, it turned out that the the compressed The Bat!
> became too “heavy”.
On a more serious note, Windows Desktop Search support is one thing,
but it would be useful to have Google Desktop integration, too. There
once was a third-party plugin for it but it's long-defunct now.
-
like "problem with DEP detection
under Windows 2008 Server" ([1]). Milit'ry stuff, you know, not some
lowly IMAP...
[1]
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
__
Hello Carsten,
Thursday, September 17, 2009, 2:04:09 PM, you wrote:
> Meanwhile I found out more about this: The Bat disconnects
> (claiming that the server ended the connection) whenever the message
> to be uploaded exceeds 2 MB. I checked the IMAP server for such a
> limit: There is none! Thunde
od one, indeed.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.2.10.12 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
Hello Carsten,
Thursday, September 17, 2009, 11:49:06 AM, you wrote:
> I estimate the chances of this being fixed in The Bat within the
> next year at somewhere around 3%.
That's about 1000 times more generous than my estimate would be :)
--
Best regards,
Rob
on of this solution (still not fast but at least
reliable) would be to import this mbox file into Thunderbird and do
the move from there.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Curren
surprised, you are making money off it -- but telling
them to ignore AV alerts and resorting to lying is a bit unethical,
don't you think?
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanekmailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
ase, it is interesting that you decided to only kick
Arjan.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek
mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.2.4 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
ing surprises me anymore.Each new Ritlabs blunder
> just fills me with mild amusement. Otherwise I couldn't care less.
I never quote full posts just to add "Agree!" at the end but this is
the first time I genuinely feel the urge to do so.
TB!'s low quality is
to-make-any-commitments"
strategy but it is not enough for us.
So, either they deliver IMAP support or the discussions will go on :)
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
requested this particular feature (which, BTW, is not a feature but a
fix for a bug mostly likely caused by Ritlabs themselves with their
braindead antipiracy protection scheme -- most DEP errors are related
to either naive protection schemes or very lousy coding)?
--
Best regards,
e. IMAP used to provoke heated debates
here sometimes but this time it was rather calm and to the point.
Even Gleason made sure he always indicated "IMAP worked fine FOR HIM"
;-)
And don't you worry -- the last few years surely indicate the Ritlabs
have a *very* thic
-D-M-A-P otherwise known as a
R-E-L-E-A-S-E P-L-A-N.
Not a relative one ("next version", "after...") but an absolute one
("by next month"). But we are not going to get it. It would be just a
PITA for Ritlabs (an obligation they don't want).
--
Best r
).
For private email, I don't think it would be suitable for me.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.1.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
dvantages users
are *not* finding (because they can't).
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanekmailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.1.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www
y much doubt you will ever see a working IMAP
implementation in this product.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanekmailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.1.14.2 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
.e. don't speak for "most users"; thanks!)
> which is why it continues to prosper when others have not. CF Mulberry,
> Eudora, etc.
Here you made me laugh.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek
it's going to be significantly better).
Which means: we still don't know what exactly is going to be improved.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.1.11.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
to do with it: they may keep
doing basically nothing and live off it for a few next releases, they
may take the risk and invest some money into development of IMAP or
other 'big' features which may or may not pay off. Time will tell.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek
us interview from the year 2000, promising
> improved IMAP(4) support from v2. It does not say what exactly they
> were going to improve though. Somebody might find other references.
Thanks :)
I am sure there must have been similar statements made regarding v3.
I remember it was supposed t
f work
going on. I fear they won't, however, since it's easier for them not
to make any kind of commitments.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.1.11.6 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
be fixed,
(2) By when,
(3) In what version.
This question is addressed to everyone. I'll be glad if someone could
find references to their past "promises" (that they never kept).
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek mailto:tbb...@mail.
ard. This has been confirmed several
times by many users, on various server types.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek
mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.1.11.
n't how it used to work. The question is whether it is
tunable, client or server side.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek
mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.1.9.1 | 'Usi
sure the change happened some
time in the past (maybe even when I was on last versions of 3.x).
And, in the meantime I also upgraded the IMAP server I'm using
(Dovecot) so I am not even sure what caused this change in behavior.
Any comments?
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek
lt+Enter),
just right-click the search box to see all available options.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanekmailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.1.9.1 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
h
is not a priority item for me (but it would be nice
anyway, some time in the future).
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek mailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.1.1.6 | 'Using TBBETA'
Hi,
Ritlabs: now that we know that spending some cash for the 4.1 upgrade
is inevitable -- any chance for a Christmas promotion (with reduced
prices), as in previous years?
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanekmailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Hi,
Tuesday, December 16, 2008, 1:00:25 PM, you wrote:
> What I really expect/want -> ROADMAP.
I second that.
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanekmailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4
mise that has been made and broken, several times?
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanekmailto:tbb...@mail.robert.tomanek.org
Current beta is 4.1.1.5 | 'Using TBBETA' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
er step back
for The Bat!'s (already pathetic) IMAP support..
To check it, you can probably have a look at the Connection Centre
while searching -- it should say "Search Search for in "
(sounds funny but that's what is says there).
My version (4.0.26) seems to be all righ
Hello Maxim,
Friday, September 26, 2008, 5:35:21 PM, you wrote:
> What's new in 4.0.34.11 since 4.0.34.8:
> [!] New message base index for support message base files larger
> than 2G bytes and possibility to have multiple user flags
Does this mean that there is a chance that IMAP Flags/ Keywords
are); I am
currently only upgrading because I hope the next version will be less
buggy.
P.S.: My first post here, hello to everyone...
--
Best regards,
Robert Tomanek mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Current beta
33 matches
Mail list logo
