Sunday, February 17, 2002 at 2:40 PM
Geoff,
I see it open and scan OE but not the bat.
Best regards,
Shoebuddy
--
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators : mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
TBTec
I have used NAV2002 since WinXP came out back in September or
thereabouts. It does not work like NAV2001. I have not noticed
the_Bat hanging up on infected e-mail. It does change the extension
on some attachments it considers questionable, so it is apparently
scanning the incoming e-mail. The
Hi Geoff,
Sunday, February 17, 2002, 1:59:53 PM, Geoff wrote:
Geoff Lane> Has NAV 2002 actually detected a virus in your email? If so, did it
Geoff Lane> require you to intervene in some way?
Yes, last time about a week ago. It did halt further downloads, but
that isn't a problem for me as I ha
Sunday, February 17, 2002, 12:20:45 PM, Dave Conroy wrote:
> I use 2002 on two of our Win2000 boxes and it installed no problem and
> ruins with the Bat! no problem and scans no problem. However, I
> installed as part of the full SystemWorks 2002 package and it auto'd
> everything without me havi
Hi Yuki,
Sunday, February 17, 2002, 11:15:50 AM, Yuki wrote:
Yuki Taga> TB should work fine with NAV 2001. But when I upgraded to 2002 I
Yuki Taga> never got it working, and Symantec gave up on it, telling me to just
Yuki Taga> turn e-mail scanning off. Don't know why, but it cannot be
Yuki Ta
Sunday, February 17, 2002, 7:02:52 PM, Geoff wrote:
GL> Sunday, February 17, 2002, 2:05:48 AM, Shoebuddy Jones wrote:
>> Geoff,
>> I have Norton 2001 and now the bat but norton is not checking
>> each email as it used to do with OE. Do you know why
>> that is?
GL> ---
GL> It works for me.
Sunday, February 17, 2002, 2:05:48 AM, Shoebuddy Jones wrote:
> Geoff,
> I have Norton 2001 and now the bat but norton is not checking
> each email as it used to do with OE. Do you know why
> that is?
---
It works for me. Perhaps NAV is scanning, but you haven't enabled the
systray icon, an
Sunday, February 17, 2002, 12:00:01 AM, you wrote:
GL> Saturday, February 16, 2002, 10:39:04 PM, Yuki Taga wrote:
>> Interesting. I have never had this happen, so let me see if I
>> understand you correctly. You are saying that in auto-protect mode,
>> Norton will stop a download if it detects
Saturday, February 16, 2002 at 9:04 PM
Geoff,
I have Norton 2001 and now the bat but norton is not checking
each email as it used to do with OE. Do you know why
that is?
Best regards,
Shoebuddy
--
Ar
Well, seems to me that's the best way to set Norton anyway. ^_- Never
really considered anything else except automatic quarantine. Which
kind of makes my first point valid, I guess, in that setting up
Norton to scan downloads is kind of redundant, yes? (what Symantec
claims, as well) I just don't
Saturday, February 16, 2002, 10:39:04 PM, Yuki Taga wrote:
> Interesting. I have never had this happen, so let me see if I
> understand you correctly. You are saying that in auto-protect mode,
> Norton will stop a download if it detects a virus in a message coming
> it. Is that right?
---
It
Interesting. I have never had this happen, so let me see if I
understand you correctly. You are saying that in auto-protect mode,
Norton will stop a download if it detects a virus in a message coming
it. Is that right?
Symantec never mentioned that little trick to me when I had contacted
them
Saturday, February 16, 2002, 12:56:43 PM, Yuki Taga wrote:
> Don't take my word for it; go talk to the Symantec people about it.
> This is what they claim.
---
If all your mail downloads are attended, they are correct -- the
redundancy exists. However, the on-access scanner in default
configurat
Don't take my word for it; go talk to the Symantec people about it.
This is what they claim.
Yuki
Saturday, February 16, 2002, 8:55:59 PM, Geoff wrote:
GL> Friday, February 15, 2002, 11:27:42 PM, Yuki Taga wrote:
>> So, if you are running in auto-protect enabled mode,
>> *and* having Norton sc
Friday, February 15, 2002, 11:27:42 PM, Yuki Taga wrote:
> So, if you are running in auto-protect enabled mode,
> *and* having Norton scan your e-mail on the way in, you are enjoying
> repetitive redundancy, and probably slowing down your retrieval just
> a touch.
---
Not so. Using email scanni
All true. However, the *only* reason for taking the extra-resource
using step of having Norton scan your e-mail is if you are running a
box where for some reason you cannot run Norton in auto-protect mode
enabled.
Having Norton in auto-protect mode enabled already makes it
impossible to open an
Friday, February 15, 2002, 9:27:20 PM, Stephen Clayman wrote:
> Does the same apply to NAV 2000?
---
I went from NAV 5 to NAV 2001, so I can offer no guarantees. However,
if NAV offers email protection, you should be able to find something
in the NAV 2000 Help (try searching for "email"). Then a
On Friday, February 15, 2002, 3:27:20 PM, Stephen Clayman wrote:
> Does the same apply to NAV 2000?
yes. only 2002 doesn't require you to change some settings in your
account properties.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
P O Box 47828
Wichita KS 67201-7828
316.263.9706 fax 316.263.6385
mailto:[EMAIL PROTEC
Friday, February 15, 2002, 6:22:15 PM, you wrote:
GL> 1. In short, yes -- all mail goes via Norton Antivirus 2001. NAV
GL> presents a virtual POP3 server, which you specify as the server for
GL> incoming mail. The username parameter that you supply to that "server"
GL> specifies both the real t
Hello Geoff,
Friday, February 15, 2002, 7:22:15 PM, you wrote:
Snip
GL> 1. In short, yes -- all mail goes via Norton Antivirus 2001. NAV
GL> presents a virtual POP3 server, which you specify as the server for
Snip
GL> 2. No, all that selecting "Manually Configured Accounts" does is
Snip
GL> HTH,
Hi Hans,
On Friday, February 15, 2002, 1:34:05 PM, you wrote:
> 1. What are the mechanics of below procedure? Does incoming mail go via
> Norton before reaching me?
> 2. Isn't it enough to have "Manually configured accounts" ticked in
> the E-mail status window?
---
1. In short, yes -- all mai
Hello List and Geoff.
1. What are the mechanics of below procedure? Does incoming mail go via
Norton before reaching me?
2. Isn't it enough to have "Manually configured accounts" ticked in
the E-mail status window?
TIA
--
FAQ on Norton Anti Virus 2001 and TB:
> This tip has
22 matches
Mail list logo
