+ 1 for a wiki page about landuse/landcover mapping in Belgium.
I once found this interesting page about mapping the environnement in OSM
in Ukraine:
http://www.50northspatial.org/map-nature-openstreetmap-approaches-issues-key-tags/.
I think the OSM tagging should be adapted to countries/ecoregion
On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 8:42 AM, joost schouppe
wrote:
> That is just an example. Basically I would wish we had a wiki page as
> detailed as the one about bicycle lane tagging for landuse and related
> stuff.
I agree on the need of a wiki page with lot's and lot's of photos to
get a better unders
> My garden is a forest (really) and also, well, my garden; and then also
part
> of a residential area.
You could use the all of the following tags on the area of your garden:
landuse=residential
leisure=garden
access=private
landcover=trees
leaf_cycle=
leaf_type=
as a wrote a few months before,
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 9:39 PM, joost schouppe
wrote:
> My garden is a forest (really) and also, well, my garden; and then also part
> of a residential area.
You could use the all of the following tags on the area of your garden:
landuse=residential
leisure=garden
access=private
landcover=trees
On Sun, Mar 26, 2017 at 9:29 PM, Karel Adams wrote:
> Better to give less but reliable detail. "landuse=meadow" could be used in
> some specific cases, like aerodromes.
and fields where they keep cows, horses, or sheep.
___
Talk-be mailing list
Talk-be
>
> Teach me how I can determine the right tags from imagery. During my
> lunch break today I was working on the area south of the Pierstraat
> and north of Voetweg 32 http://osm.org/go/0EpHov3c-- and further to
> the east/north east.
> I wonder which tags others would use for the areas covered wit
On 26/03/17 19:10, Marc Gemis wrote:
here is another example I met today
location : http://osm.org/go/0ErT_~pXR-?m=
picture: https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2017/2017-03-26-Dessel/i-VvGqfPV/A
It's clear that the left part on the picture (north on the map) is
cultivated land, the grass is green
here is another example I met today
location : http://osm.org/go/0ErT_~pXR-?m=
picture: https://xian.smugmug.com/OSM/OSM-2017/2017-03-26-Dessel/i-VvGqfPV/A
It's clear that the left part on the picture (north on the map) is
cultivated land, the grass is greener. I assume it is
landuse=farmland. I
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 5:04 PM, joost schouppe
wrote:
>>
>> Please help me with the cleanup of the area around Reet. I honestly
>> cannot remap all landuse=farm there based on imagery, although I know
>> the area more or less. :-)
>
>
> I'll have a look :)
> What would you prefer for "unsure from
Why would you do the mechanical edit ? Just so osm.org does not show
white areas ? Or is there another reason ?
m
On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 4:42 PM, Ben Laenen wrote:
> On Friday, 24 March 2017 15:43:47 CET Marc Gemis wrote:
>> That's what some want to do in The Netherlands, a mechanical edit from
>
> > I'm mostly talking as data consumer here. I'd like to know if there are
> > cows, plants or cows-or-plants.
>
> When mappers always use farmland for crops and meadow for cows (or
> horses), the data consumer will never find an area cows-or-plants.
>
yes, that's exactly what I would like to s
>
>
> > That's what some want to do in The Netherlands, a mechanical edit from
> > farm to farmland.
>
> That's what I would do. Yes, mechanical edits are bad, but a lot of the
> landuse data isn't really that accurate to begin with and would need
> improvement anyway, especially when landuse=farm
On Friday, 24 March 2017 15:43:47 CET Marc Gemis wrote:
> That's what some want to do in The Netherlands, a mechanical edit from
> farm to farmland.
That's what I would do. Yes, mechanical edits are bad, but a lot of the
landuse data isn't really that accurate to begin with and would need
improv
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 9:11 PM, Jakka wrote:
> landuse=meadow
> landuse=grass
> landuse=farmland
> landuse=* plantgrowing
> landuse=
>
> When you are living the countryside, I see every season that the farmer use
> the crop rotation most of the landuse you define will be wrong the ne
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 5:15 PM, joost schouppe
wrote:
> I'm mostly talking as data consumer here. I'd like to know if there are
> cows, plants or cows-or-plants.
When mappers always use farmland for crops and meadow for cows (or
horses), the data consumer will never find an area cows-or-plants.
Hi,
landuse=meadow
landuse=grass
landuse=farmland
landuse=* plantgrowing
landuse=
When you are living the countryside, I see every season that the farmer
use the crop rotation most of the landuse you define will be wrong
the next season.
My personal opinion
Op 22/03/2017 om 1
>
>
> > But I wonder if we
> > could tag things so that it stays easy to recognize "agricultural land of
> > which we're not sure whether it is grazing land or plant-growing land".
>
> You mean in case you are looking at an aerial image and want to colour
> a part of the map ?
> Or is this also a
In Wallonia, we are currently working at redoing most of the old stuff and
correcting errors, and landuse=farm is part of them. As we don't have good
landuse coverage, it is probably better to just not render these old "farm"
polygon (most of them overlap other zones or are badly traced). And we wi
On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 3:03 PM, joost schouppe
wrote:
> In Flanders, the convention seems to be landuse=meadow for grazing lands,
> and landuse=farmland for growing plants. That's not according to what the
> wiki says (farmland could be grazing land). But it does make it easy to
> differentiate.
Hi,
It looks like landuse=farm rendering is being removed from the standard map.
That means a huge hole is going to be visible in landuse mapping in Belgium
in a short while.
Most of landuse=farm is the oldest landuse mapping we have. It does not
differentiate between growing plants and raising
20 matches
Mail list logo
