huge snip
*IMPORTANT* E-MAIL* let's see. Is that an oxymoron? Yes, it most
certainly is in my household and after more than a decade of promoting
it, encouraging people to use it, and trying to take it seriously, I
have finally decided to step back and look at what it is, what isn't,
what it
On Thu 12-Jun-03 5:17pm -0400, Mark wrote:
MainSet: 40a.+,a.+,a.+,a.+,
AltSet:1: 40a.+ , a.+ , a.+ ,a.+ ,
AltSet:2: 40a.+, a.+, a.+, a.+,
AltSet:3: 40a.+,a.+,a.+,a.+,
Mark, wouldn't anything found by AltSet 1, 2 or 3 would also be found
by MainSet? Also, the docs aren't clear which PCRE
Mark,
Thursday, June 12, 2003, 3:50:17 PM, you wrote:
M I think there are two schools of thought here. I for one prefer to
M deal with spam with my own filters - the absolute last thing I want
M is for some third party tool to decide what mail I get. I want to
M understand EXACTLY how my mail is
snip
The filtering system you presented, if I remember correctly, rejects
all HTML email out of hand. This seems kinda draconian to me. I'll
bet a lot of those rejections are false positives. POPFile actually
reads the HTML and can correctly distinguish spam-HTML from
non-spam-HTML.
To
Mike,
Friday, June 13, 2003, 9:49:12 AM, you wrote:
MA To this author, e-mail is text; HTML belongs on the web; HTML in
MA e-mail is spam.
MA Read my lips: Not a thing draconian about that logic.
Ain't irony great? Anyway, if you're really interested in the topic,
you might want to read:
Hello Mike,
Friday, June 13, 2003, 11:49:12 AM, you wrote:
To this author, e-mail is text; HTML belongs on the web; HTML in
e-mail is spam.
Read my lips: Not a thing draconian about that logic.
Anyway, that's my (limited) experience.
As you say, your experience is limited.
While in
Hello,
Friday, June 13, 2003, 6:49:12 PM, you wrote:
MA snip
The filtering system you presented, if I remember correctly, rejects
all HTML email out of hand. This seems kinda draconian to me. I'll
bet a lot of those rejections are false positives. POPFile actually
reads the HTML and can
While in general I agree with your sentiments about HTML email,
I do make exceptions for HTML newsletters, untrained
family/friends, and the like. In my not-so-limited email
experience I would agree that rejecting *all* HTML seems
draconian. But if it works for you, so be it.
Agreed. So be
MA To this author, e-mail is text; HTML belongs on the web; HTML in
MA e-mail is spam.
No, it is not.
Fine. Those who created e-mail, and I was present for that, are
declared the losers, and those who want to send pretty flowers and
silly pink backgrounds with their e-mails (never mind that it
Hello,
Friday, June 13, 2003, 7:44:22 PM, you wrote:
MA Fine. Those who created e-mail, and I was present for that, are
MA declared the losers, and those who want to send pretty flowers and
MA silly pink backgrounds with their e-mails (never mind that it gets
MA bloated 10-times necessary
Whilst I'm not a moderator of this list, may I remind the majority of you
who are chatting in this thread that this list is about an email program
called The Bat!, and not Spam filtering, the internet and privacy, and
whatnot.
Thank you.
--
Best regards,
neurowerx (http://www.neurowerx.de)
In
On Friday, June 13, 2003, 00:50:17, Mark wrote:
I want to understand EXACTLY how my mail is triaged and why,
particularly on my critical accounts.
The programs I mentioned don't trash the mail, they mark it. What you do
with it afterwards is left up to you.
I use SpamAssassin on a mail server I
Hello Mike,
Friday, June 13, 2003, 12:32:49 PM, you wrote:
Nor are my uninformed/untrained family/friends sending me
unsolicited commercial email when they send me HTML emails.
Uninformed/untrained family/friends are, or should be, trainable by
a respected and experienced user.
You don't
On Friday, June 13, 2003, 00:47:19, Joseph N. wrote:
Any opinion about how either measures up to SpamPal?
My opinio is that they'll do a better job, universally. Spammers will
aways find open, still unidentified relays. When I'm not mistaken, SpamPal
only queries RBLs. Don't always trust RBLs!
The era of 28k modems are over. Get on with it! I could not care less
if a message is 1 kb or 10 kb, or God forbid 1 Mb.
If your logic continues, very soon even the present internet
infrastructure will be inadequate. I have a commercial broadband
account and am unafraid of a 200+ Megabyte
Hello,
Friday, June 13, 2003, 8:10:43 PM, you wrote:
nwd Whilst I'm not a moderator of this list, may I remind the majority of you
nwd who are chatting in this thread that this list is about an email program
nwd called The Bat!, and not Spam filtering, the internet and privacy, and
nwd whatnot.
I have stated that while in general I do not like HTML email, but
am willing to make specific exceptions. I have stated that for
that reason, for my purposes I would consider a rejection of
*all* HTML email as draconian. I have stated that classifying all
HTML email as spam does not fit the
Hello Mike,
Friday, June 13, 2003, 1:40:52 PM, you wrote:
Sorry Dave. I view dictionaries, as the late lexicographer David P.
Guralnick said Dictionaries are historical documents, recording
where a language was at the time it went to print (or words to that
effect.
The great Ambrose
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Apsey, [MA] wrote:
The era of 28k modems are over. Get on with it! I could not care less
if a message is 1 kb or 10 kb, or God forbid 1 Mb.
MA If your logic continues, very soon even the present internet
MA infrastructure will be inadequate.
Dear Bats
Here is a regex spam filter folks might find useful
It picks up emails addressed to a whole bunch of people with the
same starting letter or the same domain, eg in my case something
like.
[EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED], [EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED] .
or
[EMAIL
Hi Mark,
On Thursday, June 12, 2003, 23:17:05, Mark wrote:
Here is a regex spam filter folks might find useful
[...]
That is a good way to start, but there are more powerful spam filters.
SAProxy is a Windows incarnation of SpamAssassin, a very widely used and
thoroughly perfected spam filter
On Thursday, June 12, 2003, Roman Katzer wrote in
mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
RK SAProxy is a Windows incarnation of SpamAssassin, a very widely
RK used and thoroughly perfected spam filter which looks for all
RK kinds of clues in a mail. It gives positive points for spam
RK indicators and negative
RK Hi Mark,
RK That is a good way to start, but there are more powerful spam filters.
RK SAProxy is a Windows incarnation of SpamAssassin, a very widely used and
RK ...
RK training but seems pretty stable and dependable.
I think there are two schools of thought here. I for one prefer
to deal
Hello,
Friday, June 13, 2003, 1:02:32 AM, you wrote:
CK There's only one problem that I saw, which is
CK negligible. If one receives an e-mail with a large attachment, K9
CK chews on it for quite some time. You can give it a try here:
CK http://keir.net .
I have just checked. The new 1.05
Hello,
Thursday, June 12, 2003, 11:44:19 PM, you wrote:
RK Hi Mark,
RK On Thursday, June 12, 2003, 23:17:05, Mark wrote:
Here is a regex spam filter folks might find useful
RK That is a good way to start, but there are more powerful spam filters.
RK [...]
I used spampal with quite good
snip
I want to understand EXACTLY how my mail is triaged and why,
particularly on my critical accounts.
Unfortunately, it is my sad yet considered opinion the choice to do
your own filtering is evaporating. My friend told me boastfully about
how his Iowa (USA) ISP was Filtering his mail with a
Zero replies and zero comments on my earlier list post,
which although posted in good spirit with a 3-hour compose
time, was evidently a waste of time in the minds of the
target audience, eh?
Not so fast Mike. Just because there wasn't a long thread
full of replies and opinions doesn't mean
Good day to everyone,
You are going to laugh, but I signed up to this list just a day or two
ago in order to find out a few things about TB in order to perfect the
anti-spam mechnism that I just developed. Not really developed, just
added a few final touches to known techniques. The resulting
On Thu 12-Jun-03 7:02pm -0400, Csaba Kiss wrote:
snipped
Csaba, you seem to be having a few macro problems. (1) The `Re:` in
your subject line is not separated from the real subject. (2) You
appear to be deleting the In-Reply-To line in the Kludges - this
destroys threading (you also have no
It's easy to get jaded when you do something for the common
good with little or no return. Trust me, I know.
This is a busy list. Thanks for your comments. Jaded is indeed a good
word for what I was feeling at the time my reply was written. I would
add only that to work as designed, and after
Hello Andre,
I tried SpamPal and although it worked ok, it seemed to bring my PC
to a crawl whenever I popped. Have there been improvements to correct
this or was it just me?
I am going to checkout popfile now.
Fred
Sunday, March 16, 2003, 8:31:06 AM, you wrote:
AW For now you can use
Good evening Newsacct,
It was foretold that on 17-3-2003 @ 10:12:03 GMT-0500 (which was
16:12:03 where I live) Newsacct would mumble:
snipped a bit
N I tried SpamPal and although it worked ok, it seemed to bring my PC
N to a crawl whenever I popped. Have there been improvements to
Is there a pre-made spam filter which i download and install into
thebat? Anyway i hope that something like in mozilla 1.3 mailreader
will come in futher releases of thebat. A junk tagging system that in
time learns to spot new junkmail would be a great improvement.
Kate
Hello Cathy,
On Sunday, March 16, 2003, 14:14:01 +0100 GMT (which was 14:14 local
time), Cathy wrote:
C Is there a pre-made spam filter which i download and install into
C thebat? Anyway i hope that something like in mozilla 1.3 mailreader
C will come in futher releases of thebat. A junk tagging
Good afternoon Cathy,
It was foretold that on 16-3-2003 @ 14:14:01 GMT+0100 (which was
14:14:01 where I live) Cathy would mumble:
snipped a bit
C Is there a pre-made spam filter which i download and install into
C thebat?
There are plugins being developed at this moment: you can get more
Hello Cathy,
A junk tagging system that in time learns to spot new junkmail would
be a great improvement.
Use POPFile (http://popfile.sourceforge.net/), it's unbeatable.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v1.62i
Does the vampire plugin use some kind of autolearning or is it a
rulebased filter system? If it's rulebased where can i get predefined
sets of rules?
Kate
Current version is 1.62 | Using TBUDL information:
Hallo Adam,
On Thu, 27 Jun 2002 22:49:06 -0230GMT (28-6-02, 3:19 +0200GMT, where I
live), you wrote:
A How do you make a filter with dozens of addresses?
Place the addresses in your address book in one group.
What you've got to do is at the 'advanced' tab check 'address(es) must
be listed in
On Friday, June 28, 2002, 03:19, Adam wrote:
How do you make a filter with dozens of addresses?
Besides Roelof suggestion you can also make a .txt file with all
addresses and filter against that one. This method does however only
work with the Selective Download filter.
--
Regards,
Marcus
How do you make a filter with dozens of addresses?
--
Best regards,
Adam
Current Ver: 1.60q
FAQ: http://faq.thebat.dutaint.com
Unsubscribe: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives : http://tbudl.thebat.dutaint.com
Moderators :
Hi Marck,
Your SpamCop filters work great now. I've reported 32 spammers so far
in just two days (should I be glad or sad? :)
I haven't had any responses from ISP's yet. From what I understand,
SpamCop will forward those to me. I was thinking that maybe I should
use the comment field in the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
@21 June 2002, 02:11:23 +0200 (01:11 UK time) Daniel van Rooijen
[CopyCats] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
In closing: Whenever spamcop.bat is run, it leaves a DOS window on my
screen that has to be closed manually.
Hi Marck,
All such bounce messages do, no matter how well intentioned or formed,
is inform the spammer that the message got through.
Oh boy..
Thanks for the enlightenment!! :)
I'm now trying those Spamcop filters from the TB FAQ, but I'm not sure if
they work as intended. Here's what I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
@18 June 2002, 14:38:09 +0200 (13:38 UK time) Daniel van Rooijen
[CopyCats] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Thanks for the enlightenment!! :)
A pleasure :-)
I'm now trying those Spamcop filters from the TB FAQ, but
Hi Marck,
MDP I always report to SpamCop (there are some nice filters for doing
MDP this published on the FAQ)
The second stage filter doesn't work right for me either.. it finds
the incoming confirmation from Spamcop, then exports the whole message to
spamcop.bat and tries to execute it! :)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
@18 June 2002, 14:38:09 +0200 (13:38 UK time) Daniel van Rooijen
[CopyCats] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... The export format was Text, is that alright?
Just spotted this - no, it should be Unix. What a pig's ear!
Hi Marck,
MDP Perhaps there's a bug in the filter paste function?
Or I have missed something, so don't redo the filters just yet..
I couldn't find a Paste button or anything like it in the Sorting
Office, so I simply pressed Ctrl-V.
Have I been stupid again? O :-)
Best regards,
-Daan-
Marck D Pearlstone [MDP] wrote:
MDP All of which seem to have failed to import correctly :-(.
Ehm. Someone else already mentioned (maybe on the german mailing
lists) that this problems are caused by some unwanted linebreaks on
the faq page.
1st Filter: after Actions
2nd Filter: after
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Daniel,
@18 June 2002, 15:15:27 +0200 (14:15 UK time) Daniel van Rooijen
[CopyCats] wrote in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Perhaps there's a bug in the filter paste function?
Or I have missed something, so don't redo the filters
Hi Matthias,
MA Ehm. Someone else already mentioned (maybe on the german mailing
MA lists) that this problems are caused by some unwanted linebreaks on
MA the faq page.
Oops - that makes sense. I don't know why I didn't notice! I'll try
again without the linebreaks and see how I fare..
Your
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Marck,
@18 June 2002, 14:28:53 +0100 Marck D Pearlstone wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here they are again:
The MainSet property is wrong:
MainSet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
,-=[ Try again :-( ]-
BeginFilter
Name:
Hello Daniel,
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002 at 3:35:11 PM you wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (at least in part):
DvRC When I try to enter a high-ascii character using
DvRC Alt-nnn, the Bat doesn't enter the character but instead performs all
DvRC sorts of system functions (menu's
Hi Marck,
MDP Nope. You done good! The How to says to use Ctrl-V. Actually, I just
MDP tried it and it's completely hit and miss!
Matthias' hint about the broken lines on the website was right on
target - I've got the filters working now.
However, I had to make a small change to the second
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 14:28:53 +0100 GMT (18/06/02, 20:28 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP ,-=[ Spamcop reply Intercept ]-
[...]
MDP SaveTemplate:
MDP
\22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%REGEXPTEXT\3D\22http://\5CS*\22\0D\0A
This
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
@18 June 2002, 20:53:15 +0700 (14:53 UK time) Thomas F wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP SaveTemplate:
MDP
\22c:\5CProgram\20Files\5CInternet\20Explorer\5CIEXPLORE.EXE\22\20%REGEXPTEXT\3D\22http://\5CS*\22\0D\0A
Hi Peter,
PP Is there a small chance you have turned 'NumLock' off and don't keep
PP 'Alt' pressed while trying to enter the character codes?.
I am keeping Alt pressed down, but you're right about Numlock - it is
off (as it should be!! :-)
When I turn Numlock on, Alt-nnn and Alt- works
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
Nope. You done good! The How to says to use Ctrl-V. Actually, I just
tried it and it's completely hit and miss! Sometimes it pastes 100%
correctly, sometimes not. Here they are again:
snip
Call me stupid... but I cannot get those to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@18 June 2002, 09:29:09 -0500 (15:29 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Call me stupid... but I cannot get those to work... I've pasted the
filter into my filters list, and when I got to run
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
Pass - try doing a Ctrl-C on the filter in the filter list then a
Ctrl-V into a replay to this message so we can see what you've
actually got in the filter. It works fine for those not stumbling over
bad wrapping.
Oddly enough, it was
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@18 June 2002, 09:45:04 -0500 (15:45 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oddly enough, it was the first thing I checked for, pasted it into an
external editor, removed wrappings from the
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
snip
... and it's perfect (apart from not marking the spam as Read). I
have no idea why that wouldn't create a message for you. It should be
queued in the outbox of whichever account is active and sent on the
next send cycle.
Is the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@18 June 2002, 10:07:31 -0500 (16:07 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... and it's perfect (apart from not marking the spam as Read). I
have no idea why that wouldn't create a message for
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
Is the fact that it's a common folder have any affect?
Yes Yes YES! (sorry - didn't mean to yell, just got excited). You need
to enhance the template to include a %ACCOUNT=main to provide a
sending account!
Modified... now I just have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@18 June 2002, 10:38:29 -0500 (16:38 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is the fact that it's a common folder have any affect?
Yes Yes YES! (sorry - didn't mean to yell, just got excited).
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
Modified... now I just have to wait for the inevitable spam ;)
... or retrieve an earlier one from the Forwarded Spam folder ...
;-)
True... just be resubmitting it... just cancel the post
--
Jonathan Angliss
([EMAIL PROTECTED])
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@18 June 2002, 10:52:32 -0500 (16:52 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... or retrieve an earlier one from the Forwarded Spam folder ...
;-)
True... just be resubmitting it... just cancel
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
... I thought we'd determined that the submission didn't happen
because no account was specified to send it from ... or did you do it
by hand anyway?
I did them all as a batch by hand... using ALT SHIFT F5, then putting
in the SpamCop
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@18 June 2002, 11:01:49 -0500 (17:01 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... I thought we'd determined that the submission didn't happen
because no account was specified to send it from ... or
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
Dunno. I have mine in the create message template that already as
put='c:\temp\export.txt' in it. I use this construct myself because
I filter my spam to an account called Anti-Spam that has no related
POP3/SMTP servers.
That is where I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jonathan,
@18 June 2002, 11:13:08 -0500 (17:13 UK time) Jonathan Angliss wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
That is where I put it, but no luck still... I guess an extra key
combo isn't going to kill me ;)
Okay. Next step. Shut
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
Okay. Next step. Shut down and restart your system. I actually
submitted a bug to the BugTraq about Create message filters not
working at one point. After the next reboot, they worked perfectly and
I could never replicate the problem
Hi Marck.
At 11:33 AM on Tuesday, June 18, 2002 you wrote the
following about [SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher
program)]:
MDP [...] You need to enhance the template to include a
MDP %ACCOUNT=main to provide a sending account! [/...]
What is this ACCOUNT=main? Haven't seen that before
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, Jan Rifkinson wrote...
Hi Marck.
MDP [...] You need to enhance the template to include a
MDP %ACCOUNT=main to provide a sending account! [/...]
What is this ACCOUNT=main? Haven't seen that before.
%ACCOUNT is a macro... just replace main with the name of the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jan,
@18 June 2002, 13:08:27 -0400 (18:08 UK time) Jan Rifkinson wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP [...] You need to enhance the template to include a
MDP %ACCOUNT=main to provide a sending account! [/...]
What is this
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 18 Jun 2002 15:16:51 +0100 GMT (18/06/02, 21:16 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP As Dann suggests, the regexp filter needs enhancing to:
MDP http://spamcop.net/sc\S*. SpamCop have changed the format of the
MDP notification message for free accounts :-(.
Thanks.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Thomas,
@18 June 2002, 03:16:11 +0700 (21:16 UK time) Thomas F wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP As Dann suggests, the regexp filter needs enhancing to:
MDP http://spamcop.net/sc\S*. SpamCop have changed the format of the
MDP
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, 4:29 PM, you wrote:
MDP As Dann suggests, the regexp filter needs enhancing to:
MDP http://spamcop.net/sc\S*. SpamCop have changed the format of the
MDP notification message for free accounts :-(.
Thanks. Works. :-)
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@18 June 2002, 16:41:19 -0400 (21:41 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
one more time, could you reply with the entire correct filter for that
notifcation message for PAID accounts, I'd like to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, 5:06 PM, you wrote:
MDP ,-=[ Pick up reply - all flavours ]-
MDP BeginFilter
MDP Name: SpamCop AutoResponder
MDP Active: 1
MDP Source: \Inbox
MDP Target: \Trash
MDP CopyFolder: none
MDP MainSet: [EMAIL
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
@18 June 2002, 17:32:14 -0400 (22:32 UK time) Paul Cartwright wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://\S*spamcop.net/sc\S*
- -so, should I replace: http://\5CS*spamcop.net/sc\5CS*
with your line:
Hi Marck.
At 1:52 PM on Tuesday, June 18, 2002 you wrote the following
about [SPAM filter with The Bat (Mailwasher program)]:
What is this ACCOUNT=main? Haven't seen that before.
MDP main was just a for example. Mine is
MDP %ACCOUNT=Marck. Jonathan knew what I meant,
MDP fortunately.
Whew
On Tuesday, June 18, 2002, 5:46 PM, you wrote:
MDP It's a chalk and cheese issue..
MDP http://\5CS*spamcop.net/sc\5CS*; is how a string looks when intended
MDP to be used as part of a copy/paste of an entire filter into the
MDP sorting office.
MDP http://\S*spamcop.net/sc\S*; is exactly the
Hello,
I would like to create a spam filter using this very useful list of
spammers domain names that I found on the Internet:
http://www.znet.com/blocked-domains.html
I copied this list, I created an address book with all these domain
names and I tried to create a filter with the Bat 1.60q
On Sunday, June 16, 2002, 5:34:55 PM, Carlo Revelli wrote:
Do you know if there is a way to create a filter with a huge list
of domain names (and not only with e-mail addresses)? How?
Not using the regular Inbox filters. You can load a file for
Selective Download filtering, but I think that
Hello Julian,
Sunday, June 16, 2002, 7:59:22 PM, you wrote (possibly edited):
On Sunday, June 16, 2002, 5:34:55 PM, Carlo Revelli wrote:
Do you know if there is a way to create a filter with a huge list
of domain names (and not only with e-mail addresses)? How?
One fairly successful
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Peter,
@05 April 2002, 10:15:34 +0200 (09:15 UK time) Peter Palmreuther wrote
in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MDP Turn on Regular expressions and use /s/s/s/s/s (five
MDP contiguous spaces).
Or use it's shorter and more readable
Hello Roman Katzer,
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 18:47:06 +0200 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, April 4, 2002, 11:47:06 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Roman Katzer wrote:
On Thursday, April 4, 2002, 15:31:32, Jon Lawrance wrote:
What about all the foreign character rubbish I get?
Anyone
Hello Allie C Martin,
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 16:00:32 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Friday, April 5, 2002, 4:00:32 AM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie C Martin wrote:
Sure. I'm saying that it's more difficult to keep your Inbox free of
spam by filtering the spam itself. I'm not saying
on Friday, April 5, 2002, 9:40:53 AM, tracer wrote:
Hello Daniel Grunberg,
1. Copy the subject line of one of the foreign character emails.
filtering by subject in any language unless some idiot is insisting
will not be effective as general spam filter.
I am no idiot.
You quoted me
On Friday, April 5, 2002, 16:39:27, tracer wrote:
Ok, which expressions do you have which work...
So far: (irrelevant lines deleted)
BeginFilter
Name: Spam
Active: 1
Source: \\RoKa\Inbox
Target: \\RoKa\spam
CopyFolder: none
MainSet: 40charset=.*ks_c_5601-1987
AltSet:1: 40charset=.*euc-kr
On Thursday, April 4, 2002, 09:43, Jon Lawrance wrote:
Does anyone have a ready made spam filter they could share? Are they
importable?
All filter are easily importable and exportable through the sorting
office copy/paste capabilities. To export a filter, mark it and hit
ctrl-c then paste
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 10:53:14 +0200 [ Thu, 4 Apr 2002], Marcus Ohlström [MO] wrote these
words of wisdom:
...
MO I use three filters, one that filter on certain words like teen,
MO porn and so forth, another to filter on certain patterns (4 spaces
MO in a row in the
.
Anyone else get this type of spam and what method do you use to get rid of it?
--
Best regards,
Jon
Thursday, April 4, 2002, 9:53:14 AM, you wrote:
MO On Thursday, April 4, 2002, 09:43, Jon Lawrance wrote:
Does anyone have a ready made spam filter they could share? Are they
importable?
MO
Hello Allie C Martin,
On Thu, 4 Apr 2002 06:40:11 -0500 GMT your local time,
which was Thursday, April 4, 2002, 6:40:11 PM (GMT+0700) my local time,
Allie C Martin wrote:
@ 10:53:14 +0200 [ Thu, 4 Apr 2002], Marcus Ohlström [MO] wrote these
words of wisdom:
...
MO I use three filters,
On Thursday, April 4, 2002, 15:31:32, Jon Lawrance wrote:
What about all the foreign character rubbish I get?
Anyone else get this type of spam and what method do you use to get rid of it?
I use the charset information to filter that stuff out. If there's something
like charset=big5 or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
@ 21:23:28 +0700 [ Thu, 4 Apr 2002], Tracer [T] thoughtfully wrote the
following:
...
T Not quite true as most spammers use certain things in their headers
T which betray its spam.
Sure. I'm saying that it's more difficult to keep your Inbox free of
The best results I've had with my spam filtering is to actually create
a folder per group or subject (clubs, relatives, work, e-news, etc.).
I have a folder for each mailing list, project, etc., if it doesn't
fall into any of those categories, filter it against your AddressBook,
then make sure
E-Mail Message
~~
From: Marcus Ohlström
Date: Thursday, April 04, 2002 at 2:53 AM
Subject: Ready made Spam filter
_
MO Before you copy/paste the filters below, make sure to edit the folders
MO to suite your setup. Place
On Friday, April 5, 2002, 03:50, Jody Watts wrote:
MO Before you copy/paste the filters below, make sure to edit the
MO folders to suite your setup. Place them in the same order that I
MO have done in this mail.
I thought the filters weren't held in an editable file. Where (what
file) do I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Jody,
@05 April 2002, 19:50:05 -0600 (02:50 UK time) Jody Watts wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MO Before you copy/paste the filters below, make sure to edit the
MO folders to suite your setup. Place them in the same order that
101 - 200 of 260 matches
Mail list logo
