A typical address should something like this:
addr:housenumber=1 addr:street=Rizal addr:city=Makati #osmit 121.43167, 14.53816
80 characters in all.
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 7:42 AM, Noli Sicad nsi...@gmail.com wrote:
Maning, this really good to get Street Address (i.e. House No. Street
Name and
Sorry for replying late but I had to leave for the night shift yesterday.
On 2011-07-05 15:28, John Smith wrote:
On 5 July 2011 23:04, Andreas Perstingerandreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
What do you consider as same result? How far away do I have to place a node?
If I put one additional
-Oorspronkelijk bericht-
Van: John Smith [mailto:deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com]
Verzonden: Tuesday, July 05, 2011 9:17 PM
Aan: Licensing and other legal discussions.
Onderwerp: Re: [OSM-legal-talk] license change effect on un-tagged nodes
On 6 July 2011 02:49, ce-test, qualified testing
On 02/07/2011 17:15, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
suppose there's a node that has been created by user A with no tags
on it. Suppose the node has later been moved by user B. A has not
accepted the CT, while B has.
Will the node have to be removed when we go to phase 5 of the license
change?
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
I must be missing something, because I believe this discussion is a
complete waste of time.
It is good that you have the modesty to assume that you're missing
something rather than 10 others are completely wasting their time ;) in
this case you are indeed missing (or I
Robert Whittaker (OSM) wrote:
On 16 June 2011 09:55, Richard Fairhurst lt;rich...@systemed.netgt;
wrote:
Robert Whittaker wrote:
A major purpose of the CTs is to ensure that all the data
remaining in OSM is suitable for re-licensing under any Free
and Open license without the need for
On 7 July 2011 04:03, Kai Krueger kakrue...@gmail.com wrote:
Although it still seems to be controversial how clause 1 and 2 of the CT
interact, with the recent draft intent of the LWG to issue a clarifying
statement[1] that indeed data only has to be compatible with the current
license and
On 6 July 2011 16:46, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
Then what about the attached alternative versions? For each version I
started JOSM, opened a new layer, added the node (-31.069902030361792,
152.728383561) which is close to the beginning of the road, loaded the
On 7 July 2011 04:20, John Smith deltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2011 16:46, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
Then what about the attached alternative versions? For each version I
started JOSM, opened a new layer, added the node (-31.069902030361792,
On 06/07/2011 18:29, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
I must be missing something, because I believe this discussion is a
complete waste of time.
It is good that you have the modesty to assume that you're missing
something rather than 10 others are completely wasting their time ;)
On 2011-07-06 20:23, John Smith wrote:
On 7 July 2011 04:20, John Smithdeltafoxtrot...@gmail.com wrote:
On 6 July 2011 16:46, Andreas Perstingerandreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
Then what about the attached alternative versions? For each version I
started JOSM, opened a new layer, added
On 7 July 2011 06:12, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
But even if I'm just one person the question still remains: Do you consider
any of these 4 versions a violation of your copyright?
Are you planning to try and replace all my work one way at a time like this?
Which is of
On 2011-07-06 22:17, John Smith wrote:
Are you planning to try and replace all my work one way at a time like this?
No, I just wanted to show you that you can't really tell if someone
retraces a removed way by looking at an aerial imagery, by looking at
the current OSM map or by just moving
On 7 July 2011 07:25, Andreas Perstinger andreas.perstin...@gmx.net wrote:
No, I just wanted to show you that you can't really tell if someone retraces
a removed way by looking at an aerial imagery, by looking at the current OSM
map or by just moving randomly some nodes.The same goes for
IMHO
On 7 July 2011 08:27, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com wrote:
Google in addition have their ToS.
So one person copies tiles and breaches contract and gives them to
another person who is only bound by copyright ...
___
legal-talk mailing list
On 06/07/2011 21:04, Anthony wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 3:57 PM, Frederik Rammfrede...@remote.org wrote:
Dave F. wrote:
If one of these gets moved then the whole way gets updated,
No.
Substantively, that is what happens, but technically, in the database,
it is not.
In the database, we
Am 06.07.2011 20:31, schrieb John Smith:
On 6 July 2011 18:20, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
[GG] I was not talking about copyright. Copyright laws are of no use
in the digital era,
You were talking about databases, however databases can still store
On 7 July 2011 09:34, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
That does not imply that individual contributors actually hold any rights in
the data they
contributed. As we know, that is a difficult question and depends on
jurisdiction and so
on, and my take on it would be: probably not. For all
Am 06.07.2011 23:25, schrieb Andreas Perstinger:
BTW I've just found some high court decisions which clearly state that
a map (and its content) isn't protected by copyright automatically
here in Austria. You have to prove individual creativity. Just
reproducing geographical facts like
On 7 July 2011 09:47, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Normally none of them lead to a protected work and nobody would confuse it
for creativity
I'm not sure if I'm more amused that you have to try and scale things
down to the size of a brick or the fact that even you state it's the
morally
Am 07.07.2011 01:40, schrieb John Smith:
On 7 July 2011 09:34, Simon Poolesi...@poole.ch wrote:
That does not imply that individual contributors actually hold any rights in
the data they
contributed. As we know, that is a difficult question and depends on
jurisdiction and so
on, and my take
Upps you are really confused about the origins of copyright protection,
which are rather recent
and had nothing to do with morals.
Simon
Am 07.07.2011 01:54, schrieb John Smith:
On 7 July 2011 09:47, Simon Poolesi...@poole.ch wrote:
Normally none of them lead to a protected work and
On 7 July 2011 10:04, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Upps you are really confused about the origins of copyright protection,
which are rather recent
and had nothing to do with morals.
I didn't know the late 1800s was considered rather recent
___
Am 07.07.2011 01:56, schrieb Anthony:
...
There certainly is creativity involved in making a brick wall.
Choosing a herringbone bond vs. a stretcher bond, for instance. And in
some cases it can be copyrightable - not if it's just a herringbone or
a stretcher bond, but if the pattern is
In terms of laws, sure.
Am 07.07.2011 02:08, schrieb John Smith:
On 7 July 2011 10:04, Simon Poolesi...@poole.ch wrote:
Upps you are really confused about the origins of copyright protection,
which are rather recent
and had nothing to do with morals.
I didn't know the late 1800s was
Well 300 to 400 years earlier (as in printing press with movable
letters) which doesn't make it recent,
but still twice as old as copyright law.
The main point however is that copyright law has a economic motivation,
not moral as you imply.
Simon
Am 07.07.2011 02:12, schrieb John Smith:
On 7 July 2011 10:20, Simon Poole si...@poole.ch wrote:
Well 300 to 400 years earlier (as in printing press with movable letters)
which doesn't make it recent,
but still twice as old as copyright law.
The main point however is that copyright law has a economic motivation, not
moral as you
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.comwrote:
are there any suggestions for making it easier?
--
robin
I suggested a long time ago that adding segment roads in routes relations
was a bad idea.
The alternative is to put the intersection nodes and end-nodes of
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 4:54 AM, Robin Paulson robin.paul...@gmail.com
wrote:
are there any suggestions for making it easier?
--
robin
Well you could put in a request to make the boundary between the
taglist and relations list in Potlatch moveable, so you can see more
relations. Having the
There is this proposal
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Route_Segments, which I
like, but it seems it's not worked on anymore and it's not rendered, since
it involves relations containing relations. I don't really mind having many
relations on roads. It doesn't pose a problem
2011/7/6 Pieren pier...@gmail.com:
The alternative is to put the intersection nodes and end-nodes of the route.
This has the big advantage that ways are not split any more for some
abstract features like routes (and you don't have to add a 2nd relation to
rebuild the road). But it has the
Cool thing around pictures, as most of twitter clients can upload them
themselves and make a short links in the posts, so, we can try to use that
links and put them into nodes as well!
Also @mentioning - we're adding both ways now - so, you'll be able to use
@osm_it - to hide your mappings from
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:23 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com
wrote:
if you stored only nodes there would be ambiguity problems in cases
where several ways connect the same nodes.
You also have ambiguity problem in the other model e.g. when you have
segments in your relation
By the way, we'v reduced permissions for twitter - just like it should be!
Thanks for mentioning that!
--
RO
2011/7/6 Oleg gel...@gmail.com
Cool thing around pictures, as most of twitter clients can upload them
themselves and make a short links in the posts, so, we can try to use that
links
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Why on earth should we give references to proprietary data projects
like mapmaker in our wiki?
Including it in the list gives us a chance to link to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_map_maker
and explain why people should *not* choose GMM instead of OSM.
--
On 6 July 2011 22:03, Tobias Knerr o...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Why on earth should we give references to proprietary data projects
like mapmaker in our wiki?
Including it in the list gives us a chance to link to
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Google_map_maker
On 6 July 2011 18:20, ce-test, qualified testing bv - Gert Gremmen
g.grem...@cetest.nl wrote:
[GG] I was not talking about copyright. Copyright laws are of no use
in the digital era,
You were talking about databases, however databases can still store
copyrightable content, in this case it's
Am 06.07.2011 20:17, schrieb John Smith:
On 6 July 2011 22:03, Tobias Knerro...@tobias-knerr.de wrote:
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Why on earth should we give references to proprietary data projects
like mapmaker in our wiki?
Including it in the list gives us a chance to link to
Hi,
Dave F. wrote:
If, by _used_ you mean that it's a part of the way, then *millions* of
nodes have no attributes.
No tags. Yes.
If one of these gets moved then the whole way gets updated,
No.
Bye
Frederik
--
Frederik Ramm ## eMail frede...@remote.org ## N49°00'09 E008°23'33
On 6 July 2011 22:39, Pieren pier...@gmail.com wrote:
Detaching intersection nodes is not something usual. At the moment, the
complexity is more on managing ways with an increasing amount of relations
and an increasing amount of segments within the relations for a single
street.
hmm, all
i did a search for new zealand, and was heartened to find we are now
part of australia. at last, we have come to our senses and joined as a
nation!
slightly more seriously, could someone help with the labelling of the
node for nz? apart from somehow being part of australia, if i click on
the
On 07/06/2011 11:35 PM, Robin Paulson wrote:
is there any consensus on shortening of parts of names?
e.g.:
street/st
saint/st
avenue/ave
point/pt
mount/mt
i was under the impression consensus was to type the full word, then
renderers would shorten where necessary? apparently some
On Thu, Jul 07, 2011 at 03:35:07PM +1200, Robin Paulson wrote:
is there any consensus on shortening of parts of names?
e.g.:
street/st
saint/st
avenue/ave
point/pt
mount/mt
i was under the impression consensus was to type the full word, then
renderers would shorten where necessary?
Looking at the details it seems like the Australia being referred to
is the continent, not the country. The New Zealand node has a
is_in:continent=Australia tag and there is a place=continent node
that nominatim is associating it with. So I guess this is correct
but perhaps a little confusing in
Since the ban on all contributors who didn't sign the CTs, and ban on all
new contributors from using NearMap and other CC-BY/CC-BY-SA sources, I'm no
longer actively contributing to the OSM database. Instead I am now actively
contributing to the fosm database. I am interested to hear what other
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 9:29 PM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.comwrote:
Since the ban on all contributors who didn't sign the CTs, and ban on all
new contributors from using NearMap and other CC-BY/CC-BY-SA sources, I'm no
longer actively contributing to the OSM database. Instead I am now
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.comwrote:
Are you going to stop contributing data altogether? Or are you putting you
efforts on hold at the moment.
My efforts are on hold at the moment. Still disillusioned...
___
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 21:29, Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Are you moving to the fosm db? If so, great! Less problems with trying to
merge your data into fosm, and we can all get back to mapping. Do you have
any concerns over the switch?
I have concerns. The
This is exactly right.
On 7/6/2011 5:35 AM, Chris Barham wrote:
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 21:29, Andrew Harveyandrew.harv...@gmail.com wrote:
snip
Are you moving to the fosm db? If so, great! Less problems with trying to
merge your data into fosm, and we can all get back to mapping.
On 6 July 2011 22:35, Chris Barham cbar...@pobox.com wrote:
I'd like to think all this rather dull licence bickering will play out
and OSM will continue and strengthen. It's sad that people with
agendas are talking up the 'possible' deletion of data, and rushing
off to fork. That energy
On 06/07/2011, at 9:29 PM, Andrew Harvey wrote:
because any CC-BY-SA derived data you add may be removed if OSM
abandons CC-BY-SA at some point in the future (or may even be
conflicting with your agreed CTs now...).
How could I add CC-BY-SA derived data if I use GPS traces, audio
On 7 July 2011 07:54, Mark Pulley mrpul...@lizzy.com.au wrote:
How could I add CC-BY-SA derived data if I use GPS traces, audio recordings
of names, or imagery like Yahoo or Bing? The only way I could see this
happening would be if I was to deliberately go out of my way to add a
Actually it's
Steve Coast st...@asklater.com wrote:
This is exactly right.
It's only exactly right if you don't have a problem with the new
licence, with the process by which it was implemented, with mass
deletion of data, with the proliferation of incompatible open licences,
with irrevocable and eternal
On 7/6/2011 3:20 PM, Sam Couter wrote:
Steve Coastst...@asklater.com wrote:
This is exactly right.
It's only exactly right if you don't have a problem with the new
licence, with the process by which it was implemented, with mass
deletion of data, with the proliferation of incompatible open
As others have said..
1) Ive moved to fosm since the lockout
2) Im feeling pretty disillusioned at the whole thing, and seriously
wonder if its not worth just paying 5 bucks for a map that I cannot
share, rather than deal with the politics of a staggered mapping project
3) Ive made a couple of
Date: Wed, 6 Jul 2011 21:29:54 +1000
From: Andrew Harvey andrew.harv...@gmail.com
To: OSM Australian Talk List talk-au@openstreetmap.org
Subject: [talk-au] Active Australian OSM contributors in light of
CT/license changes
Message-ID:
Hi
Is anybody good at spotting eBay scams? This dude has 64 new Garmin Vista HCx's
on eBay for about $120 less than comparable offers. Apart from zero feedback
and the price, it looks legit to me.
Hmm - any thoughts on a possible GPS bargain? (I was thinking it could be ok as
Canada is awash
The URLs you sent didnt work here, but personally Ive bought a few GPS
receivers from dealextreme.com Theyre a hong kong based business but
have free shipping and low prices. I think my GPS data logger cost
about $15 there. Most of their LCD GPS units simply run windows CE so
you simply have to
Você pode baixar os mapas daqui:
http://download.geofabrik.de/osm/south-america/ (baixe o PBF, o OsmAnd
reconhece). A atualização é semanal, se não me engano.
O OsmAnd permite atualizar nomes de vias e sentido ?
O iOS tem alguma aplicação que permita isso ? Se não tiver, alguém quer me
ajudar a
Hallo,
auf unsrem (internationalen) Wiki sind ja alle Stammtisch-Termine
weltweit aufgelistet. Von 83 Terminen, die dort eingetragen sind, sind
71 in Deutschland, und 69 davon sind Stammtischtermine.
Dem unbedarften Besucher aus, sagen wir, Mexico City muss es also so
vorkommen, als ob
Hi!
ein Problem ist ja, dass viele Stammtische jeden Monat stattfinden und der
Kalender 6 Monate umfasst, sie also mehrfach auftreten. Man könnte vielleicht
jeweils nur den nächsten Termin davon darstellen und alle weiteren erst nach
Klick auf wiederkehrende Termine einblenden oder sowas.
Jochen
Moin,
bevor ich einen Editwar beginnen, wollte ich nur klären, ob ich da
falsch liege... Es geht darum, wenn mehrere Bänke an einem Platz stehen.
Ich hab immer einen Node für jede Bank gesetzt. Nun geht ein User in
Ilmenau durch und löscht die Bänke. Auf unserem Kirchplatz stehen
jeweils Bäumchen
Am 6. Juli 2011 10:50 schrieb Andreas Neumann andr-neum...@gmx.net:
bevor ich einen Editwar beginnen, wollte ich nur klären, ob ich da
falsch liege... Es geht darum, wenn mehrere Bänke an einem Platz stehen.
Ich hab immer einen Node für jede Bank gesetzt. Nun geht ein User in
Ilmenau durch und
Hallo Carsten, Dirk et al.,
ich suche eine routingfähige Garminkarte für Mitteleuropa. Ist das Vista
HCX zu alt, um die Karte in zwei Dateien zu laden?
Kann ich die halbe eu_rout_gmapsupp1.img.gz irgendwie in eine allein
lauffähige Karte halb Europas konvertieren?
Ein Versuch, mit
Am 06.07.2011 11:03, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
Am 6. Juli 2011 10:50 schrieb Andreas Neumannandr-neum...@gmx.net:
bevor ich einen Editwar beginnen, wollte ich nur klären, ob ich da
falsch liege... Es geht darum, wenn mehrere Bänke an einem Platz stehen.
Ich hab immer einen Node für jede Bank
Am 6. Juli 2011 09:47 schrieb Frederik Ramm frede...@remote.org:
Was koennten wir tun, um die restliche OSM-Welt nicht so zu erdruecken?
Sollten wir vielleicht einfach eine Extra-Kalenderseite Regular pub meets
in Germany machen?
Ja, man könnte die Pub-meetings nach Ländern sortieren und auf
Am 6. Juli 2011 10:50 schrieb Andreas Neumann andr-neum...@gmx.net:
bevor ich einen Editwar beginnen, wollte ich nur klären, ob ich da
falsch liege... Es geht darum, wenn mehrere Bänke an einem Platz stehen.
Ich hab immer einen Node für jede Bank gesetzt. Nun geht ein User in
Ilmenau durch
Am 6. Juli 2011 11:24 schrieb Falk Zscheile falk.zsche...@googlemail.com:
Vielleicht könnt ihr euch ja darauf einigen, dass die nahe beieinander
stehenden Bänke über eine site-Relation zusammengefasst werden.
-1, wozu sollte das gut sein? Es ist ein Leichtes, nahe
zusammenstehende Bänke _im
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 10:50:41AM +0200, Andreas Neumann wrote:
Moin,
bevor ich einen Editwar beginnen, wollte ich nur klären, ob ich da
falsch liege... Es geht darum, wenn mehrere Bänke an einem Platz stehen.
Ich hab immer einen Node für jede Bank gesetzt. Nun geht ein User in
Ilmenau
Am 6. Juli 2011 11:36 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer dieterdre...@gmail.com:
Am 6. Juli 2011 11:24 schrieb Falk Zscheile falk.zsche...@googlemail.com:
Vielleicht könnt ihr euch ja darauf einigen, dass die nahe beieinander
stehenden Bänke über eine site-Relation zusammengefasst werden.
-1, wozu
Moin !
Der Sommerurlaub steht für viele vor der Tür und was liegt da näher als
am Urlaubsort auch einwenig zu mappen. Neben den einfachen Dingen wie
Postkästen, Bierstuben etc. gibt es auch größere Objekte die in der
Regel die Zusammenarbeit mehrerer erfordern - ich spreche hier
Würde man statt einem Waldstück jeden einzelnen Baum erfassen?
Warum nicht?
Vielleicht mit Pilzbewuchs und ohne als Tag?
Die Frage ist doch immer wieviel ist ausreichend und macht Sinn?
Und ist ist das Konstrukt noch allgemein durchschaubar?
Gruß Sven
Am Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2011, 11:40:06
...
... umgekehrt - ich muss erst einmal auf windows7 packen und dann das
richtige entpackscript auf dem zerver haben !
hast Du mir dem Teil schon einaml das Bündeln von Dateien in verschachtelten
Verzeichnissen realisiert bekommen ??
such mal nach tar bzw. komprimiere dann mit
Hallo,
Am Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2011 00:50:43 schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
einerseits sehe ich es gerade bei Autobahnen schwierig an, dort vor
Ort genaue Maße zu erheben,
damit hast du recht, die wenigsten Mapper werden die Gelegenheit eines Staus
nutzen und schnell die Mittelstreifenbreite mit
Hallo,
Am Mittwoch, 6. Juli 2011 12:20:32 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck (OSM):
Moin !
Der Sommerurlaub steht für viele vor der Tür und was liegt da näher als
am Urlaubsort auch einwenig zu mappen.
... um 14 Uhr dann Beachvolleyball am Zentralstrand und um 16 Uhr Wasserball
im Pool ...
scnr,
Am 6. Juli 2011 12:20 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck (OSM) o...@tappenbeck.net:
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Sommeraufgabe2011
nette Idee, ich habe mal ein paar Hinweise für Italien ergänzt. Hast
Du das auch im Forum gepostet?
Gruß Martin
___
Am 6. Juli 2011 11:53 schrieb Falk Zscheile falk.zsche...@googlemail.com:
Aha, und das ist dann genauer/besser? Ich denke dieses Beispiel zeigt
schön, dass hier irgendwo eine Grenze bei der Datengenauigkeit liegt.
Klar gibt es eine Grenze bei der Datengenauigkeit, aber die besteht
eben nicht
Am 06.07.2011 13:13, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
Am 6. Juli 2011 12:20 schrieb Jan Tappenbeck (OSM)o...@tappenbeck.net:
[1] http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:Sommeraufgabe2011
nette Idee, ich habe mal ein paar Hinweise für Italien ergänzt. Hast
Du das auch im Forum gepostet?
Gruß Martin
Am 6. Juli 2011 12:27 schrieb Sven Sommerkamp s_sommerk...@gmx.de:
Würde man statt einem Waldstück jeden einzelnen Baum erfassen?
Warum nicht?
ja, warum nicht.
Vielleicht mit Pilzbewuchs und ohne als Tag?
warum nicht, wenn man Zeit, Lust und Interesse daran hat.
Die Frage ist doch
Am 03.07.2011 07:42, schrieb Jan Tappenbeck:
hi !
habe gerade den Link http://www.map2go.org/maps/ gefunden - kann mir
einer sagen was das ist oder dahinter steckt ??
Ich finde kein Impressium und sonstigen Texte !!
Gruß Jan :-)
Keine Ahnung, WhoIs zeigt:
Registrant Name:Thorsten
Hallo Fabian,
Am 06.07.2011 11:09, schrieb Fabian Schmidt:
ich suche eine routingfähige Garminkarte für Mitteleuropa. Ist das Vista
HCX zu alt, um die Karte in zwei Dateien zu laden?
Ja, die Software erwartet nur eine Kartendatei und diese heißt gmapsupp.img.
Kann ich die halbe
Hi,
On 07/06/11 11:14, M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Ja, man könnte die Pub-meetings nach Ländern sortieren und auf
Unterseiten unterbringen.
Eigentlich finde ich, dass ausser Deutschland kein Land eine Unterseite
braeuchte ;) oder, wenn Du gern eine allgemeingueltige Regel haettest,
wuerde
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:27:29PM +0200, Sven Sommerkamp wrote:
Würde man statt einem Waldstück jeden einzelnen Baum erfassen?
Warum nicht?
Vielleicht mit Pilzbewuchs und ohne als Tag?
Ist das nicht vielleicht was anderes?
Begriffstechnisch ist schon Wald nicht gleich Baum.
Wohingegen
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 01:27:00PM +0200, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Am 6. Juli 2011 12:27 schrieb Sven Sommerkamp s_sommerk...@gmx.de:
Würde man statt einem Waldstück jeden einzelnen Baum erfassen?
Warum nicht?
ja, warum nicht.
Vielleicht nicht anstatt sondern zusaetzlich? Das machen die
Hi,
On 07/06/11 13:27, M?rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
Die Frage ist doch immer wieviel ist ausreichend und macht Sinn?
Und ist ist das Konstrukt noch allgemein durchschaubar?
ja, wobei das bei der Aufnahme wieder der einzelne Mapper entscheidet,
während das Löschen m.E. mind. einen
Hi,
On 07/06/11 14:19, Florian Lohoff wrote:
Und ist ist das Konstrukt noch allgemein durchschaubar?
Was ist daran nicht durchschaubar wenn ich eine flaeche highway=pedestrian
area=yes habe und darauf viele nodes mit amenity=bench?
+1 - in der Praxis ist es doch eher so: Je detailreicher
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:All_in_one_Garmin_Map/Gebiete
Ab morgen gibts es zwei bis dreimal die Woche von allen auf der Seite
registierten Listen downloadbare Karten.
Dirk
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:All_in_one_Garmin_Map/Gebiete
Ab morgen gibt es alle 2-3 Tage von allen dort eingetragenen Gebieten
downloadbare Listen.
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hallo, das einfachste wäre es doch, die in fernerer Zukunft liegenden
Stammtische mal zusammen in ein noinclude /noinclude zu packen.
Unterbrochen wären diese Ausblendeblöcke nur von den Konferenzen.
Schon wäre die Startseite aufgeräumter.
Die Vorschau sollte aus meiner Sicht bei einem bis
http://www.faz.net/artikel/C31158/unterwegs-mit-dem-smartphone-outdoor-routenfuehrer-fuer-android-30455768.html
Grüße
Dominik
--
Dominik Wegerle
fortunequest
o...@dwegerle.eu
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
Hi,
Kolossos wrote:
Hallo, das einfachste wäre es doch, die in fernerer Zukunft liegenden
Stammtische mal zusammen in ein noinclude /noinclude zu packen.
Unterbrochen wären diese Ausblendeblöcke nur von den Konferenzen.
Schon wäre die Startseite aufgeräumter.
Von mir aus gern!
Bye
Frederik
Am 06.07.2011 19:55, schrieb Frederik Ramm:
Von mir aus gern!
Erledigt.
Grüße Tim
___
Talk-de mailing list
Talk-de@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-de
Hallo,
Am Freitag 01 Juli 2011 00:44:23 schrieb Frederik Ramm:
PS: Gibt es das eigentlich ueberhaupt, dass Strassen und Schienen ueber
die gleiche Bruecke fuehren? Ich kenne, zumindest in Deutschland, glaub
ich nur separate Bruecken, selbst wenn beides direkt benachbart ist.
und noch ein
Am 06.07.11 schrieb fla...@googlemail.com:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/DE:All_in_one_Garmin_Map/Gebiete
Ab morgen gibts es zwei bis dreimal die Woche von allen auf der Seite
registierten Listen downloadbare Karten.
Entsprechen die Nummern 70013xxx der Kacheln unter europe-daily/img/
Moin!
Am 06.07.2011 14:19, schrieb Florian Lohoff:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2011 at 12:27:29PM +0200, Sven Sommerkamp wrote:
Die Frage ist doch immer wieviel ist ausreichend und macht Sinn?
Nein - es gibt kein ausreichend. Jeder darf so viel und so detailreich mappen
wie er will solange er nicht
Am 7. Juli 2011 00:05 schrieb Stephan Wolff s.wo...@web.de:
Wie könnte man z.B. bei einer Bushaltestelle mit Bank und Unterstand die
Lage der drei Einzelobjekte (Haltestellenmast am Fahrbahnrand, Bank hinter
dem Fußweg, Unterstand 5 m in Fahrtrichtung) abbilden ohne eine bestehende
Auswertung
Hallo,
Stephan Wolff wrote:
Nein - es gibt kein ausreichend. Jeder darf so viel und so detailreich
mappen
wie er will solange er nicht dadurch den anderen die nutzung kaputt
macht.
Aber woran erkennt ein Mapper, ob nicht irgendeine Nutzung kaputt geht
oder schwerwiegende Nachteile hat?
I managed to download the LULC layer but when I try to download in JOSM, I
get a message
Sorry! No data available in this scale.
This is for very low zoom levels i.e.1 inch = 1 km
Any idea why?
Shalabh
The imagery is for even lower zoom levels since its on the 1:1million scale.
I
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.comwrote:
I managed to download the LULC layer but when I try to download in JOSM, I
get a message
Sorry! No data available in this scale.
This is for very low zoom levels i.e.1 inch = 1 km
Any idea why?
Shalabh
The
On Thu, Jul 7, 2011 at 12:06 AM, Shalabh shalab...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 11:58 PM, Arun Ganesh arun.plane...@gmail.comwrote:
I managed to download the LULC layer but when I try to download in JOSM,
I get a message
Sorry! No data available in this scale.
This is for
1 - 100 di 171 matches
Mail list logo
