Re: Attachments in sent folder?

2004-08-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Darrin, On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 15:29:20 -0700GMT (16-8-2004, 0:29 +0200, where I live), you wrote: DR> I was looking through my sent folder and noticed that my emails with DR> image attachments showed the name of the attachment and the type but DR> the size reads as 0 bytes and cant be o

Re: Save sent messages in same folders as originals

2004-08-15 Thread Richard Wakeford
Hello Critter, On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 you wrote in C> is that a possibility? Would "Filter\Actions\save copy in another folder" work. Not tried it but just an idea. -- Regards, Richard | Using The Bat! 2.12.03 & SpamPal | Windows XP (build 2600), version 5.1 Service Pack

Save sent messages in same folders as originals

2004-08-15 Thread Critter
is that a possibility? -- =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-[ Ctz Consulting ]-= =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-[ http://ctzconsulting.com ]-= Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones

Re: Attachments in sent folder?

2004-08-15 Thread Darrin Rich
On 8/15/2004 5:09 PM my time, Mary wrote: MB> Not here. The last attachment I sent (just today), a small jpeg to my MB> sister, says under the icon when I pass my cursor over it, in the sent MB> mail, the name of the file and its size, 63,165 bytes. Hi Mary, Thanks for looking into it. Ill have

Re: Attachments in sent folder?

2004-08-15 Thread Mary Bull
Hello Darrin! On Sunday, August 15, 2004, 5:29 PM, you wrote: DR> I was looking through my sent folder and noticed that my emails with DR> image attachments showed the name of the attachment and the type but DR> the size reads as 0 bytes and cant be opened. Is this normal? Not here. The l

Attachments in sent folder?

2004-08-15 Thread Darrin Rich
Hello, I was looking through my sent folder and noticed that my emails with image attachments showed the name of the attachment and the type but the size reads as 0 bytes and cant be opened. Is this normal? -- Darrin WinXP Home Service Pack 1 Tbat! 2.12.00 "This message transmitted on 10

Re: adding all addresses in AB

2004-08-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo pk, On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 21:28:56 +0530GMT (15-8-2004, 17:58 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PR> how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's PR> to address book ? Incoming filter 'Rule' tab String: . Location: Kludges Present: Yes 'Advanced' tab Check 'Addresses must not be i

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/15/2004 12:35:29, I think I heard George Mitchell say: > It might be coincidence, but Paul Graham has written much about > Bayesian filtering. I'd guess it has something to do with his > methodology. Even if I'm wrong, there's some interesting reading at: > http://www.paulgra

Re: adding all addresses in AB

2004-08-15 Thread Greg Strong
Hello Stuart, Sunday, August 15, 2004, 11:28:50 AM, Stuart Cuddy wrote: pr how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's pr to address book ? ... >>> You can right click on the appropriate header in the Header bar and >>> select Add to address book. ... pr>> this is one way.. a

Re: More than 1 AV Plugin at the same time ?

2004-08-15 Thread Allie Martin
Peter Meyns, [PM] wrote: > You should not run two virus scanners at the same time. They are very > likely to disturb each other. At least that is what I learned. :-) Since the plugin interface will determine how each antivirus checks the incoming message, using 2 may actually be possible. I'm rea

Re: NOD32 plugin (was: Re[2]: Panda antivirus plugin)

2004-08-15 Thread Allie Martin
Marek Mikus, [MM] wrote: > did You tested first beta version of plugin for NOD32 v2? It was > created by Maxim some weeks ago and works with last beta of NOD32, > which has file nod32api.dll included. We have found only one issue > yet, system must be restarted after installing beta of NOD and > a

Re: More than 1 AV Plugin at the same time ?

2004-08-15 Thread Peter Meyns
Hi WilWilWil, on Sun, 15 Aug 2004 17:24:06 +0200GMT, you wrote: W> As SO ask for using 2 plugins at the same time for blocking spam, is it possible W> for anti virus plugins ? Because my Grisoft plugin (not free version 6, but W> registered version 7) sometimes doesn't see viruses within arc

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread George Mitchell
DZ-Jay wrote: DJ> Some time around 08/15/2004 11:13:49, I think I heard Stuart Cuddy say: >>What is Graham? >>What is Spam-grade? DJ> AFAIK, spam-grade would be the probability of it being spam, and DJ> Graham, I suppose, means the probability of it being not-spam (I DJ> suppose, non-spa

Re[3]: adding all addresses in AB

2004-08-15 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello pk, Sunday, August 15, 2004, 11:20:02 AM, you wrote: pr>>> how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's pr>>> to address book ? pr>>> any suggestions ! >> You can right click on the appropriate header in the Header bar and >> select Add to address book. I believe it then gives you the

Re[2]: adding all addresses in AB

2004-08-15 Thread pk roy
Hello Stuart, pr>> how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's pr>> to address book ? pr>> any suggestions ! > You can right click on the appropriate header in the Header bar and > select Add to address book. I believe it then gives you the option to > add all other recipients to same ad

Re: adding all addresses in AB

2004-08-15 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello pk, Sunday, August 15, 2004, 10:58:56 AM, you wrote: pr> how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's pr> to address book ? pr> any suggestions ! You can right click on the appropriate header in the Header bar and select Add to address book. I believe it then gives you the option to a

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/15/2004 11:57:15, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say: > Sunday, August 15, 2004, 11:11:00 AM, you wrote: DJ>> Some time around 08/15/2004 10:52:14, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say: DJ>>\BayesIt\base DJ>> or DJ>>\MAIL\BayesIt\base > ??? Mine are in C:\Documents and S

Re[2]: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread Pete Holsberg
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 11:11:00 AM, you wrote: DJ> Some time around 08/15/2004 10:52:14, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say: >> Sunday, August 15, 2004, 7:44:17 AM, you wrote: AW>>> Hello MikeD, AW>>> On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote: AW>>> Have you deleted you spam

adding all addresses in AB

2004-08-15 Thread pk roy
hello, how to all address (to/cc/bcc) including sender's to address book ? any suggestions ! pk roy -- <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ;-) TB v2.12.0 / W2K SP4 Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUD

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/15/2004 11:13:49, I think I heard Stuart Cuddy say: > I am not seeing the "empty" tokens, but the following message is being >received without being caught. I sent it again to myself about 5 or >6 times and marked it as junk each time. The values do not seem to >chan

Re: Monaco TTF Police ? ->Fonts

2004-08-15 Thread WilWilWil
==Original message text=== From: WilWilWil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Date: Sunday, August 15, 2004, 5:26:00 PM Subject: Monaco TTF Police ? W> Hello, W> I've seen in a previous subject that SO spoke about monaco.ttf ? I can't find this W> subject again in ar

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/15/2004 11:13:49, I think I heard Stuart Cuddy say: >What is Graham? >What is Spam-grade? AFAIK, spam-grade would be the probability of it being spam, and Graham, I suppose, means the probability of it being not-spam (I suppose, non-spam-grade > ham-grade > graham ?)

Re: Monaco TTF Police ?

2004-08-15 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello WilWilWil, 15-Aug-2004 17:26, you wrote: > I've seen in a previous subject that SO spoke about monaco.ttf ? I can't find this > subject again in archive... SO can remember me the link for get this police ? Police? ...anyway... :-) http://www.pa.msu.edu/ftp/pub/misc/tek-phaser/ttfonts/MONA

Monaco TTF Police ?

2004-08-15 Thread WilWilWil
Hello, I've seen in a previous subject that SO spoke about monaco.ttf ? I can't find this subject again in archive... SO can remember me the link for get this police ? Thanks, -- WilWilWil (France) [EMAIL PROTECTED] TB 2.12.00 Windows XP Service Pack 1 ___

More than 1 AV Plugin at the same time ?

2004-08-15 Thread WilWilWil
Hello, As SO ask for using 2 plugins at the same time for blocking spam, is it possible for anti virus plugins ? Because my Grisoft plugin (not free version 6, but registered version 7) sometimes doesn't see viruses within archives ! Any Suggestion for the 2nd plugin if I can use 2 model ?

Re[2]: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread Stuart Cuddy
Hello DZ-Jay, Sunday, August 15, 2004, 9:25:14 AM, you wrote: DJ> However, I recently noticed why some obviously spam messages DJ> are given a probability of 0%: Apparently the analysis engine is DJ> regarding a few "empty" tokens with a value of 0%, which DJ> "unspamifies" the final value, for e

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/15/2004 09:24:56, I think I heard MikeD (3) say: DJ>> I was too. I just upgraded yesterday to 0.5.9 and I haven't DJ>> noticed a difference. It does provide a white/black list, which I DJ>> don't care to use because it defeats the purpose of a Bayesian DJ>> filter (there's hug

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/15/2004 10:52:14, I think I heard Pete Holsberg say: > Sunday, August 15, 2004, 7:44:17 AM, you wrote: AW>> Hello MikeD, AW>> On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote: AW>> Have you deleted you spam and non-spam dictionary files when you AW>> upgraded? > W

NOD32 plugin (was: Re[2]: Panda antivirus plugin)

2004-08-15 Thread Marek Mikus
Hello all, Sunday, August 15, 2004, Allie Martin wrote: > The current challenge with using a plug-in is that they often don't > work from TB! version to TB! version, and they often don't work across > anti-virus versions. Each time DrWeb released an upgrade, it broke the > plug-in and you'd have t

Re[2]: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread Pete Holsberg
Sunday, August 15, 2004, 7:44:17 AM, you wrote: AW> Hello MikeD, AW> On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote: AW> Have you deleted you spam and non-spam dictionary files when you AW> upgraded? What are their names and where are they? -- _

Re: Panda antivirus plugin

2004-08-15 Thread Allie Martin
Alexander S. Kunz, [ASK] wrote: > I just wonder if it is really necessary to have an antivirus plugin for > (any) email program. I wouldn't say that it's absolutely necessary because once a realtime, system scanner is running, the infected attachment will be detected before you run it or save it

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/15/2004 10:20:47, I think I heard Alexander S. Kunz say: > I just checked my POPfile bucket pages and found it very interesting that, > despite spam is only 5.8% of my messages (lucky me, hu?), the "distinct > word count" for those spam messages is by far the highest (only messa

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello DZ-Jay, 15-Aug-2004 15:12, you wrote: > I checked the BAYESIT.LOG file and realized that all messages are > marked with either 100/99 % or 0% probability, which means that no matter > how low I set the parameter, it will continue working the same. I don't > understand how come there is no

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/15/2004 09:23:46, I think I heard MikeD (3) say: > Hello Andre, > Sunday, August 15, 2004, 6:44:17 AM, you wrote: AW>> Have you deleted you spam and non-spam dictionary files when you AW>> upgraded? > Funny, that. When I first upgraded I did not and it seemed to work > fine

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/15/2004 09:24:56, I think I heard MikeD (3) say: DJ>> I started with the "move message" setting at 40 and continued DJ>> to lowered it without noticing any effect. That's when I checked DJ>> the BAYESIT.LOG file and realized that all messages are marked DJ>> with either 100/99

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/15/2004 09:28:42, I think I heard Thomas Fernandez say: DJ>> What is not that simple? The bayesian algorithm or how the DJ>> "regarding threshold" is used by the plugin? > The Bayesian algorithms. Your question, to which I answered, could be > understood this way, so I don't fe

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hello DZ-Jay, On Sun, 15 Aug 2004 09:20:41 -0400 GMT (15/08/2004, 20:20 +0700 GMT), DZ-Jay wrote: DJ>>> That makes sense. But do you know how the weight is calculated? >> Check out for a mathematician called Bayes. 19th century, IIRC. DJ> Have you read at all the entire thread, or did you just

Re[2]: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread MikeD (3)
Hello DZ-Jay, Sunday, August 15, 2004, 8:12:23 AM, you wrote: DJ> Some time around 08/14/2004 22:24:58, I think I heard MikeD (3) say: >> What settings are you using? Under the old version (0.4gm) I had it >> trained and was getting most spam caught, no false positives with a >> "Move message" s

Re[2]: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread MikeD (3)
Hello Andre, Sunday, August 15, 2004, 6:44:17 AM, you wrote: AW> Hello MikeD, AW> On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote: AW> Have you deleted you spam and non-spam dictionary files when you AW> upgraded? Funny, that. When I first upgraded I did not and it seemed to work

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/15/2004 07:43:05, I think I heard Andre Wichartz say: > Hello DZ-Jay, > On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:42:17 -0400 GMT [20:42 CEST] you wrote: DJ>> That makes sense. But do you know how the weight is DJ>> calculated? I can assume it is the product of its initial DJ>> probability by the

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/14/2004 23:28:14, I think I heard Thomas Fernandez say: DJ>> That makes sense. But do you know how the weight is calculated? > Check out for a mathematician called Bayes. 19th century, IIRC. Have you read at all the entire thread, or did you just decided to come in and offer

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread DZ-Jay
Some time around 08/14/2004 22:24:58, I think I heard MikeD (3) say: > What settings are you using? Under the old version (0.4gm) I had it > trained and was getting most spam caught, no false positives with a > "Move message" setting of 10. Now I have gone down as low as 1 and as > high as 99 wit

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello MikeD, On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:47:24 -0500 GMT [21:47 CEST] you wrote: M> I have been following this thread since I have been having some M> problems too. I was using the old version (0.4gm) until I upgraded to M> the current version of TB. M> The settings I used to use don't seem to work an

Re: Help with BayesIt tuning

2004-08-15 Thread Andre Wichartz
Hello DZ-Jay, On 14 Aug 2004 at 14:42:17 -0400 GMT [20:42 CEST] you wrote: DJ> That makes sense. But do you know how the weight is DJ> calculated? I can assume it is the product of its initial DJ> probability by the "regarding threshold" value, is that true? I don't program the thing. For speci

Re: more than just spam/ham classification

2004-08-15 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello dAniel hAhler, 15-Aug-2004 11:55, you wrote: > I thought you were using another Bayesian Filter, but you're using > POPFile, too.. :) I'd vote for integrating something like POPfile into TB, of course. ;-) -- Best regards, Alexander Gumperson's Law: The probability of anything happenin

Re: more than just spam/ham classification

2004-08-15 Thread dAniel hAhler
Hello TBUDL, on Sun, 15. Aug 2004 at 07:19:14 +0200 Alexander S. Kunz wrote: >>> I tried Bayesfilter, but somehow it did not learn as fast as BayesIt. >>> However, I'm using PopFile now and use Virtual Folders to reflect the >>> bucket classification of PopFile (except for spam, of course). >> B

Re: Address book, using multiple addresses

2004-08-15 Thread Robin Anson
On Sun 15 August 2004, 5:31:45 +1000, Critter wrote: > In the address book, you can put additional email addresses, one per > line, but is there a way to access the second, third email addresses > while creating a new message w/o having to click on the "To:" and have > the secondary address to to t

Re: Adress Book vs. Adress Book Groups

2004-08-15 Thread Peter Ballantyne
I use the address book groups very heavily. It acts as my contact manager and the fields for Internet links will link to local files also. I don't let it hide entries that are included in a group, so that the default always shows the whole lot. In a couple of years I have hammered it and it has

Re: Panda antivirus plugin

2004-08-15 Thread Alexander S. Kunz
Hello Claude Renaud, 14-Aug-2004 13:58, you wrote: > I just did a search on google about the panda antivirus plugin. The only > plugin I found is the 0.1 test version which seems to work with the > latest panda antivirus software. Does someone know if a more recent > version has been realeased ?

Re: Selecting Text - Reply to all

2004-08-15 Thread Costas Papadopoulos
Hello Critter, Saturday, August 14, 2004, 10:38:40 PM, you wrote (possibly edited): > Is there a way to add a keyboard shortcut or is there one? Shift-Ctrl-F5 => Reply to all -- Best regards, Costas Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' in

Re: Selecting Text - Reply to all

2004-08-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo Critter, On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 15:38:40 -0400GMT (14-8-2004, 21:38 +0200, where I live), you wrote: C> I know there is a keyboard shortcut F4 to quote selected text in a C> reply, but I do not see there is one for quoting and replying to all. C> Is there a way to add a keyboard shortcut or is

Re: Addressing email

2004-08-15 Thread Roelof Otten
Hallo rich, On Sat, 14 Aug 2004 18:15:38 -0400GMT (15-8-2004, 0:15 +0200, where I live), you wrote: RG> How, in your third line above, did you enter the 2 handles to begin RG> with? handle1 comma space handle2 tab (tab to go to the next header) RG> Did you use ANY keystroke(s) at all to indicat