Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

I finally managed to get in touch with one of the organisers, and raised the licensing/waiver issue. They've said they asked Planet Labs for the waiver, I've also independently reached out to the Planet Labs disasters contact with background on why OSM asks for the waiver and the waiver asking

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

Hi Andrew, are they (the organisers) aware of the licensing issues/requirements? Are they following here? Please engage with the discussion :-) On 6 February 2020 12:37:16 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey wrote: >I was corrected by someone off list, looks like they are planning on >mapping within OSM

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] zone résidentielle dans une zone résidentielle ?

Le 05/02/2020 à 21:58, osm.sanspourr...@spamgourmet.com a écrit : Les relations boundary place place neighbourhood (par exemple)

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"

aste exactly the replies to you? >> > (again at the risk of sounding like a broken record) I'd recommend > trying to make these comments in public, via changeset discussion > comments so that: > > * It's clear what the problem is, and which change actually introduced >the

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

On 6/2/20 3:21 pm, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 13:14, Andrew Harvey > wrote: Fair point, I didn't find it since it's not documented https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/damage#wiki. The two tags can coexist so I don't see a

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 13:14, Andrew Harvey wrote: > Fair point, I didn't find it since it's not documented > https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/damage#wiki. The two tags can > coexist so I don't see a problem with using damage as a quick and easy > method for new contributors. > As long as

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

Fair point, I didn't find it since it's not documented https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/keys/damage#wiki. The two tags can coexist so I don't see a problem with using damage as a quick and easy method for new contributors. On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 14:04, Phil Wyatt wrote: > The damage tag has

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

The damage tag has been widely used in past international events https://taginfo.openstreetmap.org/search?q=damage Oh for a standardised tagging system! From: Andrew Harvey Sent: Thursday, 6 February 2020 1:44 PM To: Phil Wyatt Cc: Stephen Backway ; talk-au Subject: Re:

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"

in the united states we call this a strip mall if you are walking on the outside one building sharing the same roof   but divided by fire walls, or just a mall if you are walking on the inside with multiple buildings in a central core.   as i see it that is not the problem it is the abuse of

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

The lifecycle prefix is the way to go https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lifecycle_prefix and has already been used fairly widespread to map impact from the current fire season. razed:building=* ruins:building=* On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 13:05, Phil Wyatt wrote: > Hi Folks, > > > > I am also not

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

Hi Folks, In past assessments such as this I think the actual event has also been tagged damage:event=’NSW Fires 2020’ A good paper on the accuracy of this type of remote capture work Section 3.1 seems to be the critical few paragraphs. It’s a few years ago and hopefully image

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

Hi Folks, I am also not sure that adding Damage=No is suitable for OSM either? If the building footprint already exists then add a "Damaged" tag with a value of "Yes" if it looks to have been impacted by fire or "No" if it has not been impacted by fire. If you are unsure do not enter a

Re: [talk-au] Transport for NSW (TfNSW)

Thanks for the feedback. I now realise that the easily accessible data from Transport NSW is NOT licensed under Creative Commons and I would need assistance to access the licensed data. Andrew, thanks for the offer to assist in accessing the data. However, on reflection, I don't think it

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

I was corrected by someone off list, looks like they are planning on mapping within OSM https://tasks.hotosm.org/project/7893. Now I have to scrabble to validate Planet Labs has provided the necessary permission for their imagery to be traced into OSM. On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 12:12, Andrew Harvey

Re: [talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

I sent an email to the contact email to ask for more information, but by the looks of it they aren't uploading anything to OpenStreetMap, they are creating their own datasets (which may or may not be released as open data, they haven't stated yet). It's unclear how they are planning on consuming

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping for emergency services

Mike N writes: >> If you consider an urban search and rescue team's mission, and a large >> scale event, buildings on a map can be extremely helpful for planning >> and operations where the accountability of many directed searches of >> structures is imperative. > > That's good information - I

[talk-au] SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon - Sunday 9th Feb

Hi group,   I just came across this Map-A-Thon by chance, apologies if it has been shared already and I missed it: https://sssi.org.au/fire-map-a-thon/about-map-a-thon   Extract from the above page: The SSSI National Bushfire Recovery Map-a-thon is being held on Sunday, 9th February, 2020

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping for emergency services

> On Feb 5, 2020, at 12:32 PM, Mike N wrote: > > On 2/5/2020 9:49 AM, Eric Christensen via Talk-us wrote: > >> For the record, my team(s) has many cartographic resources at our >> fingertips that we can use for search and rescue including, but not >> limited to: USGS 7.5' maps, National Park

Re: [talk-au] Transport for NSW (TfNSW)

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 10:58, Graeme Fitzpatrick wrote: > > > > On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 09:34, Andrew Harvey > wrote: > >> >> >>> 2. Depending on the answer to the above, do we need to add TfNSW to the >>> List of Conributors in the wiki? and does the waiver need to published in >>> the wiki? >>>

Re: [talk-au] Transport for NSW (TfNSW)

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 09:34, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > >> 2. Depending on the answer to the above, do we need to add TfNSW to the >> List of Conributors in the wiki? and does the waiver need to published in >> the wiki? >> > > Yes, if the data is used in OpenStreetMap, per the waiver agreement

Re: [talk-au] Transport for NSW (TfNSW)

On Thu, 6 Feb 2020 at 10:09, cleary wrote: > > Some Sydney bus routes have changed and I have modified a few by survey > (catching buses and recording routes and stops). Using TfNSW data would be > much easier. > > 1. Can I use the TfNSW data now to modify/add some local bus routes or do > we

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Interrogation base FINESS

Le 06/02/2020 à 00:30, marc marc a écrit : Le 06.02.20 à 00:15, deuzeffe a écrit : http://finess.sante.gouv.fr/fininter/jsp/index.jsp Merci pour vos tests ! test ok :) FF esr centos :) Grand merci ;) -- deuzeffe ___ Talk-fr mailing list

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Interrogation base FINESS

Le 06.02.20 à 00:15, deuzeffe a écrit : > http://finess.sante.gouv.fr/fininter/jsp/index.jsp > > Merci pour vos tests ! > test ok :) FF esr centos :) ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-fr

[Talk-in] AI Assisted Road Mapping

Hello OSM India community, I'm part of the Map With AI team at Facebook. We are working with RMSI to map roads in major cities throughout the country. RMSI will be doing the bulk of the mapping work as they are an Indian team with local knowledge of the country but my team may also assist from

[OSM-talk-fr] Interrogation base FINESS

'soir, J’essaie d'interroger la base FINESS (http://finess.sante.gouv.fr/fininter/jsp/index.jsp ) et y récupérer des ref. kivonbien mais la console (FF, Debian ou windows, ou Chromium) me renvoie une avalanche d'erreurs "js" C'est moi ou bien ? Merci pour vos tests ! -- deuzeffe -

Re: [talk-au] Transport for NSW (TfNSW)

Some Sydney bus routes have changed and I have modified a few by survey (catching buses and recording routes and stops). Using TfNSW data would be much easier. 1. Can I use the TfNSW data now to modify/add some local bus routes or do we need to await discussion and an agreed import plan? 2.

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated" - fake building for several shops inside one building

5 Feb 2020, 21:06 by marc_marc_...@hotmail.com: > Hello, > >> I've now moved to tagging as many of them them as 'fixme' >> > > nice to highlight the issue. > but why not fixing it ? > In case of systematic mass edit, (especially by paid mappers) it may take unreasonable effort to fix it. And

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] zone résidentielle dans une zone résidentielle ?

Le 05/02/2020 à 21:23, pepilepi...@ovh.fr a écrit : Le 05/02/2020 à 19:53, Arnaud Champollion a écrit : Bonjour, Est-ce qu'on peut avoir un landuse=residential à l'intérieur d'un autre landuse=residential englobant ? Par exemple pour un quartier ou un lotissement, comme celui-ci :

Re: [talk-au] Australian guidelines for mapping landuse-landcover?

Yep. ditch the landuse page as I don't think our landcover is any different to anywhere else? As a matter of fact, the main Australia page could do with a clean-u / refresh https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Australia As for the tagging guidelines, I'm also in two minds? How about something

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] zone résidentielle dans une zone résidentielle ?

> Justement je ne veux pas le faire. Tu peux préciser ? Landuse=residential dans landuse=residential, outre le fait que ça n'a guère de sens entraine des effets de rendus non désirables ("frontières"). Donc "Je me suis dit que ça n'avait pas l'air normal" ! Les relations boundary

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated" - fake building for several shops inside one building

On 05/02/2020 20:06, marc marc wrote: nice to highlight the issue. but why not fixing it ? part of the reason for that was described a decade ago by Andy Allan: https://blog.gravitystorm.co.uk/2009/11/10/the-pottery-club/ That was talking about imports, but "poor commercial mapping in the

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping for emergency services

On 2/5/2020 9:49 AM, Eric Christensen via Talk-us wrote: For the record, my team(s) has many cartographic resources at our fingertips that we can use for search and rescue including, but not limited to: USGS 7.5' maps, National Park Service maps, OSM, Google maps, state and local GIS data, and

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated" - fake building for several shops inside one building

On 05/02/2020 20:06, marc marc wrote: Hello, I've now moved to tagging as many of them them as 'fixme' nice to highlight the issue. but why not fixing it ? As stated previously, it's not the responsibility of the person spotting errors to fix it, especially if it's been performed

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] zone résidentielle dans une zone résidentielle ?

Le 05/02/2020 à 21:23, pepilepi...@ovh.fr a écrit : Pourquoi tu veux faire ça ? Si c'est juste pour le nommer il y a place=neighbourhood ... Bonne soirée, Justement je ne veux pas le faire. Je suis tombé dessus car il y a

Re: [OSM-talk-be] RFC: removing OpenGeoDB and is_in tags (RFC by 29 Feb 2020)

About the is_in: oh please, get rid of them. About the geoDB: clean them up as well, although I am a bit more reserved. I don't know openGeoDB, but I feel that it is unmaintainted and superseded by the combination of OSM and Wikidata. I feel that using a wikidata entry is a more futureproof

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] zone résidentielle dans une zone résidentielle ?

Le 05/02/2020 à 19:53, Arnaud Champollion a écrit : > Bonjour, > > Est-ce qu'on peut avoir un landuse=residential à l'intérieur d'un > autre landuse=residential englobant ? > > Par exemple pour un quartier ou un lotissement, comme celui-ci : > > https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570993621 > >

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated" - fake building for several shops inside one building

Hello, > I've now moved to tagging as many of them them as 'fixme' nice to highlight the issue. but why not fixing it ? remove the building tag for every fake building object, add the building on the whole outer back. josm contourmerge pluging can do that easily. or, of course, contact DWG if

Re: [OSM-talk] MWG needs some customizations in CiviCRM

On 26/01/2020 15:28, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > what about multiple OpenStreetMap userIDs controlled by the same user? Our > current guidelines actively encourage the creation of multiple logins/users. > > Cheers Martin Hi Martin That is a good point that hasn't occurred to me yet. However I

Re: [OSM-talk-be] RFC: removing OpenGeoDB and is_in tags (RFC by 29 Feb 2020)

I say "go" Op wo 5 feb. 2020 16:37 schreef Midgard : > Dear mappers > > If you ever touched a place node, chances are you saw it was cluttered > with: > - tags with a "openGeoDB:" prefix and > - "is_in" tags. > > I hereby propose a mechanical edit to delete those from all features in > Belgium.

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] zone résidentielle dans une zone résidentielle ?

Bonjour, Le 05.02.20 à 19:53, Arnaud Champollion a écrit : > Est-ce qu'on peut avoir un landuse=residential à l'intérieur d'un autre > landuse=residential englobant ? c'est pas interdit mais le 2ieme n'apporte souvent rien de correct par rapport au 1er. je dirais même qu'un landuse dans un

Re: [OSM-talk-fr] Référencer la production alimentaire locale

Le 05.02.20 à 19:35, Vincent Bergeot a écrit : > j'aimerai bien ajouter la ref siret, mais sur quel objet ? sur l'objet décrit par le siret :) un office=company ou landuse=farmyard me semble bien ___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

[OSM-talk-fr] zone résidentielle dans une zone résidentielle ?

Bonjour, Est-ce qu'on peut avoir un landuse=residential à l'intérieur d'un autre landuse=residential englobant ? Par exemple pour un quartier ou un lotissement, comme celui-ci : https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/570993621 lui-meme inclus dans https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/391336579 ?

[OSM-talk-fr] Référencer la production alimentaire locale

Bonjour, pour référencer les lieux de productions alimentaires (les fermes en particulier) et pour pouvoir "comparer" avec d'autres listes, j'aimerai bien ajouter la ref siret, mais sur quel objet ? Quand il y a un lieu de vente le shop=farm semble approprié (à voir si il n'y a pas 2 siret

Re: [OSM-talk-be] RFC: removing OpenGeoDB and is_in tags (RFC by 29 Feb 2020)

Hi, I agree with both. I've been removing is_in tags here and there since a few months as JOSM encourages to do so.By the way, I also noticed that at some places streets (highways) have an is_in tag. Regards, StijnRR Op woensdag 5 februari 2020 16:37:26 CET schreef Midgard : Dear

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"

On 05/02/2020 12:15, Dave F via talk wrote: Who & how did you contact them? If a Public forum, could you post a link? if email, could you copy paste exactly the replies to you? not a public forum, I wrote to VigotheCarpatian as an openstreetmap message, here's some of it: myself, on

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"

On 05/02/2020 17:15, Dave F via talk wrote: On 05/02/2020 15:45, Mario Frasca wrote: hi all,  I am in no position to take care of the amount of instances of this practice, and fix them You shouldn't be expected to. Contributors who make errors should fix them. Agreed.  I've forwarded

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"

On 05/02/2020 11:53, Andy Townsend wrote: it can sometimes be difficult to decide where one building ends and the next starts sometimes, sometimes it's clear.  sometimes you walk in the area, you see the façade and you wonder how they can know the name of the shop and not have seen it's

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"

On 05/02/2020 15:45, Mario Frasca wrote: hi all,  I am in no position to take care of the amount of instances of this practice, and fix them You shouldn't be expected to. Contributors who make errors should fix them. I've signalled it to their editors, or to their leaders, but apparently

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"

good day Andy On 05/02/2020 11:53, Andy Townsend wrote: I also don't think that's a typical reaction from paid mappers generally (apart from spammers of course), can you help me understanding the following statement otherwise than "too late"? Hi Mario, thank you for all the information and

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"

Feb 5, 2020, 16:45 by ma...@anche.no: > something done by Kaart editors: > > Are they organized mappers? Are they paid mappers? > splitting a building into as many slices as the amount of commercial > activities within the building > Sound blatantly incorrect to me. You can map shop as

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"

On 05/02/2020 15:45, Mario Frasca wrote: ... but apparently when an activity is closed, it's too late to ask them to review. I don't think that that's a reasonable approach for any OSM mapper to take (whether they're working for a company or not).  I also don't think that's a typical

Re: [OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"

this is what I'm talking about: https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Qqh one more things that make this situation even more complicated, is that many of these ways have shop:yes, which sounds like "I'm too lazy to investigate the details, please someone does it for me", which I did in one shopping

[OSM-talk] it's not a fake, but "it's complicated"

hi all, I sort of moved to Panama.  I am trying to find local mappers wanting to discuss issues, help take decisions, document decisions, and validate data.  it's been a hard task, and it's not the only hard task here in Panama: time and again I find tons of mistakes added by people who,

[OSM-talk-be] RFC: removing OpenGeoDB and is_in tags (RFC by 29 Feb 2020)

Dear mappers If you ever touched a place node, chances are you saw it was cluttered with: - tags with a "openGeoDB:" prefix and - "is_in" tags. I hereby propose a mechanical edit to delete those from all features in Belgium. The Overpass query to fetch the data is https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/Qqa

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping for emergency services

On 2/3/20 9:57 AM, Mike Thompson wrote: > The > exception was a search and rescue group that used OSM to help locate > missing people in the back country because OSM contains trails that no > other source has. I was just sitting down to discuss how I use OSM in wilderness search and rescue

[OSM-talk-fr] cabinets infirmiers - healthcare=nurse

Bonjour, j'ai vu qu'un ticket était en suspens sur le rendu des healthcare=* https://github.com/cquest/osmfr-cartocss/issues/43 Quelqu'un a des nouvelles ? Merci Georges___ Talk-fr mailing list Talk-fr@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-us] Mapping for emergency services

On 2/4/2020 9:57 AM, Paul Johnson wrote: .  Oddly enough, for the rural firefighters?  Osmand with Microsoft Earth imagery as the background is their most popular pick because it works brilliantly offline and we have better map data than the state itself does. It is useful to learn what

Re: [talk-au] Airborne Research Australia South Australia Bushfire Imagery

You can now find it at https://osmlab.github.io/editor-layer-index/ and click the add to JOSM button. On Wed, 5 Feb 2020 at 22:16, Andrew Harvey wrote: > They've agreed to the imagery tracing waiver! PR to add this into editors > is at https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/pull/785, but

Re: [OSM-talk-be] 17/02: Towards Equal Street Names with Open Data

That won't be the purpose of the workshop. Main goal is to link to link streets in OSM with the person they were named after, either directly through name:etyomolgy:wikidata or indirectly via the (already existing) Wikidata item of the street and the "named after" property. -Oorspronkelijk

Re: [Talk-gb-westmidlands] Mappa Mercia this Thursday

Daer all, > > By my calendar it is the next meetup this coming Thursday. I am assuming > central Birmingham, likely at The Bull...? I'll be there as well. Eike > > *Rob* > > ___ > Talk-gb-westmidlands mailing list >

Re: [Talk-GB] Still too many universities in Cambridge

 >On Tuesday, 4 February 2020, 16:40:21 GMT, Andy Townsend wrote:      >  >On 04/02/2020 15:37, Peter Neale via Talk-GB wrote:  >>There isn't, I'm afraid.. it's a right hotchpotch  >>IMHO, it would be a waste of time, if you tried to create a single area object (do I mean "closed

Re: [Talk-de] State of the Map in Kapstadt - Unterstützung für Reisekosten

On Wednesday 05 February 2020, Frederik Ramm wrote: > > Da kann man (leider erst auf Seite zwei eines Google-Formulars, nicht > hauen, ich hab mir das nicht ausgedacht) dann eintragen, welche Art > von Unterstützung man brauchen würde, um teilzunehmen: > * Admission (freier Eintritt) > *

Re: [talk-au] Airborne Research Australia South Australia Bushfire Imagery

They've agreed to the imagery tracing waiver! PR to add this into editors is at https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/pull/785, but in the meantime you can load this URL into JOSM or iD: https://{switch:a,b,c,d}.

[OSM-talk-fr] SotM 2020 aide financière

Bonjours! Il y a un programme "scholarship" pour aider la communauté OSM de participer à SotM 2020 à Cape Town. Ce programme a des niveaux différentes de support. Ça commence avec le support pour les frais de voyage et finit avec la couverture des toutes dépenses inclusivement argent de poche. Le

Re: [OSM-talk-be] 17/02: Towards Equal Street Names with Open Data

As I wrote on Riot, I do hope this event will not copy geocoded data from OSM into Wikidata, I think this violates https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Open_Data_License/Geocoding_-_Guideline Please let me know if I'm wrong. regards m. On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 12:08 PM Jo wrote: > > Hi, > > I did

Re: [talk-au] Australian guidelines for mapping landuse-landcover?

If the page has not Australian specifics, get rid of it/delete. I also agree on the length of the tagging guidelines being too long. How do other languages or counties solve that? On 5 February 2020 2:35:47 pm AEDT, Andrew Harvey wrote: >I'm for just deleting this page. > >While I agree the

[OSM-talk-fr] [OT mais pas trop][LOCAL][POITIERS et environs] Série de projections du film « La bataille du libre » 10-11-12 mars 2020

Oyez-oyez cher amis cartographes ! Trois projections du film « La bataille du libre » suivies de débats en présence du réalisateur Philippe Borrel et de Gilles Caire, maitre de conférences, responsable du Master Professionnel Droit et développement de l’Economie sociale et solidaire,

[talk-ph] Topical nCov dispersion map.

Seemed relevant enough to post, and pleasingly factual ICAO Coronavirus 3DFX dispersion Jim ___ talk-ph mailing list talk-ph@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-de] State of the Map in Kapstadt - Unterstützung für Reisekosten

(Crosspost mit Forum) Hallo, das "Scholarship"-Programm der State of the Map-Konferenz ist nicht nur dazu da, um mittellosen Mappern aus "armen" Ländern die komplette Reise zu finanzieren; es soll durchaus auch mit kleineren Reisekosten-Zuschüssen dafür sorgen, dass Mapper aus "reichen"