2015-01-14 21:22 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be:
Perhaps I should try it out, I only tried out what it produces, so
it's
frustrating. I have the feeling from looking at the data that it
doesn't take the existing data into account, when someone marks a
2015-01-14 20:15 GMT+01:00 Glenn Plas gl...@byte-consult.be:
On 14-01-15 19:30, Jo wrote:
iD has many flaws, but one thing can't be beat about it. It provides
(new) users with an easy way to enter into our world.
Perhaps I should try it out, I only tried out what it produces, so it's
Perhaps I should try it out, I only tried out what it produces, so it's
frustrating. I have the feeling from looking at the data that it
doesn't take the existing data into account, when someone marks a
speed_camera, it's usually not connected to the way, but right on top of
On 14-01-15 19:30, Jo wrote:
iD has many flaws, but one thing can't be beat about it. It provides
(new) users with an easy way to enter into our world.
Perhaps I should try it out, I only tried out what it produces, so it's
frustrating. I have the feeling from looking at the data that it
This mapper just registered today. Even though he managed to 'destroy' some
data during his first attempts at editing the map, I believe our first
priority should be to welcome him in our midst. The second step is show him
the light and explain what JOSM is and how it's far superior to iD, LOL.
For a first time user, his edit wasn't actually _that_ bad. The shape
of the buildings was far better than mine, so I kept that.
We have to seize the opportunity on the OpenData conference in Namur to
get fresh blood in and warn about ID editor, promoting JOSM.
I only used the reverter plugin
one small mistake from your side :-)
building=residential is allowed, see
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dresidential
But if it was building=house (or another more specialised description)
before, it would be wrong to retag it of course.
regards
m
On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 5:49
I really start hating the ID editor + bing as a background. I completed
all streetnames/buildings on postal codes 1980/1981/1982
This changeset pretty much destroyed most of my work, simple buildings
are turned into multipolygons, building=residential.
Realigning the buildings is piece of
I know, just figured this out myself, I didn't know, I'll correct it.
14-01-15 17:54, Marc Gemis wrote:
one small mistake from your side :-)
building=residential is allowed,
see http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:building%3Dresidential
But if it was building=house (or another more
It's quite likely he doesn't know what a multipolygon is. iD creates those
for the user when they merge areas. That merging is meant to make holes
in areas.
So I guess he merges some form with another form, and iD creates a
multipolygon without the user knowing it.
The realigning of course is
On 14-01-15 18:04, Sander Deryckere wrote:
It's quite likely he doesn't know what a multipolygon is. iD creates
those for the user when they merge areas. That merging is meant to
make holes in areas.
Ok, great to know this, tx I didn't realise. ID also doesn't seem to
validate as the original
11 matches
Mail list logo
