Hallo Thomas,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 09:03:19 +0700GMT (3-1-2008, 3:03 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
RO Ouch! I'd go crazy when all filters were thrown in one group.
TF You don't need to do that.
snip
TF You can still have them seperated, nobody forces you to use them for
TF both Incoming and
Hello Thomas,
M I'm sure many of us have a number of filters checking on From: in
M Incoming filters and on To: in Outgoing, and having a single filter
M for Incoming and Outgoing and filtering on From: .OR. To: may not
M be exactly the same. A simple example:
M I receive email from, and write
Hello,
I am using notebook with resolution 1280x800 and LCD monitor with 1440x900
resolution.
Sometimes when I restart system with LCD plugged, TB starts, but Folder
tabs position is wrong and area of app/desktop under The Bat! is displayed
between tabs and status bar.
In screenshot, You can see
Hello Roelof,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 11:06:26 +0100 GMT (03/01/2008, 17:06 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF You can still have them seperated, nobody forces you to use them for
TF both Incoming and Outgoing. Tick only one of the boxes, it's that
TF easy.
RO But that would be self defeating for a
Hello Marek,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 03:27:46 +0100 GMT (03/01/2008, 09:27 +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
In fact, you can work the same way you work now, if you tick only
Incoming in one set, and only Outgoing in another. The wish will
*allow* you (not force you) to make a filter have both
Hi,
GP The thing that amazes me is that people can continue to argue that TB
GP Imap does not work while so many of us here attest otherwise.
A matter of usage behaviour, I suppose. If I start TheBat at nine in
the morning and at ten have to discover that it's not like nobody
would have sent me
Hello MAU,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 12:10:52 +0100 GMT (03/01/2008, 18:10 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
M - If From: A .OR. To: A, move to folder A.
M - If From: B .OR. To: B, move to folder B.
M And now assume A writes to B and just CCes me. Where would this message
M end up? And where if it is B who
Hallo Thomas,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 20:08:01 +0700GMT (3-1-2008, 14:08 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
TF If you want to seperate them, you have many choices. Two come to mind:
What you're suggesting is that Ritlabs break something that's rather
good at the moment and now you're thinking of ways
Hello Roelof,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 14:57:48 +0100 GMT (03/01/2008, 20:57 +0700 GMT),
Roelof Otten wrote:
TF If you want to seperate them, you have many choices. Two come to mind:
RO What you're suggesting is that Ritlabs break something that's rather
RO good at the moment and now you're thinking
Hello MAU,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:01:55 +0100 GMT (03/01/2008, 21:01 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
If A sends to B, or B sends to A, and they CC to you, both are now
covered by Incoming filters.
M Of course, but where do the two messages end up? To answer the question
M you just have to be as dumb as
Hi Sean Rima,
On Wed, 02 Jan 2008 23:02:59 GMT
Sean Rima [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just tried to send an image to the list showing that thebat showes no
imap mail when in fact there is unread mail. Now I have an image of
showing the folder list with it showing unread mail but not which folder
Hello Thomas,
If A sends to B, or B sends to A, and they CC to you, both are now
covered by Incoming filters.
Of course, but where do the two messages end up? To answer the question
you just have to be as dumb as computers are and do exactly what the
code (filter conditions and actions) tell
Hello all,
Thursday, January 3, 2008, Peter Hampf wrote:
Hello tbbeta,
has this been reported before?
I have changed the setting in Options/Preferences/Other
Options/Confirmations
for the Marking folder as read option from off to on.
After restarting TB 4.0.0.6/Alpha the options
Hello Thomas,
M If the filters are:
M - If From: A .OR. To: A, move to folder A.
M - If From: B .OR. To: B, move to folder B.
M Do they end up in the same folder, yes or no?
That depends on the order of your incoming filters,
Did you read my first reply to you?
You are not getting my
Het was donderdag 3 januari 2008 om 15:48 uur dat jij iets schreef over 'One
kind of filters' :
Hallo MAU,
M If the filters are:
M - If From: A .OR. To: A, move to folder A.
M - If From: B .OR. To: B, move to folder B.
M Do they end up in the same folder, yes or no?
That depends on the order
Hello all,
Thursday, January 3, 2008, Peter Hampf wrote:
MM confirm, but in reversed order
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6621
confirmed.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
http://www.thebat.cz
Using the best The Bat! 4.0.0.6 (ALPHA)
under Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Hello MAU,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:48:47 +0100 GMT (03/01/2008, 21:48 +0700 GMT),
MAU wrote:
M Do they end up in the same folder, yes or no?
That depends on the order of your incoming filters,
M Did you read my first reply to you?
Yes.
You are not getting my point:
M And quite certainly you
Hello all,
Thursday, January 3, 2008, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
You are not getting my point:
let me reply again with other reasons against your idea, I am not generally
against it, but I am sure, it will limit of usage and whole Filtering
system will be unintuitive. Let me describe why.
Alto,
GP The thing that amazes me is that people can continue to argue that TB
GP Imap does not work while so many of us here attest otherwise.
A matter of usage behaviour, I suppose. If I start TheBat at nine in
the morning and at ten have to discover that it's not like nobody
would have
Hello Cees,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:54:12 +0100 GMT (03/01/2008, 21:54 +0700 GMT),
Cees wrote:
M Did you read my first reply to you?
You are not getting my point:
M And quite certainly you are not getting mine. I give up! :)
C I'd say the priority has some influence also. Won't it?
Priority of
Hallo Peter,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 15:24:01 +0100GMT (3-1-2008, 15:24 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PH I have changed the setting in Options/Preferences/Other
Options/Confirmations
PH for the Marking folder as read option from off to on.
PH After restarting TB 4.0.0.6/Alpha the options
Hello Beta-Bats,
Some url's in HTML-messages are being truncated when the use of smiley icons is
turned on.
See: Options-Preferences-Viewer/Editor-Use Smiley Icons in HTML Viewer
See BT : https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6622
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The
Hallo Roelof,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:54:23 +0100GMT (3-1-2008, 16:54 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
PH I have changed the setting in Options/Preferences/Other
Options/Confirmations
PH for the Marking folder as read option from off to on.
PH After restarting TB 4.0.0.6/Alpha the options
On Thursday, January 3, 2008, 8:07:18 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
BTW my wish would also benefit those who use gmail and its derivates
(like thebat.net) on mailing lists.
How? From you suggestions, the first thing I see is that one would
have to go through and rename all their existing filters
Hi Gleason Pace,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:12:30 -0500
Gleason Pace [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alto,
GP The thing that amazes me is that people can continue to argue that TB
GP Imap does not work while so many of us here attest otherwise.
A matter of usage behaviour, I suppose. If I start
Hello, Mark. On the third January 2008 You wrote:
Some url's in HTML-messages are being truncated when the use of
smiley icons isturnedon.See:
Options-Preferences-Viewer/Editor-Use Smiley Icons in HTML Viewer
See BT :
Added to bugtrack https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6620 with
piccies
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4880
--
Best regards,
Vilius
Current beta is 3.99.29 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
Hi Roelof,
on Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:59:49 +0100GMT (03.01.2008, 16:59 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
PH I have changed the setting in Options/Preferences/Other
Options/Confirmations
PH for the Marking folder as read option from off to on.
PH After restarting TB 4.0.0.6/Alpha the options is set
Hi Peter,
on Thu, 3 Jan 2008 17:01:21 +0100GMT (03.01.2008, 17:01 +0100GMT here),
you wrote:
PH Answering a current message (Thursday, January 3, 2008, 16:54)
PH Good evening Roelof,
RO Can't confirm.
PH Maybe (again) an OTFE related issue?
Probably not, as I observe the same as Roelof.
--
Hi,
On Wednesday, January 2, 2008, 3:54:17 PM, Gary wrote:
I don't have to think, I know.
says it all
You should not take someones thoughts out of the context. I'm with
Gary here. We, the admins and IT pros, KNOW how IMAP works. And you
know what? There is *nothing* special about it. It's
Hello Konrad,
Thursday, January 3, 2008, 5:56:11 PM, you wrote:
KS I don't know which version of this file do You use, but if You'll add
KS '\*' to the first exclusion a link from your message will works.
I don't know what version it is either.
Opened it with EditPad Pro and changed the third
Hello Gleason,
Other people may have other definitions.
GP No, other people have at least that definition. Even Thunderbird can
GP do that much.
Indeed. So what does it say to you that TheBat can't EVEN do that much?
GP TB users (like me) usually have a number of other message handling
GP
Hello Vilius,
Thursday, January 3, 2008, 6:40:27 PM, you wrote:
VŠ If I were a product manager at RitLabs I've
VŠ done one of the things:
VŠ a) Split POP3 and IMAP TB! into two separate products. POP3 version
VŠ with all the advanced filters, virtual folders, etc. into one.
--8--
That would be
Hello Vilius,
Thursday, January 3, 2008, 5:09:08 PM, you wrote:
Added to bugtrack https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6620 with
piccies
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4880
Ok maybe should be linked
Sean
--
Sean
Thawte, GSWoT and CaCert WOT Assurer
I believe that every human
Vilius,
You should not take someones thoughts out of the context. I'm with
Gary here. We, the admins and IT pros, KNOW how IMAP works. And you
know what? There is *nothing* special about it. It's not a rocket
science. Without IMAP extensions it can be easily implemented as
fast as in 3-4
On 1/3/2008, Gleason wrote:
Actually, what I see is that not one email client developer has done
a good complete job of implementing Imap, as easy as you say it is.
TB has come closest.
Actually, this is not correct. Mulberry is by far the best, most
complete, and most capable IMAP client.
Randy,
Actually, what I see is that not one email client developer has
done a good complete job of implementing Imap, as easy as you say
it is. TB has come closest.
Actually, this is not correct. Mulberry is by far the best, most
complete, and most capable IMAP client. Unfortunately, it
Randy,
On 1/3/2008, Gleason wrote:
For me, complete includes things that Mulberry does not do, such as
better than primitive html/graphics handling, notes attached to
messages. And Mulberry does have performance issues too. No, MB
doesn't make the cut.
The issues you point out have
On 1/3/2008, Gleason wrote:
For me, complete includes things that Mulberry does not do, such as
better than primitive html/graphics handling, notes attached to
messages. And Mulberry does have performance issues too. No, MB
doesn't make the cut.
The issues you point out have nothing to do
Hello Marek,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 16:09:03 +0100 GMT (03/01/2008, 22:09 +0700 GMT),
Marek Mikus wrote:
MM let me reply again with other reasons against your idea, I am not
MM generally against it, but I am sure, it will limit of usage and
MM whole Filtering system will be unintuitive. Let me
Hello Dwight,
On Thu, 3 Jan 2008 10:18:16 -0600 GMT (03/01/2008, 23:18 +0700 GMT),
Dwight A Corrin wrote:
BTW my wish would also benefit those who use gmail and its derivates
(like thebat.net) on mailing lists.
DAC How?
Because Gmail doesn't send your messages back to you when you send
them
On Thursday, January 3, 2008, 7:33:40 PM, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
BTW my wish would also benefit those who use gmail and its
derivates (like thebat.net) on mailing lists.
DAC How?
Because Gmail doesn't send your messages back to you when you send
them to a mailing list. You need to use
On Thursday, January 3, 2008, 3:56:28 PM, Gleason Pace wrote:
And Mulberry does have performance issues too.
and it was not commercially sustainable.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
1201 W River Blvd Apt B108
Wichita KS 67203
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The
On Wed, 2 Jan 2008, at 18:38:48 [GMT +0100] (which was 18:38 where I
live) Henk M. de Bruijn wrote:
Added a note ;-)
I added a note because I have some dozen of private maps/folders, not
mailinglists. In which the relevant messages arrive and theirs answers.
I supported this wish first because
44 matches
Mail list logo
