> Hence the approach I suggest in
> mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], which is also what Marten
> refers to in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...whoops - just for the record it was Robin as well as Roelof who helped
with my version of the filter - I forgot that - sorry Robin...
--
Marten Gallagher
Annery Kiln Web D
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 2:00:53 PM, Urban wrote:
>> Memo is no substitute.
> So forward it to yourself and change the subject line.
work arounds are no substitute
--
Dwight A. Corrin
928 S Broadway
Wichita KS 67211
316.303.1411 fax 316.265.7568
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
Using IMAP with The
EC>> In fact there where numerous discussions on this topic.
TF> True, but [un]resolved.
UNRESOLVABLE. This topic is similar in tone to a religious war for some
reason! Those who insist that the integrity of an email should be
unassailable seem wholly unable to compromise. Nobody else cares, and
t
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 at 19:12:07 -0500, Rich wrote:
U>> So forward it to yourself and change the subject line.
>
> But that would alter the "correct" sender ID and time stamp.
Hence the approach I suggest in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], which is also what Marten
refers to in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--
Ro
U> So forward it to yourself and change the subject line.
But that would alter the "correct" sender ID and time stamp.
--
Beautiful Butterfly Displays
http://FramedButterflyArt.com
Random tagline:
"A liberal is a person whose interests aren't at stake at the moment." -
Willis Player
_
Hello Urban!
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 2:00 PM, you wrote:
>> But only helpful if there are meaningful subject lines, using words
>> relevant to the body text's content.
>> Memo is no substitute.
> So forward it to yourself and change the subject line.
Yes, Urban, that's another nice work-a
Monday, January 22, 2007, Mary Bull wrote:
> But only helpful if there are meaningful subject lines, using words
> relevant to the body text's content.
> Memo is no substitute.
So forward it to yourself and change the subject line.
--
Urban
I believe you should live each day as if it is your
Hello Doug!
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 11:10 AM, you wrote:
>> Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)?
>> THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it.
> So if I want to do a fast search of subject lines anything in memo
> will show up? No, it wo
Hi Eddie,
Monday, January 22, 2007, 12:50:23 PM, you wrote:
> Dear Dwight,
>-->> Montag, 22. Januar 2007, 03:47:47:
>> [...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are regarded
>> as bad people who need to be protected from themselves
> I agree to this. In fact there where num
Hi Mary,
Monday, January 22, 2007, 3:38:01 PM, you wrote:
> Hello Dwight!
> On Monday, January 22, 2007, 9:18 AM, you wrote:
>>> Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)?
>>> THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it.
>> it is a WORKAROUND. and
> Hello Thomas!
> On Monday, January 22, 2007, 8:43 AM, you wrote:
[...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are
regarded as bad people who need to be protected from themselves
EC>>> I agree to this.
>> Well, I don't.
EC>>> In fact there where numerous discussions on th
> In a time where Governments are thinking of considering eMail as a legal
> document it it more than being a 'bad person' altering such a document
> (also when there is a possibility through exporting and re-importing.
An email is only able to be regarded as a legal document to the same level
as
Hello Dwight!
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 9:18 AM, you wrote:
>> Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)?
>> THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it.
> it is a WORKAROUND. and a not very satisfactory one at that. I guess
> I am going to hell o
Hello Thomas!
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 8:43 AM, you wrote:
>>> [...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are
>>> regarded as bad people who need to be protected from themselves
EC>> I agree to this.
> Well, I don't.
EC>> In fact there where numerous discussions on this topic.
On Monday, January 22, 2007, 6:50:23 AM, Eddie Castelli wrote:
> Michael, why are you not using the 'Memo' function (Shift+Crl+I)?
> THat is much faster, uncomplicated and you can make searches on it.
it is a WORKAROUND. and a not very satisfactory one at that. I guess I
am going to hell or to pr
Hello Dwight!
On Sunday, January 21, 2007, 8:47 PM, you wrote:
>> Is there a way to edit a message one has received--not for reply
>> but for filing.
> this, and being able to edit text have been longstanding requests of
> some, which have been opposed, and not adopted because users who
> wish t
Hello Eddie,
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 13:50:23 +0100 GMT (22/01/2007, 19:50 +0700 GMT),
Eddie Castelli wrote:
>> [...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are regarded
>> as bad people who need to be protected from themselves
EC> I agree to this.
Well, I don't.
EC> In fact there where
Dear Dwight,
-->> Montag, 22. Januar 2007, 03:47:47:
> [...] and not adopted because users who wish to do this are regarded
> as bad people who need to be protected from themselves
I agree to this. In fact there where numerous discussions on this
topic. Personally I also think an eMail shoul
On Sunday, January 21, 2007, 7:33:29 PM, Michael S. Greenbaum wrote:
> Is there a way to edit a message one has received--not for reply but
> for filing.
this, and being able to edit text have been longstanding requests of
some, which have been opposed, and not adopted because users who wish
to d
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 at 18:33:29 -0700, Michael wrote:
> Is there a way to edit a message one has received--not for reply but for
> filing.
>
> For example, I sometimes get email messages from people without
> subject lines or with meaningless subject lines. I'd like to file
> the message with a su
Thomas Fernandez @ 2007-1-21 8:03:06 PM
"Editing Received Messages"
>>> Is there a way to edit a message one has received--not for reply
>>> but for filing. (sic)
>> * Move the message to the outbox.
>> * Edit it.
>> * Save it as a draft.
>>
Hello Chris,
On Sun, 21 Jan 2007 19:49:53 -0600 GMT (22/01/2007, 08:49 +0700 GMT),
Chris W. wrote:
>> Is there a way to edit a message one has received--not for reply but
>> for filing. (sic)
CW> * Move the message to the outbox.
CW> * Edit it.
CW> * Save it as a draft.
CW> * Move the message fr
Michael S. Greenbaum @ 2007-1-21 7:33:29 PM
"Editing Received Messages"
> Is there a way to edit a message one has received--not for reply but
> for filing. (sic)
* Move the message to the outbox.
* Edit it.
* Save it as a draft.
* Move the message from the outbox back to wh
Hello Michael,
Sunday, January 21, 2007, 7:33:29 PM, you wrote:
MSG> Is there a way to edit a message one has received--not for reply but for
filing.
MSG> For example, I sometimes get email messages from people without
MSG> subject lines or with meaningless subject lines. I'd like to file
MSG> t
Is there a way to edit a message one has received--not for reply but for filing.
For example, I sometimes get email messages from people without subject lines
or with meaningless subject lines. I'd like to file the message with a subject
line that makes sense to me, so I'd like to add a subject
Hello Nick,
MR>> What I then do is this:
>
MR>> 1) I place a "! " at the beginning of each memo, then...
>
>
> Melissa, nice bit of lateral thinking!
Yes, it certainly is. Thanks Melissa :-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.61
_
Melissa,
Wednesday, November 27, 2002, 8:02:00 PM, you wrote:
MR> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
MR> Hash: RIPEMD160
MR> On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 6:26:09 AM PST, Nick Dutton wrote:
>> Is there any way that I can edit a received message? I use many of
>> my TB folders for reference
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
On Wednesday, November 27, 2002, at 6:26:09 AM PST, Nick Dutton wrote:
> Is there any way that I can edit a received message? I use many of
> my TB folders for reference and would like to be able to modify some
> of the messages for clarity etc.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
'Lo Nick,
On Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:26:09 + your time, you said:
ND> Is there any way that I can edit a received message? I use many of my TB
ND> folders for reference and would like to be able to modify some of the
ND> messages for clarity etc.
Wed, 27 Nov 2002 14:26:09 [GMT +] (9:26 AM EST here) Nick Dutton
wrote:
> Is there any way that I can edit a received message? I use many of
> my TB folders for reference and would like to be able to modify some
> of the messages for clarity etc.
Redirect the message to yourself. Edit the me
Hello,
Is there any way that I can edit a received message? I use many of my TB
folders for reference and would like to be able to modify some of the messages
for clarity etc.
Regards,
--
Nick
Using The Bat! v1.61 on Windows XP 5.1 Build 2600
Service Pack 1
__
Sorry for replying this late, i still have >400 messages to sift
through...
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 17:41:04 -0800, Januk Aggarwal wrote:
JA> www.gmx.net
[...]
JA> -> It seems to reject all mail from Hotmail.com addresses. I'm not
JA> completely sure about this point, but maybe someone else cou
Hi there!
>> how do I get my messages and email addresses off of hotmail and onto the bat.
>> I'm having trouble fining their pop3 address.
JA> You can
JA> find the message in the archives at:
JA> http://www.mail-archive.com/tbudl@thebat.dutaint.com/msg15604.html
JA> It is extremely well writt
On Friday, November 17, 2000, 3:42:30 PM, Marck wrote:
> If anyone want's to continue discussing this topic then do so
> either in private or on TBOT. Tempers are fraying and I don't
> want to see anyone saying anything they may regret :-).
> So - t'is a DEAD HORSE, my friends.
This is wh
Hi Januk,
On Friday, November 17, 2000 @ 17:41:04 -0800, you
wrote the following about "Hotmail and TB (was: Re:
Editing received messages)"
Januk> [...] consider changing e-mail accounts to a service
Januk> that does offer free POP3 acce
Hello Doug,
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 at 18:54:42 GMT + (which was 10:54 AM
where I live) witnesses say Doug Weller typed:
> Why shouldn't users have the choice?
> Eg. I get a long post full of recipes. I only want to keep a few of them.
> What is wrong with deleting the
> rest?
As others ha
Hello ADoe196701,
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 at 16:47:52 GMT EST (which was 1:47 PM
where I live) witnesses say [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed:
> how do I get my messages and email addresses off of hotmail and onto the bat.
> I'm having trouble fining their pop3 address.
As far as I know, Hotmail does n
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Manfred,
On 17 November 2000 at 23:21:35 + (which was 23:21 where I
live) Manfred Ell wrote and made these points:
ME> Everyone is entitled to his or her position.
Agreed. I have snipped the rest of this message because I want this
branc
On 17-11-2000 at 23:06:22GMT +0100 (which was 22:06 where I live)
Dieter Hummel wrote regarding the subject of "Editing received messages"
Hello Dieter,
Now here is someone teaching again! I'm German too Dieter (and we like to
teach for sure).
> The fact that you h
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug,
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000, at 22:34:39 [GMT +] you wrote:
[..]
> Any comments from anyone as to how it is with thousands of messages (yes, I
> know that
> might be considered a bad idea, but it happens!). Other clients are very
> sl
On 17-11-2000 at 22:34:39GMT + (which was 22:34 where I live)
Doug Weller wrote regarding the subject of "Editing received messages"
> Any comments from anyone as to how it is with thousands of messages (yes, I
> know that
> might be considered a bad idea, but it happen
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug,
On 17 November 2000 at 22:34:39 + (which was 22:34 where I
live) Doug Weller wrote and made these points:
DW> Any comments from anyone as to how it is with thousands of
DW> messages (yes, I know that might be considered a bad idea, but
On 17/11/00 at 21:14 Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
[SNIP]
>
>Please understand that it is a known standard practice for competitors
>to join mailing lists and start a fight just for the "flying fur" of
>it. As moderator it is my job to be vigilant and nip any such attack
>"in the bud". Again,
On 17/11/00 at 23:06 Dieter Hummel wrote:
[SNIP]
>
>Archiving messages with an email client s.o. is using isn't the way
>to work professionally and effectively: there is specialized software
>out there for just that purpose.
>
Why shouldn't it be a way to work professionally and efficiently?
Ref Subject: Editing received messages
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi ADoe196701,
A> how do I get my messages and email addresses off of hotmail and onto the bat.
A> I'm having trouble fining their pop3 address.
Wow, what a perfect note to hang on the wall under:
How not to send an
Hello Listmembers,
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 at 22:43:36 [GMT +] Manfred Ell wrote:
> do. And changing the email is one of such things. I have requested
> this myself.
The fact that you have requested an unnecessary feature doesn't
necessarily imply that it has to be realized. You can
how do I get my messages and email addresses off of hotmail and onto the bat.
I'm having trouble fining their pop3 address.
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list moderation team
On 17/11/00 at 14:37 A. Curtis Martin wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:09:10 +, Doug Weller thoughtfully wrote
>the following:
>
>[...]
>DW> Well, I hope you accept that I intended to cause no offense and am
>DW> genuinely interested in The Ba
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug,
On 17 November 2000 at 19:09:10 + (which was 19:09 where I
live) Doug Weller wrote and made these points:
>> Sorry if this seems a bit of an aggressive response but your
>> postings here seem to me like a veiled attempt to pro
On 17/11/00 at 15:41 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>There are legitimate uses for this ability that have nothing
>to do with editing any individual's messages.
>
>To wit: I subscribe to several newsletters. Of the many
>items of information in any given newsletter, only one or
>two may be relevant
There are legitimate uses for this ability that have nothing
to do with editing any individual's messages.
To wit: I subscribe to several newsletters. Of the many
items of information in any given newsletter, only one or
two may be relevant to my business or of interest to me.
Why should I not
Friday, November 17, 2000, 12:45:15 PM, Ming-Li wrote:
ML> On Thursday, November 16, 2000, 2:19:16 PM, Marck wrote:
>> There are good reasons that an email client doesn't allow
>> you to change incoming mails easily. For instance, it is
>> this kind of trivialisation that cheapens
On November 17, 2000, at 11:40:08 AM, Jan Rifkinson Wrote:
ME The only problem I see here is for a memo to get automatically displayed if
ME there is a memo for a message and to hide itself if there isn't.
ACM>>> You know that there is a column provided for displaying memos using the
ACM
Jan Rifkinson wrote on Freitag, 17. November 2000 20:40:08 h
about "Editing received messages":
Hello Jan,
Kari>> To be honest, no, I don't know. I just managed to open that little
Kari>> Memo Box, but a single column would be much better. How do I do this?
JR>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 19:09:10 +, Doug Weller thoughtfully wrote
the following:
[...]
DW> Well, I hope you accept that I intended to cause no offense and am
DW> genuinely interested in The Bat as an alternative. However, given
DW> your strong posit
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Kari,
On Friday, November 17, 2000 @ 20:11:06 +0100, you
wrote the following about "Editing received messages"
Kari> A . Curtis Martin wrote on Freitag, 17. November 2000 12:27:15 h
Kari> about "Editing rece
On 16/11/00 at 23:27 Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
[SNIP]
>
>I was mildly concerned that Doug posted his original enquiry using
>Calypso. Then he only replied to one of the responses he had received
>by promoting Calypso's features, once again using Calypso. Aren't you
>concerned that Doug
A . Curtis Martin wrote on Freitag, 17. November 2000 12:27:15 h
about "Editing received messages":
Hello A,
ACM> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:06:54 +, Manfred Ell thoughtfully wrote
ACM> the following:
ME>> The only problem I see here is for a memo to get automatically d
On 16/11/00 at 22:19 Marck D. Pearlstone wrote:
>-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
>Hash: SHA1
>
>Hi Doug,
>
>On 16 November 2000 at 21:14:20 + (which was 21:14 where I
>live) Doug Weller wrote and made these points:
>
>DW> Thanks, but right now I can click on Edit Message in Calypso, edit
On 17/11/00 at 02:27 Karin Spaink wrote:
>
>Doug, if the only thing that you want to get rid of is the
>html, there often is an easier solution within TB:
>
>When you open a html-message, you'll often (not always) see
>small tabs at the end of the message. Click on the first tab
>and you'll get
to edit received messages for filing. I also accept that I
am
>MDP> probably in the minority in holding that position :-).
>
>I completely agree that editing received messages leaves them tainted
>and untrustworthy. I would like to request that this never be done to
>TB.
Why
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Manfred,
On Friday, November 17, 2000 @ 18:15:07 +, you
wrote the following about "Editing received messages"
Manfred> [...] I must say, you've put it all pretty well in
Manfred> a nutshell. I agree
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 November, 2000, 1:36 PM, I saw Manfred's comments made on
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 18:15:07 +, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth:
[...]
ME> Let's keep our eyes on the competition folks! There is something to learn
ME> (aka implement).
..
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 17 November, 2000, 1:09 PM, I saw Ming-Li's comments made on
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 09:45:15 -0800, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth:
OK, Ming; I'll take your 'preambulatory' cue, :=), and start by saying
that I was thinking of declaring this
On 17-11-2000 at 09:45:15GMT -0800 (which was 17:45 where I live)
Ming-Li wrote regarding the subject of "Editing received messages"
> Hi, all,
> I'm replying to Marck's message for it contains the bulk of things I
> want to address. Yet I did read through the
Hi, all,
I'm replying to Marck's message for it contains the bulk of things I
want to address. Yet I did read through the whole thread and I'll
cut-n-paste relevant parts into this reply. Original authors of
those parts would be noted, of course.
On Thursday, November 16, 2000, 2:19:16 PM, Marck
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello A!
On Friday, November 17, 2000 at 1:43:23 AM you wrote:
MY>> I completely agree that editing received messages leaves them tainted
MY>> and untrustworthy. I would like to request that this never be done to
MY>> TB.
>
Hello!
ACM> Perfectly. :=) I work with a 1600x1200 resolution and still complain.
Poser! ;-]
beste Gruesse,
(best regards)
Thomas D. Frueh
--
--
View the TBUDL archive at http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
To send a message to the list
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
When I saw Manfred's message about "Editing received messages ",
I just had to make these comments:
>> You know that there is a column provided for displaying memos using the
>> message listing, right?
ME> I now, yes,
On 17-11-2000 at 06:27:15GMT -0500 (which was 11:27 where I live)
A. Curtis Martin wrote regarding the subject of "Editing received messages"
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:06:54 +, Manfred Ell thoughtfully wrote
> the following:
ME>> The only problem I see here is for a mem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 10:06:54 +, Manfred Ell thoughtfully wrote
the following:
ME> The only problem I see here is for a memo to get automatically displayed if
ME> there is a memo for a message and to hide itself if there isn't.
You know that ther
On 17-11-2000 at 16:10:55GMT -0800 (which was 0:10 where I live)
Januk Aggarwal wrote regarding the subject of "Editing received messages"
> Hello Manfred,
> On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 at 00:01:29 GMT + (which was 4:01 PM
> where I live) witnesses say Manfred Ell typed:
&g
At 03:47 17/11/2000, Thomas Fernandez wrote:
> I would also like to see what Doug says about this. He has been
> awfully quiet - but, then, I don't know his time zone or work
> schedule.
GMT. I know Doug from another mailing list and he's not the sort of
person to join a list merely to promote a
Hi Manfred,
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:01:29 +GMT (17/11/2000, 08:01 +0800GMT),
Manfred Ell wrote:
ME> True. And I didn't check what client he was using!
IMHO everybody can use what client he wants (though we prefer TB), as
long as the contents of his message concern TB - this is a TB User's
li
On 16-11-2000 at 22:50, A. Curtis Martin kindly wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 21:14:20 +, Doug Weller wrote:
DW>> Thanks, but right now I can click on Edit Message in Calypso, edit the
DW>> message/subject line, and then click on the disc
DW>> icon to save it (having clicked on remove rich tex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 19:22:39 -0500, Mike Yetto graced us with
these comments:
MY> I completely agree that editing received messages leaves them tainted
MY> and untrustworthy. I would like to request that this never be done to
MY> TB.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 16 November, 2000, 7:43 PM, I saw Marck's comments made on
Fri, 17 Nov 2000 00:34:19 +, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth:
MDP> To be fair, I don't mind it that much. I prefer the "drag it to the
MDP> outbox, edit and replace it" met
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi A,
On 17 November 2000 at 19:17:19 -0500 (which was 00:17 where I
live) A . Curtis Martin wrote and made these points:
MDP>> Of course. And I have exerted my democratic right to state an
MDP>> opinion on the subject :-).
ACM> It's difficult to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Manfred,
On Thursday, November 16, 2000 @ 00:01:29 +, you
wrote the following about "Editing received messages"
Manfred> [...] BUT I have had the need to edit one or the
Manfred> other email I have re
gt; probably in the minority in holding that position :-).
I completely agree that editing received messages leaves them tainted
and untrustworthy. I would like to request that this never be done to
TB.
- --
Mike Yetto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
E-mailed using The Bat! v1.47 Halloween Edition runnin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 23:27:15 +, Marck D. Pearlstone contributed this
to the collective wisdom of the human race:
[...]
ME>> There are no 2 equal users. One wants one feature, which the other
ME>> hates. This is called: democracy
MDP> Of course.
Hello Manfred,
On Fri, 17 Nov 2000 at 00:01:29 GMT + (which was 4:01 PM
where I live) witnesses say Manfred Ell typed:
> BUT I have had the need to edit one or the other email I have received
> (business stuff) not to change it's contents but to add some memo stuff to
> the end of it, lik
On 16-11-2000 at 23:27:15GMT + (which was 23:27 where I live)
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote regarding the subject of "Editing received messages"
Marck,
> Perhaps, but from what you say here, I don't think that you have
> clearly understood the nature of my re
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Manfred,
On 16 November 2000 at 22:43:36 + (which was 22:43 where I
live) Manfred Ell wrote and made these points:
ME> You maybe right on what you say here but I *do* think that your
ME> response is a bit harsh even for a moderator of a very
On 16-11-2000 at 22:19:16GMT + (which was 22:19 where I live)
Marck D. Pearlstone wrote regarding the subject of "Editing received messages"
> Now, if I wanted to I could join the Calypso list (using TB) and ask
> if I can do, say, one of the many things TB does tha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Doug,
On 16 November 2000 at 21:14:20 + (which was 21:14 where I
live) Doug Weller wrote and made these points:
DW> Thanks, but right now I can click on Edit Message in Calypso, edit
DW> the message/subject line, and then click on the disc i
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 16 Nov 2000 21:14:20 +, Doug Weller wrote these
comments about 'Editing received messages':
DW> Thanks, but right now I can click on Edit Message in Calypso, edit the
DW> message/subject line, and then click on the disc
Thanks, but right now I can click on Edit Message in Calypso, edit the
message/subject line, and then click on the disc
icon to save it (having clicked on remove rich text (HTML) if it wasn't
plain text).
That's a lot easier!
Doug
--
Doug Weller Moderator, sci.archaeology.moderated
Submissi
Hi Doug,
Wednesday, November 15, 2000, 11:38:47 PM, you wrote:
...
> I've used Becky and Calypso and become dependent upon the ability to
> edit the text and subject line of old messages.
...
> I like The Bat -- is there any chance it might get this facility
> sometime?
Try this:
1. mark the
On 15-11-2000 at 22:38:47GMT + (which was 22:38 where I live)
Doug Weller wrote regarding the subject of "Editing received messages"
> Apologies if this is an old chestnut, but I've used Becky and Calypso and
> become dependent upon the ability to edit
> the text
On 15-11-2000 at 22:38:47GMT + (which was 22:38 where I live)
Doug Weller wrote regarding the subject of "Editing received messages"
> Apologies if this is an old chestnut, but I've used Becky and Calypso and
> become dependent upon the ability to edit
> the text
Apologies if this is an old chestnut, but I've used Becky and Calypso and
become dependent upon the ability to edit
the text and subject line of old messages. I use my mail reader as a
temporary or permanent archive, and wouldn't want to
lose this facility. I like The Bat -- is there any chance i
92 matches
Mail list logo
