* Jack Burke burke...@gmail.com [2015-06-22 08:32 -0400]:
On June 22, 2015 2:46:36 AM EDT, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
tiger:reviewed=no
Most of the well reviewed Tiger I see still has this tag.
People don't know to delete it.
Usually I change it to =yes instead of
I’m considering whether it makes sense to remove the `tiger:reviewed=no` tag
when a user performs certain edits in iD.
Discuss here: https://github.com/openstreetmap/iD/issues/2697
On Jun 22, 2015, at 2:46 AM, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
In other words, it won't route over a
In other words, it won't route over a rural road tagged as
highway=residential
tiger:reviewed=no
Most of the well reviewed Tiger I see still has this tag.
People don't know to delete it. The automatic delete on edit does not
apply to tiger:reviewed (it applies to a Tiger tag
So, just for fun, I'm going through the area you pointed out and fixing some of
the roads. I'm making some of those Unclassified instead of Tertiary because
they go from nowhere to nowhere, but feel free to change them.
I plan on making a road trip in a few weeks, and depending on timing and
Usually I change it to =yes instead of just deleting it. The main reason is I
frequently use ITOworld maps to review the county I live in to find unreviewed
roads, and I like the color pattern better that way.
-jack
On June 22, 2015 2:46:36 AM EDT, Bryce Nesbitt bry...@obviously.com wrote:
There's really two kinds of cycling: including trails and unpaved
roads because your bicycle has nobblies and springs, and not. The
first are fine with such roads, and the second very much not. I've
done both types of cycling, and with high pressure narrow tyres
(that's a nod to Richard, so he
Harald Kliems wrote:
Until then you could consider a user setting to avoid/not avoid
unpaved roads.
Unfortunately contraction hierarchies - the routing algorithm used by OSRM -
don't really allow user settings. For each distinct routing profile, you
need to regenerate the routing graph, which
Richard, I would somewhat caution against penalizing unpaved roads too
much. In many areas of the US they actually make wonderful cycling routes,
whereas the paved alternatives are high traffic and unpleasant to ride on.
Of course, proper smoothness tagging would help but that will be a long way
Just as a postscript to this discussion I thought I'd cite an example area.
If you look here, in Georgia:
http://cycle.travel/map?lat=31.9023lon=-84.0398zoom=14
you'll see that most of the roads are unreviewed TIGER residentials. Of
those, these are adjacent to each other:
Paul Norman writes:
The most important change is probably setting appropriate surface
information. I don't know the exact secret sauce magic of
cycle.travel, but surface information is very important for
selecting reasonable routes on a bike - or indeed, any non-foot
method of transportation.
SteveA wrote:
Richard (Fairhurst), if cycle.travel/map's router logic is not
paying attention to surface= tags, perhaps it should, as
doing so truly can improve selected routes
It very much does - it'll look at surface=, and failing that tracktype= or
smoothness=, as one of the principal
Minh Nguyen writes:
You aren't alone. I stopped bothering with tiger:reviewed tags back in
the Potlatch 1 days. It just isn't a well-designed tag:
- not very discoverable to mappers who weren't around in 2008
Makes ways a sickly yellow if you edit using JOSM.
- doesn't say whether
Richard Fairhurst writes:
Finally, many thanks to everyone who's tested it so far,
particularly Steve All - your feedback was and continues to be
enormously useful.
Kind of you to say this, Richard. I was delighted to help test your
fine bicycle router. I wish cycle.travel, and especially
On 2015-06-13 17:08, Harald Kliems wrote:
Very nice, Richard! One quick comment: I might not be the only who
doesn't always change the tiger:reviewed tag when fixing TIGER-imported
roads. I don't know if that's technically feasible, but maybe it would
be better to check if a way has been
Well, you've certainly motivated me to from now on always modify the
tiger:reviewed tag :-)
Thanks again for your efforts!
On Sun, Jun 14, 2015 at 2:38 PM Richard Fairhurst rich...@systemed.net
wrote:
Harald Kliems wrote:
Very nice, Richard! One quick comment: I might not be the only
who
On 6/14/2015 2:24 PM, Harald Kliems wrote:
Well, you've certainly motivated me to from now on always modify the
tiger:reviewed tag :-)
Thanks again for your efforts!
The most important change is probably setting appropriate surface
information. I don't know the exact secret sauce magic of
Harald Kliems wrote:
Very nice, Richard! One quick comment: I might not be the only
who doesn't always change the tiger:reviewed tag when fixing
TIGER-imported roads. I don't know if that's technically feasible,
but maybe it would be better to check if a way has been modified
since
On 6/13/15 2:38 PM, Richard Fairhurst wrote:
I've been finding this a really useful way of locating unreviewed
TIGER and fixing it... it's actually quite addictive. :) Looking for
roads which cross rivers, or with long sweeping curves, is an easy way
of identifying quick wins. My modus
Very nice, Richard! One quick comment: I might not be the only who doesn't
always change the tiger:reviewed tag when fixing TIGER-imported roads. I
don't know if that's technically feasible, but maybe it would be better to
check if a way has been modified since import, independent of the
Hi all,
At State of the Map US last weekend I was really pleased to unveil
bicycle routing for the US (and Canada) at my site, cycle.travel.
The planner, at http://cycle.travel/map , will plan a bike route for you
between any two points - whether in the same city or on opposite sides
of the
20 matches
Mail list logo
