[Talk-br] Padronização de tags DER

Todos os estados do país tem um DER (Departamento de Estradas de Rodagem) [1] ou equivalentes como DAER, DEER, Deinfra, Deter, entre outros, a depender do estado e até da própria administração pelo que tudo indica. Ao mapear tags específicas como zona_de_fiscalizacao=* e categoria_rodoviaria=* no

Re: [Talk-GB] Farmland (crop or animals)?

Humm What is it that needs to be tagged? Possibly some sub tags for tillage=yes/no/yearly/* ? to indicate if ploughed and if known how frequently produce:category=animal/plant to indicate the broad group of produce? This could then be applied to any 'landuse' ... no matter how it is tagged.

Re: [talk-cz] Update translation of Cs:Tag:route=hiking

Jednosměrné jsou též singltreky např https://openstreetmap.cz/#map=16/ 50.9279/15.2461=kKHG K tomu ale nebudeme mít vyfocené rozcestníky, jelikož tam mají pouze v centru mapu a po lese pouze značky. -- Původní e-mail -- Od: Jan Macura Komu: OpenStreetMap Czech Republic Datum: 25.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] les parties des camping ou d'une aire caravane

c'est exactement ca lien overpass pour se faciliter la vie https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Jka Le 24.05.19 à 22:46, deuzeffe a écrit : > Donc, si je comprends bien, pour le moment, > > - au vue de : > [out:json][timeout:600]; > {{geocodeArea:France Métropolitaine}}->.searchArea; >

Re: [talk-cz] Update translation of Cs:Tag:route=hiking

On Thu, 23 May 2019 at 08:33, wrote: > A mam takovy dojem, ze neco podobneho (minimalne v rovine doporuceneho > smeru) je na Broumovsku, u ruznych skalnich mest, kde by se lidi pri mijeni > zbytecne fackovali... Mozna i Adrspach... > Přesně to jsem si právě taky myslel, ale když jsem procházel

Re: [talk-cz] Is name=Automat na jizdenky MHD a good tagging?

Ahoj On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 23:25, Miroslav Suchý wrote: > Technicaly public_transport_tickets can be for any public transport. > Rails, boats, trams... so the name *can* specify this. In theory this > can be already specified by operator... > Yes, it can be justified, when it clarifies the

Re: [talk-au] cuisine tag fitting amenity=fast_food name=Oporto

On Sat, 25 May 2019 at 01:47, Mateusz Konieczny wrote: > Is there one that apply to every single location for this poi? > > What would be appropriate value for it? > Mainly chicken - they do offer other things as well, but if I had to pick 1 thing it would be chicken. "Nando's" is also

Re: [talk-cz] Is name=Automat na jizdenky MHD a good tagging?

Dne 24. 05. 19 v 21:54 Mateusz Konieczny napsal(a): > There is a group of 51 vending machines( http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JjV > ) tagged > > * amenity=vending_machine > * name=Automat na jizdenky MHD > * operator=DPMB > * payment:coins=yes > * vending=public_transport_tickets > > Is it a good

Re: [Talk-GB] Farmland (crop or animals)?

Fair enough, I agree that a wildflower meadow is a very pleasant place to be. However, I would still be more concerned to avoid the unpleasantness of walking through cropland where the path is variously ploughed under, utterly obscured by wheat or maize, or in the best case surfaced with heavy

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] les parties des camping ou d'une aire caravane

Donc, si je comprends bien, pour le moment, - au vue de : [out:json][timeout:600]; {{geocodeArea:France Métropolitaine}}->.searchArea; nwr["camp_site"][camp_site!=basic][camp_site!=standard][camp_site!=serviced][camp_site!=deluxe](area.searchArea); out meta;>;out meta qt; 2 cas principaux et

[talk-cz] Is name=Automat na jizdenky MHD a good tagging?

There is a group of 51 vending machines( http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/JjV ) tagged * amenity=vending_machine * name=Automat na jizdenky MHD * operator=DPMB * payment:coins=yes * vending=public_transport_tickets Is it a good idea to use name tag in this way? It

Re: [Talk-lv] estrādes

https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:leisure%3Dbandstand ? On Fri, May 24, 2019, 16:42 Rihards wrote: > Vai mēs nonācām pie vienošanās par to, kā tagot estrādes? > Derētu kas vienots visām, neatkarīgi no tā, vai ir jumts vai nav utt. > Un vēl būtu labs kas tāds, kas iekļautu arī skatītāju

Re: [Talk-it] highway=residential con access=permissive

no, "permissive" vuole dire che il proprietario potrebbe vietare l'accesso, > ma nelle strade private non è necessariamente così, possono essere > costretti a dover far passare la gente. > "permissive" in ogni caso non vuole dire che si vuole un permesso, al > contrario vuol dire che c'è un

Re: [Talk-it] highway=residential con access=permissive

On Fri, 24 May 2019 at 13:06, scratera wrote: > ..guardando i casi della mia zona sono tute strade in cui è permesso > l'accesso ai soli residenti > Che cosa vuole dire "solo residenti"? Accesso solo residenti per me è access=private (persone e vehicoli) O se si tratta di strade chiuse al

Re: [Talk-uy] Abitab - is it amenity=payment_centre or amenity=bureau_de_change?

Yes, sure they all are amenity=payment_centre, but in some of them you can also exchange money. Some use "Abitab" as name, but others, the older ones that existed before the brand was created have their own name and use "Abitab" as brand. So, besides tag "name", maybe tags "brand" and

Re: [Talk-uy] Abitab - is it amenity=payment_centre or amenity=bureau_de_change?

It's a payment center. They can not exchange money. El vie., 24 may. 2019 a las 13:21, Mateusz Konieczny (< matkoni...@tutanota.com>) escribió: > For start: sorry for using English. > > Abitab - is it amenity=payment_centre or amenity=bureau_de_change? Or both? > > * is amenity=payment_centre

[Talk-uy] Abitab - is it amenity=payment_centre or amenity=bureau_de_change?

For start: sorry for using English. Abitab - is it amenity=payment_centre or amenity=bureau_de_change? Or both? * is amenity=payment_centre sometimes preferable tagging for Abitab? * is amenity=bureau_de_change sometimes preferable tagging for Abitab? Is it maybe describing objects using the

Re: [OSM-ja] 北海道の廃線マッピングの対応について

[talk-au] cuisine tag fitting amenity=fast_food name=Oporto

Is there one that apply to every single location for this poi? What would be appropriate value for it? This brand may be described at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Oporto_(restaurant) I am asking as I want to improve

Re: [OSM-talk-be] join us at State of the Map

Talking about money: now is the time to buy your tickets: https://blog.openstreetmap.org/2019/05/24/sotm-2019-ticket-sales-opened/ Early bird community tickets are just 75 euro, which is probably less than the cost for the food you'll be getting during the event.

Re: [Talk-GB] Farmland (crop or animals)?

On Friday, 24 May 2019, SK53 wrote: > As a walker I appreciate walking through a real hay meadow full of > attractive flowers rather than a sterile green desert of rye grass. And as a walker a real meadow is a very nice place to sit down and enjoy a relaxing lunch or coffee break. Phil

Re: [Talk-GB] Farmland (crop or animals)?

As a walker I appreciate walking through a real hay meadow full of attractive flowers rather than a sterile green desert of rye grass. I think Dudley Ibbett made this point long ago about the Peak District. The difference is roughly equivalent to walking through a dark lifeless spruce plantation

[Talk-lv] estrādes

Vai mēs nonācām pie vienošanās par to, kā tagot estrādes? Derētu kas vienots visām, neatkarīgi no tā, vai ir jumts vai nav utt. Un vēl būtu labs kas tāds, kas iekļautu arī skatītāju reģionu (ar vai bez soliem). https://help.openstreetmap.org/questions/31186/how-to-tag-an-outdoor-stage min

Re: [Talk-se] Naturvårdsverkets nya Nationella MarktäckeData

Hej! Jag har bläddrat igenom samtliga kommuner för att uppskatta vilka områden inte behöver någon dataimport eftersom de redan är helt kartlagda eller av en annan anledning. Jag har fyllt i detta in i tabellen:

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

On 24/05/2019 10:41, Phil Wyatt wrote: Hi Folks, As a relatively new OSM editor, I tend to agree with the explicit tagging rather than implicit - it should help folks learn tags much faster Hi Phil 1) Even for newbies, common sense should tell you that railway=platforms are for the purpose

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

On 24/05/2019 09:27, Wiklund Johan wrote: As a frequent mapper of public transport features, I agree with the opinions of Markus. Adding footway to the platform serves no purpose but to please poorly built routing engines. Whole heartedly agree. There are far too many routers who can't be

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

On Fri, 2019-05-24 at 08:27 +, Wiklund Johan wrote: > As a frequent mapper of public transport features, I agree with the > opinions of Markus. Adding footway to the platform serves no purpose > but to please poorly built routing engines. I concur

Re: [Talk-GB] Tools to support solar panel mapping?

My bad. No IDs in the recent fit reports, but they *used* to publish them. The September 2016 files show the fit ID. https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/environmental-programmes/fit/contacts-guidance-and-resources/public-reports-and-data-fit/installation-reports Best, Rob

Re: [talk-cz] Upgrade OsmHiCheck

Dne 23. 05. 19 v 14:10 Tom Ka napsal(a): > - nove ukazuje nenafocene mapy, infotabule a emergency body Tohle me osobne vadi. Resp. ze to nejde oddelit. Kdyz se divam kam se podivam na vylet, kde chybi fotky rozcestniku, tak se mi do toho motaji ty mapy a tabule, ktere maji pro me vyrazne nizsi

Re: [OSM-ja] 北海道の廃線マッピングの対応について

＞現地にもほぼ記載がない、あるいは調べることができないけれども事実である、というものがあると思っていて。 ＞例えばpower関連のviltageタグや、railwayで使われるgauge, frequency, voltageタグあたりは ＞現地の記載ではなく、かなりの確率で、なにかしらの情報源を参照しているであろう、と思っていたりします。 私は、インフラ系は特に業務に携わるなどにより詳しい人が多いので、目の前で何らかの資料を参照しなくても自分の知識のみでマッピングできる人もいるであろうと解釈しています。source=knowledgeかと。 muramoto

Re: [Talk-it] highway=residential con access=permissive

Il ven 24 mag 2019, 13:31 Martin Koppenhoefer ha scritto: > > > Am Fr., 24. Mai 2019 um 13:15 Uhr schrieb Francesco Ansanelli < > franci...@gmail.com>: > >> Buongiorno a tutti, >> Scusate l'intrusione, ma da residente in una strada privata potrei >> ipotizzare che sono permissive tutte le strade

Re: [OSM-ja] 北海道の廃線マッピングの対応について

＞JA:Available Dataのページにある「ウェブサイト上の店名、住所、電話番号など」が「事実情報」としてマッピング可能であるという記述からは、どのようなウェブサイトならば利用してよいのかということが読み取れないからです。 なるほど。たしかにこの記述から判断すると、『「Wikipediaに記載された名称」は「事実情報」としてマッピング可能である』と読み取れますね。気が付きませんでした。

Re: [Talk-GB] Farmland (crop or animals)?

It is well-known that meadows (hay meadows) are now a vanishingly small part of the British landscape. For instance in Nottinghamshire we have around 28 ha of MG4 grassland (the typical meadow plant community for meadows in the East Midlands). Work

Re: [Talk-it] highway=residential con access=permissive

Am Fr., 24. Mai 2019 um 13:15 Uhr schrieb Francesco Ansanelli < franci...@gmail.com>: > Buongiorno a tutti, > Scusate l'intrusione, ma da residente in una strada privata potrei > ipotizzare che sono permissive tutte le strade senza sbarre o cancelli. > no, "permissive" vuole dire che il

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

Hi Martin, PS – Is a meadow ‘used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians’? I think not, likewise is a carpark ‘used mainly or exclusively by pedestrians’ – again I think not. If there is a well worn path through the meadow then yes, or if there are designated footways through the carpark then

Re: [Talk-it] highway=residential con access=permissive

Buongiorno a tutti, Scusate l'intrusione, ma da residente in una strada privata potrei ipotizzare che sono permissive tutte le strade senza sbarre o cancelli. Quando è presente una sbarra chiusa non è permesso andare oltre. Spero possa essere una spiegazione utile. Saluti, Buon mapping Francesco

[OSM-talk] Update email address not working?

Some time back I changed my email address, but missed that the confirmation email never actually happened. Just tried to post and of cause the new email address got bounced to moderation. Checked my profile again and have twice had the messages about watching for email, but as yet no email ...

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

On 24/05/2019 09:27, Wiklund Johan wrote: As a frequent mapper of public transport features, I agree with the opinions of Markus. Adding footway to the platform serves no purpose but to please poorly built routing engines. Same here ... Routing for rail passengers should be handled correctly

Re: [Talk-it] highway=residential con access=permissive

..guardando i casi della mia zona sono tute strade in cui è permesso l'accesso ai soli residenti -- Sent from: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/Italy-General-f5324174.html ___ Talk-it mailing list Talk-it@openstreetmap.org

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

Hi Martin, So what are the explicit exceptions given the wiki says “Use public_transport=platform to identify the places where passengers board or alight from public transport of any type” which to me would also suggest that it’s

Re: [Talk-GB] Farmland (crop or animals)?

As a walker, the most important distinction in agricultural land (not including orchards) is whether it is tilled or otherwise reduced to bare earth, or whether grass is allowed to establish permanent root systems. How long or varied the grass is allowed to get really doesn't concern me,

Re: [OSM-ja] 北海道の廃線マッピングの対応について

石野です。 私も、wikipediaをソースとして事実情報を記すのは違法ではなくても規範としては避けるべきであるというスタンスであり、 「李下に冠を正さず」を全面的に支持します。但し、wikipediaソースの情報を直ちに削除すべきというのには反対であり、性善説で対応すべきと考えます。 というのは、JA:Available Dataのページにある「ウェブサイト上の店名、住所、電話番号など」が「事実情報」としてマッピング可能であるという 記述からは、どのようなウェブサイトならば利用してよいのかということが読み取れないからです。

[OSM-talk-fr] Fête nationale du breton à Langonnet et OSM

Comme en 2017, la Fête nationale du breton aura lieu à Langonnet (en Morbihan, près de Gourin et du Faouët), les 7-8-9 juin. L’association organisatrice, « Mignoned ar brezhoneg », veut montrer « qu’on peut tout faire en breton ». Comme il y a 2 ans, une petite équipe brittophone d’OSM sera

Re: [Talk-GB] Farmland (crop or animals)?

On 24/05/2019 10:43, Gregory Marler wrote: What is going on with landuse=farmland, and what are we going to do? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland With regard to tagging, I agree with a lot of what you say there, but I suspect that the first thing to do is to talk to

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

Am Fr., 24. Mai 2019 um 11:44 Uhr schrieb Phil Wyatt : > Hi Folks, > > As a relatively new OSM editor, I tend to agree with the explicit tagging > rather than implicit - it should help folks learn tags much faster The problem is that a platform is not a footway, at least not universally.

Re: [Talk-GB] Farmland (crop or animals)?

I have used farmland=pasture and farmland=arable to cover these cases. Other cases could be farmland=vineyard. Sadly too many mappers use meadow to describe pasture which is a shame as it would be good to be able to find real meadows. Obviously these cannot easily be armchaired. I don't

Re: [Talk-GB] Farmland (crop or animals)?

On 24/05/2019 10:43, Gregory Marler wrote: to me, meadow is a different to the common farm fields that have animals in. A meadow is likely longer grass, or encouraged to get long. It might be for flowers/wildlife rather than animals. Meadows, in farms, in a land use context, are for producing

[Talk-GB] Farmland (crop or animals)?

What is going on with landuse=farmland, and what are we going to do? https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:landuse%3Dfarmland It had a classic "map for the renderer" and "no blank spots on the map" problem. Armchair mappers found it important to map large swathes of farmland, which I don't

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

Hi Folks, As a relatively new OSM editor, I tend to agree with the explicit tagging rather than implicit - it should help folks learn tags much faster Cheers - Phil -Original Message- From: Wiklund Johan [mailto:johan.wikl...@entur.org] Sent: Friday, 24 May 2019 6:28 PM To: Talk

Re: [talk-cz] Upgrade OsmHiCheck

Jen doplnim, jedna se o 1546 rozcestniku, doplneno do kontrol, za chvili bude i v JSON a GPS, tak se projevi na osmap.cz. Bye pá 24. 5. 2019 v 11:19 odesílatel Tom Ka napsal: > > To je "v poradku". Rozcestnik https://osmap.cz/node/2527295361 nema > hiking=yes nebo obdobne, takze se nema k cemu

Re: [talk-cz] Upgrade OsmHiCheck

Jak psala Majka, tyhle fotky jeste cekaji na verifikaci. Jsem nekde v pulce 2016. Dokonceni se ted budu venovat, ale jak jsem psal, jsou to starsi, takze kdyz se nafoti, bude to jedine k uzitku. čt 23. 5. 2019 v 16:51 odesílatel Petr Vozdecký napsal: > > hlasim chybu v zobrazovani nenafocenych

Re: [talk-cz] Upgrade OsmHiCheck

To je "v poradku". Rozcestnik https://osmap.cz/node/2527295361 nema hiking=yes nebo obdobne, takze se nema k cemu parovat. Viz. co jsem psal v tom mailu. Je to tak, ze pro OSM body i fotky se de fakto vytvari instance pro jednotlive kategorie bodu jak jsem psal, pokud dany objekt nema

Re: [talk-cz] Upgrade OsmHiCheck

Krome odkazu, co poslali kluci taky archiv talk-cz. V nem je videt i ruzne zpusoby vyuzivani podle oblasti (dane KCT bunky?). Bye čt 23. 5. 2019 v 16:21 odesílatel Miroslav Suchy napsal: > > Dne 23. 05. 19 v 14:10 Tom Ka napsal(a): > > cyklo/silnicniho rozcestniku > > Jaky je rozdil mezi cyklo

Re: [OSM-talk] Remove validation rule asking to add highway=footway to railway/public_transport=platform

As a frequent mapper of public transport features, I agree with the opinions of Markus. Adding footway to the platform serves no purpose but to please poorly built routing engines. Regards Johan Wiklund Data manager johan.wikl...@entur.org www.entur.org -Original Message- From:

Re: [Talk-it-lazio] Incontro del 27/05/2019.

Io mi scuso se sono sparito dall'ultimo incontro. Purtroppo, come vi dicevo, siamo in pieno piano di riorganizzazione delle biblioteche e ci saranno a breve parecchi accorpamenti amministrativi, per questo non ho avuto molto tempo per dedicarmi alle mappe. Lunedì sera, se vi vedete, in ogni caso

Re: [Talk-GB] Tools to support solar panel mapping?

I note that the FiT register data does have the LLSOA for each entry. So I think that could be used as a means of measuring completeness in a more granular manner than local authority or the first half of the postcode. The OSM data can also be determined per LLSOA. Both the number of

Re: [OSM-ja] 信濃川リレーションに対するfixmeタグのコメントについて(Triglav2018さんとのやり取り)

いいだです。 やり取り、ありがとうございます。。 TL;DRになりそうなので、主張を整理します。 # Triglav2018さんの主張 ## 実施したいこと 以下2項目の編集 * 一級水系本流の109本 * 主要二級水系本流＋一級水系支流の100本程度 の計200件ほど（1本平均 4リレーションとして最終合計 800〜1000リレーション前後） 最終的に、Wikipedia側のマップ表示に、リレーションを表示させたい（？） ## 具体的な方法 1. 河川を描く際、waterwayリレーションに、riverbankエリアを含めたい 2.