-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When should bayesit start doing it's stuff?
For the last few days I've received a number of near identical
messages telling me that i need to update my system with the attached
security fix.
I know that the mail is junk and the the file
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Can this be made to function as a selective download filter?
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm SE
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
The journey of a thousand
Hello TBUDL,
I'm trying to get the latest BayesIt (0,5), according to the website it's part of the
latest TheBat distro but I havent been able to find it.
Can someone point me in the right direction
--
thanks,
Graham mailto:[EMAIL
Hello,
I'm playing with BayesIt (0.5.5) having used Popfile happily for a few
years now.
All seems very nice, but I used to have a rule for TB to remove
messages marked as spam from the server. Is there some way that I can
do this with BayesIt?
I've tried assigning a rule to the
I finally got BayesIt trained and it caught its first bit of spam
today. :) A few questions:
1. Is ongoing training necessary only when BayesIt misses spam or
mis-identifies non-spam, or is something more required?
2. Is there a point where training BayesIt doesn't noticeably improve
acc
I'm sure this is a FAQ but I haven't been paying attention...
Just upgraded to TB 3.01, no problems, but BayesIt has stopped spotting ANY spam - not
that it ever was any good at it (about 1 in 3 with 2.x). Do I have to retrain the new
version?
--
Regards,
G.
Where do I find the link to the latest version
--
Kind Regards
Dave Thomas
Product Manager
Psionet
Tel +27 21 683 1192
Fax +27 21 683 1196
Web: www.psion.co.za
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silverstones.c
How do you install this Bayesit filter?
--
Kind Regards
Dave Thomas
Product Manager
Psionet
Tel +27 21 683 1192
Fax +27 21 683 1196
Web: www.psion.co.za
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.silver
Hello Stuart,
Thursday, January 22, 2004, 7:42:55 AM, you wrote:
sec> When should bayesit start doing it's stuff?
sec> For the last few days I've received a number of near identical
sec> messages telling me that i need to update my system with the
sec> attached security
Hi Stuart
On Thursday, January 22, 2004 at 1:42 PM, shemming wrote:
> When should bayesit start doing it's stuff?
That's the same question I had. As I have SpamAssassin on the mail
server, most of my spam gets caught and filtered that way, but I was
hoping that this would catch t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SC> but I think it may be since Beta 40.
If it /is/ TB! version related then it's broken in b45 too.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm
PGP Key available f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
SC> I have been using Bayesit for some time now and it had been working
SC> just fine. In the last little while it has quit working altogether. I
SC> don't know if it is just here, but I think it may be since Beta 40.
I've upgrade
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
M3> I also had to crank the
M3> threshold *way* down to get reasonable results.
How do I do that?
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm
PGP Key available fro
it. Thanks for that. Now let's see if Bayesit
catches anything.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.
-BEGIN PGP SIG
it and changed it. Thanks for that. Now let's see if Bayesit
SH> catches anything.
Finally!, it caught the fist message that came in after changing the
settings!
Thanks for the help.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt!
e
spammers and melted the b*st*rds machines to slag. Maybe in v2.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm
PGP Key available from ldap://keyserver.pgp.com
Change is inevitable, except from a vending machine.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATUR
Once I copied and installed the developer's "primer" files
(http://legacy.sheltonbbs.com/~jmmorse/Bayesit/) this thing works
great. hasn't missed a one, threshold 30. and no false positives.
can't find the instructions url so I'll just copy them here:
"
Mon, 26 Jan 2004 17:33:35 -0500 (5:33 PM EST here) Dan Greenberg wrote:
> Once I copied and installed the developer's "primer" files
> (http://legacy.sheltonbbs.com/~jmmorse/Bayesit/) this thing works
> great. hasn't missed a one, threshold 30. and no fals
Hallo shemming,
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 16:49:58 +GMT (18-3-04, 17:49 +0100, where I
live), you wrote:
S> Can this be made to function as a selective download filter?
No. If it would do that, it should decide on spam on the headers,
that's not very likely to be a very precise method.
--
Groetj
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
RO> No. If it would do that, it should decide on spam on the headers,
RO> that's not very likely to be a very precise method.
I expected that.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.05 Beta/1 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided
Hello bats,
on Fri, 19. Mar 2004 at 08:57:08 + Stuart Hemming wrote:
RO>> No. If it would do that, it should decide on spam on the headers,
RO>> that's not very likely to be a very precise method.
> I expected that.
It was possible with an older version, don't know if that feature is
depreci
Wed, 9 Jun 2004 09:07:46 +0200 (3:07 AM EDT here) Graham Dodd wrote:
> Hello TBUDL,
> I'm trying to get the latest BayesIt (0,5), according to the website
> it's part of the latest TheBat distro but I havent been able to find
> it.
For what it's woorth, the path i
Hi Nick!
> All seems very nice, but I used to have a rule for TB to remove
> messages marked as spam from the server. Is there some way that I can
> do this with BayesIt?
As far as I know this is not yet possible. That's something that I
would like to have also :-)
--
Re
Hello Nick,
On Friday, June 18, 2004, 5:11:15 PM, you wrote:
N> All seems very nice, but I used to have a rule for TB to remove
N> messages marked as spam from the server. Is there some way that I can
N> do this with BayesIt?
You can download the mail and delete it (not putting it into
Hello Nick,
Friday, June 18, 2004, 10:11:15 AM, you wrote:
ND> I'm playing with BayesIt (0.5.5) having used Popfile happily for a few
ND> years now.
ND> All seems very nice, but I used to have a rule for TB to remove
ND> messages marked as spam from the server. Is there some
> Hello,
> I'm playing with BayesIt (0.5.5) having used Popfile happily for a few
> years now.
I change to POPFiel from weeks of frsutration with BayesIt slowing
down things, crashing the Bat etc.
May I ask why you are going the toher way - I am sopleased with
POPFile. It seems
t your
ISP's, but your Popfile proxy.
>> Is there some way that I can do this with BayesIt?
RTT> As far as I know this is not yet possible. That's something that I
RTT> would like to have also :-)
It's not 'not yet possible', but it isn't possible a
Hello Richard,
On 19 Jun 2004 at 05:33:38 +0500 GMT [02:33 CEST] you wrote:
RHS> I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching about
RHS> 95% of the spam, which I hope will increase eventually, but even then
RHS> that's only one or two a day that get t
Hi TBUDL!
> Sure you did, but you realize of course that that server wasn't your
> ISP's, but your Popfile proxy.
No, I didn't POPFile just redirected the deletion to the server.
Worked well as long as I used it.
[snip a bunch of stuff I don't understood]
Maybe you got me wrong. I had no proble
Hello Dougie,
On 19 Jun 2004 at 22:29:07 +0100 GMT [23:29 CEST] you wrote:
DC> I use 'Mailwasher' but decided to give BayesIt a go.
DC> I seem to be missing the 'spamdict.bye' file though, so could
DC> someone send me a copy off list?
That file is created by bayes
s a small dialog (if you have enabled it) that
> says training.
But don't forget to train BayesIt also on Ham. If possible, take the
same amout of ham than of spam.
--
Kind Regards
:Feli:
The Bat! 2.11.04 on Windows 2000 5.0 2195 Service Pack 4
___
Hello Fredrik,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 10:28:20 +0200GMT(21.06.2004, 10:28 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
> I guess that I have to select lots of HAM (nonspam?) and click "Mark
> as not SPAM"?
that's it :-)
--
Kind Regards
:Feli:
The Bat! 2.11.04 on Windows 2000 5.0 2195 Service Pack 4
_
Hi Feli,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, at 12:23:12 [GMT+0200] (which was 20:23:12 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
> The Bat! 2.11.04
Where did you get that version from?
--
John Phillips, Sydney, Australia
Using The Bat! v2.11.02 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
What has four legs
Hello John,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004 20:57:30 +1000GMT(21.06.2004, 12:57 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
>> The Bat! 2.11.04
> Where did you get that version from?
go to http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/, register as beta tester and
download the latest version.
--
Kind Regards
:Feli:
The Bat! 2.
Hi Feli,
On Mon, 21 Jun 2004, at 14:00:21 [GMT+0200] (which was 22:00:21 Australian
Eastern Time) you wrote:
>> Where did you get that version from?
> go to http://www.ritlabs.com/en/tbbeta/, register as beta tester and
> download the latest version.
Thanks, beta versions previously showed
Hello Code,
On 11 Jul 2004 at 10:28:06 -0700 GMT [19:28 CEST] you wrote:
C2> 1. Is ongoing training necessary only when BayesIt misses spam or
C2> mis-identifies non-spam, or is something more required?
You only need to correct mistakes.
C2> 2. Is there a point where training BayesI
Hallo Code,
On Sun, 11 Jul 2004 10:28:06 -0700GMT (11-7-2004, 19:28 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
C2> And for you Ritlabs guys watching: you've *got* to get the help files
C2> updated and/or a manual produced. BayesIt would be a lot less
C2> intimidating with some instructi
On 7/11/04, at 1:29 PM, Code 2 sent the following:
Code> I finally got BayesIt trained and it caught its first bit of spam
Code> today. :) A few questions:
I finally gave up on the Bayeslt it was not catching that much spam and classed
personal
good mail as spam. I had be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings All,
According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
the latest version:
%STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
%STATSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
%STATNONSPAMLETTERS(hours)
%STATNONSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
%STATSPAMERLETTERS(hours)
%STATSPAMERTRAFFIC
Hi,
It may have been covered before, but I cannot find the message thread:
How can I tell the score of individual messages using BayesIT 5.11? I
have looked in BayesIT.log and cannot figure it out. Any assistance
would be appreciated
Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download?
The site given in Plugin-BayesIt is a Russian language page of Ritlab.
TIA
--
Best regards,
Peter Kerekes (Toronto, Canada)
"A synonym is a word you use when you can't spell
the word you first thought of."
Hello,
Just installed Bayesit 0.5.11 and had a couple of problems that I
thought I would share. I have managed to work around them, but
hopefully it is something that can get fixed in the future.
After I deleted all traces of the old version, I installed the new
one, then started TB and added
Hello,
I am having a crash about twice a day and was told the problem is with BayesIt! 0.6.00.
I was also told that the problem is fixed in 0.6.4. Where/how can I get the upgrade
to BayesIt?
Using The Bat! v3.0.0.8 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 2
Is there a way to see what score BayesIt gave a message?
Just upgraded to 3.0.1.33 and use BayesIt for the forst time (dodn#t work
before).
Roman
--
What is Snow White's favorite drink? Seven up.
Current version is 3.0.1.33 | 'U
Hello G.,
Tuesday, October 19, 2004, 9:24:45 AM, you wrote:
GM> I'm sure this is a FAQ but I haven't been paying attention...
GM> Just upgraded to TB 3.01, no problems, but BayesIt has
GM> stopped spotting ANY spam - not that it ever was any good at it
GM> (about 1 in 3 w
Hello Dave,
Tuesday, November 2, 2004, 6:31:10 AM, you wrote:
DT> Where do I find the link to the latest version
Sorry, I no longer have that link handy and I cannot read the site
well enough to find the link
Hopefully someone else will be able to post a copy of the link for
you.
--
Best reg
Tue, 2 Nov 2004 13:31:10 +0200 (6:31 AM EST here) Dave Thomas wrote:
> Where do I find the link to the latest [Bayesit] version
You might want to try
www.ritlabs.com/download/files3/bayesit/bayesit.lng .
Using: The Bat! v2.12.00, BayesIt! 0.5.9,
MyMacros 1.11, gMacrosPlugin 0
At 12:24 [GMT+0200] on Wednesday November 3 (actual time - 6:24pm on Wednesday
in Perth, Western Australia), you wrote:
[snips]
Dave> How do you install this Bayesit filter?
I did it by downloading and installing Spampal :-)
After a fair bit of testing, I find it's better than an
Hello Dave,
Wednesday, November 3, 2004, 5:24:51 AM, you wrote:
DT> How do you install this Bayesit filter?
First unarchive the TBP file someplace in either the TB executable
tree or the data tree. I put mine in Prg_files/TheBat/Bayesit
Go to Options / PLugins.
Click add and then point at
Hello Chris,
Why does the Bayesit plugin not work very well?
It will pick up an occasional spam but misses most.
It will still fall for the same messages even after I mark them as
spam.
--
~John
{Race Car spelled backwards is Race Car!}
The_Bat! Version 3.0.2.2 Rush
http
It's a piece of crap... I should have made a Hungarian description for
the 0.8.1, I have tried to install new LNG file, no success at me and
some other buddies. At some guy it has changed to Hungarian, but after
restart, it is English again.
Was it ever tested?
--
Vili
___
I am having a bit of trouble getting BayesIt sorted out
I have a whitelist into which I placed all Good email address but BayesIT
seems to have prepended each line with TEXT:
Does that mean it is looking in the body of the email for that?
In which case do I just change the TEXT: to say FROM: or
Hello TB Users and Beta Lists,
I had been using Bayesit! for a few years with fairly good
success on my laptop. About two months ago, my laptop
developed a hardware problem and I switched to my wife's
desktop (XP Pro SP2).
I have been training Bayesit! from scratch and have had it
catch no
Hi Stuart
On Thursday, January 22, 2004 at 1:42 PM, shemming wrote:
>> When should bayesit start doing it's stuff?
It didn't start working well for me until I had about 1,000 messages
in **both** spam and ham for it to work from. I also had to crank the
threshold *way* down t
Hello Stuart,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 3:39:22 AM, you wrote:
SH> Hash: SHA1
SC>> but I think it may be since Beta 40.
SH> If it /is/ TB! version related then it's broken in b45 too.
Is any one having problems with Bayesit all of a sudden, in beta
40
filter cannot evaluate it. Worse, if it if a
statistical filter - a bayesian one like bayesit - then that filter
will not learn about the spam's content and be able to update its
filtering.
The only exception for this that I can think of is the way The Bat!
implements its plug-in architecture - wh
Hello Philip,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 9:58:11 AM, you wrote:
PS> However, at the moment, I'm only aware of one free filter plugin for
PS> spam - bayesit - so this very nice feature of The Bat! goes unused as
PS> yet. Hopefully you can now see why the plugin architecture is s
annot evaluate it. Worse, if it if a
> statistical filter - a bayesian one like bayesit - then that filter
> will not learn about the spam's content and be able to update its
> filtering.
I have used two filters in the past with no problems at all. I used a
SpamAssassin and popfile c
Hello Stuart,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 9:09:37 AM, you wrote:
SH> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
SH> Hash: SHA1
M3>> I also had to crank the
M3>> threshold *way* down to get reasonable results.
SH> How do I do that?
Look in Options, Preferences. Open the Anti-spam item and near the
botto
M3>>> the transfer to junk at 10 at the moment. Works great for me.
SH>> Found it and changed it. Thanks for that. Now let's see if Bayesit
SH>> catches anything.
SH> Finally!, it caught the fist message that came in after changing the
SH> settings!
SH> Th
Hello Stuart,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 6:53:12 PM, you wrote:
SC> BayesFilter
SC> Download: http://www.lkcc.org:8500/download/bayesfilter.zip
SC>
SC> BayesIT
SC> Download: http://klirik.narod.ru/usefuls/bayesit.htm
SC>
SC> Vampire
Hello Terry,
Friday, January 23, 2004, 7:13:11 PM, you wrote:
T> Thanks for your response, but I think you must have misunderstood what
T> I wrote.
Evidently. Sorry about that.
T> I'm not using the beta, so I am on the right list.
Ah - some of the replies were mentioning betas, so I just wante
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
It is possible to see what score a message gets from bayesit? I
wanted to check on how well it's learning.
- --
Stuart
Using The Bat! v2.03 Beta/45 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600 Service Pack 1
Aided by BayesIt! 0.4gm
PGP Key available from
Hello TBBETA,
Can you use BayesIT with secure authentication such as APOP?
I used PopFile in the past. I was very satisfied with it, but had to
discontinue using due to use of APOP authentication on receiving email
from my POP servers. I really do not get much spam to speak, but it is
nice to
When I upgraded to the latest version of TheBat! I decided to
experiment with the new spam plug in. I don't have a great need for it
due to a number of message filters that I have tweaked over time.
Before I pull it out in frustration, I thought I would post a question
or two.
I don't see any way
I've been happy using SpamPal and some plug-ins, including the
Bayesian filter, with TB! Is there any reason I should consider
switching to Bayesit?
--
JN
Current version is 2.04.7 | 'Using TBUDL' information:
http://www.s
Greetings:
I'm using v.2.04.7 with the Bayesit plugin. Although Bayesit is still
"learning", until a couple of days ago it was catching 65 - 85
percent on any given day.
Two days ago I switched to Avast! AV, which also has a plugin for TB!.
Since then, Bayesit is catching only 50
I just upgraded to v.2.1, which has the BayesIt plugin v.5. Since
upgrading, all mailing lists (including TBUDL) and friends' e-mails
that have a bunch of cc's are filtered to the Junk folder. None
of the adjustments I've made has made a difference.
So far I've marked them as
Please post the url for the new (5.3 ?0 version of bayesit. The link
in the knowledge base is http://klirik.narod.ru/usefuls/bayesiteng.htm
which is to version 4. The Russian tabs on that page are no help to
me.
BWs Gordon N.
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED
I was one who had problems with the the BayesIt v0.5 plugin marking
all mail as spam, so eventually went back to v0.4. I have since
installed v0.5.3, and initially it was doing fine - 85% or the first
couple of days. All of a sudden it's now marking only 30%, and missing
some from vendors th
Could someone post an example of the correct syntax to use to add
something to the whitelist of the BayesIt plugin?
For example, if I wanted to be sure anything from @abc123.org didn't
get mistaken for spam how would I enter that into the whitelist?
Thanks.
--
ò¸ó Nick
Danger
[MUA: 2.
As BayesIT! is now bundled with TheBat!, I assume it is OK to ask
about it on this list.
I was having great success with the 0.45gm (or whatever version) of
BayesIT. But with the latest version of TheBat!, I see BayesIT is up
to 0.5 and it's success has severely dropped off.
It seems to cla
Now that I'm thinking of returning to TB for my IMAP account, can
anyone tell me whether or not BayesIT works with IMAP? (I
couldn't figure out a way to search this question, since so many
users have the word "BayesIT" in their signatures.)
If BayesIT doesn't work,
Saturday, June 19, 2004, 2:13:08 AM, you wrote:
aacu> I change to POPFiel from weeks of frsutration with BayesIt slowing
aacu> down things, crashing the Bat etc.
I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching about
95% of the spam, which I hope will increase even
Hello Richard,
Saturday, June 19, 2004, 2:33:38 AM, you wrote:
RHS> Saturday, June 19, 2004, 2:13:08 AM, you wrote:
aacu>> I change to POPFiel from weeks of frsutration with BayesIt slowing
aacu>> down things, crashing the Bat etc.
RHS> I'm using BayesIT, and have no
Hi Folks,
Saturday, June 19, 2004, 5:45:36 PM, you wrote:
I use 'Mailwasher' but decided to give BayesIt a go.
I seem to be missing the 'spamdict.bye' file though, so could someone send me a copy
off list?
TIA.
Cheers.
Dougie
>>>> Douglas Coull, Langbank,
Hello Andre,
Saturday, June 19, 2004, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
AW> Hello Richard,
AW> On 19 Jun 2004 at 05:33:38 +0500 GMT [02:33 CEST] you wrote:
RHS>> I'm using BayesIT, and have no problems with it. It's catching about
RHS>> 95% of the spam, which I hope will i
Hello Graham,
Monday, June 21, 2004, 9:22:21 AM, you wrote:
GD> Hello Andre,
GD> Saturday, June 19, 2004, 12:25:11 PM, you wrote:
AW>> Hello Richard,
AW>> On 19 Jun 2004 at 05:33:38 +0500 GMT [02:33 CEST] you wrote:
RHS>>> I'm using BayesIT, and have no probl
Hello Fredrik,
Monday, June 21, 2004, 9:33:20 AM, you wrote:
FB> Hello Graham,
FB> Monday, June 21, 2004, 9:22:21 AM, you wrote:
GD>> I would be happy if I could catch 1 spam... :-(
GD>> I did not have this problem with BayesIt 0.4g, I have followed the advice
GD>>
as Junk" from the Specials Menu. That's the new way
>> to train, it even shows a small dialog (if you have enabled it) that
>> says training.
FW> But don't forget to train BayesIt also on Ham. If possible, take the
FW> same amout of ham than of spam.
Ohh, th
On 21 Jun 2004 at 09:22:21 you wrote:
GD> I would be happy if I could catch 1 spam... :-(
GD> I have SpamAssassin running on the mail server, it throws certain Spam into an IMAP
GD> account for manual proofing - I mark all this and flag as Junk (training
GD> BayesIt)
I don
Hello Chenoa,
Monday, June 21, 2004, 12:29:31 PM, you wrote:
C> So how many spam and non-spam messages have you marked?
I was at upwards of 1,000 posts in spam and almost that many ham posts
before I was getting solid results, but this was under the earlier
build. I am a bit out of date at the m
proofing - I mark all this and flag as Junk (training
GD>> BayesIt)
C> I don't think bayesit works with imap.
GD>> Spam that reaches TB also gets marked as Junk (more BayesIt training)
C> So how many spam and non-spam messages have you marked? The information
C> under
Greetings All,
There is an option in BayesIt! 5.5 for [use "whitelist" kludges]
What is the format of this list?
--
Michael L. Wilson, MBA :usflag:
Ecclesiastic Philosopher
Teacher
Critic
"Big Brother is watching" -
Hi Michael,
Monday, August 2, 2004, 7:23:00 PM, you wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Greetings All,
> According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
> the latest version:
> %STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
> %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
Hello Morgan,
On 2 Aug 2004 at 21:08:55 +0100 GMT [22:08 CEST] you wrote:
>> According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
>> the latest version:
>> %STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
>> %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
>> %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(hours
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello Andre,
On Monday, August 02, 2004 , at 22:29:20[GMT +0200](which was 1:29 PM
where I live) you wrote (at least in part):
AW> Hello Morgan,
AW> On 2 Aug 2004 at 21:08:55 +0100 GMT [22:08 CEST] you wrote:
>>> According to t
Hi Michael and list,
On Monday, August 2, 2004 at 14:12:45 GMT -0700 (which was 23:12 where
I live) Michael L. Wilson wrote (at least in parts) and made these
valuable points on the subject of "BayesIT Macros":
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Hello
Hello Michael,
Monday, August 2, 2004, 2:23:00 PM, you wrote:
MLW> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MLW> Hash: SHA1
MLW> Greetings All,
MLW> According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
MLW> the latest version:
MLW> %STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
MLW> %
AGE-
MLW>> Hash: SHA1
MLW>> Greetings All,
MLW>> According to the BayesIT help, the following macros are included in
MLW>> the latest version:
MLW>> %STATSPAMLETTERS(hours)
MLW>> %STATSPAMTRAFFIC(hours)
MLW>> %STATNONSPAMLETTERS(hours)
MLW>> %S
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello TBUDL,
I think my BayesIT not working. Must be not configured correctly.
How do u configure BayesIT and how to confirm it's working or not ?
Thanks in advance for your feedbacks.
Below are the logs:-
--- New sessio
Hello Michael,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 21:48:35 -0700 GMT [06:48 CEST] you wrote:
MLW> How can I tell the score of individual messages using BayesIT 5.11? I
MLW> have looked in BayesIT.log and cannot figure it out. Any assistance
MLW> would be appreciated.
Graham: 1
Spam-grade: 1
T
On Tuesday, August 24, 2004 it appears that Andre Wichartz
wrote the following in regards to "BayesIT scoring":
AW> Graham: 1
AW> Spam-grade: 1
AW> That's the spam probability (don't ask me for the difference of the
AW> two)
AW> Value for The Bat!: 99
AW>
Hello Jan,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 08:14:15 -0400 GMT [14:14 CEST] you wrote:
JR> Are you saying that the black/white list rules are basically +/- 99
No, I wasn't speaking about blacklists at all. I think whitlisted mails
get a score of 0, blacklisted of 100 and the rest is 1..99.
--
Cheers,
Andre
I just did Options > Preferences > Plugins. selected BayesIt! and clicked on
Information.
All my statistics show "0" as their values!
What's going on here?
Thanks.
--
Current version is 2.12.00 | 'Usin
Hello Peter,
On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:58:43 -0400 GMT [22:58 CEST] you wrote:
PK> Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download?
PK> The site given in Plugin-BayesIt is a Russian language page of Ritlab.
PK> TIA
http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit0511.rar
-
On Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:59:29 +0200, Andre Wichartz wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
> On 24 Aug 2004 at 16:58:43 -0400 GMT [22:58 CEST] you wrote:
>
> PK> Where can I find the latest version of BayesIt for download?
>
> PK> The site given in Plugin-BayesIt is a Russian langu
Dear MikeD,
-->> Mittwoch, 1. September 2004, 16:08:19:
PC>> [http://www.ritlabs.com/download/bayesit/bayesit053.rar]
> That is a bit out of date. 0.5.5 is the one that is included in the
> 2.12 TB distribution and the latest I have seen is 0.5.11.
I need to download v0.
Wed, 1 Sep 2004 16:32:22 +0200 (10:32 AM EDT here) Eddie Castelli wrote:
> I need to download v0.5.9 and don't know the exact link. Can someone
> post it please? Thanks ...
I tried a Google Advanced search of English documents for:
"Bayesit" 0.5.11 download
I found th
Hello Eddie,
On 1 Sep 2004 at 16:32:22 +0200 GMT [16:32 CEST] you wrote:
EC> I need to download v0.5.9 and don't know the exact link. Can someone
EC> post it please? Thanks ...
I don't know what's wrong with the newer ones but 0.59 you can get here:
http://www.ritlabs
1 - 100 of 615 matches
Mail list logo
