Really good idea!
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Steve Singer [mailto:ssinger...@sympatico.ca]
Sent: 4 décembre 2011 09:23
To: Connors, Bernie (SNB)
Cc: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] import complaints
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Connors, Bernie (SNB) wrote:
Richard
On 4-12-2011 15:22, Steve Singer wrote:
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Connors, Bernie (SNB) wrote:
Richard,
Do you have a link to Import Guidelines that are specific to
Canvec data?
I think http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec needs to have some
specific guidelines for canvec imports.
In
data.
Best regards,
Daniel
-Original Message-
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Sent: December-02-11 16:07
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] import complaints
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Connors, Bernie (SNB)
bernie.conn...@snb.ca wrote:
Richard
We have to accept that OSM it is not a static project. For those discoverers
that want to start from a blank sheet, there are still so many thematics to
look for, and see how we can bring the information in OSM, how we can render
it.
For me, what it is interesting in OSM, it is all the space
On Fri, 2 Dec 2011, Connors, Bernie (SNB) wrote:
Richard,
Do you have a link to Import Guidelines that are specific to Canvec
data?
I think http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/CanVec needs to have some
specific guidelines for canvec imports.
In particular
1. A caution to avoid importing
On 11-12-03 10:18 , Gerald A wrote:
I think there might have been a misread here -- I don't believe Richard
was saying that we should only _use_ aerials
Nor did I mean that. If you're doing a foot and GPS survey of somewhere,
and there's nothing on OSM, and there's no useful aerials or other
I to have reservations about some Bing image imports. I helped a twelve
year old enter a footway, we carefully made a GPS trace, checked the
features page and decided it was a footway not a path, added it JOSM and
uploaded both the GPS trace and the footway under my name. Patrick was
very proud
Having a similar problem recently, I used the option to send the edit by
smaller chunks.
Pierre Béland
De : john whelan
Date/heure : 2011-12-03 12:20:56
A : Stewart C. Russell
Cc : Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Sujet : Re: [Talk-ca] import complaints
I to have reservations about some
, December 02, 2011 4:07 PM
To: Talk-CA OpenStreetMap
Subject: Re: [Talk-ca] import complaints
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Connors, Bernie (SNB)
bernie.conn...@snb.ca wrote:
Richard,
Do you have a link to Import Guidelines that are specific to Canvec
data?
Sure.
All imports should comply
Richard,
Do you have a link to Import Guidelines that are specific to Canvec
data?
Bernie.
--
Bernie Connors, P.Eng
Service New Brunswick
(506) 444-2077
45°56'25.21N, 66°38'53.65W
www.snb.ca/geonb/
-Original Message-
From: Richard Weait [mailto:rich...@weait.com]
Sent:
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 3:27 PM, Connors, Bernie (SNB)
bernie.conn...@snb.ca wrote:
Richard,
Do you have a link to Import Guidelines that are specific to Canvec
data?
Sure.
All imports should comply with the OSM import guidelines. My
preference is that we do not import at all. We
I /think/ I'm responsible for that big error in Hudson Bay. I've fixed
it, but can't quite figure out how two small mistakes caused that big
glitch. Perhaps the real problem is that the coastlines are updated only
a few times a year, I fixed the problem as soon as I saw it, and yet it
will
On 11-12-02 16:07 , Richard Weait wrote:
So let's start treating external like we treat aerial imagery.
Let's don't, and say we did. For much of Canada, aerials aren't useful.
Look at, say, Elliot Lake:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=46.3846lon=-82.6852zoom=13layers=M
- aerials don't
13 matches
Mail list logo
