5.3.2.2 - Memory leak?

Hello TBBETA, I'm seeing huge memory usage by TB! Virtual Memory 1GB, working set 478K Anyone else seeing this? -- Best regards, Tony mailto:t...@parkinch.co.uk The Bat! 5.3.2.2 (BETA) with IMAP on Windows XP 5.1.Service Pack 3 Build: 2600 __

Memory Leak when running Maintenance Center

I have had this error twice today, once when shutting down and just now when running the maintenance center. There are no log entries --- Application Error --- Exception ECriticalSectionsLeak in module tbmapi.dll at 000116F5. Resource leak: 2 instan

Memory leak?

So, as I wrote earlier, my VM runs up when reply to a mail. I managed to track down to the Reply template. So, if my reply template is empty, %BLANK, replying a mail will not really increase the VM size. BUT: if I have a simple %QUOTES %CURSOR Vili reply template, then replying to a 3-line mai

Re: Memory leak, 2. (WAS Video Issue?)

"Kertész Vilmos" wrote on 19/04/2008 at 23:26:50 +1100 subject "Memory leak, 2. (WAS Video Issue?)" : > Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns: > - start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me. > - open the Mail Editor to write a mail > The

Re[2]: Memory leak, 2. (WAS Video Issue?)

Hello Rick, >> Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns: >> - start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me. >> - open the Mail Editor to write a mail >> The size of the VM shoots up to 125 MB... It is not lowered when I >> send the mail or close the mail editor. >> Isnt it a

Re: Memory leak, 2. (WAS Video Issue?)

> Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns: > - start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me. > - open the Mail Editor to write a mail > The size of the VM shoots up to 125 MB... It is not lowered when I > send the mail or close the mail editor. > > Isnt it a little too

Memory leak, 2. (WAS Video Issue?)

Ok, I found the cause of the HUGE VM size and I think the slowdowns: - start TB. It is like 50 MB VM at me. - open the Mail Editor to write a mail The size of the VM shoots up to 125 MB... It is not lowered when I send the mail or close the mail editor. Isnt it a little too much increase?

Memory leak (WAS Video Issue?)

find the cause yet. BUT: monitor the VM in the Task Manager, and open/close an email that has online images in it. You may see that the size of the VM increases. Not that much, but there is a memory leak. Also, at some mail with online content, I dont see VM increase. We should test w

Re: memory leak

On Friday, March 14, 2008, 20:46:35, Volker Ahrendt wrote: > At the moment (running some hours) 15MB RAM/61MB virtual Memory, > minimized 3MB/61MB. Hint: when a program is minimised it doesn't use any less memory, Windows only swaps most of it's working set out to swap file. -- < Jernej Simonči

Re: memory leak

[Reply to: »Jan Rifkinson« · 2008-03-14 · 21:14 h (CET)] Moin, Jan! > Has anyone noted a memory leak in the current betas? Trying to track > something down. Quite the contrary – v4.0.x is much better than the v3.99.x in this point. At the moment (running some hours) 15MB RAM/61MB v

memory leak

Battyfolk, Has anyone noted a memory leak in the current betas? Trying to track something down. Thanks. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB!4.0.18, Windows 2000, Service Pack 4 Current beta is 4.0.18 | 'Using TBBETA' i

Re[2]: Memory Leak

n (seems) necessary and predecessors did. Thanks for your note on the memory leak. I'll wait for version 4.0 to see if it addresses memory use. Jerry -- Best regards, Ethanmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: Memory Leak

Hello Ethan, Sunday, November 25, 2007, 3:47:23 PM, you wrote: EJM> Can anyone verify this problem? I can't look for the reason, I can only confirm that this .25 version also uses more memory than (seems) necessary and predecessors did. -- Best Wishes, Mark using

Re: Memory Leak

Hello Ethan, Sunday, November 25, 2007, 8:47:23 AM, you scribbled: EJM> Sunday, November 25, 2007 EJM> I continue to experience some sort of memory leak with the current EJM> official version of The Bat. After about half of a day of use, it EJM> moves from 57, 232 K to just und

Re: Memory Leak

> I continue to experience some sort of memory leak with the current > official version of The Bat. After about half of a day of use, it > moves from 57, 232 K to just under 180, 000K. Even when I minimize the > program, it still continues to escalate. > Can anyone verify this p

Memory Leak

Sunday, November 25, 2007 I continue to experience some sort of memory leak with the current official version of The Bat. After about half of a day of use, it moves from 57, 232 K to just under 180, 000K. Even when I minimize the program, it still continues to escalate. Can anyone verify this

Re: Mighty memory leak?

·---·-Date---· | Q&A [1] | 2007-04-18 | ·---·· [Reply to: »Volker Ahrendt« · 2007-04-17 · 17:49 h (CET)] >> The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Hello Marek, On Tuesday, April 17, 2007 at 12:20:38 PM Marek [MM] wrote: MM> Hello all, MM> Tuesday, April 17, 2007, Roelof Otten wrote: MP>>> The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple MP>>> of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes, MP>>> th

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Hello Michal, > Unfortunately someone did beat me to the leak by around 24 hours: > > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6341 > > so what I will do is comment on this issue :) You have to be quick if you want to get the honour ;-) -- Best regards, Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain) Us

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Hello all, Tuesday, April 17, 2007, Michal Paluchowski wrote: > https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=6341 > so what I will do is comment on this issue :) confirmed and priority increased to High. -- Bye Marek Mikus Czech support of The Bat! http://www.thebat.cz Using the best The Bat! 3

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 5:56:41 PM, you wrote: > You discovered the leak and you deserve the honour of opening it ;) > It's easy, go to https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/main_page.php and sign up. Ah, well... I guess one more BT registration won't harm. I live on them anyway, most of the time on the

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Hello Michal, >> Confirmed here also. Has a BT report been open? If not, RIT may not >> take any action to correct this. > > I'm not registered in the BT, so can someone else please file a > report? You discovered the leak and you deserve the honour of opening it ;) It's easy, go to https://www.

Re: Mighty memory leak?

·---·-Date---· | Q&A [1] | 2007-04-17 | ·---·· [Reply to: »Michal Paluchowski« · 2007-04-17 · 06:11 h (CET)] Hello, Michal! > The screenshot shows Bat

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 2:18:03 PM, you wrote: > Confirmed here also. Has a BT report been open? If not, RIT may not > take any action to correct this. I'm not registered in the BT, so can someone else please file a report? -- Michal Paluchowski [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Hello Michal, > I thought Firefox would be the ultimate memory-eater, but it seems > like The Bat! 3.98.12 beats all :) > > The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple > of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes, > that is well over 900MB :) Con

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Hello Michal, Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 12:11:25 AM, you wrote: MP> I thought Firefox would be the ultimate memory-eater, but it seems MP> like The Bat! 3.98.12 beats all :) MP> The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple MP> of hours running. First column is Mem Usage,

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Hello all, Tuesday, April 17, 2007, Roelof Otten wrote: MP>> The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple MP>> of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes, MP>> that is well over 900MB > Confirmed. > On starting TB it uses 117 MB over here, after

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Hallo Michael, On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 06:11:25 +0200GMT (17-4-2007, 6:11 +0200, where I live), you wrote: MP> The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple MP> of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes, MP> that is well over 900MB Confirmed. On st

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 9:25:39 AM, you wrote: > Maybe it's the autobackup that is running every night. Can't be. I'm not using it. As for plugins, I have only the Bayes Filter Plugin (not! BayesIt), which hasn't been updated for a while anyway. -- Michal Paluchowski [EMAIL PROTECTED] _

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Hello Michal, Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 9:40:29 AM, you wrote: > Yap, definitively something wrong here. It's running now for 2 hours > and the VM size is already at 135MB. Same thing here: VM size 533 Mb (). Maybe it's the autobackup that is running every night. I'm using OTF by the way. --

Re: Mighty memory leak?

"Michal Paluchowski" wrote on 17/04/2007 at 15:11:25 +1100 subject "Mighty memory leak?" : > I thought Firefox would be the ultimate memory-eater, but it seems > like The Bat! 3.98.12 beats all :) > The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after

Re: Mighty memory leak?

Tuesday, April 17, 2007, 6:11:25 AM, you wrote: > The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple > of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes, > that is well over 900MB :) Yap, definitively something wrong here. It's running now for 2 hours and the

Mighty memory leak?

I thought Firefox would be the ultimate memory-eater, but it seems like The Bat! 3.98.12 beats all :) The screenshot shows Bat's memory usage on my computer after a couple of hours running. First column is Mem Usage, second is VM Size. Yes, that is well over 900MB :) -- Michal Paluchowski

Ongoing Memory Leak Problem 3.60.01

> [-] memory leaks A problem reported with the last beta on the list and in bug track was memory leak issues. Specifically, the more you used The Bat, the higher and higher the memory usage would climb. Then, if you minimized the program, memory usage would drop significantly. Then once

Memory Leak in Release Version 3.51.10

In the beta series, the leak was report on the bug track at https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4925 It is very much present in this public release. Will this be addressed in the next beta. Currently, it does not take much to run it up to 75 when doing a round of mail responses. Jerry --

Re[2]: Memory leak?

Hello Wayne, > I am fairly new to the list, I'm not sure what you mean. Is Robo one > of the developers? In other words, if this issue is being looked into, > then I am satisfied and I will stop posting about it. Yes, he's a developer, I was told that he's working on it. -- Vili The Bat 3.51.7

Re: Memory leak?

Hello Wayne! On Thursday, July 21, 2005, 12:25 PM, you wrote: V>> As I learnt it, it came with new GUI, and Robo is working on it to fix V>> it. > I am fairly new to the list, I'm not sure what you mean. Is Robo one > of the developers? In other words, if this issue is being looked into, > then

Re: Memory leak?

Hello Vili, On Thursday, July 21, 2005, at 6:57:46 AM, you wrote re: Memory leak?: V> As I learnt it, it came with new GUI, and Robo is working on it to fix V> it. I am fairly new to the list, I'm not sure what you mean. Is Robo one of the developers? In other words, if this iss

Memory leak in message viewer with multipart UUencoded messages

Good day, tbbeta. Sample message, which being replied by ftpmail generates а couple of uuencoded messages. Then received part is chosen, TB hangs up to a minute and shows raw UUE data. The volume of occupied memory comes nearer to 100-120 MBytes. It's so from early v2. -- WBR, Vladimir 'ins

Re[2]: Memory leak?

Hello Wayne, WH>> One more thing that I noticed on this topic: Open The Bat! and WH>> close it without doing anything else. Do this several times. WH>> Notice how the memory footprint increases significantly each WH>> time!! I am now up to 67 MB after about 8 or 10 times! > I substantially reduced

Re: Memory leak?

WH> One more thing that I noticed on this topic: Open The Bat! and WH> close it without doing anything else. Do this several times. WH> Notice how the memory footprint increases significantly each WH> time!! I am now up to 67 MB after about 8 or 10 times! I substantially reduced the number of mess

Re: Memory leak?

Hello Clive, On Sunday, July 17, 2005, at 7:37:06 AM, you wrote re: Memory leak?: >> When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and >> sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and >> it becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! i

Re[3]: Memory leak?

Sunday, July 17, 2005, 6:18:19 AM, (Internet Time - @512) you wrote: Hello Vili, V> Hello Goncalo, >> I have TB! running for almost an hour, I'm replying to TBBeta and >> this it the memory consumption. V> I sent this to BT, please support it if you think: V>

Re: Memory leak?

> When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and > sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and > it becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I didnt > use IMAP (removed temporarly), while I tried. This is an old problem that's been discuss

Re[2]: Memory leak?

Hello Goncalo, > I have TB! running for almost an hour, I'm replying to TBBeta and > this it the memory consumption. I sent this to BT, please support it if you think: <http://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4925> Summary: Memory leak Description: On T

Re: Memory leak?

In reply to  : V> Hello tbbeta, V> When  I  start  TB!,  it  takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and V> sending  one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and it V> becomes  slow  to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I V> didnt use V> IMAP 

Re[2]: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

Hello Michael, > Then I switched over to a POP account and on the Process Explorer when > I hit CTL-N the "Private Bytes History" jumped to 54 mb from about 3 > mb. I have attached a screen shot. > Maybe you can make some kind of sense out of this, as I am no > programer. :) I will look into it,

Re[2]: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

ore in depth > analysis... > http://www.sysinternals.com/Utilities/ProcessExplorer.html > BTW it is freeware with no spyware :) I check it, thanks! After we, i.e. RL will fix this current memory leak issue, I would like to check the leaks related to IMAP, if any. -- Vili The Bat 3.5

Re[2]: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

Hello Alexander, >> Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be >> a leak, I felt it :) ...: > [...] >> Please confirm it. > I can confirm this, too - however, when I minimize TB to the system > tray > and then open it again, memory usage is

Re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

Hello Vili & everyone else, on 16-Jul-2005 at 21:27 you (Vili) wrote: > Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be > a leak, I felt it :) ...: [...] > Please confirm it. I can confirm this, too - however, when I minimize TB to the system tray and then

Re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

Hello Roelof, On Saturday, July 16, 2005, at 4:28:46 PM, you wrote re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :))): RO> Well, I was using the AVG plug-in and BayesIt. Not here. Memory leak is occurring without it. Just checked, TB is using 63 MB. That's almost twice MS Access wit

Re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

Hallo Vili, On Sat, 16 Jul 2005 21:27:26 +0200GMT (16-7-2005, 21:27 +0200, where I live), you wrote: V> Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be V> a leak, I felt it :) ...: V> 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB. V> 2.

Re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

Saturday, July 16, 2005, 2:27:26 PM, (Internet Time - @852) you wrote: Hello Vili, V> Hello tbbeta, V> Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be V> a leak, I felt it :) ...: V> 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB. V> 2

Re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

On Saturday, July 16, 2005 at 2:27:26 PM [GMT -0500], Vili wrote: > 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB. > 2. Ctrl+N, new mail. And just close it, dont do anything. Repeat it, > for example 10 times. > 3. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. It will be ca

Re: Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

Saturday, July 16, 2005, 2:27:26 PM, (Internet Time - @852) you wrote: Hello Vili, V> Hello tbbeta, V> Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be V> a leak, I felt it :) ...: V> 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB. V> 2

Re: Memory leak?

Hello Vili, On Saturday, July 16, 2005, at 3:21:26 PM, you wrote re: Memory leak?: V> When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and V> sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and it V> becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itse

Memory leak in the last version, I found it! :)))

Hello tbbeta, Ok, I found the cause of the memory leak. I know, that there must be a leak, I felt it :) ...: 1. Check the mem. need of TB! in task manager. Lets say it is X MB. 2. Ctrl+N, new mail. And just close it, dont do anything. Repeat it, for example 10 times. 3. Check the mem. need

Memory leak?

Hello tbbeta, When I start TB!, it takes 38 MB RAM. After reading some mail and sending one out, it takes 46 MB. Sometimes it goes up to 57 MB and it becomes slow to CLOSE the mails and CLOSE TB! itself. Now I didnt use IMAP (removed temporarly), while I tried. But with IMAP, I have seen

Memory leak in RC1

Hi TBBETA I previously reported a memory leak in RC1 and logged it as https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=4531, yet have received only 1 confirmation in Bugtrack. I assume the RIT developers assign priority for fixes based on Bugtrack confirmations / requests etc, so if you have experienced

RTV: memory leak with bis messages

Hello List, hello 9Val, as https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=3915 hasn't changed it's status since my note added I wanted to make sure it gets recognized before the final is released. I'd consider this RTV-memory-bug a real show stopper and therefore vote against a final version without this

Re: Memory leak when opening editor

On Thursday, October 14, 2004, 16:01, Marcus Ohlström wrote: > This is even worse now, according to my Task Manager, TB!'s memory > usage goes up between 5-7MB each time I open the MicroEd. In addition, > 5-7MB of virtual memory is reported as lost too. When trying after sending the mail, I coul

Re: Memory leak when opening editor

> sending the email or by cancelling it). > Since I'm still on a very old beta, I would appreciate confirmations > from users with current betas. I'll add a BT item as soon as someone has > confirmed the memory leak. This is even worse now, according to my Task Manager, TB!&

Memory leak or not (was: Bye for now)

Hello Graham! On Friday, September 5, 2003 at 9:52:50 AM you wrote: > Well, my own limited testing on TB! With IMAP on mail5.com, was that > everytime TB! Polled the server, memory usage when up by about 100k. I just > sat and watched it. That sounds like a memory leak to me. It's

Re: Beta 49: RTV memory leak gone

On Friday, March 15, 2002, 12:43:20 PM, Dierk Haasis wrote: > In the last few days I already had the idea to make a small poll > about when TB! is ready for the next release. And - as mentioned > above - my biggest concern was the memory leak. I fully concur. -- Dwight A. Corri

Re: Beta 48: RTV memory leak

Hello Dierk, 14. marec 2002, 20:44:16, you wrote: DH>When I tried to change the viewer - never a problem before - TB! DH>told me I was out of memory and immediately got an AV. It got it DH>over and over again when I OK'ed it. Something similar happened here: I was using RTV for som

Beta 48: RTV memory leak

Hello TBBETA Members! I just had a message finished that it works, bur: No. For a few minutes everything looked rock solid with no memory drain at all. But after having a short trip through one of my folder consisting of 16 messages RAM was gone. Worse, the Tray icon showed new me

Re[2]: Memory leak under W2K?

On Saturday, March 2, 2002, 05:47, you wrote: > Oddly enough, I recall something very similar happening > here. I dismissed it as a mistake in reporting by CoolMon. I can't > reproduce it now no matter what I do. But if memory serves me > right, this was around the time I was using be

Re: Memory leak?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Peter! On 6 Dec 2001 at 09:15:13 you wrote: > No, but this may be due to the fact I'm running W2K with it's much > improved memory handling. You are right, from the last discussion on memory leakage (concerning the new RTV) I remember that t

Re: Memory leak?

Hello Dierk, On 6 Dec 2001 at 10:47:57 you wrote (at least in part): >> I use it all the time (for testing!!! I don't need true type fonts >> *g*) DH> You surely do mean "variable pitch fonts"? If you really don't need DH> TrueType (which, BTW, is a trademark) you are either not on Windows or

The Bat! - bug report: Memory leak

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello The Bat! developers, I'm using The Bat! Version 1.54 Beta/15 Serial Number 8AA0F474 under Windows 95 4.0 Build 67306684 C and would like to report a bug The bug description: Memory leakage on Windows 95 Steps to reproduce the

Re[2]: OT: E-mailaholics Anonymous (EmA) - was Re: Memory leak or what?

\\\|/// / ~ _ \ (- O o -) --oOOo-(_)-oOOo--- Hello Ali, AM> You know, I was thinking of a questionnaire along those lines. You are AM> indeed a worthy member and we will accept you graciously. :

Re: OT: E-mailaholics Anonymous (EmA) - was Re: Memory leak or what?

Hi Ali, Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 8:34:33 AM, you wrote: AM> Do you feel depressed or restless when your e-mail volume gets low and AM> furthermore, do you fiddle with your e-mail program when AM> disappointingly no mail is awaiting you when you check for it? ROFL If you are really des

Re[2]: OT: E-mailaholics Anonymous (EmA) - was Re: Memory leak or what?

Hello Ali, Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 4:34:33 PM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote: AM> You know, I was thinking of a questionnaire along those lines. You are AM> indeed a worthy member and we will accept you graciously. :) But AM> remember, we seek no remedy for our apparent infirmity. AM> Do you

Re: OT: E-mailaholics Anonymous (EmA) - was Re: Memory leak or what?

Leif Gregory <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, my name is Leif Gregory, and I've been an E-mailaholic for the > last 10 years (BBSs before Internet). > Sometimes I wake up in the middle of the night to go to the bathroom > or get a drink and I just can't help hitting the ALT-F2 keys as I roll

OT: E-mailaholics Anonymous (EmA) - was Re: Memory leak or what?

Ali, Hi, my name is Leif Gregory, and I've been an E-mailaholic for the last 10 years (BBSs before Internet). Sometimes I wake up in the middle of the night to go to the bathroom or get a drink and I just can't help hitting the ALT-F2 keys as I roll out of bed. Other times I excuse myself from

Re[2]: Memory leak or what?

Hello Ali, Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 2:16:17 PM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote: AM>>> Organization: E-mailaholics anonymous >> LOL - would like to ("need to"?) join. AM> Sure. Go right ahead. >> Any initiation rituals? ;-) AM> Yes. You absolutely must add your new status to your message hea

Re: Memory leak or what?

Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: AM>> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 00:29:34 -0500 AM>> From: Ali Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AM>> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.38) S/N CCA4F9B8 / Personal AM>> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AM>> Organization: E-mailaholics anonymous > LOL - would like to ("need to"?

Re[2]: Memory leak or what?

Hello Ali, Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 1:29:34 PM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote: AM> Date: Wed, 8 Dec 1999 00:29:34 -0500 AM> From: Ali Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AM> X-Mailer: The Bat! (v1.38) S/N CCA4F9B8 / Personal AM> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AM> Organization: E-mailaholics anonymous LOL

Re: Memory leak or what?

Thomas Fernandez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] > Is this an NT thing, or can I see memory usage in Win98 as well? Yes, the TaskManager is an NT thing. :) -- Ali Martin | Using The Bat! v1.38 mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] | Windows NT 4.0 (Service Pack 6)

Re: Memory leak or what?

Hello Ali, Wednesday, December 08, 1999, 12:51:41 AM GMT+0800, Ali Martin wrote: [...] AM> I checked the task manager and saw that available physical memory was AM> down to 29MB. Is this an NT thing, or can I see memory usage in Win98 as well? -- Thanks, Thomas. Message reply created with

Re[2]: Memory leak or what?

Hello List Members, on 07.12.1999 at 20:38, Alexander Drunin wrote: > Confirm. Also entering large folders cause now huge increments in > TB! memory Confirm also. Uses way too much memory for an email client... Regards Dieter Hummel Running TheBat! 1.38 Beta/6 on Windows NT v4 Build 1381