Re: [OSM-talk] GDPR introduction

2018-04-17 Thread Simon Poole
Am 17.04.2018 um 19:37 schrieb Michael Reichert: > > *Controller vs. processor* > > Chapter "Recommendations", section 3 (page 10) writes: >> Using the data for user and contribution profiling will either require a data >> processing agreement (and a similar agreement for research) or the

Re: [OSM-talk] GDPR introduction

2018-04-17 Thread Michael Reichert
Hi Simon, Am 2018-04-17 um 12:48 schrieb Simon Poole: > On the 25th of May 2018 the *General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) > * will > enter in to force, this will likely result in some changes in how > OpenStreetMap operates

Re: [OSM-talk] GDPR introduction

2018-04-17 Thread Ed Loach
Andrew asked: > Yes that does help clarify my concerns too. I still wonder if someone > outside the EU can go ahead and publish the full metadata included > OSM database under the ODBL outside the OSMF, or in the worst case > local communities outside the EU can still publish their regional

Re: [OSM-talk] GDPR introduction

2018-04-17 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Tuesday 17 April 2018, Andrew Harvey wrote: > > Yes that does help clarify my concerns too. I still wonder if someone > outside the EU can go ahead and publish the full metadata included > OSM database under the ODBL outside the OSMF, or in the worst case > local communities outside the EU can

Re: [OSM-talk] GDPR introduction

2018-04-17 Thread Andrew Harvey
On 17 April 2018 at 23:31, Christoph Hormann wrote: > On Tuesday 17 April 2018, Simon Poole wrote: > > > > > * When you add new 'terms of use' or 'data processing agreement' > > > provisions that people who want to access OSM data with metadata > > > need to agree to does that

Re: [OSM-talk] GDPR introduction

2018-04-17 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Tuesday 17 April 2018, Simon Poole wrote: > > > * When you add new 'terms of use' or 'data processing agreement' > > provisions that people who want to access OSM data with metadata > > need to agree to does that constitute an amendment of the ODbL and > > therefore a change in license? If not

Re: [OSM-talk] GDPR introduction

2018-04-17 Thread Andrew Harvey
Thank you those in the LWG that have put this paper together. My thoughts are OSM's ODBL license grants me the right to publish a version of http://hdyc.neis-one.org/ open to the public, not restricted to OSM users. Reading this, I understand the OSMF is proposing to introduce Terms of Use which

Re: [OSM-talk] GDPR introduction

2018-04-17 Thread Simon Poole
Am 17.04.2018 um 14:14 schrieb Christoph Hormann: > On Tuesday 17 April 2018, Simon Poole wrote: > >> LWG GDPR Position Paper >> >> >> Please feel free to discuss on the talk page >>

Re: [OSM-talk] GDPR introduction

2018-04-17 Thread Christoph Hormann
On Tuesday 17 April 2018, Simon Poole wrote: > > LWG GDPR Position Paper > > > Please feel free to discuss on the talk page > or on this list. A number of questions/comments: * Is

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-07-26 Thread Jo
Hi Dirk, Welcome! It's a bit odd to have to use a 'non-indigenous' language to communicate on this list, but it sure beats having to write all messages in 2 or 3 languages. When you're talking about something concerning only Antwerp or a Flemish topic like De Lijn, you could simply use Dutch as

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-07-26 Thread Wouter Hamelinck
I noticed somewhere (but can't remember wher exactly) that the belgian OSM-chapter were given some (I believe 11) real hiking-GPS-devices and I interpreted the remarks as if some of those devices would be available for tracking (this is quite cumbersome with a NUVI). Has anyone got an idea

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-16 Thread Marc Gemis
Hi all, Now, I really understand why I was hesitating to start adding roads. ;-) Anyhow, I'll change it to 'track'. Here's the sign that you can find at the ends of Voetwegen and Burrtwegen in Rumst (incl. Terhaghe, Reet) and Boom

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-16 Thread Karel Adams
On 04/16/2011 10:33 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: It is still unclear to me which name I should use. I'm in favor of BW23, since that is on the sign. Het uiteindelijke antwoord moet van de bevoegde overheid komen, in dit geval het gemeentebestuur veronderstel ik. Eens navragen bij het kadaster? Of

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-16 Thread Ben Laenen
Karel Adams wrote: On 04/16/2011 10:33 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: It is still unclear to me which name I should use. I'm in favor of BW23, since that is on the sign. Het uiteindelijke antwoord moet van de bevoegde overheid komen, in dit geval het gemeentebestuur veronderstel ik. Eens navragen

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-16 Thread Ben Laenen
Marc Gemis wrote: Now for the surface. Do I have to split the road each time the surface changes ? Between paved and unpaved: yes, since that changes the road classification. Between different surfaces: not if you don't want to. I just use surface=unpaved and be done with it. First it is

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Julien Fastré
Hi, Welcome ! If you need help, just ask the list. Julien PS: If you want to meet other OSM'ers in Belgium : http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_Belgium/Activities#Upcoming_activities Le 15/04/2011 13:10, Marc Gemis a écrit : Hi, My name is Marc Gemis. I'm new to OpenStreetMap.

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Ivo De Broeck
Use potlatch 2 (simple) choose among the path's the generic path Interesting discussion to help a newbie ;-) 2011/4/15 Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com Jo wrote: Hi Marc, Your help will be much appreciated! Voetwegen are usually tagged as: highway=footway name=Voetweg 22 bicycle=yes

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Jo
He won't be a newbie for long, with our 'stoomcursus'... Polyglot 2011/4/15 Ivo De Broeck ivo.debro...@gmail.com Use potlatch 2 (simple) choose among the path's the generic path Interesting discussion to help a newbie ;-) 2011/4/15 Ben Laenen benlae...@gmail.com Jo wrote: Hi Marc,

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Ben Laenen
Ivo De Broeck wrote: Use potlatch 2 (simple) choose among the path's the generic path Interesting discussion to help a newbie ;-) (off-topic) That simple way of editing in Potlatch2 is just asking for trouble. I advise everyone to learn and use the raw tags from the start for things like

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Jo
Hi Marc, In JOSM, you can use aerial photography on the background by selecting: Luchtfotografie/Bing Sat in the menu. Then you can align your ways on those as well. As the name I would have put 'Buurtweg 23'. We don't use abbreviations in the names. (Except if BW23 is what you actually found

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Marc Gemis
Hi Jo, The signs of the buurtwegen en the voetwegen always have the abbreviated name BW23 or VW51, followed by the name of the residential road to which the are leading (and thus different on both sides). I'll look into aligning the BW23 with the aerial photo regards m On Fri, Apr 15, 2011 at

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Gerard Vanderveken
Hi and Welcome! I assume you use the Atlas for looking up 'trage wegen' (slow roads) Then it is as said in full Voetweg (sentier) or Buurtweg (chemin) followed by a number eg Voetweg 23 Example of Sint-Agatha-Rode (and area around)

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Gerard Vanderveken
Hi, Tags are good. Except segregated = no is only to be used with footway and cycleway. So, delete this tag. The name in full, name = Buurtweg 23 I don't know where you get this BW23 from. It is not indicated as such in the atlas: http://gis1.provant.be/Geoloketten/geoloket.jsp?geoloketid=55

Re: [OSM-talk-be] Introduction

2011-04-15 Thread Jo
I see, then it's done differently in the province of Antwerp, than here in Vlaams-Brabant... 2011/4/15 Marc Gemis marc.ge...@gmail.com Hi Jo, The signs of the buurtwegen en the voetwegen always have the abbreviated name BW23 or VW51, followed by the name of the residential road to which the

Re: [OSM-Talk-ZA] Introduction

2011-02-07 Thread David Richfield
Hi Wimpie! You've come to the right place: we need more GPS traces, especially of out-of-the-way places. Do you have a GPS device that can record traces, and do you know how to get them as GPX files? If so, you can upload them to http://www.openstreetmap.org/traces - you'll have to create a

Re: [OSM-Talk-ZA] INTRODUCTION REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE

2010-04-05 Thread Justin Arenstein
/Canada Pacific Subject: Re: [OSM-Talk-ZA] INTRODUCTION REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE Hello Justin, On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:44 AM, justin.arenst...@stanford.edu wrote: [3] Tracking crime reports, from both police private security companies, and mapping it so that it is accessible to ordinary

Re: [OSM-Talk-ZA] INTRODUCTION REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE

2010-04-04 Thread David Richfield
Hi Justin, I think you've got a brilliant project here, and I'd be willing to help as far as possible. I've not done any coding on OSM yet, but I can program and I have submitted GPS data and map info to the project, so I know the basics about OSM. Unfortunately I don't have a huge amount of

Re: [OSM-Talk-ZA] INTRODUCTION REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE

2010-04-04 Thread Dave Coventry
Me too. I'm in Johannesburg ATM, but it looks like an interesting project. On 4 April 2010 08:17, David Richfield davidrichfi...@gmail.com wrote: Hi Justin, I think you've got a brilliant project here, and I'd be willing to help as far as possible.  I've not done any coding on OSM yet, but I

Re: [OSM-Talk-ZA] INTRODUCTION REQUEST FOR ASSISTANCE

2010-04-04 Thread Nic Roets
Hello Justin, On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 1:44 AM, justin.arenst...@stanford.edu wrote: [3] Tracking crime reports, from both police private security companies, and mapping it so that it is accessible to ordinary residents so they can begin to understand the underlying trends, hotspots, etc. I'd

Re: [OSM-Talk-ZA] Introduction

2009-08-24 Thread Brendan Barrett
Hi Eduard Welcome to OpenStreetMap! I see that you have signed up to the mapping party on the weekend of the 19th / 20th (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Cape_Town_mapping_party_-_September_2009). It'll be good to see you there. In the mean time, have you looked here: