Re: [OSM-talk-be] Taalgebruik

2011-01-09 Per discussione Claude Minette
Je pensais à l'Esperanto Ik dacht van het Esperanto I was thinking to Esperanto Ich dachte an Esperanto Mi estis pripens Esperanto ^^ Claude Le 7/01/2011 14:13, Philippe Duthoit a écrit : is latijn een optie :-) 2010/11/20 Karel Adams ade...@skynet.be mailto:ade...@skynet.be Mannen,

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] CTs and the 1 April deadline

2011-01-09 Per discussione ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
sarcasm on So we have 15 years to discuss the next licence Why the hurry ? sarcasm off Gert -Oorspronkelijk bericht- Van: legal-talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org [mailto:legal-talk-boun...@openstreetmap.org] Namens Anthony Verzonden: vrijdag 7 januari 2011 16:29 Aan: Licensing and other

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] UK mapping authority switches to Open Government Licence (was: CTs and the 1 April deadline)

2011-01-09 Per discussione Ben Last
On 7 January 2011 21:56, Mike Collinson m...@ayeltd.biz wrote: In the case of Nearmap, it is my understanding, Ben might like to comment or contradict, that level 1 is livable with. The real concern being the possible that future OSM generations might want to drop share-alike. It's indeed

Re: [OSM-legal-talk] UK mapping authority switches to Open Government Licence

2011-01-09 Per discussione Richard Fairhurst
davespod wrote: If we assume that the reading of ODBL in the LWG minutes is correct, then ODBL would not require attribution of OSM's sources in produced works (e.g., maps), rather only attribution of the OSM database. I'm restating what I said in

Re: [OSM-talk] Postmortem analysys

2011-01-09 Per discussione Lester Caine
Nathan Edgars II wrote: But why write routers for the one case thats theoretically possible, instead of the millions that are not only possible, but already in existance? I don't care how the routers are written. I care about people wrecking the data by merging dupes. And assuming that no

Re: [OSM-talk] Postmortem analysys

2011-01-09 Per discussione Tom Hughes
On 09/01/11 10:34, Lester Caine wrote: Nathan Edgars II wrote: But why write routers for the one case thats theoretically possible, instead of the millions that are not only possible, but already in existance? I don't care how the routers are written. I care about people wrecking the data by

Re: [OSM-talk] New user mistakenly nuking things

2011-01-09 Per discussione Mike N.
Unfortunately he accidentally nuked a bunch of nodes in one area. He tried to re-add them but he didn't get them all. He has also added some things and then re-deleted them. I am in contact with him trying to figure things out but for those who have experience reverting things: How hard would it

Re: [OSM-talk] New user mistakenly nuking things

2011-01-09 Per discussione Donald Campbell II
I wonder how frequently something like this happens in some unmonitored area in the US. I'm pretty sure it happens all over the place all the time. I'm one of very few people actively mapping Guyana and just last week this new user stuck a town in the ocean. So I politely messaged him and

Re: [OSM-talk] Postmortem analysys

2011-01-09 Per discussione Lester Caine
Tom Hughes wrote: On 09/01/11 10:34, Lester Caine wrote: Nathan Edgars II wrote: But why write routers for the one case thats theoretically possible, instead of the millions that are not only possible, but already in existance? I don't care how the routers are written. I care about people

[OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-09 Per discussione vikas yadav
Hi, I surveying from Northern India. I studied how addresses are to be tagged in order so nominatim can locate it. That went great. The problem is the every house has to be tied to a street (addr:street). 1) We don't have names for living streets 2) We so many times have blocks or sectors (tagged

Re: [OSM-talk] New user mistakenly nuking things

2011-01-09 Per discussione Bráulio
This is a great idea, in my opinion. I hope someone implements. The Windows 3.11 tutorial is a great example of how to do it. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n_s-py34eNU 2011/1/9 Donald Campbell II donaciano2...@gmail.com I wonder how frequently something like this happens in some

[OSM-talk] To those who remove dupe nodes

2011-01-09 Per discussione Oscar Orbe
Dear listI am uploading some landuse polygons and sometimes I get the error that says something like that node does not exist.  I think there are people removing unused nodes too fast. Perhaps those people can change their algorithms so that they only remove unused nodes whose age is at least 24

Re: [OSM-talk] Postmortem analysys

2011-01-09 Per discussione Matt Amos
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Lester Caine les...@lsces.co.uk wrote: The original decision that there should be no duplicate nodes simply ignored many of the arguments that there are very good reasons for needing them, then tools like the duplicate nodes map ASSUME that the decision takes

Re: [OSM-talk] To those who remove dupe nodes

2011-01-09 Per discussione Matt Amos
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Oscar Orbe oskaro...@yahoo.com wrote: Dear list I am uploading some landuse polygons and sometimes I get the error that says something like that node does not exist. I think there are people removing unused nodes too fast. Perhaps those people can change

Re: [OSM-talk] To those who remove dupe nodes

2011-01-09 Per discussione Oscar Orbe
hello:thanks for the hint.in any case, I dont think it's a good idea to remove unused nodes which are extremely recent. regards--oscar --- On Sun, 1/9/11, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote: From: Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] To those who remove dupe nodes To: Oscar

Re: [OSM-talk] Postmortem analysys

2011-01-09 Per discussione Lester Caine
Matt Amos wrote: On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:09 PM, Lester Caineles...@lsces.co.uk wrote: The original decision that there should be no duplicate nodes simply ignored many of the arguments that there are very good reasons for needing them, then tools like the duplicate nodes map ASSUME

Re: [OSM-talk] To those who remove dupe nodes

2011-01-09 Per discussione Frederik Ramm
Oscar, Oscar Orbe wrote: in any case, I dont think it's a good idea to remove unused nodes which are extremely recent. I don't think that someone dos it programatically - but if you edit an area and find a stray unused node you often delete that without checking when it was created! Your

[OSM-talk] no map data available for chilean map

2011-01-09 Per discussione Felipe Edwards
Hi I have a garmin 1490t with europe navteq map as default. I regularly use the chilean .img file from geofabrik. It let me route and search cities, but i can´t search for addresses. When i try a pop up message cames out saying no map data available can anyone help me? i tried everything, even

Re: [OSM-talk] no map data available for chilean map

2011-01-09 Per discussione Craig Wallace
On 09/01/2011 15:09, Felipe Edwards wrote: Hi I have a garmin 1490t with europe navteq map as default. I regularly use the chilean .img file from geofabrik. It let me route and search cities, but i can´t search for addresses. When i try a pop up message cames out saying no map data available can

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 77, Issue 26

2011-01-09 Per discussione Richard Welty
On 1/9/11 6:18 AM, David da...@incanberra.com.au wrote: I guess in theory, having a double decker bridge, directly over a state line is possible. But why write routers for the one case thats theoretically possible, instead of the millions that are not only possible, but already in existance?

Re: [OSM-talk] To those who remove dupe nodes

2011-01-09 Per discussione andrzej zaborowski
On 9 January 2011 14:54, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote: hi oscar. are you using diff uploads to create the polygons? if so, it would be a good idea to group the uploaded ways and relations for the polygon along with the nodes it needs. this would mean that such an error wouldn't occur.

[OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-09 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
Does anyone know when the xapi will be back online? It's been down for several days at least. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] To those who remove dupe nodes

2011-01-09 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
Frederik Ramm wrote: Your original complaint was about people removing *duplicate* nodes though, not people removing fresh, unused nodes. That's another situation; if your upload creates duplicate nodes then your upload is buggy and should be stopped. Not always - an import of TIGER

[OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-09 Per discussione Gorm E. Johnsen
Hi Today there is 5500 ways with highway=unsurfaced (Taginfohttp://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/highway=unsurfaced). They seem to be evenly spread over the planet and was depreciatedhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_featuresalmost three years ago. I would like to replace them with

Re: [OSM-talk] To those who remove dupe nodes

2011-01-09 Per discussione Lennard
On 9-1-2011 17:17, andrzej zaborowski wrote: You can use the set python of scripts descibed in the wiki here: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Upload.py to do this to some degree. The smarter-sort script sorts your changes in such a way that they look as much as possible like a manual edit.

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-09 Per discussione Greg Troxel
I would think the intent of original taggers is that highway=unsurfaced was that they were real roads that aren't paved vs tracks. So I'd map highway=unsurfaced to highway=unclassified surface=unpaved note=review:was-highway-unsurfaced or something like that. Have you looked at a

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-09 Per discussione Oscar Orbe
aha!that must be the reason why I was getting osm/osm files with it... --- On Sun, 1/9/11, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: From: Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com Subject: [OSM-talk] xapi downage To: OSM talk@openstreetmap.org Date: Sunday, January 9, 2011, 4:19 PM Does anyone

Re: [OSM-talk] To those who remove dupe nodes

2011-01-09 Per discussione Matt Amos
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: Frederik Ramm wrote: Your original complaint was about people removing *duplicate* nodes though, not people removing fresh, unused nodes. That's another situation; if your upload creates duplicate nodes then your upload

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-09 Per discussione 80n
Should be ok now. Seems like someone had been messing with the server ... it somehow had an identity crisis. On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:45 PM, Oscar Orbe oskaro...@yahoo.com wrote: aha! that must be the reason why I was getting osm/osm files with it... --- On *Sun, 1/9/11, Nathan Edgars II

Re: [OSM-talk] To those who remove dupe nodes

2011-01-09 Per discussione Oscar Orbe
--- On Sun, 1/9/11, Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com wrote: From: Matt Amos zerebub...@gmail.com Subject: Re: [OSM-talk] To those who remove dupe nodes To: Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com Cc: talk@openstreetmap.org Date: Sunday, January 9, 2011, 5:07 PM On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:25 PM, Nathan

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-09 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 12:14 PM, 80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote: Should be ok now. Seems like someone had been messing with the server ... it somehow had an identity crisis. Hmmm - I'm still getting the same failed to open a connection to the remote server message in JOSM.

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-09 Per discussione Pieren
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote: highway=unclassified surface=unpaved note=review:was-highway-unsurfaced unclassified + surface is probably correct for most of the cases. But it sounds more cautious to replace it by highway=road + note=deprecates

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-09 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/9 Pieren pier...@gmail.com: On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 5:38 PM, Greg Troxel g...@ir.bbn.com wrote:  highway=unclassified  surface=unpaved  note=review:was-highway-unsurfaced unclassified + surface is probably correct for most of the cases. But it sounds more cautious to replace it by

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-09 Per discussione Richard Fairhurst
Gorm E. Johnsen wrote: They seem to be evenly spread over the planet and was depreciatedhttp://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features almost three years ago. Depreciated means reduced in value. You mean deprecated, but you can only deprecate a feature from the wiki docs, not from the

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-09 Per discussione Pierre-Alain Dorange
80n 80n...@gmail.com wrote: Should be ok now. Seems like someone had been messing with the server ... it somehow had an identity crisis. I'm afraid not. -- Pierre-Alain Dorange OSM experiences : http://www.leretourdelautruche.com/map/ ___ talk

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-09 Per discussione Chris Hill
On 09/01/11 16:28, Gorm E. Johnsen wrote: Hi Today there is 5500 ways with highway=unsurfaced (Taginfo http://taginfo.openstreetmap.de/tags/highway=unsurfaced). They seem to be evenly spread over the planet and was depreciated http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features almost

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-09 Per discussione john
In a prosperous country, the only roads likely to be unsurfaced are tracks, unclassified, or bridleways. Other roads are likely to have at least a gravel surface. However, in much of the Third World, the majority of the roads are likely to be unsurfaced, even if they are of major importance

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-09 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: On 9 January 2011 16:19, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: Does anyone know when the xapi will be back online? It's been down for several days at least. 80n is the only person who coded / runs the

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-09 Per discussione Pierre-Alain Dorange
Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: Future of XAPI... Since December there is a new java implemenation of XAPI under development. Code is open source https://github.com/iandees/xapi-antlr/ . OSM sysadmin team has provided a modest server (

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-09 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2011/1/9 ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) mevi...@gmail.com: I surveying from Northern India. I studied how addresses are to be tagged in order so nominatim can locate it. That went great. The problem is the every house has to be tied to a street (addr:street). 1) We don't have names for living streets

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-09 Per discussione Milo van der Linden
They seem to be evenly spread over the planet and was depreciated http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Deprecated_features almost three years ago. I am mapping Aruba, most unpaved roads there are currently set to highway=track, and there is a lot of them. I will check Aruba for deprecated

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-09 Per discussione Grant Slater
On 9 January 2011 18:58, Nathan Edgars II nerou...@gmail.com wrote: XAPI currently uses 2 servers:  * xapi.org.org: Hardware provided and hosted by OSM sysadmin team. Sysadmin policy that the code needs to be open source. 80n remove the source code dump in December. So you're saying that

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-09 Per discussione Elizabeth Dodd
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 17:28:14 +0100 Gorm E. Johnsen osml...@gorm.cc wrote: I would like to replace them with something better. I was thinking highway=road + surface=unpaved. Do you agree that we should replace highway=unsurfaced? If not, please write a few words why you don't think we should.

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-09 Per discussione Elizabeth Dodd
On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 20:15:46 +0100 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/1/9 ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) mevi...@gmail.com: I surveying from Northern India. I studied how addresses are to be tagged in order so nominatim can locate it. That went great. The problem is the every

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-09 Per discussione Tom Hughes
On 09/01/11 18:58, Nathan Edgars II wrote: On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 1:45 PM, Grant Slater openstreet...@firefishy.com wrote: XAPI currently uses 2 servers: * xapi.org.org: Hardware provided and hosted by OSM sysadmin team. Sysadmin policy that the code needs to be open source. 80n remove the

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-09 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 2:39 PM, Tom Hughes t...@compton.nu wrote: Although policy is that software should be open source, and 80n has recently removed the access to the code we have not as yet done anything to restrict his access to or use of the server. Ah, OK. Thanks for the clarification.

Re: [OSM-talk] xapi downage

2011-01-09 Per discussione Nathan Edgars II
The xapi is now back up. Thanks to everyone involved in creating and maintaining this great resource. ___ talk mailing list talk@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-09 Per discussione Dave F.
On 09/01/2011 16:28, Gorm E. Johnsen wrote: Hi Today there is 5500 ways with highway=unsurfaced... Whilst the surface condition should be a sub-tag (surface=*), you unfortunately don't know what the actual road classification is, so it's inadvisable to do a mass change. Does anyone know

Re: [OSM-talk] highway=unsurfaced

2011-01-09 Per discussione Steve Bennett
On Mon, Jan 10, 2011 at 3:28 AM, Gorm E. Johnsen osml...@gorm.cc wrote: Today there is 5500 ways with highway=unsurfaced  (Taginfo). They seem to be evenly spread over the planet and was depreciated almost three years ago. I would like to replace them with something better. I was thinking The

[OSM-talk] amenity=Observatory OR amenity=astronomical_observatory

2011-01-09 Per discussione marcellobil...@gmail
Hi all, just a question for all the community which one tag is better: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Observatory or http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/amenity=astronomical_ob servatory I realized just now that there is already another tag similar to what I

Re: [OSM-talk] amenity=Observatory OR amenity=astronomical_observatory

2011-01-09 Per discussione Richard Weait
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 4:06 PM, marcellobil...@gmail marcello.bil...@gmail.com wrote: Hi all, just a question for all the community which one tag is better: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Observatory or

[OSM-talk] Landsat WMS is dead

2011-01-09 Per discussione Stephan Knauss
Hi, The landsat WMS service is dead. Server returns this: This server no longer provides full WMS services! They suggest to use tiled WMS. Is this working with JOSM? http://onearth.jpl.nasa.gov/ Unfortunately for many areas Landsat is still the best available imagery source. Stephan

Re: [OSM-talk] Landsat WMS is dead

2011-01-09 Per discussione Vincent Pottier
Le 09/01/2011 23:13, Stephan Knauss a écrit : Hi, The landsat WMS service is dead. Server returns this: This server no longer provides full WMS services! They suggest to use tiled WMS. Is this working with JOSM? http://onearth.jpl.nasa.gov/ Unfortunately for many areas Landsat is still the

Re: [OSM-talk] amenity=Observatory OR amenity=astronomical_observatory

2011-01-09 Per discussione Dave F.
On 09/01/2011 21:06, marcellobil...@gmail wrote: Hi all, just a question for all the community which one tag is better: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Observatory or http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/amenity=astronomical_ob servatory I realized just now

Re: [OSM-talk] Landsat WMS is dead

2011-01-09 Per discussione Stephan Knauss
On 10.01.2011 00:10, Vincent Pottier wrote: In JOSM I use Landsat (mirroir) wms:http://irs.gis-lab.info/?layers=landsat; that returnes totally blurred images when compared to the original ones. I thought it could be an issue with resizing the pictures before delivering. Even tried to contact

Re: [OSM-talk] Landsat WMS is dead

2011-01-09 Per discussione Chris Browet
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 23:13, Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de wrote: They suggest to use tiled WMS. Unfortunately, they decided to create their own extension for a tiled WMS (i.e. not WMS-C nor TMS) which, AFAIK, they are alone to use. It makes it a bit pointless for developers to

Re: [OSM-talk] New user mistakenly nuking things

2011-01-09 Per discussione Toby Murray
Well I just went ahead and did it with the JOSM plugin. I think the desired effect was achieved. http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/changeset/6922696 Turns out he thought he was just making changes to a local copy of the data but was actually uploading the changes to the server. The changeset

Re: [OSM-talk] address parsing by nominatim

2011-01-09 Per discussione Daniel Kastl
2011/1/10 Elizabeth Dodd ed...@billiau.net On Sun, 9 Jan 2011 20:15:46 +0100 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote: 2011/1/9 ヴィカス ヤダヴァ (vikas yadav) mevi...@gmail.com: I surveying from Northern India. I studied how addresses are to be tagged in order so nominatim can locate

Re: [OSM-talk] Landsat WMS is dead

2011-01-09 Per discussione Komяpa
Hi, 2011/1/10 Stephan Knauss o...@stephans-server.de: On 10.01.2011 00:10, Vincent Pottier wrote: In JOSM I use Landsat (mirroir) wms:http://irs.gis-lab.info/?layers=landsat; that returnes totally blurred images when compared to the original ones. Could you please give an example? I didn't

Re: [OSM-talk] talk Digest, Vol 77, Issue 26

2011-01-09 Per discussione John Smith
On 10 January 2011 02:04, Richard Welty rwe...@averillpark.net wrote: not just in theory: George Washington Bridge, connecting NYC with New Jersey. and it's not a minor bridge, it is rather a pretty significant one in the traffic grid. so you can't really dismiss the case as purely

Re: [OSM-talk] New user mistakenly nuking things

2011-01-09 Per discussione Toby Murray
On Sun, Jan 9, 2011 at 11:36 PM, Richard Weait rich...@weait.com wrote: Show him some of the existing alternative renderings, like opencyclemap and wheelmap.org.  Also the University of Maryland pedestrian map. http://www.map.umd.edu/map/# Then have a look at the route filters. ;-)

[OSM-talk-nl] weekbulletin

2011-01-09 Per discussione Martijn van Exel
Ha allemaal, Iemand nog wat voor het weekbulletin? Ik wil en kan het niet in mijn eentje trekken, graag dus ieders input. Hoe was bijvoorbeeld die homepage-dag vandaag? Schrijft mee! https://docs1.google.com/document/d/1bihWQMlO-ucLUqPy04OoUVQxZiXP4xOOEXuCjcF2wh8/edit?hl=enauthkey=CIqZu-QG#

Re: [OSM-talk-nl] weekbulletin

2011-01-09 Per discussione Frank Fesevur
Martijn, Ik heb deze week niets toegevoegd aan het document, maar ik doe dat wel regelmatig. Zelf houd ik deze en de internationale mailing list en een aantal blogs in de gaten. Dat deed ik toch al, dus de highlights eruit pikken en even vastleggen is een kleine moeite. Maar op die bronnen deze

Re: [Talk-de] [OT] Garmin etrax vista schaltet sich ab

2011-01-09 Per discussione Andreas Tille
On Sat, Jan 08, 2011 at 05:41:16PM +0100, Holger Blum wrote: Dieses neue Gerät schaltet sich nach einem mir unerklärlichen Prinzip hin und wieder einfach ab. Ja, das macht meines auch. Einigermaßen reproduzierbar passiert das bei einer Ortssuche nach Namen, gelegentlich auch bei der

Re: [Talk-de] Hausnummern bei Wohnblocks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Steffen Heinz
Am 08.01.2011 20:27, schrieb Walter Nordmann: Um die Einträge der Adress-Verlage u.ä mach ich aber einen großen Bogen, da funktioniert meine innere Schere ganz gut. Ansonsten hinfahren und nach den Schildern sehen - scheint ja nen größerer Ort zu sein wo man bestimmt mal auch was anderes

Re: [Talk-de] Plastiken / Statuen

2011-01-09 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Am 8. Januar 2011 21:44 schrieb Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu: Hallo, wie taggt man Plastiken / Statuen - Kunst die so mal im Straßenbild herumsteht? die für Touristen? ;-) Gruß Martin ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

Re: [Talk-de] Aktion 11 - Verbindungsprobleme in Afrika

2011-01-09 Per discussione Werner Hoch
Hallo Gary68, nachdem die Aktion fast abgeschlossen ist habe ich noch ein paar Anmerkungen/Verbesserungswünsche. Eventuell kannst du ja die ein oder andere Idee umsetzen: 1. geographische Sortierung der Fehler Die Sortierung der Fehler hat folgende Vorteile: * naheliegene oder

Re: [Talk-de] virtuelle Knoten in JOSM

2011-01-09 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Am 8. Januar 2011 13:13 schrieb Christian H. Bruhn br...@arcor.de: Hallo! Eine kleine Frage zur Bedienung in JOSM: Gegeben seien zwei aneinandergrenzende Flächen mit gemeinsamen Knoten. Nun möchte ich die Grenze zwischen den beiden Gebieten verfeinern und füge sogenannte virtuelle Knoten

Re: [Talk-de] Status Aktion 11

2011-01-09 Per discussione Rainer Kluge
Hallo Gary, Am 08.01.2011 20:30, schrieb Gary68: Nach 24h sind 17 von 36 Paketen abgearbeitet Inzwischen sind alle Pakete abgearbeitet! SUPER und vielen Dank allen Helfern schon mal soweit!!! Die ganze Aktion war *super* vorbereitet und organisiert. Das einzige was mich anfangs etwas

Re: [Talk-de] [OT] Garmin etrax vista schaltet sich ab

2011-01-09 Per discussione M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
Am 8. Januar 2011 17:28 schrieb Andreas Tille andr...@an3as.eu: Dieses neue Gerät schaltet sich nach einem mir unerklärlichen Prinzip hin und wieder einfach ab.  Das ist mir in den letzten 3 Wochen schon viermal passiert.  Die Akkus sind dabei NICHT alle (es kam auch nicht die Warnung über

Re: [Talk-de] Hausnummern bei Wohnblocks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Robert S.
2011/1/9 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com Am 8. Januar 2011 17:01 schrieb Robert S. osm-m...@autobahnen-europa.eu: 2011/1/7 Walter Nordmann walter.nordm...@web.de http://www.openstreetmap.org/browse/way/48876726 ein Haus mit zwei Eingängen und unterschiedlichen Hausnummern.

Re: [Talk-de] Hausnummern bei Wohnblocks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Tobias Knerr
Am 09.01.2011 11:58, schrieb Robert S.: Ist für mich bei der Adresserfassung aber auch unerheblich, weil ich mir angewöhnt habe, die Adressen direkt an den Eingang zu hängen. Siehe dazu auch: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:Housenumbers.pdf Das ist der Standpunkt von Lulu-Ann, die sich

Re: [Talk-de] Stadtarchiv

2011-01-09 Per discussione Wolfgang
Hallo, Am Samstag 08 Januar 2011 22:39:59 schrieb Andreas Tille: Hi nochmal, wie taggt man ein Stadtarchiv (kein Museum)? tunnel=yes? scnr, Wolfgang ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org

[Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-09 Per discussione Tirkon
Im Wiki findet sich die Beschreibung von access: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access Beim Anwenden der Regeln kamen mir aber immer wieder Zweifel, wie ich vorzugehen habe. Als erste Maßnahme habe ich oben das Bild mit der Vererbung der Fortbewegungsarten eingefügt, das nicht von mir

Re: [Talk-de] Tankstellendach

2011-01-09 Per discussione Tirkon
Henning Scholland h.scholl...@googlemail.com wrote: Ich zeichne idR auch nur einen service-Weg durch die Zapfsäulen. Ich würde zudem für ein service=fuel plädieren, um die spezielle Charakteristik dieses service deutlich zu machen, analog zum service=parking_aisle und service=driveway.

Re: [Talk-de] Frage zu ti...@home Windows

2011-01-09 Per discussione Stephan Knauss
On 08.01.2011 11:19, Rainer Knaepper wrote: o...@stephans-server.de (Stephan Knauss) am 08.01.11: Als Tile-Dienst halte ich das Konzept für überholt. Mein server rechnet Mapnik bis Z19 und das ist in einigen sehr dicht gemappten Gegenden auch schon zu knapp um alle Details zu sehen. Nuja,

Re: [Talk-de] Stadtarchiv

2011-01-09 Per discussione Andreas Tille
On Sun, Jan 09, 2011 at 12:48:33PM +0100, Wolfgang wrote: Hallo, Am Samstag 08 Januar 2011 22:39:59 schrieb Andreas Tille: Hi nochmal, wie taggt man ein Stadtarchiv (kein Museum)? tunnel=yes? ROFL! Aber unseres ist noch oberirdisch und in Wernigerode wird auch keine U-Bahn gebaut

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-09 Per discussione Tobias Knerr
Am 09.01.2011 12:58, schrieb Tirkon: - Einge Werte lassen sich nur im Zusamenhang mit access=*, nicht aber mit einer Fortbewegungsart benutzen, z.B. agricultural. Alle Werte lassen sich mit allen Schlüsseln verwenden. vehicle=agricultural ist z.B. ein häufiger Fall. - Benutzt man eine

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-09 Per discussione Tirkon
Danke für die Aufklärung Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote: - Wie regelt sich das im Falle von psv=yes? Muss man da auch foot=yes addieren, denn ohne Fahrgäste machen Busse keinen Sinn. Laufen die Fahrgäste zu Fuß neben dem Bus her? Wenn nein, sind sie in diesem Moment keine Fußgänger.

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-09 Per discussione Georg Feddern
Moin, Tirkon schrieb: Im Wiki findet sich die Beschreibung von access: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Key:access Beim Anwenden der Regeln kamen mir aber immer wieder Zweifel, wie ich vorzugehen habe. Als erste Maßnahme habe ich oben das Bild mit der Vererbung der Fortbewegungsarten

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-09 Per discussione Peter Wendorff
Am 09.01.2011 14:31, schrieb Tirkon: Danke für die Aufklärung Tobias Knerro...@tobias-knerr.de wrote: - Wie regelt sich das im Falle von psv=yes? Muss man da auch foot=yes addieren, denn ohne Fahrgäste machen Busse keinen Sinn. Laufen die Fahrgäste zu Fuß neben dem Bus her? Wenn nein, sind

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-09 Per discussione Tirkon
Peter Wendorff wendo...@uni-paderborn.de wrote: Aus einer Straße, die für Busse reserviert ist, folgt aber nicht, dass an dieser Straße auch eine Haltestelle existiert. Es kann sich auch um eine Tatsächlich dem Busverkehr vorbehaltene Zufahrt zum Busbahnhof handeln, während Fußgänger auf

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-09 Per discussione Tirkon
Georg Feddern o...@bavarianmallet.de wrote: Beim Anwenden der Regeln kamen mir aber immer wieder Zweifel, wie ich vorzugehen habe. Als erste Maßnahme habe ich oben das Bild mit der Vererbung der Fortbewegungsarten eingefügt, das nicht von mir stammt. in diesem Zusammenhang möchte ich

Re: [Talk-de] Hausnummern bei Wohnblocks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Steffen Heinz
Am 09.01.2011 11:09, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer: +1, es werden m.E. da besser 2 Häuser, die aneinandergebaut sind, gezeichnet. I.d.R. sind die beiden Häuser nämlich statisch ebenfalls unabhängig (besitzrechtlich sind es 2 unterschiedliche Teile). D.h. es gibt zwar im Bereich der Trennwand

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-09 Per discussione Frederik Ramm
Hallo, Tirkon wrote: ... ist natürlich selbstredend. Da ist häufig aus Kostengrüden kein Fußgängerverbot aufgestellt. Wenn da eine schmale Busstraße zur Haltestelle existiert, wo der Bus gerade durchpasst und getrennte Fußwege bestehen, wird der verantortungsvolle Mapper (§1 StVO) - gerade an

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-09 Per discussione Peter Wendorff
Am 09.01.2011 16:08, schrieb Frederik Ramm: Hallo, Tirkon wrote: ... ist natürlich selbstredend. Da ist häufig aus Kostengrüden kein Fußgängerverbot aufgestellt. Wenn da eine schmale Busstraße zur Haltestelle existiert, wo der Bus gerade durchpasst und getrennte Fußwege bestehen, wird der

[Talk-de] Relationen und Osmarender/t...@h

2011-01-09 Per discussione Heiko Jacobs
Moin Wie verarbeitet Osmarender / t...@h eigentlich Relationen? Multipolygone genauer gesagt. Ist da irgendwo was dokumentiert? Gruß Mueck ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-09 Per discussione Tirkon
Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org wrote: Die Interpretation des §1 StVO obliegt aber dem Verkehrsteilnehmer und nicht dem Mapper. Ich waere sehr froh, wenn Mapper das mappen wuerden, was sie sehen, und nicht das, was ein Verkehrsteilnehmer ihrer Ansicht nach tun (oder unterlassen) sollte. Das

[Talk-de] kreative gpx-tracks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Walter Nordmann
moin moin, hab ich gerade in meiner Gegend entdeckt. http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/file/n5904573/Screenshot.png http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/file/n5904573/Screenshot-1.png zum näher ansehen: http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=50.1304lon=8.12119zoom=17layers=M kann man nix machen. nur

Re: [Talk-de] kreative gpx-tracks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Benjamin Lebsanft
Hallo, kann man nix machen. nur über die Phantasie mancher Kollegen wundern. vielleicht kann sein GPS Gerät keine Wegpunkte setzen ;) Liebe Grüße Benni signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ Talk-de mailing list

Re: [Talk-de] kreative gpx-tracks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Walter Nordmann
Benjamin Lebsanft wrote: vielleicht kann sein GPS Gerät keine Wegpunkte setzen ;) oder er springt gerne im Dreieck ;) - 33,33% aller Statistiken beruhen auf kleinen Datenmengen. -- View this message in context: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/kreative-gpx-tracks-tp5904573p5904585.html

Re: [Talk-de] Hausnummern bei Wohnblocks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Johann H. Addicks
Am 09.01.2011 11:09, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer: +1, es werden m.E. da besser 2 Häuser, die aneinandergebaut sind, gezeichnet. I.d.R. sind die beiden Häuser nämlich statisch ebenfalls unabhängig Das mag in vielen Fällen funktionieren. Aber an Gewerbeobjekten scheitert es. Also z.B.

Re: [Talk-de] unpräzise Beschreibung von access im Wiki

2011-01-09 Per discussione Frederik Ramm
Hallo, Tirkon wrote: Da muss man die Kirche im Dorf lassen und es der Ortskenntnis und der Verantwortung der Mapper überlassen, damit der Routenplaner oder Navi die Autos nicht auf solche Wege jagt. Der Routenplaner sollte schlau genug sein, die Strasse als schneller zu erkennen und sie

Re: [Talk-de] kreative gpx-tracks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Frederik Ramm
Hallo, Walter Nordmann wrote: http://gis.638310.n2.nabble.com/file/n5904573/Screenshot.png Sowas hab ich schon oefter gesehen. Das muss irgendeine Importsoftware eines bestimmten Herstellers sein, die solchen Murks erzeugt. Bye Frederik -- Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ##

Re: [Talk-de] kreative gpx-tracks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Frederik Ramm
Hallo, Frederik Ramm wrote: Sowas hab ich schon oefter gesehen. Das muss irgendeine Importsoftware eines bestimmten Herstellers sein, die solchen Murks erzeugt. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Upload_Waypoints Scheint sich ein User aus Nuernberg ausgedacht zu haben. Bye Frederik --

[Talk-de] Max (5,0t) mit [Anlieger frei]?

2011-01-09 Per discussione koppenho
Hallo Leute, in JOSM habe ich mir das RoadSigns-Plugin eingebunden. Damit wollte ich folgendes taggen: Verbotsschild Maximales Gesamtgewicht 5,0t traffic_sign=DE:262:5.0 http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/File:120px-Zeichen_262.svg.png mit Zusatz Anlieger frei

Re: [Talk-de] kreative gpx-tracks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Manuel Reimer
Frederik Ramm wrote: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Upload_Waypoints Scheint sich ein User aus Nuernberg ausgedacht zu haben. Wichtig ist da der Teil: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Upload_Waypoints#Bitte_beachten Wenn der Benutzer zu ermitteln ist, der diese GPX-Daten

Re: [Talk-de] Hausnummern bei Wohnblocks

2011-01-09 Per discussione Raimond Spekking
Am 09.01.2011 16:04, schrieb Steffen Heinz: Aus den NL kenne ich Häuser das sind die Hausnummern noch komplizierter PS.: was passiert eigentlich mit den Postleitzahlen in den NL? das hat jedes Dorf, jede Straße mehrere... Das macht ja nichts, sofern jedes Gebäude/jeder Eingangsnode

[Talk-de] Post offices near Lünen

2011-01-09 Per discussione Johann H. Addicks
Auf der openstreetmap.org Seite ist unterhalb des Suchfeldes ein Kurztext zu lesen: Suchen: Beispiele: „München“, „Heinestraße, Würzburg“, „CB2 5AQ“, oder „post offices near Lünen“ (mehr Beispiele) So richtig effektiv ist diese Suche aber nicht:

[Talk-de] OSM-Wochennotiz Nr. 25

2011-01-09 Per discussione Michael Schulze
Die Wochennotiz Nr. 25 ist jetzt da, viel Spaß beim Lesen! http://blog.openstreetmap.de/2011/01/osm-wochennotiz-nr-25/ ___ Talk-de mailing list Talk-de@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de

  1   2   >