Sigh, here we go again.
Can't be stuffed registering to add comments on that thread.
This proposal goes against the "map what's on the ground" principles that
countless others have surveyed or made good faith judgement calls on.
I am unclear why we are still attempting to have any conversation
In SA, there are a number of "Unmade Road Reserves". Where it gets a bit
interesting is when someone either illegally fences it off; or applies for
it to be transferred to them via something like Roads (Opening and Closing)
Regulations 2021.
Generally, I've mapped these were there is a path,
While OSM doesn't have layers, https://openaddresses.io/ more or less acts
as the address layer. The datasets there aren't all ODBL, but they are
generally open. It includes GNAF. Given how frequently addresses update, to
keep it in sync with OSM would be pretty significant and hard to reconcile
https://maproulette.org/challenge/38490/task/155741018 seems a bit weird!
Is it possible to easily split the pedestrian crossings from traffic lights?
Some appear to just be "crossings" for example -
https://maproulette.org/challenge/38490/task/155740397 - no lights/etc.
Worth mapping, but a fair
This seems useful. How often do your reports re-run? (manually?) Would be
good to chip away at issues and get a sense of progress.
On Mon, Nov 28, 2022 at 4:44 PM Mateusz Konieczny via Talk-au <
talk-au@openstreetmap.org> wrote:
> I have created
>
Adelaide metro areas have had some updated imagery (great!) but sadly some
of the mapwithai training is based on previous versions; and it's now a
little inaccurate.
Fingers crossed, updated imagery will result in updated AI feature
extraction shortly.
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 1:12 PM Graeme
Through overpass, plus random sampling as I'm editing; I'm still seeing a
substantial amount of misclassifications.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1aIk
~2400 ways.
https://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1aIl
Most of these outside of townships appear to be still very poorly
classified, and last edited 2
I've noticed and raised https://github.com/microsoft/Open-Maps/issues/65 to
no response in the last 24 hours, ditto to changeset comments; and it looks
like the team is still chugging away. Not all of the edits are wrong, but a
lot are.
Overpass suggests up to ~5000 highway=residential or
On Thu, 27 May 2021, 8:09 pm Andrew Davidson, wrote:
> On 25/5/21 4:41 pm, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
> > I'd make a polite argument there is still value in at least the suburb,
> > possibly postcode being still provided. When exporting data via
> > overpass as CSV; it
On Mon, May 24, 2021 at 8:59 PM Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On 21/5/21 9:23 pm, Andrew Harvey via Talk-au wrote:
> >
> > For now the iD preset doesn't show the any inherited attributes, so
> > it will prompt mappers to supply these fields. While it might be
> > redundant, it's also not wrong, would
Just to flag a note of caution here - I'd recommend small scale evaluations
*only* at this stage; or if you do bigger test imports; in a sandbox
environment.
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Sandbox_for_editing#Experiment_with_the_API_.28advanced.29
If there is interest; later we can create a
Looks like my other message didn't go through.
Agree re the slight rotational issues; and it being at about the level of a
new-intermediate contributor from the samples around Adelaide I managed to
look at.
I found sometimes, it would mistake bright concrete as part of a building
footprint.
Hi folks,
I was wondering how mapbox had coverage of areas that hadn't been traced
into OSM; and after a bit of digging came across this ODBL data:
https://github.com/microsoft/AustraliaBuildingFootprints
As fun as hand tracing data is; I'd be pretty keen to swap to small scale
imports of this,
Take a look at... https://opencouncildata.org/ perhaps. There is a mailing
list (quiet at the moment); a set of standards for a bunch of open data (
http://standards.opencouncildata.org/); etc.
There isn't a specific one for cycling infrastructure; but its a good model
they can perhaps follow;
On Wed, Jan 8, 2020 at 1:14 PM Andrew Harvey
wrote:
> This MapRoulette challange is mostly about adding the operator and
> operator:wikidata tags and also branch if you can.
>
>
If you do see other attributes like solar (rare), or water tanks (less
rare); please do map those too.
Map of
Nice work.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZf3SJ1V-iQ and https://openclimatefix.org/
may be also of interest.
One of the pet ideas for this data I had was generating a number of
overpass queries looking for big commercial real estate without solar
deployed; to form the basis of advocacy
>
>
>
> *Port Adelaide Enfield*
>
> The City of Port Adelaide Enfield has uploaded 228,000 images and just shy
> of 1,000 km of coverage. They are using the uploaded imagery to update
> their traffic sign inventory.
>
> This imagery consists of road surveys but also surveys of the footpaths
>
+1.
Do have to amend the bits around not legal for SA cyclists to be on
footpaths given
https://www.sa.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0020/23438/DPTI-Cycling-and-the-Law-Booklet.pdf
On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 3:31 PM Andrew Davidson wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 4, 2019 at 3:09 PM Herbert.Remi via Talk-au <
On Thu, Jun 6, 2019 at 2:32 PM Phil Wyatt wrote:
> PS – where it’s a building it wants to update each node of the building –
> not sure if this is a roulette issue or something else
>
>
>
That is annoying, I think its a maproullette issue - the queries look for
named nodes, named ways; when it
>
>
> For example my personal preference is to tag the
>
> name: brand + branch
>
> eg. so Westfield Chatswood is tagged
>
> name=Westfield Chatswood
> brand=Westfield
> branch=Chatswood
> brand:wikidata= -> wikidata for Westfield brand
> wikidata= -> wikidata for Westfield Chatswood
>
> Same
Hey folks,
Since ID now includes some handy presets and some recommendations to
"upgrade tags", I thought I'd trial out a challenge to find all Woolworths
supermarkets without wikidata.
https://maproulette.org/browse/challenges/8118
1) Is this kind of challenge and the resulting armchair mapping
My preference is to infer; because suburbs have a nasty habit of changing
their boundaries and postcodes very frequently.
On Tue, Apr 16, 2019 at 11:23 AM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 23:01, Sebastian Spiess wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> this question originates from the
Side note: http://www.opentrees.org may be of interest to you, takes a
number of tree datasets in a standard format, renders them.
On Sun, 14 Apr. 2019, 10:16 pm David Sisourath,
wrote:
> Thanks Andrew, I have looked at all of the tags in the raw data and have
> created a Python file to
Ah, nice - and compared to the mapillary ones, has picked out school
zone/hours/etc very well (at least in the example provided)
Will be great when https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/4851 gets
into ID; possibly https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/5666 gets
sorted out too.
On
I'm happy to contribute; it would be good to redo the data.sa.gov.au
dataset process again and clean up the last few hundred that didn't get
assessed + new changes.
One of the other periodic checks I do; tracking down all landuse:
construction / highway: construction a few times a year.
Would be
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 6:53 AM wrote:
> Hi, I'm thinking it might be worth emailing the businesses being
> advertised and telling them that the SEO company that they engaged is
> making edits that they might not want their business associates.
> Tony
>
> > Concur. Be ruthless. These people are
Onosm.org generates a structured note.
Source code at https://github.com/osmlab/onosm.org
On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 3:41 PM Graeme Fitzpatrick
wrote:
>
> On Thu, 31 Jan 2019 at 06:51, Martijn van Exel wrote:
>
>> You can point businesses to https://www.onosm.org/ which gives
>> businesses an
On Tue, Dec 25, 2018 at 4:53 PM Andrew Davidson wrote:
> The old data.gov.au permission is no longer sufficient to use a dataset
> in OSM. The first thing you are going to have to do is approach the Council
> and get them to sign the wavier.
>
>>
>>
If it is no longer sufficient, can you update
I've started https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Ballarat_Building_Import ;
will capture all of the various TODOs there shortly
___
Talk-au mailing list
Talk-au@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/talk-au
Hey folks,
Another mapper, Pierce, has pointed out
https://data.gov.au/dataset/ballarat-3d-buildings is available.
>From a cursory review, the data seems to be similar to
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Geelong_Building_Import - also CC BY A
3.0, and I think covered by the existing
For knowing "whats mapped" at a high level, I like http://qa.poole.ch - I
believe it has filters for unmapped addresses.
On the ground stuff - streetcomplete does really well at prompting for
things without address, highly recommend.
Setting up a task manager instance; I reckon it could make a
dont forget to share with the upstream source, otherwise they will be
forever wrong
On Sat, 21 Apr. 2018, 8:44 pm Nick Hocking, wrote:
> Andrew wrote "According to the Geographical Names Board "Bullenbung
> Creek" is the old name and "Bullenbong Creek" is the new name
So all we need is permission to use the LPI addressess for all of NSW and
> someone with the time and skill to do the import and we'll have a useful
> NSW map :-)
>
>
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#New_South_Wales_Land_and_Property_Information
>From the news today, RFG (Gloria Jeans, Brumby's, Michel’s Patisserie,
Pizza Capers, Crust, a few others) look like they might be closing up to
200 of their stores
Supposedly, they have ~1150 stores in total and the below query highlights
about ~150; so we've got a bit over 10% modelled -
:( https://www.adelaidemetro.com.au/planner/ appears to have swapped over
to google maps, sigh
On Tue, Feb 20, 2018 at 12:59 PM, Andrew Harvey <andrew.harv...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> On 20 Feb. 2018 1:41 pm, "Daniel O'Connor" <daniel.ocon...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>From here, you might be interested in emailing the maintainer and asking if
they will specifically license that dataset as ODBL (
https://opendatacommons.org/licenses/odbl/), an open data license suitable
for datasets.
Their standard terms of use are:
*Content sharing*
*All content produced by
I tend to treat these in rural areas as "city limit signs" ("Welcome to X").
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:traffic_sign#Tagging
I would maybe tag a residential area with the sign name for a
'neighbourhood' / 'real estate development vanity naming' sign as per
We have explicit permission for https://data.sa.gov.au/data/dataset/roads
to be imported, which *in theory* is the exact same dataset in use by the
http://location.sa.gov.au/viewer/
Broadly, if its in the shapefile, its good to use.
I'm in! Point me at the things to map!
On 15/07/2017 2:02 PM, wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
>
>
> I’m from Maptime Melbourne, we have found that using library meeting rooms
> has been good. They tend to have decent wifi and plenty of space for people
> to sit.
>
>
>
> We have a
Would be good to setup monthly run of https://github.com/q-bits/osm-scripts
but I lack the ability to do it.
It might not detect roundabouts; but will pick out name differences and
unknown roads. We got it down to under 300 at one point, I think.
On 25 Apr 2017 11:31 AM, "Alex Sims"
I added a stub of an issue -
https://github.com/osmlab/editor-layer-index/issues/297
Will flesh out with more details (or just comment there so we have all the
required fields sorted!)
On 13 Mar 2017 8:45 AM, "Andrew Davidson" wrote:
> If someone knows how to add this to
Perhaps a good use for this kind of data would be a feed of *buildings not
mapped*
IE:
- Grab data as you are doing or via a platform like morph.io
- Overpass queries to find out if there is any building geometry at given
coordinates
- Produce an RSS feed or similar (Maproulette? To-fix?)
I
Straw men seem to be popular this afternoon. The question is not whether or
not you map an unincorporated area but how should you map it?
One of your first actions was deletion from what I understand of the
changesets, after a brief look.
Until now you havent conveyed that message (your concern
Just want to point out the advice from the wiki:
*Don't map your local legislation, if not bound to objects in reality*
*Things such as local traffic rules should only be mapped through the
objects which represent these rules on the ground, e.g. a traffic sign,
road surface marking. Other rules
Its an interesting one - unlike suburbs, LGAs don't really have a physical
presence or much you can survey; even though they have a spatial
relationship/are often defined by physical features.
For being surveyable... maybe you get a 'welcome to foo shire' sign or two.
I would say that* if an LGA
permission (all datasets), will add to wiki.
On Mon, Dec 19, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Daniel O'Connor <daniel.ocon...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> A good dataset may be address point data, if available. I know we have
> GNAF, but we've been unable to get the explicit permission needed.
>
> Coverage i
A good dataset may be address point data, if available. I know we have
GNAF, but we've been unable to get the explicit permission needed.
Coverage is OK at the moment, so any import would be better as a
semi-manual, street by street kind of thing.
Public toilets, BBQs, Playgrounds, Park names,
Another SA person; welcome :)
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_South_Australia talks a bit
about some of the things happening.
In general, a lot of roads are accurate across the state; due to
data.sa.gov.au datasets - names, maybe a little less so. Bus stops...
fairly accurate from
> What a shame. It seems that in lieu of having any buildings marked out,
using property borders would have been a useful way to indicate addresses
In general its a huge rabbit hole to get stuck down if using cadastre/data
where government works in the torrens title first, addresses second
> Those individuals who are concerned should lobby the government NOW. Not
wait for the licence to be declared, nor any requirements made.
There is already a commitment for CC-BY-3.0 or better due to
http://www.ausgoal.gov.au/creative-commons and http://data.gov.au/about
Prematurely lobbying
Hi all,
Many of you may be interested in
https://blog.data.gov.au/news-media/blog/geocoded-national-address-data-be-made-openly-available
Provided the license is CC-BY-3.0 or better; we already have explicit
permission to use said data:
studies
where open data has been used to solve a problem or provide a service.
This will help citizens engage with those who release the data.
Cheers
Open Data Team
*From:* Daniel O'Connor [mailto:daniel.ocon...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, 13 March 2015 5:26 PM
*To:* simon.coste
For those of your that are interested, we've made a fair number of
improvements to the process and edited quite a large number of ways.
You can see the improvement via http://qa.poole.ch/ - compared to other
states/places, South Australia is showing a very low density of errors. New
Zealand,
not sure I agree that the Adelaide metro area should be given
particular priority over other areas. But I’m probably biased, since I grew
up in rural SA!
Probably we should make a posting to the osm “imports” list before too
much longer, to let them know what we’re thinking.
From: Daniel
make a posting to the osm “imports” list before too
much longer, to let them know what we’re thinking.
*From:* Daniel O'Connor [mailto:daniel.ocon...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Monday, 9 March 2015 5:32 AM
*To:* Henry Haselgrove
*Cc:* Alex Sims; OSM Australian Talk List
*Subject:* Re: [talk-au
So, after doing this manually for a bit; it's generally working well.
There are some where spot checking against other sources suggests the
dataset is wrong, how do you suggest we indicate these?
I've put in NOTE or FIXME on the relevant way.
The thing that is troubling me is the size of the
Neat. So map roulette would solve the 'no need to fix
On 22/02/2015 11:20 AM, Henry Haselgrove haselgr...@gmail.com wrote:
* From:* Daniel O'Connor [mailto:daniel.ocon...@gmail.com
daniel.ocon...@gmail.com]
Softgrow has done some work in metro Adelaide around checking roads:
http
automated (git, 1x cron, etc)
On 22/02/2015 11:20 AM, Henry Haselgrove haselgr...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Daniel O'Connor [mailto:daniel.ocon...@gmail.com]
Softgrow has done some work in metro Adelaide around checking roads:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_South_Australia
Softgrow has done some work in metro Adelaide around checking roads:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_South_Australia
I would be keen for:
- New roads (housing developments etc) in metro, outer metro areas first
- Identifying naming conflicts in metro areas next
The later I would
?
Part of the motivation for mapping smaller dams has been for things like
XPlane (realistic terrain); and excluding unnamed features would
potentially make the data set less useful than it could be
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Daniel O'Connor daniel.ocon...@gmail.com
wrote:
What's the level
What's the level of detail like for small bodies of water?
For example, I've put in some manual effort around small dams in places
like http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=14/-35.0894/138.8376 - i'd be
curious to see a preview of this sort of area with the merged data.
On Wed, Jan 21, 2015 at 1:30
One thing we could do is import some of their data into OSM. For example:
- addresses
Addresses may be one of the more useful data sets, and you might want to
look at things like openaddresses.io as well - though I did open up a pull
request for VicMap data.
A similar import is
are possibly going
to be invalidated.
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 1:24 PM, Daniel O'Connor daniel.ocon...@gmail.com
wrote:
One thing we could do is import some of their data into OSM. For example:
- addresses
Addresses may be one of the more useful data sets, and you might want to
look at things
Hey all,
Some work went in earlier to import a number of geelong roofprints, and I
got to talking with the data provider, Martin, about data sets that might
be of interest to the community.
I've just spotted:
http://data.gov.au/dataset/7014a203-2e73-46f8-87b6-09e29172bb08
You can see most of the
This is interesting. Looking at
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Australian_government_public_information_datasets,
it seems ABS data should already be fine to use, and is indeed already in
use for suburbs. However from the import plan page
So, the SA stuff is the result of an import.
A corresponding data set might be:
https://sdi.nsw.gov.au/sdi.nsw.gov.au/catalog/search/resource/details.page?uuid=%7B012BD68E-569E-4965-A4B0-48CBBBA64FF4%7D
... though you'd want to get in contact with the maintainers and get an
alternative
Oh, and streets too are the result of open data -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_South_Australia#Roads - well
worth doing if you have a public transport agency that consumes
openstreetmap for some of its journey planning, etc.
On Sun, Apr 20, 2014 at 11:06 PM, Daniel O'Connor
Would be really good to tackle a lot of this with semi-automated importing
of open address data sets (Vicmap, for example).
We've been pretty lucky here in SA, with Alex Sims spending the last 4
months attaching data from data.sa.gov.au for road names (2800 entries
added! WOO).
I know the area has been redeveloped, but from driving past it on occasion,
the remapping doesn't at all look like my mental picture of it.
Changeset/remapping:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/21473635#map=17/-34.91607/138.59736
Any other mappers with knowledge of the area or project able
Bus stops sounds great although there is a stack load (thousands) of
existing Brisbane Stops imported from a no longer accessible source (QROTI)
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/QROTI
(Here is a quick example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/739929)
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/1RH -
a substantial number of the
agency's bus stops.*
Cheers,
Jason
On 26 December 2013 12:14, Daniel O'Connor daniel.ocon...@gmail.comwrote:
Bus stops sounds great although there is a stack load (thousands) of
existing Brisbane Stops imported from a no longer accessible source (QROTI
On Thursday, December 5, 2013, Jason Ward wrote:
Hi again,
There has been a response from TMR and the necessary permission has been
obtained (for their datasets
accessiblehttps://data.qld.gov.au/organizationon the
data.qld.gov.au portal). I have an administrative query to be cleared by
of Clockwerx contributions. Keep up the good work.
We have noticed the layers have improved in the last little while.
*From:* Daniel O'Connor [mailto:daniel.ocon...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Thursday, 28 November 2013 12:08 AM
*To:* waldo000...@gmail.com
*Cc:* Walker, Garth (DPTI); talk-au
Hi all,
Just saw http://data.gov.au/dataset/41527e85-0907-4faf-b5f4-e9655b23d128appear
on my RSS feeds.
Would there be interest in importing this data?
Along with perhaps
http://services.land.vic.gov.au/landchannel/content/vicmapdata?productID=1?
(Explicit permission for this data set would be
I started out with buildings, but got a bit excited in my local area;
getting down into trees, power lines, fences, driveways etc.
http://www.openstreetmap.org/#map=19/-34.84928/138.52277
Not super pretty looking.
Nowdays, I tend to map the primary houses only, and perhaps significant
features
Are they by chance a new development or similar?
Can ask at work, have valuers/appraiser who probably know the area from
survey/local knowledge.
On 03/12/2013 4:25 PM, Alex Sims a...@softgrow.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm looking at changesets
http://www.openstreetmap.org/changeset/17084700
Updated the wiki.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/WikiProject_South_Australia#Mapcraft_Projects.2C_Imports_and_more
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Alex Sims softg...@internode.on.netwrote:
Hi,
I had a bit of a go at the missing street names last night and have
developed a workflow and
Also, added a mapcraft project to help share/visualize progress/generate a
bounding box easily.
http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/pie/337
On Fri, Nov 29, 2013 at 1:16 PM, Daniel O'Connor
daniel.ocon...@gmail.comwrote:
Updated the wiki.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki
If you want to do something that helps, but aren't sure where to begin on
the technical parts; try doing the following up on the first step of the
import guidelines' advice: ask for explicit permission.
Here's two other examples of it working successfully
With
Street Address Limitations ( missing streets and street numbers)
At the moment, this is a bit painful, but quite possible to fix up manually.
The full extent of the problem is visible through the OSM inspector,
highways layer.
/South_Australian_Suburb_Boundaries
... which is about 300/1800 locations imported so far - hopefully, you
should see improvements to routing as a result, particularly in tiny
suburbs.
On Thu, Nov 28, 2013 at 12:02 AM, Daniel O'Connor
daniel.ocon...@gmail.comwrote:
With
Street Address Limitations ( missing streets
Yeah, that'd be really, really great if SA could publish cadastre and other
information openly.
It'd be interesting to know what's already available via the land services
group - I know for example that cadastre and address info is published and
integrated by the PSMA to make GNAF/Cadlite
Would be great to participate in that convo.
Have being doing a lot of HOT stuff with Haiyan, and that has generated a
lot of possibilities for what I do during work hours (property industry) -
custom tiles, how quickly satellite data was acquired, use of the task
manager.
While my work
Can I recommend for the smaller data sets, that conversion scripts are done
and published to github?
Ie: shp to geo json is done, then geojosn to osm, plus splitting, etc?
That allows you to preview, and when the underlying data changes, version
control it a little.
I have the same issues to
Hrm, this email got filtered I think due to the attachments.
On Saturday, October 12, 2013, Daniel O'Connor wrote:
Did the bits to produce .osm files (again on github); suitable to open up
and view in JOSM.
I spot checked two areas near me that I know well, and the accuracy is
pretty high
I did look through a few of the existing tools; but most fell into the too
hard basket. In the end, manually doing it via QGIS and exporting into the
right projection was fairly easy.
I've pushed to github what I've done; which is produce geojson kml
serializations of it - I had assumed
Hey folks,
Just spotted a few updated/new data sets for
http://data.gov.au/organization/city-of-gold-coast
Included are:
Fitness Stations
The layer refers to a symbol indicating the location of Fitness Stations on
public land adjacent to waterways in the Gold Coast area.
Fences on Public Land
Also: clarify explicitly that attribution in the wiki is acceptable to
them.
On 17/09/2013 6:43 PM, Daniel O'Connor daniel.ocon...@gmail.com wrote:
I would send them the odbl licence and position it as 'is this ok with
your open government stance? '
neatly avoids cc by confusion, gives them
I would send them the odbl licence and position it as 'is this ok with your
open government stance? '
neatly avoids cc by confusion, gives them an attitude to address, and
likely ends up with 'let it be free'
On 17/09/2013 4:53 PM, Li Xia lisxia1...@gmail.com wrote:
Gday everyone,
I've been
@ Daniel, I can not upload this shape file because I do not have the
permissions to do so (and I don't even know how), there are strict
guidelines witch need to be completed
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Import/Guidelines it's more of a formal
process. I don't know what to do from here. I
Re licensing, you are good to go -
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Attribution/sa.data.gov.au_explicit_permission
The activity log (http://data.sa.gov.au/dataset/activity/suburb-boundaries)
suggests it has been updated a few times, where the ABS data is likely
fixed at a point in time.
Can't
CC-BY-A is fine to my knowledge - you can fulfill the attribution
requirements with an appropriate attribution in the wiki.
See:
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Contributors#Australian_government_public_information_datasets
Hey folks,
Thought I might share the two efforts below that I'm working on in the
Adelaide area:
http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/pie/279
http://mapcraft.nanodesu.ru/pie/278
I see a fair bit of discussion around different tagging approaches
happen on this list, and I'm curious how much folks are
The SA govt has joined many of the other state/local governments in
publishing open data.
The current implementation is powered by CKAN, and though I haven't seen it
yet, appears to be leveraging openstreetmap / cloudmade in some fashion.
Anyway, the majority of the data sets are CC-A licensed,
On Tue, Apr 30, 2013 at 6:59 PM, kristy van putten
kristy.vanput...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Aussie OSM people!
I would like to introduce myself, my name is Kristy Van Putten and I am
currently living and working for the Australian Government in Indonesia as
a the Spatial Analyst. Over the last
Am happy to help re technical convos - can talk about postgis/mapnik to
render, or other things like slippy map solutions
On Apr 30, 2013 5:35 PM, John Henderson snow...@gmx.com wrote:
On 30/04/13 14:29, Nick Hocking wrote:
The other day I was riding the push bike along some trails and got
Hi,
I work in the property valuation industry, and have a strong interest in
mapping buildings, leisure areas like swimming pols or tennis courts and
more...
How did you sell the idea of mapping buildings in your recent project? I
have done what I can, but it is a hard slog to map my own city
What do you guys think?
It's non trivial to do it this way, but:
- Define a relationship between zoom level and number of ways/nodes
within the bounding box
- Sort the ways in a weighted fashion - roads first, land boundaries
second, etc
- Zoom level max, with 10 nodes to
On Thu, Nov 1, 2012 at 5:08 PM, Alex Sims a...@softgrow.com wrote:
Adelaide Metro, the umbrella brand for public transport in Adelaide on
their new (beta) website at
http://www.adelaidemetro.com.**au/ http://www.adelaidemetro.com.au/
are using OpenTripPlanner and OpenStreetmap for journey
All of the timetable data and stop data has been available for a year or so
as GTFS format, although hidden on their old site under site map. There
is a copy also on GitHub.
Neat, wish I'd seen that sooner!
Getting back on topic
So I guess...
What's the best kind of contribution that would
100 matches
Mail list logo