Hello DZ-Jay, Sunday, August 15, 2004, 8:12:23 AM, you wrote:
DJ> Some time around 08/14/2004 22:24:58, I think I heard MikeD (3) say: >> What settings are you using? Under the old version (0.4gm) I had it >> trained and was getting most spam caught, no false positives with a >> "Move message" setting of 10. Now I have gone down as low as 1 and as >> high as 99 without success. DJ> I started with the "move message" setting at 40 and continued DJ> to lowered it without noticing any effect. That's when I checked DJ> the BAYESIT.LOG file and realized that all messages are marked DJ> with either 100/99 % or 0% probability, which means that no matter DJ> how low I set the parameter, it will continue working the same. I DJ> don't understand how come there is no "gray area", with messages DJ> marked with a, say, 30% probability, etc. I do not get any false DJ> positives at all, but I do get about 4% of false negatives... At the moment, everything in the log is .99. Nothing has any other value. Does that sound right? >> BTW, I am using the 0.5.5 verision that came with 2.12. Should I be >> using the newer version that I saw mentioned? DJ> I was too. I just upgraded yesterday to 0.5.9 and I haven't DJ> noticed a difference. It does provide a white/black list, which I DJ> don't care to use because it defeats the purpose of a Bayesian DJ> filter (there's huge discussion -- more like religious wars -- DJ> about this on the POPFile list hehe). Also, the kludges.txt file DJ> doesn't seem to be implemented either (ignore list for headers). That's too bad <sigh> -- Best regards, MikeD mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v2.12.00 on Windows ME 4.90 Build 3000 ________________________________________________ Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Using TBUDL' information: http://www.silverstones.com/thebat/TBUDLInfo.html
