Dear Anne,
@5-Apr-2004, 04:51 Anne [A] in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
M>> These days bug tracking is done through the BugTraq system
A> Marck or anyone,
More "anyone" than me. Or, specifically, Alexander Leschinsky!
A> I've just noticed a message from Bugtracker about a bugnote I
A> added to R
Hello TBUDL,
So I want to invoke the despatcher if a message is bigger than, say,
100K or 200K (with attachments). How do I do that?
--
TIA,
Thomas.
Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLI
Thomas Fernandez, [TF] wrote:
TF> So I want to invoke the despatcher if a message is bigger than, say,
TF> 100K or 200K (with attachments). How do I do that?
AFAIK, you can't invoke the dispatcher automatically and in a
selective way like that. You either invoke it manually or have it come
up wit
Hello Allie,
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 06:20:45 -0500 GMT (05/04/2004, 18:20 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM> AFAIK, you can't invoke the dispatcher automatically and in a
AM> selective way like that. You either invoke it manually or have it come
AM> up with each mailcheck.
I see.
AM> What I used t
Hello Thomas,
On 5 Apr 2004 at 18:39:38 +0700 GMT [13:39 CEST] you wrote:
TF> But how do you define "large"? For me it is 100K (or 200K, have to
TF> check which works for me). The setting option under Account /
TF> Properties / Mail Management lets me fill in how many "header lines"
TF> should be
Hello Andre,
On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:13:42 +0200 GMT (05/04/2004, 19:13 +0700 GMT),
Andre Wichartz wrote:
TF>> But how do you define "large"? For me it is 100K (or 200K, have to
TF>> check which works for me). The setting option under Account /
TF>> Properties / Mail Management lets me fill in how
On Monday, 5 Apr 2004 04:51 [+0100] Anne wrote:
A> Marck or anyone,
A> I've just noticed a message from Bugtracker about a bugnote I
A> added to Richard's bug - the characters are all to pot. I'm
A> guessing it's Cyrillic but shouldn't it be in English in
A> Bugtracker - at least when the bug was
Hello bats,
I just got a paid Spamcop account and so it came that I'm fiddling
around with TheBat's IMAP support for the first time.
I want to have the "Held Mail" folder in my Spamcop-Account folder list,
but I cannot manage to get this done. Creating a new folder with that
name fails, because "
Thomas Fernandez wrote:
AW> Account Properties -> Mail Management -> Receiver header only if
AW> message size is greater than
Arggh... I looked just two lines too low. thanks.
One thing though Thomas. I remember when I used to do what you're doing,
TB! would not download the messages exceeding y
dAniel hAhler wrote:
I want to have the "Held Mail" folder in my Spamcop-Account folder list,
but I cannot manage to get this done. Creating a new folder with that
name fails, because "File exists", but the existing one does not show up
anywhere.
I have to ask the obvious. :)
Have you checked if
Hello Allie,
On Mon, 05 Apr 2004 10:40:06 -0500 GMT (05/04/2004, 22:40 +0700 GMT),
Allie Martin wrote:
AM> One thing though Thomas. I remember when I used to do what you're doing,
AM> TB! would not download the messages exceeding your specified limit and
AM> the option to delete messages from t
If they aren't going to use the Help->Feedback->Bug report option or even accept
delivery, then maybe they should remove it from TB!
Also, the latest TB! release (2.04.7) fixed my problem just as it was recommended.
Couldn't we get an automated check for new releases? If there was any notific
Hi Steve,
Sunday, April 4, 2004, 7:59:22 AM, you wrote:
ST> I'm having some trouble with IMAP filtering. When I try to
ST> re-filter the InBox, it creates ghost messages that I cannot delete.
ST> The only way I can get rid of them is to delete the account and
ST> re-add.
ST> What am I
Hi Lawrence,
on Mon, 5 Apr 2004 11:06:56 -0500GMT, you wrote:
LJ> If they aren't going to use the Help->Feedback->Bug report
LJ> option or even accept delivery, then maybe they should remove it
LJ> from TB!
Supported. :-)
LJ> Also, the latest TB! release (2.04.7) fixed my problem just
LJ> as it
Hello bats,
on Mon, 05. Apr 2004 at 10:49:07 -0500 Allie Martin wrote:
>> I want to have the "Held Mail" folder in my Spamcop-Account folder list,
>> but I cannot manage to get this done. Creating a new folder with that
>> name fails, because "File exists", but the existing one does not show up
>
Christopher Brown wrote:
It seems like IMAP needs a bit more work to be truly useable. Folder
behavior is a bit funny, and sometimes the folder list says I have a
new message, but it doesn't show up in the message list (webmail
shows the new message). I am sure the developers are focussing on
dAniel hAhler wrote:
It does not show up there and Resetting does not bring it there either.
Just INBOX is there, with "Synchronise" checked ("All messages").
If a disconnect, reconnect and reset fo the 'Manage IMAP folders'
doesn't show up the 'Held Mail' folder then I think that the held mail
Hello Christopher,
Monday, April 5, 2004, 9:17:19 AM, you wrote:
CB> I am having the same problem.
Thanks for the response. Here is another one . . . I've checked the
box under IMAP Fine Tune to "Compress folder when switching to another
folder". But, every time I compress, I get the followi
On Monday, April 05, 2004, dAniel hAhler wrote...
>>> I want to have the "Held Mail" folder in my Spamcop-Account folder
>>> list, but I cannot manage to get this done. Creating a new folder
>>> with that name fails, because "File exists", but the existing one
>>> does not show up anywhere.
>> I
Hello bats,
on Mon, 5. Apr 2004 at 12:26:07 -0500 Jonathan Angliss wrote:
> You could try the down and dirty method...
> telnet imapserveraddress 143
Wow, that did it. The LIST command said:
->8
A02 LIST "" "*"
* LIST (\HasNoChildren) "
On Monday, April 05, 2004, dAniel hAhler wrote...
>> You could try the down and dirty method...
>> telnet imapserveraddress 143
> Wow, that did it. The LIST command said:
->>8
> A02 LIST "" "*"
> * LIST (\HasNoChildren) "." "INBOX.Held M
Hi Allie,
Monday, April 5, 2004, 10:15:25 AM, you wrote:
AM> I still use IMAP because it's really neat to use at home. ~snip~
AM> The flexibility is addictive and I'm willing to use ThunderBird
AM> at work to be able to work with IMAP and TB! at home.
This is the reason I am hoping that the dev
Hi List,
Anyone know why each post I make to the list incurrs this reply (and a corresponding
delay in posting):
>
>Your mail to 'TBUDL' with the subject
>
>Re[2]: IMAP Filtering
>
>Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>
>The reason it is being held:
>
>Mess
Dear Christopher,
@5-Apr-2004, 14:56 -0700 (05-Apr 22:56 UK time) Christopher Brown
[CB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUL:
CB> Anyone know why each post I make to the list incurrs this
CB> reply (and a corresponding delay in posting):
>>
>>Message has a suspicious header
...
CB> For
Hi Marck,
MDP> Please use a different server or disable the scanners! I was meaning
MDP> to write to you - you may just get a warning - I actually have to
MDP> approve your posts manually each time :-(.
What does that mean? I don't understand. First, whats wrong with the scanners? Why are
they c
Hello tbudl,
I just have recently started using the Bat and like it quite well. Until today, I got
home and opened The Bat and knew I had emails because I had checked them at work form
OE. When I get home to download them I get a series of dings on my PC. I then see
where no files were download
Dear Christopher,
@5-Apr-2004, 15:42 -0700 (05-Apr 23:42 UK time) Christopher Brown
[CB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP>> Please use a different server or disable the scanners! I was
MDP>> meaning to write to you - you may just get a warning - I
MDP>> actually have to approve your po
Hello Marck,
Monday, April 5, 2004, 6:14:33 PM, you wrote:
MDP> It's because they are adding non-standard headers to the message.
MDP> They shouldn't do that to outbound messages. It's breaking
MDP> standards.
I have also had my messages held by the list software (hopefully my
headers are now fi
At 7:14 PM on 4/5/2004, Marck D Pearlstone typed ...
M> Bill Blinn also had such headers added to his messages and was kind
M> enough to either turn them off or use an alternate routing that
M> didn't add them. Please consider doing the same. I'd really
M> appreciate it if I didn't have to keep ap
Hello bats,
on Mon, 5. Apr 2004 at 19:11:13 -0400 Ebaystuff wrote:
> I looked at the log and saw where The Bat had deleted ALL of my
> emails on the server. Most of them were from "Known" users.
what does the account log say exactly?
--
shinE!
GnuPG/PGP key: http://thequod.de/danielhahler.asc
Roelof Otten wrote:
ND>> I realise that this is a failing of my filing system, but has anyone
ND>> found a way that I can jump to the next match using the keyboard?
> Press followed by pressing the character you're
> searching on.
Interesting... I use Ctrl+V all the time, but never have to tou
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 00:14:33 +0100 GMT (06/04/2004, 06:14 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> It's because they are adding non-standard headers to the message.
MDP> They shouldn't do that to outbound messages. It's breaking
MDP> standards.
IIRC X- headers don't break any stand
Dear Thomas,
@6-Apr-2004, 12:35 +0700 (06-Apr 06:35 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
CB>>> How could information that was intended to curb abuse be
CB>>> suspicious?
MDP>> Because it does not conform to standards - any standards.
TF> Except the RFC dealing
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 06:57:37 +0100 GMT (06/04/2004, 12:57 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF>> That's a bug in the list server software then. It should ignore
TF>> any X-headers it doesn't have a clue about.
MDP> Usually it does - but not these.
The list server software finds
34 matches
Mail list logo
