[Reply to: »Luc« · 2008-03-19 · 22:30 h (CET)]
Moin, Luc!
MM If someone makes a wish about this feature, I will support it.
I filed a bug report... although it might be a wish for most
Leave comments here: https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/view.php?id=2969
Cheers!
VA
- --
QA mailto:[EMAIL
the flagged status is preserved. The same should be possible with
parked messages.
--
Best regards,
Luc
http://www.dzinelabs.com
---
Powered by The Bat! version 4.0.18 with Windows XP (build 2600),
version 5.1 Service Pack 2 and using the best
Dwight Corrin wrote:
DC On Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 3:37:30 PM, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
Why should I not move parked messages and keep the Parked flag?
DC You can't have a message be parked and moved at the same time. It
DC would be like having a door locked and open it the same time.
I think
group
[f.i. Moving Parked, Parkeerbeheer :-) or whatever], assigns it to the
parked messages before moving them, one doesn't have to worry about unread
messages that already were in the folder you were moving them to.
FWIW :-)
--
Best Wishes,
Mark
using The Bat
[Reply to: »George Mitchell« · 2008-03-19 · 07:30 h (CET)]
Moin, George!
Why should I not move parked messages and keep the Parked flag?
You can't have a message be parked and moved at the same time. It
would be like having a door locked and open it the same time.
I think what people
[Reply to: »MFPA« · 2008-03-19 · 01:46 h (CET)]
Moin, MFPA!
So you really think that I should make even more friends on
TBBeta Mailing List as I did in the past? ;-)
I thought he was referring to filing a wish on Bug Tracker
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
I know that. I am just referring to
Hello George and Dwight,
On Wednesday, March 19, 2008 at 1:30:20 AM you wrote:
DC On Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 3:37:30 PM, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
Why should I not move parked messages and keep the Parked flag?
DC You can't have a message be parked and moved at the same time. It
DC would
Hello Volker,
On Tue, 18 Mar 2008 21:37:30 +0100 GMT (19/03/2008, 03:37 +0700 GMT),
Volker Ahrendt wrote:
VA I bet it is working as designed, but I am not convinced that the
VA design is completely user friendly:
VA I sometimes move a bunch of messages (parked and unparked) from one
VA folder
it to the
MP parked messages before moving them, one doesn't have to worry about unread
MP messages that already were in the folder you were moving them to.
Right, that's also an easy way to find them back and re-park them
again.
Tnx (Bedankt)
--
Best regards,
Luc
http://www.dzinelabs.com
Good morning MFPA,
It was foretold that on 18/03/2008 @ 00:46:38 GMT+ (which was
21:46:38 where I live) MFPA would write:
snipped a bit
M Perhaps the pop-up could/should have a checkbox option to re-park
M the messages after moving them.
Excellent idea IMHO
--
Best regards,
Luc
Good morning Dwight,
It was foretold that on 19/03/2008 @ 00:14:56 GMT-0500 (which was
02:14:56 where I live) Dwight Corrin would write:
DC You can't have a message be parked and moved at the same time. It
DC would be like having a door locked and open it the same time.
I see your point but
On Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 9:43:38 AM, Luc wrote:
I see your point but since apparently it's possible when you copy
the message,
so it does. Makes sense, since the message is parked when it's
copied, but not when it's moved. Solves the problem about not being
able to find it at its
had
50,000 or so parked messages, parking wouldn't mean much any more.
Put differently, if everything was 'parked' how would I recognize the
messages which were important enough to park?
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone ahead to fax
dcorrin at fastmail.fm
photo galleries at http
Good afternoon Dwight,
It was foretold that on 19/03/2008 @ 10:01:15 GMT-0500 (which was
12:01:15 where I live) Dwight Corrin would write:
snipped a bit
DC Solves the problem about not being
DC able to find it at its destination. And no dialogue boxes asking
DC questions.
Still don't see
Hi Volker,
Wednesday, March 19, 2008, 8:17:55 AM, you wrote:
[Reply to: »George Mitchell« · 2008-03-19 · 07:30 h (CET)]
Moin, George!
Why should I not move parked messages and keep the Parked flag?
You can't have a message be parked and moved at the same time. It
would be like having
Hi Dwight,
On Wednesday, March 19, 2008 at 10:10:41 AM you wrote:
DC What is the point of parking messages if you park them all?
Oh, I don't park them *all* just some, as I mentioned..
DC To me the
DC whole notion of parking a message is to make it impossible to delete.
Yes.
DC Why one
Good evening Maggie,
It was foretold that on 19/03/2008 @ 11:49:53 GMT-0500 (which was
13:49:53 where I live) Maggie Meister would write:
snipped a bit
MM If someone makes a wish about this feature, I will support it.
I filed a bug report... although it might be a wish for most
--
a message to keep you from
accidentally deleting or moving it.
Is it so? I don't know. Does Parking only mean to keep one from
deleting a message or does it mean to keep one from deleting *and*
moving a message? Why should I not move parked messages and keep the
Parked flag?
I would think the work
Hello Volker,
Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 3:37:30 PM, you wrote:
VA I bet it is working as designed, but I am not convinced that the
VA design is completely user friendly:
VA I sometimes move a bunch of messages (parked and unparked) from one
VA folder to another. I confirm the warning and have to
[Reply to: »Stuart Cuddy« · 2008-03-18 · 21:50 h (CET)]
Moin, Stuart!
I am with you on this one. It is often very difficult to find the
parked message once you move it. I would also support the wish you
are going to file. ;)
So you really think that I should make even more friends on TBBeta
mailbox. But probably the designers overlooked the
fact that users sometimes manually want to move parked messages and
keep them parked.
The way i go around this for the time being is that i mark them as
unread and move them. That way i easily find them back and
shortcut them as parked
Hi
On Tuesday 18 March 2008 at 9:24:12 PM, in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED], Volker Ahrendt wrote:
So you really think that I should make even more friends on TBBeta
Mailing List as I did in the past? ;-)
I thought he was referring to filing a wish on Bug Tracker
https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
It had
Good evening MFPA,
It was foretold that on 18/03/2008 @ 00:46:38 GMT+ (which was
21:46:38 where I live) MFPA would write:
snipped a bit
M I thought he was referring to filing a wish on Bug Tracker
M https://www.ritlabs.com/bt/
Done as we speak :-)
--
Best regards,
Luc
On Tuesday, March 18, 2008, 3:37:30 PM, Volker Ahrendt wrote:
Why should I not move parked messages and keep the Parked flag?
You can't have a message be parked and moved at the same time. It
would be like having a door locked and open it the same time.
--
Dwight A. Corrin
316.303.9385 phone
, so
you have two identical parked messages in the destination folder.
--
Cheers,
Thomas.
Moderator der deutschen The Bat! Beginner Liste.
You have a right to your opinions. I just don't want to hear them.
Message reply created with The Bat! 1.62/Beta1
under Chinese Windows 98 4.10 Build
Hello Buds!
I've been going through my email and see a problem i'm not sure
what is causing it.. those that are parked have sometimes 50, 60,
100 copies of the same parked message in the folder!!
any idea what causes this? I use parks a lot because i'm a quick
deleter!! :)
I'm wondering if
Hi Laura,
Friday, October 4, 2002, 10:21:41 PM, you wrote:
I've been going through my email and see a problem i'm not sure
what is causing it.. those that are parked have sometimes 50, 60,
100 copies of the same parked message in the folder!!
I've found this, I'm assuming it's a bug in one
Hey Joseph,
My MUA believes 'The Bat! (v1.61) Business' was used
to write [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on Tuesday, August 27, 2002 at 1:06:48 PM.
JN I am trying to figure out what causes me to get a runtime error on
JN occasion when I sync my Palm with my TB! inbox. The latest idea
I am trying to figure out what causes me to get a runtime error on
occasion when I sync my Palm with my TB! inbox. The latest idea is
that a parked message in the inbox will result in a runtime error.
Unparking the message allows a normal sync.
Can anyone confirm? Tim, any ideas?
Win 98/AMD-K6
Hello,
I've just started using the delete-messages-after-x-days-option. However,
in some of the folders there are one or more messages I want to keep. I
suppose marking those messages as parked would make TB! leave them as they
are, but since they are important messages I want to know for
Hej Marcus,
--- Marcus Ohlström / Dienstag, 05.02.2002, 17:29:01
Parked messages
I've just started using the delete-messages-after-x-days-option. However,
in some of the folders there are one or more messages I want to keep. I
suppose marking those messages as parked would make TB
On Tuesday, February 05, 2002, Eddie Castelli wrote:
Parked messages
EC Hej Marcus,
EC --- Marcus Ohlström / Dienstag, 05.02.2002, 17:29:01
EC Parked messages
I've just started using the delete-messages-after-x-days-option. However,
in some of the folders there are one or more
Hello All,
When moving a parked message manually, TB, after asking for
confirmation, moves and unparks it. Doing the same thing with a
filter (either manual or auto), TB *copy* it along with its status
(parked), and the original is left in the original folder (also
parked).
I guess this is a
On Monday, July 31, 2000 at 8:26 AM or thereabouts, Ming-Li wrote the
following about Moving parked messages:
Ming-Li I guess this is a feature, not a bug, for it has been like
Ming-Li this as I can remember and no one has complained about it
Ming-Li (since I joined). I still can't understand
ing hair over this for a while now, it's
nice to know that there's at least two others with the same point of
view :)
Personally, I'd love to see an option to move (or Copy) Parked messages with a
filter, and _keep_ them Parked (i.e. "kept" ala Agent) once they have
been filtered to t
ing hair over this for a while now, it's
nice to know that there's at least two others with the same point of
view :)
Personally, I'd love to see an option to move (or Copy) Parked messages with a
filter, and _keep_ them Parked (i.e. "kept" ala Agent) once they have
been filtered to
Oh as a new user of a few weeks standing I have been using Parked
to mean kept and moving the parked messages. I had no idea...until
now..that they lost their parked status on moving. What a PITA. It
would seem fairly obvious to me that in a program with so many
filtering capabilities a
Hi Katsmeow,
On Monday, July 31, 2000, 10:40:38 AM, you wrote in part about "Moving
parked messages":
To me "park" is a misnomer for the intent of the function; "keep"
would be more like it, and then it should be "sticky," not
disappear upon
On Monday, July 31, 2000 at 10:40 AM or thereabouts, Katsmeow wrote
the following about Moving parked messages:
Katsmeow Oh as a new user of a few weeks standing I have been
Katsmeow using Parked to mean kept and moving the parked messages. I
Katsmeow had no idea...until now..that they lost
ds,
Keithmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Monday, July 31, 2000, 12:28 PM (ET)
Monday, July 31, 2000, 11:40:38 AM, you wrote:
K Oh as a new user of a few weeks standing I have been using Parked
K to mean kept and moving the parked messages. I had no idea...until
K now..that
Hi Gary,
Monday, July 31, 2000, 10:58:27 AM, you wrote:
I also hate the conformation "Do you
wish to move the Parked Message as well" upon moving -- If I didn't,
I wouldn't move it to begin with :-)
Well, it is now clear to me that Parked really means don't move or
delete from this folder.
Hi Katsmeow,
On Monday, July 31, 2000, 11:55:00 AM, you wrote in part about "Moving
parked messages":
I also hate the conformation "Do you wish to move the Parked
Message as well" upon moving -- If I didn't, I wouldn't move it to
begin with :-)
K Well, it is now cle
On Mon, 31 Jul 2000 10:40:38 -0500, Katsmeow wrote:
K Oh as a new user of a few weeks standing I have been using Parked
K to mean kept and moving the parked messages. I had no idea...until
K now..that they lost their parked status on moving. What a PITA. It
K would seem fairly obvious
Hi Curtis,
On Monday, July 31, 2000, 1:03:43 PM, you wrote in part about "Moving
parked messages":
C As with all else who have contributed to this thread, I very much
C would prefer a 'keep' feature which I personally find more
C applicable to more situations. Most often, I simply wi
Hi TBUDL,
I want to use park as a "keep" also and have been frustrated by having to either
leave messages marked "parked" in original folder or having the "park" removed when
moving to another folder.
I'm surprised others haven't foud this irritating.
I was unaware that filters kept the
Hi Januk,
Monday, July 31, 2000, 8:42:49 PM, you wrote:
What about using flagging or colour groups instead of parking? That
may be more appropriate if you move your messages a lot.
Well, for me that doesn't serve the purpose of keeping from deleting
the message which is what I use park for.
tracer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[]
Ali I realized this when trying to figure out why ten copies of a number
Ali of parked messages were in a particular folder. I have been applying
Ali manual filters to a folder containing a few parked messages and
Ali copies are being sent
to figure out why ten copies of a number
Ali of parked messages were in a particular folder. I have been applying
Ali manual filters to a folder containing a few parked messages and
Ali copies are being sent to the destination folder each time I apply the
Ali filters.
Ali This seems to be a bug
Hallo Ali,
On Sunday, December 12, 1999, 5:59:22 PM (GMT+0800), Ali Martin wrote:
Secondly, I want to be able to removed dupes over all my
accounts/boxes in one go
AM That's another thing that makes that problem even more irritating.
AM Duplicate messages that are parked will not be deleted
for a yes or no.
Do you want to move parked messages as well?
In the spirit of consistency and to help deal with the problem of
parked messages being repeatedly copied, during a manual filter
operations, from the target folder to the destination folder, one
would think that if you run the 'kill dupe
Hallo Ali,
On Monday, December 13, 1999, 12:12:47 AM (GMT+0800), Ali Martin wrote:
Parked message cannot be deleted, not even automatically during "Kill
Dupes" for consistency (I would think).
AM In the spirit of consistency and to help deal with the problem of
AM parked mess
Monday, December 13, 1999
Hello Thomas,
Sunday, Sunday, December 12, 1999, you wrote:
Thomas Hallo Ali,
Thomas On Sunday, December 12, 1999, 5:59:22 PM (GMT+0800), Ali Martin wrote:
Secondly, I want to be able to removed dupes over all my
accounts/boxes in one go
AM That's another thing
Hi tracer,
on Monday, December 13, 1999, 2:09:54 AM GMT+0800, tracer wrote:
Thomas Another thing is a "Kill Dupes" command not only for the active
Thomas folder but as a global command (kill dupes in all folders of this
Thomas account / in all folders of all accounts in one go). Not a bad idea,
Monday, December 13, 1999
Hello Thomas,
Monday, Monday, December 13, 1999, you wrote:
Thomas I don't get your meaning. Kill Dupes is a command you don't usually do
Thomas *during* downloading, buit *after* having downloaded duplicate
Thomas messages. And why would you read old mail if you hit
,
the parked message gets copied again and so on.
I realized this when trying to figure out why ten copies of a number
of parked messages were in a particular folder. I have been applying
manual filters to a folder containing a few parked messages and
copies are being sent to the destination folder each
On Saturday, December 11, 1999, Ali Martin wrote:
I've noted something curious. If you apply filters to a folder and a
parked message meets the filtering criteria. The parked message is
copied to the destination folder and then parked. The original parked
message remains in the target
and then parked. The original parked
Ali message remains in the target folder. If you apply the filter again,
Ali the parked message gets copied again and so on.
Ali I realized this when trying to figure out why ten copies of a number
Ali of parked messages were in a particular folder. I have been applying
57 matches
Mail list logo
