking about only mapping to the nearest
5m then it is in effect true. However, once you start talking about
sub-metre accura
WGS84 is a datum fixed; as in dated 1984 and the data does not change.
I'm not sure that you've understood exactly what a semi-dynamic datum
is. Have a read of this:
http://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1142/paper6.pdf
particularly sections 3.4 and 3.5.
Or you have access to survey points/marks and the
You may reproduce the contents of this website in your web browser (and
in any cache file produced by your web browser) for the sole purpose of
viewing the content.
Good gravy. I've seen some stoopid terms and conditions but really?
You're granting me the right to render your website for the pu
(BTW, is there any way of
searching the list archives, apart from looking at every thread in each
month?).
1. You can try:
site:lists.openstreetmap.org/pipermail/talk-au thing I'm looking for
in Google but results are not so reliable.
2. Nabble has a searchable version of the list:
http://g
I've recently stumbled across another user
(http://www.openstreetmap.org/user/andy_88) who seems to be in the
process of importing a data set from Landgate.
Another user and I have left several changeset comments but so far
haven't received a reply.
I suspect that the easy availability of da
d follow the
Import Guidelines.
On 23/08/16 07:38, David Findlay wrote:
Stupid question really. Is it possible to talk to the WA Govt and get
official permission to use Landgate data? Or has that already been
pursued? Thanks,
David
On Tue, Aug 23, 2016 at 7:37 AM Andrew Davidson mailto:thesw.
On 31/08/16 21:23, Leon Kernan wrote:
> After all that, i'd only tag a turn restriction if there is a sign
> advising such.
That's a nice theory but it does mean that there is no way to tell if
you are allowed to drive from one incoming way to another outgoing way.
Turn restrictions are, afte
On 01/09/16 09:37, Nick Hocking wrote:
Ok so how do we "ensure that routing engines embody the regional rule:?
The regional rule won't help in this case. All that the routing engine
can see are the nodes connected by ways. In NSW the rule is that you
can't do a u-turn at traffic lights an
On 01/09/16 23:25, Ross wrote:
The regional rule won't help in this case. All that the routing engine
can see are the nodes connected by ways. In NSW the rule is that you
can't do a u-turn at traffic lights
and in the rest of Australia as well
Come and visit Canberra; u-turns at traffic li
On 2/9/16 13:54, John Henderson wrote:
Only where specifically permitted.
Fair point. I wonder when the rule changed? It's been a looong time
since I last did a road rules test.
Perhaps I should have said feel free to do u-turns at the lights, it's
not legal but everyone else does and no o
I think the important thing is that you should spend your time on
mapping things that interest you; you are after all volunteering your
time. Some people like adding new things, some are interested in
railways, MTB tracks, or the electricity network, some are into micro
mapping every tree, hous
Sorry I chopped off the last line of my email, which was one view on the
answer to your question:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Workflow_suggestions
On 2016-10-27 23:26, Luke Picciau wrote:
Hi, This is my first time posting to a mailing list so sorry if I mess
it up.
I just found out abo
On 2016-10-28 11:38, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
and finally if you find yourself running out of stuff to map; consider
data collection via Mapillary or OpenStreetView.
LOL. If you run out of things to map there's about 16,000 osmose issues
to deal with in SA:
http://osmose.openstreetmap.fr/en/er
It's pretty simple:
1. Admin level 6 boundaries are supposed to enclose a "Local Government
Authority".
2. In NSW the only form of "Local Government Authority" are councils
incorporated under the Local Government Act.
3. The areas covered by these councils are "incorporated areas".
4. The
On 2016-12-21 11:01, Warin wrote:
So the governance is irrelevant to the issue ... the area is managed by
'something' ..that 'something' should be treated the same way in OSM
for the same function.
The area is managed by the State of New South Wales and there is already
a admin_level 4 bounda
On 2016-12-21 14:53, Warin wrote:
On 21-Dec-16 11:38 AM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
On 2016-12-21 11:01, Warin wrote:
So the governance is irrelevant to the issue ... the area is managed by
'something' ..that 'something' should be treated the same way in OSM
for the same fun
On 2016-12-21 15:30, Warin wrote:
There is an authority that performs the role of a 'local council' in
these areas ... I don't care what it is called.
There is in effect a 'local council' there, it is not 'no mans' land',
the 'wild west' etc.
Nice straw man there... Who said that no council e
On 2016-12-21 15:57, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Just want to point out the advice from the wiki:
/Don't map your local legislation, if not bound to objects in reality/
/Things such as local traffic rules should only be mapped through the
objects which represent these rules on the ground, e.g. a traf
On 2016-12-21 16:19, Warin wrote:
Then how do you then separate out the TWO 'unincorporated areas' in NSW ??
I don't care...provided that you don't use an admin_level 6 boundary.
May I suggest admin_level=-6 ?
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@o
On 2016-12-21 16:28, Warin wrote:
:-[
Opps .. line on a map that does not represent what I though it did
only one in NSW... on the mainland.
Nah, you were right the first time. Lord Howe Island is unincorporated.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk
The metadata says that it includes roads maintained by Main Roads and
"all roads controlled by Local Government (Local Roads) that are
assigned road numbers", which is great. It also has "other centreline is
also included for paths and unknown roads" which is a bit vague as to
how complete the
On 23/12/16 09:50, cleary wrote:
I suggest a simple one-word change in the wiki so that Level 6
administrative boundaries in Australia would read "Local Government Area
Border (e.g Shire/Council)" replacing "Local Government Authority Border
(e.g Shire/Council)" clarifying that we map the area
On 28/12/16 17:51, cleary wrote:
Perhaps I might
have suggested different wording such as "local administrative
districts including but not limited to shires, cities and municipalities".
Fine, so long as you understand that none of those terms covers
unincorporated areas.
___
On 28/12/16 17:51, cleary wrote:
In suggesting the term "Local Government Area", I was thinking of areas
as shown in the Local Government Areas (LGA) datasets issued by state
and territory governments
The LGA dataset have metadata in them that indicate whether or not an
area has a form of l
On 29/12/16 09:08, cleary wrote:
I have a different view about whether the unincorporated areas actually
exist. They have defined boundaries and names, both assigned by the
respective State governments, and included in the LGA datasets. I have
seen the boundaries signposted when travelling in
On 30/12/16 10:44, Warin wrote:
It does have an administration that performs the function of a 'local
government authority'.
There is an administration that performs the function of a 'local
administration' .
The authority exercised is, in OSM terms, a level 6 authority.
The 'best fit' is
On 3/1/17 13:24, Warin wrote:
Near as I can figure .. your joking.
No I'm being serious. Your proposal is to use level 6 to map the entity
"that performs the function of a 'local government authority'". In the
case of the western part of NSW this is the New South Wales Government.
That sa
Appears that the names are "correct"
(http://www.stirling.wa.gov.au/Recreation/Parks-and-reserves/Parks%20and%20reserves%20forms%20and%20information/Reserve%20Information%20and%20Booking%20Forms/Playground%20brochure.pdf)
But the names can be with/without a hyphen/slash depending on which page
So you want to put these areas into OSM, fair enough. But why do we have
to break the definition of admin_level 6 when there are three
admin_levels that are currently undefined, unusable, or redundant?
Another option is admin_level 7 which is currently so vaguely defined
that we could come wit
This lists the publicly available address datasets:
https://github.com/openaddresses/openaddresses/tree/master/sources/au
None of which we can currently use in OSM. The NSW LPI Base Map has
street numbers on it if you zoom in close enough and we do have
permission to use these.
Otherwise the
Here's the thread from the last time this was discussed:
https://www.mail-archive.com/talk-au@openstreetmap.org/msg10021.html
Tracks are supposed to be usable by two-track vehicles:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:highway%3Dtrack
so they should be downgraded to path.
Access=discourag
On 13/1/17 11:21, Warin wrote:
That would also suggest that states and territories should be in
separate levels.
Why? the current definition for level 4 is:
"State or Territory Border"
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://l
On 13/1/17 11:51, Andrew Harvey wrote:
I agree with this. The difference between unincorporated or not could be
added by a new tag to indicate
Or we could not break the model and use a different admin_level.
, could be determined from the name,
Thus requiring the data consumer to parse the
If the street sign at the end says Smith St then that should go in as
the name tag. Lalbert Kerang Rd can go in as the alt_name tag.
On 16/01/17 10:30, Simon Slater wrote:
G'day all,
We needed our daughter to pick something up from Lalbert and since she
had never driven there herself, w
It's also a little unnecessary as the current renderer does a reasonable
job of making the place names appear and then disappear as you zoom in.
The place where most people want to go gets a little fuzzy the bigger
the settlement gets. Just for a laugh I asked for directions to "Sydney":
Goog
On 25/01/17 22:05, Andrew Harvey wrote:
As for the pontoon, per
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:man_made%3Dpier "The
man_made=pier tag is used for a raised walkway over water supported by
pillars made of metal/wood, or floating and secured using chains",
plus floating=yes
It would de
Good news people. There seems to have been a surge in the number of new
mappers in Australia:
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?country=3&hours=96&mappingdays=10&tsearch=&anyobj=t&comp=%3E&value=1000&action=c&obj=n#5/-30.600/148.425
and they all seem to be *very* interested in makin
at most would have previously marked
as cycleways to aid cycle routing are now being changed to footways. Most of
my osm editing time is taken up trying to fix all these poor edits.
Hopefully all these new editors gain experience and become a valued
editing force.
Nev
On 27 Jan 2017, at 8:52 PM
something like a ladder?
Swimming area is also something I plan on marking as these swimming
areas do have buoys on like a cable around the perimeter marking the
boundary.
Thank you to everyone for their input so far, the help is very much
appreciated.
On 26 Jan. 2017 21:14,
On 28/01/17 10:43, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote:
consist of a floating boom suspending an underwater net, surrounding the
designated area.
Turns out I can't read If it's got a net then I guess it's barrier=net.
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@ope
edits.
Cheers, Cameron
On 27/01/2017 9:52 PM, Andrew Davidson wrote:
Good news people. There seems to have been a surge in the number of
new mappers in Australia:
http://resultmaps.neis-one.org/osm-suspicious?country=3&hours=96&mappingdays=10&tsearch=&anyobj=t&comp=%3E&
One of OsmCha checks is for adding or editing a path so you can get a
list of those in Australia with an appropriate BBOX:
http://osmcha.mapbox.com/?bbox=113.1%2C-43.7%2C153.7%2C-10.6+&is_suspect=True&is_whitelisted=True&harmful=False&checked=False&reasons=21
Have a look at the filter options f
Just a heads up to let you know that we have received permission to use
Geoscience Australia's CC-BY datasets in OSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Geoscience_Australia
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lis
Now that we have permission from GA does anyone have an interest in
finishing this import:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/2369652#map=8/-42.604/146.706
(Or maybe the trees in Tassie do stop at a north-south line).
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk
o be used in OSM.
So thank you Andrew Davidson for following up about this:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/Department_of_the_Environment_and_Energy_CAPAD#Follow-up_Email
<https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/Department_of_the_Environment_and_Energy_CAPAD#Follow-up_Email&
Quick update: I haven't received a reply as yet and I was going to
follow up with another email.
On 15/2/17 19:57, Andrew Harvey wrote:
CC BY is not enough for inclusion in OSM at the moment see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility
It looks like Andrew has reached out t
Further updates:
1. I'm not as good at this as Mr Cleary.
2. We've received a response from the ACT:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/Australian_Capital_Territory
I think we're good to go but are others happy to remove the "waiting on
confirmation" from the Contributors listing
The good folks at DoEE have been more helpful and have given us
permission to use future releases of CAPAD under the same terms. Given
that the next release of CAPAD is due out in a number of weeks it raises
the question should we wait and then do an import?
Assuming that the community thinks
On 18/2/17 11:59, cleary wrote:
>
I would prefer incremental additions, that is one-by-one, after checking
what is already on the map.
My major concern with any mass import is the effect on existing data. In
particular where a new way is overlaid on an existing way, making
editing more difficu
There being no objections I have removed the "awaiting confirmation"
from the Contributors page:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Australian_Capital_Territory_Government_data
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://l
I have added some instructions to the wiki on how to use the 2016 aerial
imagery of Canberra in JOSM:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:source%3DACT2016
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/
that it could be used in iD and other editors that don't support WMS
servers. We (SOSM) would likely offer, but it doesn't really make sense
to ship the bits around half the globe and back again.
Simon
Am 12.03.2017 um 03:16 schrieb Andrew Davidson:
I have added some instructions to t
Sigh...I was hoping that no-one would ever re-open the data.gov.au
permission can of worms.
The general view is that to use CC-BY data in OSM we need explicit
permission from the *rights holder*
(https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/ODbL_Compatibility).
data.gov.au is a dataset aggregat
Using the 2014 CAPAD data I have created example osm files for
Queensland for your perusal and comment. The files are available here:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/0B7Y8oxDzqhyNMkFCRWhLQmIwZzQ?usp=sharing
The whole state is in capad2014_qld.osm.gz and I have attempted to split
the dat
First place to start is to read this:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines
Second thing to read:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OpenRailwayMap
Which has links to the tagging scheme for railways and Australia specific
railway tagging.
The hardest part of the process is confla
Yeap, it was a undiscussed import from a dataset we don't have
permission to use in OSM. Don't be surprised if you see a large number
of LGA boundaries disappear in Queensland as well (same story...private
import from dataset we can't use).
On 26/04/17 21:36, Simon Poole wrote:
Not sure if an
TL;DR summary:
I'm happy to use E.123 international format for phone numbers or local
format if they are not able to be called from overseas.
On 6/9/17 21:07, Phil (The Geek) Wyatt wrote:
> I think this is the correct format is it not?
>
>
>
> +61 3 6109 4621
It depends. Like most things it
I noticed that someone had already set up a MapRoulette Challenge to fix
phone numbers in Australia that aren't in the correct format. However
there are about 3500 of them to check and it seems pointless to use
human brain power to fix the ones that can be fixed by a machine just as
well.
Wit
These are the numbers that aren't in a valid international or local
format. They are "odd" in some way. Including a whole bunch of
highway=emergency_access_point phone=000 (whatever that is supposed to
mean?).
On 08/09/17 19:45, Warin wrote:
On 08-Sep-17 07:36 PM, Andrew Da
On 7/10/17 08:59, Warin wrote:
Rather inconsistent!
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Biniguy,_New_South_Wales says the
population 2011 was over 600.
Yeap, need to be careful when interpreting ABS data. In 2011 Biniguy was
a 2500 square kilometre locality and had a population of 625. By 2016
On 28/11/17 12:08, Andrew Harvey wrote:
Sounds fine to me, especially given most NSW national parks have already
been imported via the LPI Base Map as you pointed out.
You can use both leisure=nature_reserve and boundary=protected_area. I'm
not familiar with that reserve but you'll need to p
1 - 100 of 322 matches
Mail list logo
