Re: IMAP - Latest Theory on duplicates

2006-01-30 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Monday, January 30, 2006, 8:46:25 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: > Confirmations? I can confirm not syncing and no duplicates -- Dwight A. Corrin 928 S Broadway Wichita KS 67211 316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568 dcorrin at fastmail.fm Using IMAP with The Bat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) on Windows XP ver

IMAP - Latest Theory on duplicates

2006-01-30 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello tbbeta, This is my latest theory. Go to Accoun/IMAP commands/Manage IMAP folders and turn on Sychronization = Lots of duplicates Tun off sync of any kind = No duplicates Confirmations? -- Stuart mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.70.06 "Qigon

Re[2]: Test message for duplicates

2006-01-30 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Peter, Monday, January 30, 2006, 3:14:49 PM, you wrote: PF> Hmm, I am often using remove duplicates without having all "versions" PF> disappear. It is only after a purge that the message on the server disappears and then with a second purge the original message in the local cache disap

Re[2]: IMAP - Duplicate was (Test message for duplicates)

2006-01-30 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Dwight, Monday, January 30, 2006, 3:59:43 PM, you wrote: DAC> Re your other question, for the brief time I had any duplicate DAC> problems, killing duplicates never deleted any messages, but manually DAC> deleting messages was kind of hit or miss as I recall. It is not actually a problem

Re[2]: Test message for duplicates

2006-01-30 Thread Terry
On 30 January 2006 at 17:58, Stuart wrote: > I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates. > Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they > are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete > one of the messages, manually or by using Delet

Re[3]: IMAP - Duplicate was (Test message for duplicates)

2006-01-30 Thread Vili
Hello Stuart, V>> Stuart: could you generate me up a new IMAP fastmail account, set it in V>> your TB, reproduce the problem with it, and backup the account and V>> send as attach in private? > I will see what I can do. There are 9 copies of your message plus the > original. I am only going to try

Re: IMAP - Duplicate was (Test message for duplicates)

2006-01-30 Thread Dwight A Corrin
On Monday, January 30, 2006, 3:08:52 PM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: > I am only going to try it once though. :) If you are lucky, it will work 1st try. Re your other question, for the brief time I had any duplicate problems, killing duplicates never deleted any messages, but manually deleting messages

Re: Test message for duplicates

2006-01-30 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Stuart, On 30-01-2006 18:58, you [SC] wrote in : SC> Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they SC> are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete one SC> of the messages, manually or by using Delete Duplicates, when you do SC> a purge it will delete the o

Re[2]: IMAP - Duplicate was (Test message for duplicates)

2006-01-30 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Vili, A reminder of what Vili typed on: Monday, January 30, 2006 at 15:41:44 GMT -0500 V> Stuart: could you generate me up a new IMAP fastmail account, set it in V> your TB, reproduce the problem with it, and backup the account and V> send as attach in private? I will see what I can do.

Re: IMAP - Duplicate was (Test message for duplicates)

2006-01-30 Thread Vili
Hello Stuart, V>> Maybe it is a strange question, but as I NEVER seen this duplication V>> before: if this is a test IMAP address for you, would it be possible V>> to get it as a TBK file, so I can test it at home with the same V>> settings, that you have at you? > It is not strictly a

AB entries in Instant address box

2006-01-30 Thread Paul Meathrel
Hi all, I have a single contact with four email addresses in the AB. This contact only appears once in the AB. The ""Add this address to the instant address pop-up menu"" option for this contact in the AB is ticked. However when I create an email and type in the first name of the contact (into

Re: 3.70.06 no reasonable folder name in confirmation dialog

2006-01-30 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi Robert D., Monday, January 30, 2006 you let us know -possibly edited- : >> useless. Hoping for 08 (o7 is out) > OY !! > And I got no special message about rar from Alex? > OY!! It is not official, nothing you could download, but to be seen there: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/changelog_page.p

Re: 3.70.06 no reasonable folder name in confirmation dialog

2006-01-30 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi MAU, Monday, January 30, 2006 you let us know -possibly edited- : > Well, Cancel may be useful for someone like you. I mean, when you Yes > but mean No, etc., Cancel is even more ambiguous ;) :lol: For me sometimes another real flexible button would be handy: "idunno" "ask a friend" -- kin

Re: 3.70.06 no reasonable folder name in confirmation dialog

2006-01-30 Thread Robert D.
Recently, Charlene Ferrara squawked: > useless. Hoping for 08 (o7 is out) OY !! And I got no special message about rar from Alex? OY!! -- Regards, Robert D. :flag-us-ky: _ The Bat! Version: 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) Windows ME FireFox ___

IMAP - Duplicate was (Test message for duplicates)

2006-01-30 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Vili, A reminder of what Vili typed on: Monday, January 30, 2006 at 13:55:57 GMT -0500 V> Maybe it is a strange question, but as I NEVER seen this duplication V> before: if this is a test IMAP address for you, would it be possible V> to get it as a TBK file, so I can test it a

Re: 3.70.06 no reasonable folder name in confirmation dialog

2006-01-30 Thread MAU
Hello Charlene, > You are right, (to avoid to say "YES" in this case) > the "Cancel" is useless. Well, Cancel may be useful for someone like you. I mean, when you Yes but mean No, etc., Cancel is even more ambiguous ;) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.70

Re: BCC bug

2006-01-30 Thread Paul Meathrel
Hi Jon, Monday, January 30, 2006, 12:52:55 PM, you wrote: > Thank you Paul. See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5629. Done -- Warmest regards, Paul Created using TheBat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) on Windows XP Current beta is 3.

Re[2]: Test message for duplicates

2006-01-30 Thread Vili
Hello Stuart, SC>> Testing duplicates. > I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates. > Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they > are not on the server, just in the local folder) if you delete > one of the messages, manually or by using Delete D

Re: 3.70.06 no reasonable folder name in confirmation dialog

2006-01-30 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi MAU, Monday, January 30, 2006 you let us know -possibly edited- : > And another BTW. What's the big difference between the No and Cancel > buttons? I think there is no need for the Cancel one. You are right, (to avoid to say "YES" in this case) the "Cancel" is useless. Hoping for 08 (o7 is o

Re: 3.70.06 no reasonable folder name in confirmation dialog

2006-01-30 Thread MAU
Hello Charlene, > if I mark all messages in a folder as read (Ctrl+M), I get a > confirmation dialog like the one linked below: > > http://www.xmail.net/charlene/folder_name.gif > > There is no folder name visible, just some meta signs ("%s") I had not paid attention but your are right, I confirm

Re: Test message for duplicates

2006-01-30 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Stuart, A reminder of what Stuart Cuddy typed on: Thursday, January 26, 2006 at 20:06:50 GMT -0600 SC> Hello tbbeta, SC> Testing duplicates. I think that another bad thing is happening with these duplicates. Since these are not true duplicates in the strictest sense, (ie they are not

Re: v3.70.06 "Qigong" active button

2006-01-30 Thread MAU
Hello Charlene, > YES YES YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES YES > YES YES YES YES YES YES > YES YES YES YES YES YES > YES YESYES YES YES YES >

Re: 3.70.06 no reasonable folder name in confirmation dialog

2006-01-30 Thread harlekin
Confirmed at my end as well! -- Christian Grams Harlekin's-EDV Current beta is 3.70.06 "Qigong" | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html IMPORTANT: To register as a Beta tester, use this link firs

Re: Bug in address selection window

2006-01-30 Thread Robert D.
Recently, Vili squawked: > Please support it: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5635 so done amigo ! -- Regards, Robert D. Current beta is 3.70.06 "Qigong" | 'Using TBBETA' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInf

Re[2]: Bug in address selection window

2006-01-30 Thread Vili
Hello Robert, So, if I select addresses by Ctrl+click, and I cannot deselect the last selected contact by Ctrl+clicking on it again. >>> U, if I understand correctly: >>> I opened AB .. >>> I selected an address by >>>it then was highlited >> When you highlight on

Re[2]: Bug in address selection window

2006-01-30 Thread Vili
Hello Robert, So, if I select addresses by Ctrl+click, and I cannot deselect the last selected contact by Ctrl+clicking on it again. >>> U, if I understand correctly: >>> I opened AB .. >>> I selected an address by >>>it then was highlited >> When you highlight on

3.70.06 no reasonable folder name in confirmation dialog

2006-01-30 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hello all, if I mark all messages in a folder as read (Ctrl+M), I get a confirmation dialog like the one linked below: http://www.xmail.net/charlene/folder_name.gif There is no folder name visible, just some meta signs ("%s") And BTW: standard setting should be "YES". As to be seen on the pic,

Re: IMAP - seeing deleted mail

2006-01-30 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello Dwight, A reminder of what Dwight A Corrin typed on: Monday, January 30, 2006 at 00:34:29 GMT -0600 DAC> Found myself fumbling around looking for the browse deleted mail DAC> command, because I don't do it very often, and wondered whether there DAC> isn't a better way. DAC> Folder tabs

Re: v3.70.06 "Qigong" active button

2006-01-30 Thread Charlene Ferrara
Hi MAU, Monday, January 30, 2006 you let us know -possibly edited- : >> I mean YES if I say NO. > Knowing that..., do you want to marry me? ;-) The answer is quite simple: YES YES YESYESYESYESYESYESYESYES YES YES YES YES YES

Re: Problems with Color Groups in Betas after 3.65?

2006-01-30 Thread Lars Sölter
I have the problem as well. I have only one color group that selects a different text style for mails I send (I allways send a copy of the mails towards my self). S the rule is base on the sender address. I use pop accounts only. -- With best regards Lars Sölter The Bat! Version 3.70.06 "Qig

Re: Bug in address selection window

2006-01-30 Thread Robert D.
Recently, Vili squawked: > Hello Robert, >>> So, if I select addresses by Ctrl+click, and I cannot deselect >>> the last selected contact by Ctrl+clicking on it again. >> U, if I understand correctly: >> I opened AB .. >> I selected an address by >>it then was highlited > W

Re[2]: Bug in address selection window

2006-01-30 Thread Vili
Hello Robert, >> So, if I select addresses by Ctrl+click, and I cannot deselect >> the last selected contact by Ctrl+clicking on it again. > U, if I understand correctly: > I opened AB .. > I selected an address by >it then was highlited > I select another and it is ALSO high

Re: Bug in address selection window

2006-01-30 Thread Robert D.
Recently, Vili squawked: > So, if I select addresses by Ctrl+click, and I cannot deselect > the last selected contact by Ctrl+clicking on it again. U, if I understand correctly: I opened AB .. I selected an address by it then was highlited I select another and it is ALSO high

Re: Reply without quotation

2006-01-30 Thread Jon Polish
On Friday, January 27, 2006, 12:34:33 PM, Vili wrote: V> Confirmed with the latest beta. Thank you Vili. See BT https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5633 Jon Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2 -- "And then we'll be going to Goree Island, where I'll be giving

Re: BCC bug

2006-01-30 Thread Jon Polish
On Saturday, January 28, 2006, 7:52:17 AM, Roelof Otten wrote: RO> Hallo Jon, RO> On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:08:25 -0500GMT (27-1-2006, 21:08 +0100, where I RO> live), you wrote: JP>> I have address book entries with more than one address AND JP>> "Automatically add secondary addresses to BCC field"

Bug in address selection window

2006-01-30 Thread Vili
Hello tbbeta, So, if I select addresses by Ctrl+click, and I cannot deselect the last selected contact by Ctrl+clicking on it again. Confirmation? -- Vili The Bat 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Szervizcsomag 2 Cur

Re: The Bat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) is now available

2006-01-30 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Peter, On 30-01-2006 11:40, you [PF] wrote in : PF> On 30-01-2006 11:37, you [C] wrote in PF> : C>> I haven't seen duplicates in a long time. Is this duplicates issue a C>> product of filtering? PF> Yes, it seems that way. - but not exclusively. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.70.06 "

Re: BCC bug

2006-01-30 Thread Jon Polish
On Saturday, January 28, 2006, 6:40:33 AM, Paul Meathrel wrote: PM> I've tested this on 3.65.03 and can see the same results as you. PM> Why not file a bug report and I'll add a supporting note. Thank you Paul. See https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=5629. Jon Using The Bat! v3.65.03 on Wind

Re: The Bat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) is now available

2006-01-30 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rašė: On 30/1/2006 at 5:48:14 AM [GMT -0500], Vilius Šumskas wrote: No, I'm using server-side filtering only (as everybody with IMAP should :)). Hmmm. Strange then that you see duplicates. Is this a problem throughout all folders? If so, have you tried deleting an

Re: The Bat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) is now available

2006-01-30 Thread Curtis
On 30/1/2006 at 5:48:14 AM [GMT -0500], Vilius Šumskas wrote: > No, I'm using server-side filtering only (as everybody with IMAP > should :)). Hmmm. Strange then that you see duplicates. Is this a problem throughout all folders? If so, have you tried deleting and rebuilding the cache for the pro

Re: v3.70.06 "Qigong" active button

2006-01-30 Thread MAU
Hello Charlene, > I mean YES if I say NO. Knowing that..., do you want to marry me? ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Using The Bat! v3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) on Windows XP 5.1 Service Pack 2 Current beta is 3

Re: The Bat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) is now available

2006-01-30 Thread Vilius Šumskas
Curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> rašė: On 29/1/2006 at 9:53:34 AM [GMT -0500], Vilius Šumskas wrote: [-] IMAP: possible fix of duplications And now I began to get duplicates. Please revert. I haven't seen duplicates in a long time. Is this duplicates issue a product of filtering? Only a few of

Re: The Bat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) is now available

2006-01-30 Thread Peter Fjelsten
Curtis, On 30-01-2006 11:37, you [C] wrote in : C> I haven't seen duplicates in a long time. Is this duplicates issue a C> product of filtering? Yes, it seems that way. -- Best regards Peter Fjelsten 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) Pro ~4 POP3, 7 IMAP (UW IMAP 2002e) & 1 IMAP (Exchange 6.5),

Re: The Bat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) is now available

2006-01-30 Thread Curtis
On 29/1/2006 at 9:53:34 AM [GMT -0500], Vilius Šumskas wrote: >> [-] IMAP: possible fix of duplications > And now I began to get duplicates. Please revert. I haven't seen duplicates in a long time. Is this duplicates issue a product of filtering? Only a few of my messages are filtered using TB!,

Re: The Bat! 3.70.06 "Qigong" (Beta) is now available

2006-01-30 Thread Krzysztof Kudlacik
On 06-01-29 (15:53), you wrote: > And now I began to get duplicates. Same here. IMAP/Exchange Best regards, Krzysztof Kudłacik -- pb _, )\__/( ,_ Polska Strona Programu The Bat! | /'.;`-.`{..}',-';.`\ http://thebat.pl | /'.'; `-,`-""-',-' ;`.`\ The Bat! Pol

Re: automated maintainance

2006-01-30 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Monday, January 30, 2006, Goos wrote: > is it possible to let TB do automatic (without doing it > by hand) the maintainance? If not, it might be a fine idea. it is available as scheduller action already. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the b

automated maintainance

2006-01-30 Thread Goos
Hi tbbeta, is it possible to let TB do automatic (without doing it by hand) the maintainance? If not, it might be a fine idea. Explanation and an example: TB is running here usually for many weeks continuously. I confugured my Trash folder to: 'maximum of stored messages is 25' and 'keep messa