Re: shared folders - one more try

Hello Peter, On Wed, 12 Mar 2003 11:56:35 +0100 GMT (12/03/03, 17:56 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: TF>> In any case, I think the current version of not locking files at all TF>> is dangerous if two users write to it at the same time. Any TF>> application that is networkable should you file

Re: shared folders - one more try

Hello Thomas, On Tuesday, March 11, 2003 at 3:59:45 PM you [TF]wrote (at least in part): TF> In any case, I think the current version of not locking files at all TF> is dangerous if two users write to it at the same time. Any TF> application that is networkable should you file locks. This is true

Re: shared folders - one more try

Hello Peter, On Tue, 11 Mar 2003 10:00:23 +0100 GMT (11/03/03, 16:00 +0700 GMT), Peter Palmreuther wrote: > So your best bet is: Create a Wishlist item (follow the URL in list > footer) for _Shared folders_. RIT could this way create a special > kind of folders, marked as "sharable" which makes u

Re[2]: shared folders - one more try

hi, Peter Palmreuther said among others: P> They're named "Common folders" not because the can be shared P> without hassle between different people, but only because they don't P> belong to an account. ok, that's my fault. i barked the wrong tree. thx alexander -- Using The Bat! v1.62i on Windo

Re: shared folders - one more try

Hello Jernejcic, On Monday, March 10, 2003 at 8:17:06 PM you [JA]wrote (at least in part): P>> No ... but were in The Bat! you've seen "shared folders"? JA> what a sophisticated question. That's what I'm known for ;-) JA> I am talking abount the folders, t

Re[2]: shared folders - one more try

hi, Peter Palmreuther asked: P> No ... but were in The Bat! you've seen "shared folders"? what a sophisticated question. I am talking abount the folders, that are called "common folders" in The Bat! . imho, to use common folders could sometimes, in very special sit

Re: shared folders - one more try

Hello Jernejcic, On Wednesday, March 5, 2003 at 9:13:32 PM you [JA]wrote (at least in part): JA> is there anybody out there *really* using shared folders with more JA> than two users simultaniously? No ... but were in The Bat! you've seen "shared folders"? -- Regards Peter

Re[2]: shared folders - one more try

hi, i think it's time to polish up my english ;) Mark Wieder said: M> message said you explicitly did *not* want to share the folders...? M> Maybe you could provide some clue as to what you're trying to do and M> what isn't working. to say it in short: i expected

Re: shared folders - one more try

hi- Sure - we've been round about this before. Works fine for me with about a dozen users. But I thought your last message said you explicitly did *not* want to share the folders...? Maybe you could provide some clue as to what you're trying to do and what isn't working. -Mark Wieder Using The

shared folders - one more try

hi, is there anybody out there *really* using shared folders with more than two users simultaniously? please share your experiences and solutions with me ;) thx alexander -- The Bat 1.62i, W2K with Citrix Metaframe Current version is 1.62

Re: Shared Folders

TM> I am the one still using an IMAP server. (It is still working fine). TM> Is it possible to set something up in order to access shared folders TM> (on the IMAP server its no problem) or to have incoming mails TM> visualized to more then on users? (that do not have necessarily TM

Re: Shared Folders

Hi Thomas, > I am the one still using an IMAP server. (It is still working > fine). Is it possible to set something up in order to access > shared folders (on the IMAP server its no problem) or to have > incoming mails visualized to more then on users? (that do not have > necessa

Shared Folders

Hello, the Bat! list recipients, I am the one still using an IMAP server. (It is still working fine). Is it possible to set something up in order to access shared folders (on the IMAP server its no problem) or to have incoming mails visualized to more then on users? (that do not have necessarily