Hello Maurice,
Wednesday, July 30, 2003, 1:30:03 AM, you wrote:
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MS I was just wondering. I have assigned the key-combination Ctrl-Alt-S
MS to a filter that forwards the mail I'm reading (or is currently
MS highlighted in the message list)
cannot confirm with ctrl-alt-s,
Wednesday, July 30, 2003, 7:57:11 AM, you wrote:
cannot confirm with ctrl-alt-s, however if i just hit s quick search
pops up with the letter s inserted. Bug?
Same here with beta 9
--
Best regards,
Chris Wilson mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003 at 02:57 (which was Wednesday, July 30,
2003 at 8:57 where I am) John Seymour [JS] wrote:
JS cannot confirm with ctrl-alt-s, however if i just hit s quick search
JS pops up with the letter s inserted. Bug?
The latter is most certainly not a bug. The quick search is a
Hi all,
I'm hoping that one of these days, opening a configuration panel will no
longer lock out the rest of the TB! interface from user input. I've
found this to be a surprising shortcoming in an application that's
supposed to be so well multi-threaded. How many of you often wish to
have a
Hallo Allie,
Op een Wednesday, July 30, 2003 om 12:53:08 PM schreef jij over Configuration panels
locking the inteface:
AM Hi all,
AM I'm hoping that one of these days, opening a configuration panel will no
AM longer lock out the rest of the TB! interface from user input. I've
AM found this to
Some time around 7/30/2003 06:53:08, I think I heard Allie Martin say:
So how about it? :) Will the v2 do away with this restriction?
Hello,
IMHO, the interface gets messy when the configuration windows
are not modal (i.e. you loose focus of the configuration window and
have to
Hello Cees,
Wednesday, July 30, 2003, 12:58:08 PM, you wrote:
AM Wouldn't it be nice to be able to have the editor opened for two quick
AM templates or two filter sets? It would make copying and pasting as well
AM as comparing etc. much easier.
AM Another common reason is during support
On Wednesday, July 30, 2003, at 1:15:59 PM, DZ-Jay stitched together
what is below:
So how about it? :) Will the v2 do away with this restriction?
I second it. I cannot agree with:
it can cause some race conditions between the regular interface and
the options being edited
The config window
Hello Stefan,
I can easily imagine you're really busy working on V2, but I've 3
questions that need to be solved as I can't browse every folder to
manually remove every dupes ;-)
Is there any reason to have thousand of dupes that aren't detected as
dupe ?
Do you know if there is a bug report on
On 2003-07-30 at 13:20:41 Alain de Gevigney wrote:
Is there any reason to have thousand of dupes that aren't detected
as dupe ?
I would guess that they are not precise duplicates, see below.
Do you know if it can be a beta problem (these dupes are mostly
created when synchronizing my
Hi All - when using the Receive header only if message
size is greater than ... feature for mail management, I
think it would be nice to have another button to then
retrieve this mail should you want to. Euroda can do this,
not that I'll start using that again.
At present all you get is
Alain De Gevigney, [ADG] wrote:
ADG Do you know if it can be a beta problem (these dupes are mostly created
ADG when synchronizing my desktop (1.63b11) with my laptop (1.62)) ?
Synchronising shouldn't lead to messages being duplicated.
Synchronization usually just adds what messages the target
Hello Sean,
Wednesday, July 30, 2003, 7:02:24 AM, you wrote:
SC Hi All - when using the Receive header only if message size is
SC greater than ... feature for mail management, I think it would
SC be nice to have another button to then retrieve this mail should
SC you want to. Euroda can do this,
Hello Sean,
On Wed, 30 Jul 2003 15:02:24 +0200 GMT (30/07/03, 20:02 +0700 GMT),
Sean Clarke wrote:
Hi All - when using the Receive header only if message
size is greater than ... feature for mail management, I
think it would be nice to have another button to then
retrieve this mail
14 matches
Mail list logo
