Re[2]: BayesIt Plugin missing

30 December 2006 - 17:29 Hello Gene, Friday, December 29, 2006, 5:26:42 PM, you wrote: MP>> http://www.antispamsniper.com/ G> Thanks! It looks like it may be a keeper! Another fan here. It rarely makes a mistake and no apparent hit on performance. -- Best regards, William Flying with T

Re[2]: BayesIt Plugin missing

Alexander, Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:30:17 PM, you wrote: ASK> Are you sure it is a false positive, ie. a legitimate message being ASK> falsely classified as spam? Definitely - I check the log daily, and once in awhile something gets tagged. It happens so rarely it isn't a problem, especially

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Alexander, Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:31:31 PM, you wrote: ASK> Hello Peter Meyns & everyone else, ASK> on 29-Dez-2006 at 20:53 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: G>>> K9 No updates since April 18, 2004? >> So what? It works very well. ASK> I just wanted to say the same. ;-) I guess it would

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Peter Meyns & everyone else, on 29-Dez-2006 at 20:53 you (Peter Meyns) wrote: G>> K9 No updates since April 18, 2004? > So what? It works very well. I just wanted to say the same. ;-) -- Best regards, Alexander (http://www.neurowerx.de) You cannot kill time without injuring eternity.

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Richard H. Stoddard & everyone else, on 29-Dez-2006 at 20:19 you (Richard H. Stoddard) wrote: > K9 has proved to be remarkably accurate (99.6% typically, with only a > false positive every few months) Are you sure it is a false positive, ie. a legitimate message being falsely classified as

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hi Gene, on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 11:55:45 -0500GMT (29.12.2006, 17:55 +0100GMT here), you wrote: G> K9 No updates since April 18, 2004? So what? It works very well. I only replaced it by AntiSpamSniper (free version) because I preferred a plugin to an extra application working as a proxy.

Re[2]: BayesIt Plugin missing

Roelof, Friday, December 29, 2006, 8:35:28 AM, you wrote: RO> The BayesIt plug-in is no longer included. It can be downloaded RO> separately from: RO> http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.msi Thanks. I guess I should read release notes more thoroughly. I don&#x

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hi Gene, Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:55:45 PM, you wrote: > AntispamSniper looks like a viable product! I'm trying it now I've used AntispamSniper for quite a few months now and my experience has been quite good. Looking at my stats, I've received 33454 messages and the error rate is 1.55%,

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Urban, Friday, December 29, 2006, 12:49:40 PM, you wrote: U> Friday, December 29, 2006, Gene wrote: >> SpamPal If you think I do poor German, then imagine what a mess >> I am with *anything* using the Cyrillic alphabet U> Hopefully, the world is a nice place and the Russian page

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Friday, December 29, 2006, Gene wrote: > SpamPal If you think I do poor German, then imagine what a mess > I am with *anything* using the Cyrillic alphabet Hopefully, the world is a nice place and the Russian page should be roughly equivalent to the official TB-info from SpamPal http://w

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Mark, Friday, December 29, 2006, 10:47:34 AM, you wrote: MP> Hello Gene, MP> Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:33:30 PM, you wrote: G>> Upon installation I am prompted that, "Unregistered version of product G>> includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search G>> Web. To

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Akebono, Friday, December 29, 2006, 11:18:51 AM, you wrote: ATS> Dear Gene, >> Upon installation I am prompted that, "Unregistered version of product >> includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search >> Web. To disable the advertisements, please buy license and acti

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

very GS> good. After training for a couple of days, I only very rarely get a good GS> email labelled as spam and only occasionally does a spam get into my GS> mail box. GS> A much better experience than I had with BayesIt, and I thought it GS> well worth the money. Thanks! You ar

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

as spam and only occasionally does a spam get into my mail box. A much better experience than I had with BayesIt, and I thought it well worth the money. -- Best regards, Graham mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.85.03 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Servic

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Maxim, Friday, December 29, 2006, 11:15:59 AM, you wrote: >>>I started looking on Ritlabs.com and found that no >>>anti-spam software was really current... MM> http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/plugin/detail.php?ID=1463&phrase_id=35322 No updates since August 28, 2005? MM> http:/

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Dear Gene, > Upon installation I am prompted that, "Unregistered version of product > includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search > Web. To disable the advertisements, please buy license and activate > your copy." In fact I registered my copy AGAVA and tmasrv.exe is sti

Re[2]: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Gene, Friday, December 29, 2006, 17:33:30, you wrote: >>I started looking on Ritlabs.com and found that no >>anti-spam software was really current... http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/plugin/detail.php?ID=1463&phrase_id=35322 http://www.ritlabs.com/en/products/thebat/plugin/plugins

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Gene, Friday, December 29, 2006, 4:33:30 PM, you wrote: G> Upon installation I am prompted that, "Unregistered version of product G> includes TMAgent software that displays advertisements when you search G> Web. To disable the advertisements, please buy license and activate G> your copy."

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Maxim, Friday, December 29, 2006, 9:25:04 AM, you wrote: MM> Hello Gene, MM> Friday, December 29, 2006, 15:53:07, you wrote: >>>Yes, the installation of (3.95.6) seems to delete all files associated >>>with BayesIt except bayeslogger.exe. MM> No, it only d

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hallo Richard, On Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:57:57 -0500GMT (29-12-2006, 13:57 , where I live), you wrote: RHS> I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and RHS> all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing. I can't swear it was RHS> there when I installed

Re[2]: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Gene, Friday, December 29, 2006, 15:53:07, you wrote: >>Yes, the installation of (3.95.6) seems to delete all files associated >>with BayesIt except bayeslogger.exe. No, it only deletes the program files of BayesIt, not the database of spam/ham messages. We have removed Bay

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

d RHS>> all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing. PM> Here is what Maxim Masiutin wrote about this topic on TBBeta: PM> ,- [ mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] PM> | If you are using BayesIt filter plugin, please install PM> | http://www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.msi

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hello Richard, Friday, December 29, 2006, 7:57:57 AM, you wrote: RHS> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- RHS> Hash: SHA256 RHS> Greetings, RHS> I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and RHS> all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing. I ca

Re: BayesIt Plugin missing

Hi Richard, on Fri, 29 Dec 2006 07:57:57 -0500GMT (29.12.2006, 13:57 +0100GMT here), you wrote: RHS> Greetings, RHS> I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and RHS> all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing. Here is what Maxim Masiutin wrote about

BayesIt Plugin missing

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Greetings, I've been using the latest release (3.95.6) for several days now, and all of a sudden my BayesIt has gone missing. I can't swear it was there when I installed the latest version, since I also use K-9, which catches almost a

Re[2]: Bayesit! Confusion

MM> try AntispamSniper plugin, which is available in free version now too: MM> www.antispamsniper.com Well if we are mentioning alternatives .. agava's Bat plugin works great for me. -- Best regards, MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.81.07 Beta on Win

Re: Bayesit! Confusion

Hello all, Thursday, July 13, 2006, Bill McCarthy wrote: > I had been using Bayesit! for a few years with fairly good > success on my laptop. About two months ago, my laptop > developed a hardware problem and I switched to my wife's > desktop (XP Pro SP2). > I have been tr

Re[2]: Bayesit! Confusion - K9 alternative

>> ...I am now using K9 > Thanks for the advice. Does it work with X-Ray? Dunno - but here's the site... http://keir.net/k9_faq.html I don;t use X-Ray any more - got my own SMTP server arrangement so don't need to switch servers when around and about. and I guess you know the X-Ray support pa

Re: Bayesit! Confusion - K9 alternative

On Thu 13-Jul-06 2:33pm -0600, Marten Gallagher wrote: > I tried BayesIT again recently and found it getting things totally wrong - > it ended up 'refusing' to classify anything in one email account. > > After taking advice from this list a while back - I am now usin

Re: Bayesit! Confusion - K9 alternative

> I have been training Bayesit! from scratch and have had it > catch nothing :-( > Turning on logging, I discovered that Bayesit! appeared a > bit confused. > That was just a few days ago and Bayesit! has still not > found any spam (I guess training is just starting now). I t

Bayesit! Confusion

Hello TB Users and Beta Lists, I had been using Bayesit! for a few years with fairly good success on my laptop. About two months ago, my laptop developed a hardware problem and I switched to my wife's desktop (XP Pro SP2). I have been training Bayesit! from scratch and have had it catch no

BayesIt buttons gone

The nice little BayesIt icons to Mark as Junk or Mark as Good (probably not the right wording) disappeared after my most recent upgrade. Can anyone tell me how to restore them? Thanks in advance. -- Best, M-K Using The Bat! v3.80.06 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

Re[2]: Does BayesIt actually work?

> Hello Marten, > Thursday, May 18, 2006, 1:58:32 PM, you wrote: MG>> I have spent two days now feeding BayesIT and adjsuting the limits etc. MG>> I have imported a whitelist and added to it, I have the regex filters MG>> installed, I have imported a blacklist. MG>

Re: Does BayesIt actually work?

Hello Marten, Thursday, May 18, 2006, 1:58:32 PM, you wrote: MG> I have spent two days now feeding BayesIT and adjsuting the limits etc. MG> I have imported a whitelist and added to it, I have the regex filters MG> installed, I have imported a blacklist. MG> Still it fails to pic

Re: Does BayesIt actually work?

Hello Marten, Thursday, May 18, 2006, 1:58:32 PM, you wrote: MG> I have spent two days now feeding BayesIT and adjsuting the limits etc. MG> I have imported a whitelist and added to it, I have the regex filters MG> installed, I have imported a blacklist. MG> Still it fails to pic

Does BayesIt actually work?

I have spent two days now feeding BayesIT and adjsuting the limits etc. I have imported a whitelist and added to it, I have the regex filters installed, I have imported a blacklist. Still it fails to pick up half of the spams arriving. Are tohers more successful with theior installations

BayesIt - whitelist

I am having a bit of trouble getting BayesIt sorted out I have a whitelist into which I placed all Good email address but BayesIT seems to have prepended each line with TEXT: Does that mean it is looking in the body of the email for that? In which case do I just change the TEXT: to say FROM: or

Re: Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption

Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Did you configure BayesIt properly? (Told it where to find its files?) That was the problem. It seems that when you tell the installer to move the MAIL directory elsewhere, Bayesit will still think its configuration information is in the def

Re: Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption

structions and specified the minimum value in TB! preferences, but it M> continues to ask me on startup. Did you configure BayesIt properly? (Told it where to find its files?) M> PS: I posted this via the gmane web interface, which is the reason I didn't M> include the signature cut ma

Re: Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption

Roelof Otten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, it's correct about you using an encrypted message base, so just > do what it tells you to do. I can remember having to do the same when > I started with OTFE, back then I was still using BayesIt. I should have been clearer in

Mod: Cut mark (was: Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption)

Hallo Max, On Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:13:39 + (UTC)GMT (11-2-2006, 13:13 +0200, where I live), you wrote: M> Does anyone have any idea on what I need to do to get rid of these messages? My M> searches have yielded nothing. M> Thanks! M> M> Curr

Re: Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption

eferences > M> Antispam" menu in The Bat!)" Well, it's correct about you using an encrypted message base, so just do what it tells you to do. I can remember having to do the same when I started with OTFE, back then I was still using BayesIt. M> Does anyone have any i

Bayesit notices on startup after enabling encryption

Hi all, Today I upgraded to the latest version of TB! and enabled on-the-fly encryption. Now when I start TB!, I am prompted to enter the OFTE password. After doing so, I receive 2 warning notices related to Bayesit. The first says: "It seems that you use encrypted The Bat! Please, provid

Re[2]: No Bayesit Stats

s junk to the Junk Folder: Yes B> Use the common junk folder: No The only difference I have is my junk score is currently up to 15. I had it down into the single digits for BayesIt I have been sneaking it up, but slowly. Just one or two points a week. -- Best regards, MikeD

Re: No Bayesit Stats

On Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:34:45 -0500, MikeD (2) wrote: > Yes, I just registered my copy a couple of days ago. In most ways it > works better than BayesIt, but I still get more false positives with it > than with BayesIt. But I am still tweeking the settings What settings are you curren

Re[2]: No Bayesit Stats

ays ago. In most ways it works better than BayesIt, but I still get more false positives with it than with BayesIt. But I am still tweeking the settings -- Best regards, MikeDmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.65 on Win

Re: No Bayesit Stats

Hello Barry, Thursday, January 12, 2006, 12:58:48 AM, you wrote: B> Well, I've taken your lead and installed a copy of AGAVA for a trial. And I B> have to say that first impressions are pretty favourable. I trained it up B> with my batch of spam emails and its working very well. Ive been using i

Re: No Bayesit Stats

k > that means that not much mail is getting to the actual BayesIt filter to > be counted. Having said that, would have expected some info there. I > can send you a copy of my stat.bin if you think that might help. Or > uninstall / reinstall the plug in might help. My stat.bin is a b

Re[2]: No Bayesit Stats

blacklist B> extensively and this seems to be the best approach. B> I just sometimes look at the stats for interest and was surprised to see B> that Bayesit was reporting 'nil' spam! This got me thinking and that's when B> digging deeper I noticed the apparent issu

Re: No Bayesit Stats

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 09:57:43 -0600, Chris wrote: > This is a shot in the dark. Are the permissions on the stats file > correct? As far as I can tell. FileMon shows that Bayesit is accessing the file to read it but just doesn't seem to write anything. But I don't know whether th

Re: No Bayesit Stats

may be at crossed purposes here. :) My filtering is working very well. I use whitelist and blacklist extensively and this seems to be the best approach. I just sometimes look at the stats for interest and was surprised to see that Bayesit was reporting 'nil' spam! This got me thinking and

Re: No Bayesit Stats

Barry @ 1/11/2006 5:43:22 AM "No Bayesit Stats" > Has anyone else noticed this or can anyone suggest a fix? This is a shot in the dark. Are the permissions on the stats file correct? -- Chris Quoting when replying to this message is good for you and me. Using The Bat! v3.64

Re[2]: No Bayesit Stats

ve been running 'FileMon' and it seems to me that B> BayesIt isn't working quite right. It seems as if it tries to open B> ~stat.bin as well as stat.bin. Unfortunately ~stat.bin doesn't exist. I B> tried making a copy of stat.bin and renaming it to ~stat.bin but BayesIt

Re: No Bayesit Stats

On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:02:25 -0500, MikeD (2) wrote: > But I wasn't particularly 'religious' about checking the stats. I was > more interested in the results Well, for sure, but I've been running 'FileMon' and it seems to me that BayesIt isn't workin

Re: No Bayesit Stats

Hello Barry, Wednesday, January 11, 2006, 6:43:22 AM, you wrote: B> Hi B> I've noticed that BayesIt doesn't seem to be saving any stats. B> Has anyone else noticed this or can anyone suggest a fix? I can't look at the moment 'cuz I am currently testing out AGAVA

No Bayesit Stats

Hi I've noticed that BayesIt doesn't seem to be saving any stats. Has anyone else noticed this or can anyone suggest a fix? -- Best regards Barry barryh'at'kentra'dot'co'dot'uk Using TheBat! version 3.64.01 (Chris

Re[2]: BayesIt Plug-in

Hello Roelof, Tuesday, August 30, 2005, 9:23:09 AM, you wrote: RO> Extract them to a random directory (doesn't matter much which). Let's RO> take \Program Files\Tbe Bat!\BayesIt\ (just because that's what I'm RO> using.) RO> Now via TB's menu: RO> O

Re: BayesIt Plug-in

oesn't matter much which). Let's take \Program Files\Tbe Bat!\BayesIt\ (just because that's what I'm using.) Now via TB's menu: Options -> Preferences -> Protection\Anti SPAM -> Add Browse to the location where you stored BayesIt Configure BayesIt with the matching bu

BayesIt Plug-in

Hello tbudl, This may sound like a really dumb question, but I downloaded the rar for the BayseIt plug in, and expanded it. How do I install it? -- Best regards, lists "Success is to be measured not so much by the position that one has reached in life as by the obstacles which he has ov

Re: Re[3]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

Jeff Gaines said... > Hello Group > > On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 8:33:48 PM, P. wrote: > > > So, BayseIt is definitely not working. I've tweaked the settings and > > guess I'll wait for the onslaught of spam on Monday to see if that > > helps. > >

Re[4]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

Hello Jeff, Sunday, August 21, 2005, 11:21:58 PM, you wrote: JG> I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9 JG> now and find it much better. And, for a flipside, I've found it great. As an example,one of my accounts had 68 messages in it when I returned h

Re: Re[3]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

On 8/21/05, Jeff Gaines <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to K9 > now and find it much better. AOL that. I've never gotten BayesIt to work, and I'm not the most computer-illiterate person out there. When "c&

Re[3]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

Hello Group On Sunday, August 21, 2005, 8:33:48 PM, P. wrote: > So, BayseIt is definitely not working. I've tweaked the settings and > guess I'll wait for the onslaught of spam on Monday to see if that > helps. I found BayesIt very poor even after training. I have switched to

Re[2]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

Hello Feli, On Saturday, August 20, 2005, , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PJ>>> I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit. PJ>>> This program is not working well at all... FW>> did you also train BayesIt with Ham? Additionally you can use the F

Re[2]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

Hi Roelof, On Saturday, August 20, 2005, , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PJ>> I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit. PJ>> This program is not working well at all; I "trained" it with over PJ>> 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still ro

Re[2]: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

Hello Feli, On Saturday, August 20, 2005, , [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: PJ>> I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit. PJ>> This program is not working well at all; I "trained" it with over PJ>> 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still ro

Re: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

Hello Pat, On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:30:33 -0500GMT P.Johnson wrote: PJ> I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit. PJ> This program is not working well at all; I "trained" it with over PJ> 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivere

Re: Bayesit or Bayes Filter

Hallo Pat, On Sat, 20 Aug 2005 11:30:33 -0500GMT (20-8-2005, 18:30 +0200, where I live), you wrote: PJ> I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit. PJ> This program is not working well at all; I "trained" it with over PJ> 3,000 spam messages,

Bayesit or Bayes Filter

Hello, I recently reinstalled TB! and wanted to try the spam plugin, Bayesit. This program is not working well at all; I "trained" it with over 3,000 spam messages, yet these are still routinely delivered into my inbox with very few ending up in the junk folder. I am using the defaul

Re: Bayesit and build 30?

Hello Barry, B> I just downloaded build 30 from the Ritlabs web site and installed over my B> copy of build 25 and Bayesit 0.8.1 B> For some reason the installer removed my copy of Bayesit but didn't replace B> it. I tried installing a downloaded copy of Bayesit but its only 0.

Re: Bayesit and build 30?

Hello Barry, Friday, July 8, 2005, 2:36:40 AM, you wrote: B> Hi B> I just downloaded build 30 from the Ritlabs web site and installed over my B> copy of build 25 and Bayesit 0.8.1 B> For some reason the installer removed my copy of Bayesit but didn't replace B> it.

Re: Bayesit and build 30?

no new bug crept in while putting the Bayesit function back, Maxim has said that v. 3.51 will be placed on the public download page. -- Best regards, Mary The Bat! beta 3.51 on Windows XP 5.1 2600 Service Pack 2 Current version is 3.5.25 | '

Bayesit and build 30?

Hi I just downloaded build 30 from the Ritlabs web site and installed over my copy of build 25 and Bayesit 0.8.1 For some reason the installer removed my copy of Bayesit but didn't replace it. I tried installing a downloaded copy of Bayesit but its only 0.8.0 and when I tried runnin

BayesIt 0.8.1

It's a piece of crap... I should have made a Hungarian description for the 0.8.1, I have tried to install new LNG file, no success at me and some other buddies. At some guy it has changed to Hungarian, but after restart, it is English again. Was it ever tested? -- Vili ___

Re[2]: Bayesit Add In

Hello Group On Thursday, May 26, 2005, 2:31:56 PM, Kevin wrote: > Close The Bat! and locate and edit this file with your favorite text > editor: Thank you Kevin, that seems to have done it:-) Now for some more training... -- Jeff Gaines Damerham Hampshire UK :Jeff_Gaines:

Re: Bayesit Add In

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Jeff, On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:11:05 +0100 (8:11 AM here), Jeff Gaines [JG] wrote in : JG> I switched to BayesFilter and I'm training it. For some reason TB! JG> is not retaining this add in between sessions, I have to keep JG

Re: Bayesit Add In

ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 1:36:47 PM, you wrote: B> On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:17:24 +0200, Gerard wrote: >> ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:08:08 AM, you wrote: >> B> Copy and Paste the following REGEX expressions into the Bayesit >> B> "blacklist.txt" file in

Re[2]: Bayesit Add In

Hello Group On Thursday, May 26, 2005, 9:08:08 AM, Barry wrote: [snipped] Many thanks Vili, MikeD and Barry. I switched to BayesFilter and I'm training it. For some reason TB! is not retaining this add in between sessions, I have to keep adding it at the start of a session, although it seems to

Re: Bayesit Add In

On Thu, 26 May 2005 13:17:24 +0200, Gerard wrote: > ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:08:08 AM, you wrote: > B> Copy and Paste the following REGEX expressions into the Bayesit > B> "blacklist.txt" file in your BayesIt folder. You'll find the list below my > &g

Re: Bayesit Add In

ON Thursday, May 26, 2005, 10:08:08 AM, you wrote: B> Copy and Paste the following REGEX expressions into the Bayesit B> "blacklist.txt" file in your BayesIt folder. You'll find the list below my Hi Barry, Don't you mean the filters.txt file ?

Re: Bayesit Add In

Did you give it any "non-spam" messages when you trained it? I made that mistake when I first tried BayesIt. If you only give it spam, then it had no idea what a "Good" message looks like, so everything will look like spam to it. It needs at least as much "ham" as &q

Re: Bayesit Add In

hrough my JG> inbox and deleting junk I'm going through the junk folder un-deleting JG> stuff that isn't junk :-( JG> Any recommendations as to the best way to make it a bit less JG> aggressive? Yes: start to use BayesFilter. The newer and newer BayesIt always comes o

Bayesit Add In

Hello Group I'm still struggling a bit with this plugin (v 0.8.1). It seems to regard everything as spam except this list, which I've managed to whitelist. It's a pain because I am selling my first item on eBay and I'm getting some questions. Instead of going through my inbox and deleting junk I'

BayesIt v0.81 translation

Hello Ritlabs and all, We have translated v0.81 BayesIt to Hungarian. But there is an annoying thing: If we change the language back to English, it is not possible to change it back to Hungarian. If I delete the [Plugins] Count=1 Plugin #1=E:\Data\The Bat!\bayesit\bayesit.tbp [Plugin Data

Re: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

Hello Alexander, On Thursday, April 21, 2005, you wrote: >> It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK because it's doing lots >> of "thinking" (pathetic fallacy?) ASK> K9 does the same "thinking" and its blazingly fast OK - sold. Thanks for the advice, K9's installed and doing a pretty good

Re[2]: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

Hello Alexander, On 21 April 2005 at 10:38:07 GMT +0200 (which was 10:38:07 where I live), Alexander S. Kunz wrote and made these valuable points on the subject of "Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?": > On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:57:53 +0200, Nick Dutton <[EMAIL P

Re: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

Hi On Thursday 21 April 2005 at 2:56:10 PM, in , Urban wrote: >> RBL lookups? > http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/RBL.html Thanks -- Best regards, MFPAmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Using The Bat! v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service P

Re: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

Thursday, April 21, 2005, MFPA wrote: > RBL lookups? http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/R/RBL.html -- Urban It would be terrible if the Red Cross Bloodmobile got into an accident. No, wait. That would be good because if anyone needed it, the blood would be right there _

Re: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

Hi On Wednesday 20 April 2005 at 7:54:21 PM, in <mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Philip Storry wrote: > Because of those blank emails, I added the Bayes Filter Plugin as a > second plugin. You can find that here: http://www.lkcc.org/achim > It's good, and I chose it because unlike

Re: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 09:57:53 +0200, Nick Dutton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK because it's doing lots of "thinking" (pathetic fallacy?) K9 does the same "thinking" and its blazingly fast during mail retrieval (hardly noticable there's anything in-between

Re: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

Hello Robin, On Thursday, April 21, 2005, you wrote: RA> What version of Popfile are you using? I'm on the latest - v0.22.2. RA> I have been using it for some years now, and have never noticed it RA> slowing - what is it that you see happening? It's slow during mail retrieval, which is OK becau

Re: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

On Thu, 21 Apr 2005 01:11:08 +0200, Robin Anson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: What version of Popfile are you using? I have been using it for some years now, and have never noticed it slowing - what is it that you see happening? PopFile itself is achingly slow. :-} -- Gruesse / Greetings, Alexander Ku

Re: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

On Thu 21 April 2005, 0:58:37 +1000, Nick Dutton wrote: > I'm going through one of my irregular explorations of anti-SPAM > technology, as popfile just seems to grind slower and slower. Although > it must be said that it's almost perfect in terms of accuracy. What version of Popfile are you using?

Re: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

Hello Nick Dutton & everyone else, on 20-Apr-2005 at 16:58 you (Nick Dutton) wrote: > Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by bayesit, > I can't find any other sign in the message. Is this so? Exactly. If you're only using PopFile for spam filtering, m

Re: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

Hello Nick, Wednesday, April 20, 2005, 3:58:37 PM, you wrote: ND> Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by ND> bayesit, I can't find any other sign in the message. Is this so? As far as I can tell, TB doesn't mark the message at all - which I perso

Re: Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

st perfect in terms of accuracy. ND> One of the things that I really like about popfile is that I can get ND> TB to delete spam from the server once identified. ND> Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by bayesit, ND> I can't find any other sign in the message.

Bayesit - how does it mark a message as spam?

spam from the server once identified. Aside from the fact that mails are put into a spam folder by bayesit, I can't find any other sign in the message. Is this so? -- Nick TheBat!: v3.0.1.33 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 2

Re[2]: BayesIt blocking mail import

; data and retrained. That did not stop the problem from M3>> reoccurring either. SF> I did this and it worked. I uninstalled the plugin, deleted all SF> BayesIt files, and then downloaded and installed the latest SF> version (not the one that comes with 2.12.00). SF> I di

Re: BayesIt blocking mail import

did this and it worked. I uninstalled the plugin, deleted all BayesIt files, and then downloaded and installed the latest version (not the one that comes with 2.12.00). I didn't realise that there is a different procedure for installing the plugin now, Through Options-Preferences-Protection-A

Re[2]: BayesIt blocking mail import

read and M3>> see if that has any applicability. SF> I tried that. There are no new messages with malformed headers. SF> The problem lies elsewhere. Oh well ... SF> I tried transferring most of my BayesIt installation from the old SF> machine in order to preserve the training so p

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   >