Re: Archiving attachments

sk'. I created this one to extract JPG attachments. Is no mask is indicated, all attachments will be extracted, including .html ones. Then select a folder in your folder tree and 'Re-filter' it with Read Filter, but selecting 'Manual filter only'. You will have to re-filter each folder, one

Re: Archiving attachments

jpg IsManual IsActive Ignore endFilter Once pasted, you may change the target directory to your desired one and/or the attachments 'mask'. I created this one to extract JPG attachments. Is no mask is indicated, all attachments will be extracted, including .html ones. Then selec

Re: Transfer TB

Hello Rick, Sunday, January 15, 2017, 4:38:48 AM, you wrote: > That is the ideal way if the TBK file doesn't go corrupt which I > have had happen several times. I personally don't trust it but you > are correct - that is the best way to do it If you do Folder|Maintainance Center|Check

Re: Transfer TB

> In any case, backing up manually is always recommended; but I would > use the manual way only if the automated backup-restore doesn't work. > It has worked without problems the last couple of times over the > years. You don't NEED to copy the registry key. If you don't do it, you will have to

Re: Transfer TB

regedit /e c:\test\test.reg HKEY_CURRENT_USER\Software\RIT > That is the ideal way if the TBK file doesn't go corrupt which I > have had happen several times. I personally don't trust it but you > are correct - that is the best way to do it Because I've more programs installed of which the

Re: Transfer TB

Hello Sam, On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 23:03:43 -0500 GMT (15-Jan-17, 11:03 +0700 GMT), Sam Brown wrote: > Saturday, January 14, 2017, 9:38:48 PM, Rick wrote: > Copy your mail directory to somewhere where you can restore from. > Run this and change the path to where you want it to go and rename

Re: Transfer TB

Saturday, January 14, 2017, 9:38:48 PM, Rick wrote: Copy your mail directory to somewhere where you can restore from. Run this and change the path to where you want it to go and rename it to something that makes sense for you as this example would put "test.reg" in the

Re: Transfer TB

>>> Copy your mail directory to somewhere where you can restore from. >>> Run this and change the path to where you want it to go and rename >>> it to something that makes sense for you as this example would put >>> "test.reg" in the "C:\test". i put mine in the mail directory >>> regedit /e

Re: Transfer TB

Hello Goos, On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 19:58:17 +0100 GMT (15-Jan-17, 01:58 +0700 GMT), Goos wrote: > Hi Rick, >> Copy your mail directory to somewhere where you can restore from. >> Run this and change the path to where you want it to go and rename >> it to something that makes sense for you as this

Re: Transfer TB

Hi Rick, > Copy your mail directory to somewhere where you can restore from. > Run this and change the path to where you want it to go and rename > it to something that makes sense for you as this example would put > "test.reg" in the "C:\test". i put mine in the mail directory > regedit /e

Re: Transfer TB

> Hi! > It is too many years ago I transferred The Bat from an old to a new > PC, so that I forgot how to do that. > Now it is time again to such a transfer ... my old PC will be replaced > by a new one. So > How do I completely The Bat with all its settings, the way, that > everything will be

Re: copying filter rules from computer A to computer B

Saturday, January 14, 2017, 12:33:16 PM, you wrote: > You could take the opportunity to change them all to Common Filters Common Filters is a much better place. Then you only have one filter to add / change that will work for all your email addresses. I still have some leftover in

Re: copying filter rules from computer A to computer B

Hi On Tuesday 10 January 2017 at 11:32:02 AM, in , MAU wrote:- > Hello Avram, >> Is there a way I can replace the filters rules for >> that account on >> computer B with the rules that are on computer A? > On computer A: > - Locate your MAIL

Re: copying filter rules from computer A to computer B

Hello Avram, > Is there a way I can replace the filters rules for that account on > computer B with the rules that are on computer A? On computer A: - Locate your MAIL directory, if you don't already know where it is: - On TB's menu, select Options/Preferences/System and your MAIL

Re: Recovering address book file

Hi Rick, Yah, we did recover most of it and picked up a few since the last backup, so all isn't lost except for time. And now we've got two tools which can help in other ways with your recommendations. Thanks again, Rick. On Saturday, January 07, 2017 at 2:26:45 PM you wrote: >> Further on

Re: Recovering address book file

> Further on Recuva's progress. It did find the .abd. But, when she > tried to open it from the addressbook, it didn't show the > filename, and it had 0 entries. > Many thanks for your help. Somehow the file must have gotten > shredded in the accidental delete. OUCH Sorry to hear that. Been

Re: Recovering address book file

Hi Rick, On Saturday, January 07, 2017 at 12:42:58 PM you wrote: MM> On Friday, January 06, 2017 at 11:15:18 PM you wrote: R Get recuva R http://www.piriform.com/recuva R Install it on a stick it you can although it "probably" won't R overwrite the latest lost files if you

Re: Recovering address book file

Hi Rick, On Friday, January 06, 2017 at 11:15:18 PM you wrote: An addressbook file was accidentally deleted. It is not in the trash folder. Is there a way to recover it? Many thanks for help. R>>> Get recuva R>>> http://www.piriform.com/recuva R>>> Install it on a stick it you can

Re: Recovering address book file

>>> An addressbook file was accidentally deleted. It is not in the >>> trash folder. Is there a way to recover it? Many thanks for help. R>> Get recuva R>> http://www.piriform.com/recuva R>> Install it on a stick it you can although it "probably" won't R>> overwrite the latest lost files if you

Re: Recovering address book file

Hi Rick, On Friday, January 06, 2017 at 9:41:32 PM you wrote: >> An addressbook file was accidentally deleted. It is not in the >> trash folder. Is there a way to recover it? Many thanks for help. R> Get recuva R> http://www.piriform.com/recuva R> Install it on a stick it you can although it

Re: Recovering address book file

> An addressbook file was accidentally deleted. It is not in the > trash folder. Is there a way to recover it? Many thanks for help. Get recuva http://www.piriform.com/recuva Install it on a stick it you can although it "probably" won't overwrite the latest lost files if you install it to your

Re: Lost default folders

> Hi list >> Have you tried crtl-alt-del-L? > Hmm - what is this? Never saw this shortcut. I only I know this one: > "ctrl-alt-del". I think it is SHIFT / CONTROL / ALT L It will restore hidden folders including dictionaries, imgfiles etc but also the ones that were accidentally removed from

Re: Lost default folders

Hi list > Have you tried crtl-alt-del-L? Hmm - what is this? Never saw this shortcut. I only I know this one: "ctrl-alt-del". -- Regardes,, Martin Current version is 7.1 | 'Using TBUDL' information:

Re: Lost default folders

Hello Martin, On Mon, 2 Jan 2017 10:10:30 +0100 GMT (02-Jan-17, 16:10 +0700 GMT), Martin Schoch wrote: > Hi list > I have several POP and IMAP accounts - no problem at all. > When I remember correctly there was on first install of TheBat also > some default folders for inbox, sent, trash - but

Re: Google continually asking for access permissions

> I don't get that issue with Google on Version 7.3.12.18 (ALPHA) > (64-bit) > Every once in a while my gmail or one of my yahoo accounts start doing > something like this and I have to log into their webmail to clear the > problem. And sometimes it might be an issue with TB! not recognising a

Re: Google continually asking for access permissions

Hi On Tuesday 20 December 2016 at 5:26:17 PM, in , Rick wrote:- >> Hello Rick, >> On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:40:45 -0500 GMT (20-Dec-16, >> 08:40 +0700 GMT), >> Rick wrote: >>> This was an old problem that surfaced again since >>> the last beta (and a

Re: Google continually asking for access permissions

> Hello Rick, > On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:40:45 -0500 GMT (20-Dec-16, 08:40 +0700 GMT), > Rick wrote: >> This was an old problem that surfaced again since the last beta (and a >> system reset) >> When I start the progtam, I get MANY prompts allow google to access in The >> Bat! >> Would someone

Re: TB! 7.4: Fast!

Hello Maxim, On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 15:45:00 +0200 GMT (20-Dec-16, 20:45 +0700 GMT), Maxim Masiutin wrote: > Hello Thomas, > Tuesday, December 20, 2016, 3:26:18 PM, you wrote: >> The increase in speed is incredible! I'm not easily impressed, but >> this was really something. > Thank you! In

Re: TB! 7.4: Fast!

Hello Thomas, Tuesday, December 20, 2016, 3:26:18 PM, you wrote: > The increase in speed is incredible! I'm not easily impressed, but > this was really something. Thank you! In which of the areas did you notice the increase of speed? The time that takes the program to start, or how quickly it

Re: Disable schedules for all mail accounts

Hello Adrian, On Tue, 20 Dec 2016 14:31:09 +0100 GMT (20-Dec-16, 20:31 +0700 GMT), Adrian Godfrey wrote: > Is it possble to disable / enable the automated checking for ALL mail > accounts or do I have to go into each one individually? You have to disable this for each account individually. --

Re: Google continually asking for access permissions

Hello Rick, On Mon, 19 Dec 2016 20:40:45 -0500 GMT (20-Dec-16, 08:40 +0700 GMT), Rick wrote: > This was an old problem that surfaced again since the last beta (and a system > reset) > When I start the progtam, I get MANY prompts allow google to access in The > Bat! > Would someone please

Re: Suddenly can't delete messages from one folder

Hello Rick, Friday, December 9, 2016, 6:36:22 PM, you wrote: > Yes it is an issue with IMAP and Gmail. The bat does not clean out the "ALL > MAIL" folder After hours of trying things, I finally deleted the affected folder and recreated with a different name, as using the same name just

Re: Suddenly can't delete messages from one folder

Hello Rick, Friday, December 9, 2016, 6:36:22 PM, you wrote: > Yes it is an issue with IMAP and Gmail. The bat does not clean out > the "ALL MAIL" folder nor the spam folder. You have to access the > web every so often and clean it yourself. I reported it in bug > tracker once but no one seemed

Re: Suddenly can't delete messages from one folder

> Hello, > about an hour ago, I noticed that messages deleted from one folder > would pop right back, instead of staying in the trash folder. > I suspect it has something to do with using Gmail/Imap, but can't > for my life figure out what could be going on and what could have >

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Goos, On Friday, December 9, 2016 you wrote: >> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server >> suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a >> *plus* >> to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Goos, On Friday, December 9, 2016 you wrote: >> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server >> suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a >> *plus* >> to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted

Re: Antispamsniper

> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server > suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a > *plus* > to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted or > eliminated entirely but keep in mind that I'm new to

Re: Antispamsniper

> As far as AntiSpamSniper making decisions before emails even leave the server > suggests you have the "Pro" version which advertises that procedure as a > *plus* > to AntiSpamSniper. However, I think that feature can either be adjusted or > eliminated entirely but keep in mind that I'm new to

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Goos, On Friday, December 9, 2016 you wrote: >> Although I am new to A-SS, for me it automatically moves messages it thinks >> are >> spam to my JUNK folder. I then go into the JUNK folder and manually mark good >> messages as NOT JUNK and move them to where they're supposed to be. From

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello there! This discussion ... about Antispamsniper ... shortened to ASS and A-SS: Keep in mind that ASS and especially A-SS probably has a Spam Score. A-SS likely has a HIGHER (!) Spam Score than ASS simply because it is considered to represent the A-word by an obfuscated version. I suggest

Re: Antispamsniper

> Although I am new to A-SS, for me it automatically moves messages it thinks > are > spam to my JUNK folder. I then go into the JUNK folder and manually mark good > messages as NOT JUNK and move them to where they're supposed to be. From then > on > A-SS shouldn't ever mark those as junk again

Re: Antispamsniper

> > Antispamsniper obviously marks many mails as spam which I did not > mark myself so. Among them are even mails for which I was waiting, > like order confirmations by Amazon. > > My TB has separate folders for Amazon, Ebay, Facebook, etc. When I > got mails there I delete them after reading.

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Goos, On Thursday, December 8, 2016 you wrote: G> Hi, G> Antispamsniper obviously marks many mails as spam which I did not G> mark myself so. Among them are even mails for which I was waiting, G> like order confirmations by Amazon. G> My TB has separate folders for Amazon, Ebay,

Re: Antispamsniper

Hi On Sunday 4 December 2016 at 10:00:13 AM, in , Adrian Godfrey wrote:- > Another way. Where is your executable? Is it in > "Program Files" or > "Program Files(x86)"? If it is the first one, it > is 64-bit. If the > second one, it is 32-bit.

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Jack, On Sat, 3 Dec 2016 09:59:03 -0600 GMT (03-Dec-16, 22:59 +0700 GMT), Jack S. LaRosa wrote: > Hello MFPA, > On Saturday, December 3, 2016 you wrote: M>> Hi M>> On Wednesday 30 November 2016 at 9:00:03 AM, in M>> , Adrian Godfrey wrote:- >>>

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Adrian, On Sunday, December 4, 2016 you wrote: AG> Saturday, December 3, 2016, 4:59:03 PM, you wrote: M>>>My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" M>>> M>>>My TB! executable is called "thebat64.exe" >> Just for the record also, none of the examples

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Jack, M>> I know Jack has resolved this already, but just for the record:- > M>> M>>In Help | About my version description ends with "(64-bit)" M>> M>>My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" M>> M>>My TB! executable is called

Re: Antispamsniper

Saturday, December 3, 2016, 4:59:03 PM, you wrote: M>>My Windows start menu shortcut is called "The Bat! (64-bit)" M>> M>>My TB! executable is called "thebat64.exe" > Just for the record also, none of the examples you gave hold true for me > running > the 32 bit version. One

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello MFPA, On Saturday, December 3, 2016 you wrote: M> Hi M> On Wednesday 30 November 2016 at 9:00:03 AM, in M> , Adrian Godfrey wrote:- >> Monday, November 28, 2016, 9:48:30 PM, you wrote: >>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know >>> whether

Re: Antispamsniper

Hi On Wednesday 30 November 2016 at 9:00:03 AM, in , Adrian Godfrey wrote:- > Monday, November 28, 2016, 9:48:30 PM, you wrote: >> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know >> whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit >> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do

Re: Antispamsniper

Hi On Wednesday 16 November 2016 at 7:48:28 PM, in , Richard Newman wrote:- > I'm pretty sure that if it is registered it is the > pro version. RITlabs sell licences for both Home and Pro versions. You are only allowed to use TB! for a few weeks

Re: Changing directory

Friday, December 2, 2016, 1:06:07 AM, you wrote: > Hello Rick, > On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 22:47:44 -0500 GMT (01-Dec-16, 10:47 +0700 GMT), > Rick wrote: >>> interestingly enough I changed the directory now and TB rebuilt all >>> the folders and once I restarted the bat, not only did everything

Re: Changing directory

Hello Rick, On Wed, 30 Nov 2016 22:47:44 -0500 GMT (01-Dec-16, 10:47 +0700 GMT), Rick wrote: >> interestingly enough I changed the directory now and TB rebuilt all >> the folders and once I restarted the bat, not only did everything work >> but all the old emails were already there. I did

Re: Changing directory

> interestingly enough I changed the directory now and TB rebuilt all > the folders and once I restarted the bat, not only did everything work > but all the old emails were already there. I did not expect that. I guess when you change the mail folder it does the move for you. I did not know

Re: Changing directory

Thursday, December 1, 2016, 1:19:22 PM, you wrote: > Yes you can revert. You can save out any new messages and import > them to the new location. If you are taking it into the shop,just > copy the data folder to your OS drive and put it back when you get the drive > situation figured out

Re: Changing directory

> I have my Bat configured to store all mail on an internal separate > drive different from the Os. Same here > This drive appears to have issues I want to remove it before checking > it out further or replacing it. At the moment it still works and I > have a full backup. > If I

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Rick, On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 you wrote: >> Thanks Adrian. As can be seen from my earlier reply to Lore, I was able to >> use >> Belarc to determine what (bit)version I am using. I just downloaded and >> installed A-SS this morning and did a fetch - as luck would have it, none of

Re: Antispamsniper

> Thanks Adrian. As can be seen from my earlier reply to Lore, I was able to use > Belarc to determine what (bit)version I am using. I just downloaded and > installed A-SS this morning and did a fetch - as luck would have it, none of > the > fetched emails wound up in the JUNK folder. I guess I

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Adrian, On Wednesday, November 30, 2016 you wrote: AG> Monday, November 28, 2016, 9:48:30 PM, you wrote: >> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 >> bit >> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out? AG> Look at the Windows

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Lore, On Monday, November 28, 2016 you wrote: LG> On 11/28/2016 1:55 PM, Arkadiusz Gawlik wrote: >> Hello Jack, >> >> On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 10:32:06 PM, you wrote in subject of >> "Antispamsniper": >> JSL>>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a >>

Re: Antispamsniper

On 11/28/2016 1:55 PM, Arkadiusz Gawlik wrote: Hello Jack, On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 10:32:06 PM, you wrote in subject of "Antispamsniper": JSL>>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit JSL>>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello TBUDL@thebat., Tuesday, November 29, 2016, 7:48:30 AM, you wrote: JSL> Hello Richard, JSL> On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 you wrote: RN>> Hello Goos, RN>> Wednesday, November 16, 2016, 2:01:14 PM, you wrote: G>>> The problem is, I don't know (anymore) which of the two versions I G>>>

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Jack, On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 10:32:06 PM, you wrote in subject of "Antispamsniper": JSL>>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit JSL>>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out? RN>> Look in "Help" "About"! JSL> I

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Richard, On Monday, November 28, 2016 you wrote: RN> Hello Jack, RN> Monday, November 28, 2016, 3:48:30 PM, you wrote: JSL>> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit JSL>> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out? RN> Look in

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Jack, Monday, November 28, 2016, 3:48:30 PM, you wrote: JSL> I am considering installing A-SS but don't know whether I'm using a 32 or 64 bit JSL> TB!. It's v6.0.12 if that helps. Do you know how to find out? Look in "Help" "About"! -- Best regards, Richard

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Richard, On Wednesday, November 16, 2016 you wrote: RN> Hello Goos, RN> Wednesday, November 16, 2016, 2:01:14 PM, you wrote: G>> The problem is, I don't know (anymore) which of the two versions I G>> have. In ma program, under 'About' it states that the program is G>> registered on my

Re[2]: Best spam filter for TB!

11/28/2016 1:56 PM Hi Arkadiusz, On 11/28/2016 Arkadiusz Gawlik wrote: AG> Hello Jack, AG> On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 5:35:21 PM, you wrote in subject of "Best spam filter for TB!": JSL>> Anyway, the long and short of this message is a request to learn what this group JSL>> thinks is

Re: Best spam filter for TB!

Hello Jack, On Monday, November 28, 2016 at 5:35:21 PM, you wrote in subject of "Best spam filter for TB!": JSL> Anyway, the long and short of this message is a request to learn what this group JSL> thinks is a good spam filter for TB! today. We are both running v6.xx and JSL> Windows 10. I

Re: Antispamsniper

Hello Goos, Wednesday, November 16, 2016, 2:01:14 PM, you wrote: G> The problem is, I don't know (anymore) which of the two versions I G> have. In ma program, under 'About' it states that the program is G> registered on my name, on the other hand, I do not see the term G> 'Pro' for the commercial

Re: Problems with size (width) of HTML messages using internal viewer

e of writing HTML formatting had apparently been fixed in the latest versions. The BugTraq report has even been closed. Since then, I too have been disappointed to see images swelling the HTML again and have reported this to the developers. My apologies for the mislead - entirely uninten

Re: Problems with size (width) of HTML messages using internal viewer

Saturday, September 24, 2016, 12:12:19 AM, Richard L de S Clauson (rich...@virbius.co.uk) wrote: > Thursday, September 22, 2016, 1:42:15 PM, Marck Pearlstone > (ma...@silverstones.com) wrote: >> Dear Richard, >> >> @22-Sep-2016, 6:03 +0100 (22-Sep 12:26 here) Richard L de S Clauson >> [RLD] in

Re: checking for attachment

Hi On Monday 24 October 2016 at 9:13:03 AM, in , Tony Brookes wrote:- > Dwight, Outlook (recent versions) have that > functionality. TB! can check on attachments with a filter on outgoing messages.

RE: checking for attachment

On Sunday, October 23, 2016, 10:31:38 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: >> No, there isn't. If you don't attach anything, TB! cannot know that >> you wanted to. >Don't recall which one, but I've set up a client which noticed if you used the > word attach or attachment in your subject or text,

Re: checking for attachment

On Sunday, October 23, 2016, 10:31:38 AM, Thomas Fernandez wrote: > No, there isn't. If you don't attach anything, TB! cannot know that > you wanted to. Don't recall which one, but I've set up a client which noticed if you used the word attach or attachment in your subject or text, and

Re: checking for attachment

Hello Tom, On Thu, 20 Oct 2016 13:09:45 +1100 GMT (20-Oct-16, 09:09 +0700 GMT), Tom wrote: > Just wondering if there is a setting to have TB check on attachments > before sending it and warn if necessary - in case I miss actually > attaching it before > clicking the send button. No,

Re: Moving The Bat!

Hi On Sunday 9 October 2016 at 4:42:06 PM, in , Mike Greenbaum wrote:- > I will be moving to another new Windows 7 machine which will > support 64-bit (actually, the old computer supports 64-bit--not > sure why I'm using the 32-bit). Probably just

Re: Moving The Bat!

>> I will be moving to another new Windows 7 machine which will >> support 64-bit (actually, the old computer supports 64-bit--not sure why I'm >> using the 32-bit). >> I have a current backup named BatBackup2.tbk which is stored off-site. >> Since I'm a bit of a dunce at this, can someone let

Re: Moving The Bat!

Hello Mike, On Sun, 9 Oct 2016 08:42:06 -0700 GMT (09-Oct-16, 22:42 +0700 GMT), Mike Greenbaum wrote: > In the next week or so, I will be replacing the computer on which The Bat! is > located. > I'm a registered user of 6.4.0.2 (32-bit) currently on a Windows 7 machine. > I will be moving to

Re: Problems with size (width) of HTML messages using internal viewer

Thursday, September 22, 2016, 1:42:15 PM, Marck Pearlstone (ma...@silverstones.com) wrote: > Dear Richard, > > @22-Sep-2016, 6:03 +0100 (22-Sep 12:26 here) Richard L de S Clauson > [RLD] in mid:967995112.20160922122...@virbius.co.uk said to TBUDL: > > ... > > email ends up much wider

Re: "Properties" damaged in 7.3.4

Hello Gene, > Thanks for your response, Tony, > Problem confirmed and solved by Tech Support. Any display > setting not equal to 100% may cause troubles. >> Cannot confirm the problem in 7.3.4.1. I can see both updown numeric >> boxes. Glad I helped. Not. ;-) -- Best regards, Tony

Re: "Properties" damaged in 7.3.4

Hello TheBat, Thanks for your response, Tony, Problem confirmed and solved by Tech Support. Any display setting not equal to 100% may cause troubles. Thursday, September 22, 2016, 9:44:25 AM, you wrote: > Hello Gene, > Thursday, September 22, 2016, 1:34:48 PM, you wrote: >> Hello , >>

Re: "Properties" damaged in 7.3.4

Hello Gene, Thursday, September 22, 2016, 1:34:48 PM, you wrote: > Hello , > With Version 7.3.4, folder properties referring to "Imap > Specific" has a checkbox for "Keep Message in the base > for...", but does not have anywhere to input the amount of > days (or number of

Re: Problems with size (width) of HTML messages using internal viewer

Dear Richard, @22-Sep-2016, 6:03 +0100 (22-Sep 12:26 here) Richard L de S Clauson [RLD] in mid:967995112.20160922122...@virbius.co.uk said to TBUDL: ... email ends up much wider than the message plane in the 3-plane layout I use >> ... This is a bug in TB that was fixed 2 betas ago

Re: Problems with size (width) of HTML messages using internal viewer

Tuesday, September 13, 2016, 9:27:08 AM, Marck Pearlstone (ma...@silverstones.com) wrote: > Dear Richard, > > @13-Sep-2016, 0:41 +0100 (13-Sep 07:00 here) Richard L de S Clauson > [RLD] in mid:273697223.20160913070...@virbius.co.uk said to Richard: > RLD>> Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 6:42:35

Re: The Whole BODY of the Message

Hi On Sunday 18 September 2016 at 12:56:29 AM, in , Bill McQuillan wrote:- > The only way I have been able to accomplish the task is through the > use of Export Messages, but that interface is poor and doesn't even > allow me to specify a file name. If

Re: Searching for DSN reports

Hello Jack, TH>> I have opened a ticket: https://bt.ritlabs.com/view.php?id=925 > Just out of curiosity have you tried searching for just "Reporting" or even > just > "Report" or "MTA" by itself? I hadn't but have now. Messages still not found. -- Best regards, Tony

Re: Searching for DSN reports

Hello Tony, On Saturday, September 17, 2016 you wrote: TH> Hello Jack, TH> Friday, September 16, 2016, 5:50:55 PM, you wrote: Is TB! ignoring the section? I am searching for Any Part and have also tried looking in attachments. >> I have found that "Any Part" doesn't mean any part.

Re: Searching for DSN reports

Hello Jack, Friday, September 16, 2016, 5:50:55 PM, you wrote: >>> Is TB! ignoring the section? I am searching for Any Part and have also >>> tried looking in attachments. > I have found that "Any Part" doesn't mean any part. Try searching using > "Text". Thanks for the suggestion but TB!

Re: Searching for DSN reports

Hello Tony, On Friday, September 16, 2016 you wrote: TH> Hello Tony, TH> Tuesday, August 9, 2016, 9:11:56 PM, you wrote: >> Hello Tbudl, >> I am searching for the string "Reporting-MTA" in the messagebase to >> find the DSN reports. I understand that there are a number of >> things to

Re: Searching for DSN reports

Hello Tony, Tuesday, August 9, 2016, 9:11:56 PM, you wrote: > Hello Tbudl, > I am searching for the string "Reporting-MTA" in the messagebase to > find the DSN reports. I understand that there are a number of > things to search for but TB! cannot find this particular string. > However, I can

Re: mail messages open up as new instance of application

Thursday, September 15, 2016, 9:00:13 PM, you wrote: > See Help | Help Topics | "Contents" tab | expand "Reading Mail" | > Folder View. > > "The "Message Viewer" window is actually a Folder View window > and (by default) hides a list of messages stored in the >

Re: mail messages open up as new instance of application

Hi On Thursday 15 September 2016 at 10:58:16 AM, in , Adrian Godfrey wrote:- > But why does that new window even open at all? See Help | Help Topics | "Contents" tab | expand "Reading Mail" | Folder View. "The "Message

Re: Resend sends immediately with no option to edit/confirm

Thursday, September 15, 2016, 2:59:38 PM, you wrote: > Select the Message Menu and then Select "Edit as New". Thanks. "Edit as new" does what I expected "resend" to do. I wonder why "resend" is even there. Adrian Current version is 7.1 |

Re: Resend sends immediately with no option to edit/confirm

Hello Adrian, Thursday, September 15, 2016, 5:50:25 AM, you wrote: > The "resend" option only seems to be in the "Message" menu. It does > not seem to be visible by right clicking on the actual message. > The "Resend" in the "Message" menu sends immediately and does > not give an

Re: mail messages open up as new instance of application

Thursday, September 15, 2016, 12:29:06 AM, you wrote: > In the new window, you could try:- >View | Show message list | Hide But why does that new window even open at all? It happens for me as well (previously version 7.3.1 but also with 7.3.2). Windows 7 Ultimate is my operating

Re: mail messages open up as new instance of application

Hi, Wednesday, September 14, 2016, 5:29:06 PM, you wrote: M> In the new window, you could try:- M>View | Show message list | Hide Thanks. Don't know how I missed that. -- Avi Avram Sacks, using The Bat! Pro ver. 7.1.18 on Win 7 Pro

Re: mail messages open up as new instance of application

Hi On Wednesday 14 September 2016 at 3:43:35 PM, in , Achdut18 wrote:- > How can I restore the configuration to what it > had been such that the message opens up by itself? In the new window, you could try:- View | Show message list |

Re: Reg Exp "ReWrap" macro that worked in TB! v4.0.38 not working correctly in v7.

Hi On Sunday 11 September 2016 at 12:58:14 PM, in , MFPA wrote:- > Hi > Since upgrading from TB! v4 to v7, I have noticed > extra blank lines > appearing in the quoted text when I reply to some > messages. > I had time today to investigate which

Re: Problems with size (width) of HTML messages using internal viewer

Dear Richard, @13-Sep-2016, 0:41 +0100 (13-Sep 07:00 here) Richard L de S Clauson [RLD] in mid:273697223.20160913070...@virbius.co.uk said to Richard: RLD> Tuesday, August 30, 2016, 6:42:35 PM, Richard L de S Clauson (rich...@virbius.co.uk) wrote: ... >> email ends up much wider than the

Re: Problems with size (width) of HTML messages using internal viewer

edded images, is that the > email ends up much wider than the message plane in the 3-plane layout I use > can display (folders all down left side, folder content top-right, message > bottom-right). > > When I temporarily switch from "Use The Bat! HTML viewer" to "Use Win

<    10   11   12   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   >