Hi List,
Anyone know why each post I make to the list incurrs this reply (and a corresponding
delay in posting):
>
>Your mail to 'TBUDL' with the subject
>
>Re[2]: IMAP Filtering
>
>Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
>
>The reason it is being held:
>
>Mess
Dear Christopher,
@5-Apr-2004, 14:56 -0700 (05-Apr 22:56 UK time) Christopher Brown
[CB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to TBUL:
CB> Anyone know why each post I make to the list incurrs this
CB> reply (and a corresponding delay in posting):
>>
>>Message has a suspicious header
...
CB> For
Dear Christopher,
@5-Apr-2004, 15:42 -0700 (05-Apr 23:42 UK time) Christopher Brown
[CB] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
MDP>> Please use a different server or disable the scanners! I was
MDP>> meaning to write to you - you may just get a warning - I
MDP>> actually have to approve your po
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 00:14:33 +0100 GMT (06/04/2004, 06:14 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
MDP> It's because they are adding non-standard headers to the message.
MDP> They shouldn't do that to outbound messages. It's breaking
MDP> standards.
IIRC X- headers don't break any stand
Dear Thomas,
@6-Apr-2004, 12:35 +0700 (06-Apr 06:35 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
CB>>> How could information that was intended to curb abuse be
CB>>> suspicious?
MDP>> Because it does not conform to standards - any standards.
TF> Except the RFC dealing
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 06:57:37 +0100 GMT (06/04/2004, 12:57 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF>> That's a bug in the list server software then. It should ignore
TF>> any X-headers it doesn't have a clue about.
MDP> Usually it does - but not these.
The list server software finds
Hello Marck,
On Tue, 6 Apr 2004 08:09:14 +0100 GMT (06/04/2004, 14:09 +0700 GMT),
Marck D Pearlstone wrote:
TF>> the list server software is at fault. IMHO, of course.
MDP> It's open source - you get what you pay for!
I didn't know you pay for open source. ;-)
MDP> I'm not about to rewrite the
Dear Thomas,
@6-Apr-2004, 13:12 +0700 (06-Apr 07:12 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
TF> the list server software is at fault. IMHO, of course.
It's open source - you get what you pay for! I'm not about to
rewrite the module myself and the team responsible d
Dear Thomas,
@6-Apr-2004, 14:23 +0700 (06-Apr 08:23 UK time) Thomas Fernandez
[TF] in mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said to Marck:
TF>>> the list server software is at fault. IMHO, of course.
MDP>> It's open source - you get what you pay for!
TF> I didn't know you pay for open source. ;-)
Precisely! :
Hi Marck,
MDP> Please use a different server or disable the scanners! I was meaning
MDP> to write to you - you may just get a warning - I actually have to
MDP> approve your posts manually each time :-(.
What does that mean? I don't understand. First, whats wrong with the scanners? Why are
they c
Hello Marck,
Monday, April 5, 2004, 6:14:33 PM, you wrote:
MDP> It's because they are adding non-standard headers to the message.
MDP> They shouldn't do that to outbound messages. It's breaking
MDP> standards.
I have also had my messages held by the list software (hopefully my
headers are now fi
At 7:14 PM on 4/5/2004, Marck D Pearlstone typed ...
M> Bill Blinn also had such headers added to his messages and was kind
M> enough to either turn them off or use an alternate routing that
M> didn't add them. Please consider doing the same. I'd really
M> appreciate it if I didn't have to keep ap
12 matches
Mail list logo
