Hello Tony Boom & everyone else
08-Nov-2004 13:58, you wrote:
MO>> Oh, I remember the old Amiga clients Spot and Thor :-) The first a
MO>> fidonet client, the latter intended for both fidonet and email.
> Amiga on the web eh? Bet that was fast :)
Faster than yo momma! :-)
You know, its applic
Hello Marcus,
A reminder of what Marcus Ohlström typed on:
08 November 2004 at 12:54:00 GMT +0100
MO> Oh, I remember the old Amiga clients Spot and Thor :-) The first a
MO> fidonet client, the latter intended for both fidonet and email.
Amiga on the web eh? Bet that was fast :)
I still go
On Monday, November 8, 2004, 11:07, Tony Boom wrote:
> Out of all the clients I've bought, and I have a few, The Bat is
> the only one that has the option to prevent accidental deletion.
> Obviously we are now going to be flooded with dozens of posts
> naming others that have the option :)
O
Hello Roger,
A reminder of what Roger Phillips typed on:
08 November 2004 at 04:55:59 GMT +0100
RP> Given my comments here, can you give me a good and sensible reason why
RP> anybody would want to keep duplicates of a message within the same
RP> folder?
Woa, Woa Woa, ang on a mo. I'm no
Yes, but these 'duplicates' are all stored in different media or
different folders. The TB 'Kill dupes' feature only deals with
duplicates which occur within a single folder. It does NOT compare
the contents of a folder with the contents of any other folder.
As
Hello Tony,
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 12:51:01 PM, among other things, you wrote:
RP>> Any comments?
TB> Yes, the idea of parking a message is to protect it from exactly what your
TB> trying to do with it, deleting it!
Yes, I AM aware of the reason for parking! I was only asking about
del
On Sunday, November 7, 2004, 11:51, Tony Boom wrote:
RP>> If it is, 'as designed', then IMHO it should be changed.
> Please don't, I use it quite a lot and I like the idea of being able to
> "Idiot proof" the odd email or two, duplicate or not.
Especially since the kill duplicate procedure ha
Hello Roger,
On Sun, 7 Nov 2004 14:36:31 +0200 GMT (07/11/2004, 19:36 +0700 GMT),
Roger Phillips wrote:
RP> I disagree. If you want to have a duplicate you can make one, but
RP> why would you want to STORE one?
I wouldn't know, but it would be your decision to store those
duplicates, would
Hello Tony!
On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 3:17:31 PM you wrote:
> I put it in an archive folder, Park it and don't have to worry about
> accidentally deleting it.
> It's invariably TB! I look to first should I need them.
> Unlike a lot of people, I delete most of the mail I receive especially
Hello Dierk,
A reminder of what Dierk Haasis typed on:
07 November 2004 at 14:58:47 GMT +0100
DH> Tony may be the better one to tell, as he uses this.
Occasionally I buy software off the web, The Bat, Time & Chaos, Acronis,
MailwasherPro, NOD32 and Kerio to name a few. They send me an emai
Hello Roger!
On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 1:36:31 PM you wrote:
> I disagree. If you want to have a duplicate you can make one, but
> why would you want to STORE one?
Well, for archival reasons? If ever I intentionally duplicate a
message I am quite sure I do want to store it, too. Other
Hello Roger,
A reminder of what Roger Phillips typed on:
07 November 2004 at 09:48:53 GMT +0100
RP> Any comments?
Yes, the idea of parking a message is to protect it from exactly what your
trying to do with it, deleting it!
RP> If it is, 'as designed', then IMHO it should be changed.
P
Hello Dierk,
Sunday, November 7, 2004, 11:02:51 AM, among other things, you wrote:
>> Any comments?
DH> I think it is intentional. I also think it is logical: When I want to
DH> lock a message (which is what "Park" does), I don't want to have it
DH> deleted regardless of a duplicate purge.
I
Hello Roger!
On Sunday, November 7, 2004 at 9:48:59 AM you wrote:
> Any comments?
I think it is intentional. I also think it is logical: When I want to
lock a message (which is what "Park" does), I don't want to have it
deleted regardless of a duplicate purge.
--
Dierk Haasis
:Dierk: Copy '
Hi All,
I have only recently noticed that the 'Kill duplicates' action ignores
any messages that are marked as 'Parked'.
My question is, does anyone know if this is intentional or if it is a
bug? 9Val?
If it is, 'as designed', then IMHO it should be changed. If one wants to
remove duplicates
Hello Graham,
Monday, July 5, 2004, 12:50 you wrote at
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> 1. Improvement of "kill duplicates: If you could select which fields
>> TheBat! should compare
> There is (or at least was!) 2 command line arguments which were used
> to specify the fields used in a dedup
Thanks for
Hello Richard
> 1. Improvement of "kill duplicates: If you could select which fields
> TheBat! should compare
There is (or at least was!) 2 command line arguments which were used
to specify the fields used in a dedup
Max added them, and I understand they have been retained. I did report
them to t
Hello Allie,
On Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:43:46 -0500 GMT (24/02/2004, 23:43 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
>> Can nobody else confirm this? Send a message to yourself, put your own
>> address into both the CC and the BCC. See how the messages is
>> downloaded again and again at each mailcheck.
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> Can nobody else confirm this? Send a message to yourself, put your own
> address into both the CC and the BCC. See how the messages is
> downloaded again and again at each mailcheck.
What do you mean here? That there's always
th BCC. So when I downloaded mails at home, I got
>> two copies.
>> No problem, "kill dupes". One of the messages was deleted, as
>> expected.
>> When online at home, I check mail every 10 minutes. The deleted
>> message was downloaded every time!
> This i
he CC and th BCC. So when I downloaded mails at home, I got
> two copies.
> No problem, "kill dupes". One of the messages was deleted, as
> expected.
> When online at home, I check mail every 10 minutes. The deleted
> message was downloaded every time!
This is still true
Hello David,
On Mon, 4 Aug 2003 at 20:51:18 [GMT +0200] (which was 21:51 where I live) you wrote:
DvZ> I can forward version 1.51 if you want, or maybe someone can send a
DvZ> link. On my system that's the newest version that works correct with
DvZ> the kill dupes functionality.
Alain De Gevigney, [ADG] wrote:
ADG> Do you know if it can be a beta problem (these dupes are mostly created
ADG> when synchronizing my desktop (1.63b11) with my laptop (1.62)) ?
Synchronising shouldn't lead to messages being duplicated.
Synchronization usually just adds what m
On 2003-07-30 at 13:20:41 Alain de Gevigney wrote:
> Is there any reason to have thousand of dupes that aren't detected
> as dupe ?
I would guess that they are not precise duplicates, see below.
> Do you know if it can be a beta problem (these dupes are mostly
> created when
Hello Stefan,
I can easily imagine you're really busy working on V2, but I've 3
questions that need to be solved as I can't browse every folder to
manually remove every dupes ;-)
Is there any reason to have thousand of dupes that aren't detected as
dupe ?
Do you know if ther
Hello Stefan,
On Sun, 27 Jul 2003 at 16:44:26 you wrote:
>> I've thousand of dupes here that aren't detected as dupes
SR> Same Folder?
Yes, of course ;-)
--
Regards, Alain
The Bat! 1.63 Beta/11
Hi Allie,
On Sunday, March 17, 2002 at 10:07:38 [GMT -0500], you wrote:
ACM> If Nick is in fact using IntelliMouse drivers then the plot surely
ACM> thickens here since he's also having a mouse scrollwheel problem in
ACM> TB!. This would amount to a driver problem.
I was talking about the Intell
Hello Allie,
17. marec 2002, 15:41:30, you wrote:
ACM> Which OS are you running? I think the feature being discussed is
ACM> available only in WinXP.
Win2k has that feature, and I think that WinME, too. And I think that
Plus (or some other software) enables this on Win98, too.
--
Jernej Simon
Hello Nick,
On Sunday, March 17, 2002 at 2:37:04 PM you wrote (at least in part):
>> On my Windows 2000 Pro SP2, the ALT key toggles the underlines on and
>> off.
NA> Strange indeed.
Go to 'Display Settings' in your system (right click on desktop /
'Properties') and choose 'Effects'.
'Hide ke
Hello Dennis,
On Sunday, March 17, 2002, at 05:22:39 AM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to "How can I automate Folder --> Kill Dupes?":
> On my Windows 2000 Pro SP2, the ALT key toggles the underlines on and
> off.
Strange indeed. I seemed to have lost all the
Hello Nick,
On my Windows 2000 Pro SP2, the ALT key toggles the underlines on
and off.
Sunday, March 17, 2002, 8:18:50 AM, you wrote:
NA> Hello Dwight,
NA> On Saturday, March 16, 2002, at 10:23:40 PM -0700, you wrote
NA> the following in regards to "How can I automate Folder
Hello Dwight,
On Saturday, March 16, 2002, at 10:23:40 PM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to "How can I automate Folder --> Kill Dupes?":
> I have attached two screen shots, one I just made when the letters were
> underlined and one I made earlier today to send
t for you :-(
PP> I'm sorry not able to do more, but I have no idea what to try to get it nor
PP> working.
please import this msgbase with 2 same messages and try to kill dupes.
Thanks
--
Marek Mikus
Using the best The Bat! 1.54 Beta/4
under the worst Window
Hello all,
Monday, July 30, 2001, Peter Palmreuther wrote:
PP> Hello Marek,
PP> On Monday, July 30, 2001 at 11:51:54 AM you wrote (at least in part):
MM>> I will sent You example messages from home.
PP> Thx ... will do some testings than :-)
here they are.
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Using the be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings David
On 19 May 2001 at 10:36:45 +0200 (which was 09:36 where I live) David van
Zuijlekom wrote and made these points
DE>> There use to be a message box at the end of Kill Dupes all folders
DE>> that would inform you how many
Hello The Bat! beta users and developers,
Peter Gannushkin wrote on 12/8/2000, 7:28 PM
Peter> 1. In some mail lists people are sending copies to private addresses
Peter> too. As all my mail is filtered I don't really need them. The only
Peter> way to deal with them is
Hello Januk,
Friday, December 08, 2000, you wrote to me:
>> 1. In some mail lists people are sending copies to private addresses
>> too. As all my mail is filtered I don't really need them. The only
>> way to deal with them is to kill dupes manually. I wonder if the
y to deal with them is to kill dupes manually. I wonder if there
> is a way to put it into the filter or folder properties.
Well by manually, you mean you have to select the menu command once
every couple of mail checks? If that's what you mean, then yes, you
have to do it manually.
Hello All,
I decided to reorganize my mail a little and discovered couple of
strange things.
1. In some mail lists people are sending copies to private addresses
too. As all my mail is filtered I don't really need them. The only
way to deal with them is to kill dupes manual
Dear TBBETA,
I found that when killing dupes, the attached files to the dupes is
kept.
When A e-mail with an attached file is received, and the file already
exists, the file is renamed to 'name1.ext', If the mail is a dupe, the
mail is removed, not the file.
I know that the file if
Hello iszendro,
Thursday, December 09, 1999, 4:27:54 PM GMT+0800, iszendro wrote:
i> I am still getting duplicated messages from TBBETA. Interestingly, no
i> problems in TBUDL.
i> Confirm?
No, I'm not getting dupes on either list.
--
Best regards,
Thomas.
Message reply cr
Hi all,
I am still getting duplicated messages from TBBETA. Interestingly, no
problems in TBUDL.
Confirm?
Best regards
Istvan Szendro
Using The Bat! 1.38
under Windows 98 4.10
--
--
View the TBBETA archive at http://tbbeta
42 matches
Mail list logo
