Archiving of my mails

2003-03-21 Thread Biju Nair
Dear Friends!! Kindly help me regarding archiving of my mails. Nature of my work requires me to take daily backup of my mails & the backup is now of size 340 MBs . Please let me know is there any feature available which enables me to take an archive of of my mails up to certain

Re[2]: Archiving

2002-11-14 Thread Joseph N.
ETM, On Thursday, November 14, 2002, ETM wrote in : E> I was trying to avoid taking on another program purchase. Mailbag Assistant is better for most operations, but it's not necessary for all operations. It depends on your needs. If you just want to k

Re: Archiving

2002-11-14 Thread ETM
Hello Joseph On Thursday, November 14, 2002, you wrote > There are at least two ways. One is the method which Melissa > suggested. I second her suggestion. > As for your JPEGs, you might consider keeping attachments within the > message right from the start. In my view, it facilitates housekeepi

Re: Archiving

2002-11-14 Thread Joseph N.
Elaine, On Thursday, November 14, 2002, ETM wrote in : E> Is there a way to multiple-save messages to an outside folder? I E> have individually saved .txt messages to a folder away from TB! E> but haven't figured out a way to perform a multiple save.

Re: Archiving

2002-11-14 Thread Melissa Reese
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: RIPEMD160 On Wednesday, November 13, 2002, at 10:26:20 PM PST, ETM wrote: > I use backup regularly but for some folders I would like to save the > entire folder in a format that can be read away from TB!. Here's the perfect solution: Mailbag Assistant:

Archiving

2002-11-13 Thread ETM
Is there a way to multiple-save messages to an outside folder? I have individually saved .txt messages to a folder away from TB! but haven't figured out a way to perform a multiple save. I use backup regularly but for some folders I would like to save the entire folder in a format that can be rea

Re: Email Archiving, was: Editing incoming mail (was: Wish list item)

2002-09-30 Thread James Senick
Hello Doug, On Mon, 30 Sep 2002, at 10:48:28 [GMT +0100] (which was 5:48:28 AM in NY, USA) Doug Weller wrote: > What don't you like about Mailbag Assistant? > Has anyone tried Forkeeps? Reply to this message has been sent directly to you and to TBOT as well as this thread has been declared De

Re:Email Archiving, was: Editing incoming mail (was: Wish list item)

2002-09-30 Thread Jan Rifkinson
Hi Doug. At 5:48 AM on Monday, September 30, 2002 you [DW] wrote the following about 'Email Archiving, was: Editing incoming mail (was: Wish list item)': DW> Has anyone tried Forkeeps? Too expensive for me. -- Jan Rifkinson Ridgefield, CT USA TB! V1.61/W2K_SP3

Email Archiving, was: Editing incoming mail (was: Wish list item)

2002-09-30 Thread Doug Weller
On Sat, 28 Sep 2002 11:49:22 -0400 James Senick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello Jan, > > On Sat, 28 Sep 2002, at 11:19:22 [GMT -0400] (which was 11:19:22 > AM in NY, USA) Jan Rifkinson wrote: > [SNIP] > > In addition, I think there are other > > programs, Mailbag Assistant or Zoot for >

Re[3]: archiving

2002-08-21 Thread Joseph N.
On Tuesday, August 20, 2002, Razgo wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: JN>> However, I also archive certain email on the fly. For those messages, JN>> I have filters set up which automatically append the message onto a JN>> Unix-formatted file. R> yes, this is something I wil

Re[2]: archiving

2002-08-20 Thread Razgo
Hi Joseph, Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 2:53:48 PM, you wrote: JN>On Monday, August 19, 2002, Razgo wrote in JN> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: R>> So all suggestions on the way you guys handle backup copies of your R>> email is appreciated. JN> Razgo, JN> I think you've heard m

Re: archiving

2002-08-19 Thread Joseph N.
On Monday, August 19, 2002, Razgo wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: R> So all suggestions on the way you guys handle backup copies of your R> email is appreciated. Razgo, I think you've heard most of the better ideas, including Allie's interesting method of using a schedul

Re[2]: archiving

2002-08-19 Thread Razgo
Hi Arjan, Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 1:06:23 PM, you wrote: AdG> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Razgo wrote: >>So all suggestions on the way you guys handle backup copies of >>your email is appreciated. AdG> My favourite backup-method is to save the messages to Unix AdG> Mailbox

Re[2]: archiving

2002-08-19 Thread Razgo
Hi Marck, Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 11:32:13 AM, you wrote: R>> So all suggestions on the way you guys handle backup copies of R>> your email is appreciated. thanks. MDP> Some use Mailbag Assistant by Fookes (is that it?) to manage their MDP> email archives. As for me, I keep everything in TB.

Re[2]: archiving

2002-08-19 Thread Razgo
Hi Allie, Tuesday, August 20, 2002, 11:28:21 AM, you wrote: ACM> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- ACM> Hash: SHA1 ACM> In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, ACM> Razgo [R] wrote:' R>> I was wondering about different ways of archiving email but

Re: archiving

2002-08-19 Thread Arjan de Groot
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Razgo wrote: >So all suggestions on the way you guys handle backup copies of >your email is appreciated. My favourite backup-method is to save the messages to Unix Mailbox format: You can do this in two ways: 1) Select all messages you want to bac

Re: archiving

2002-08-19 Thread Marck D Pearlstone
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Razgo, @20-Aug-2002, 11:22 +1000 (02:22 UK time) Razgo [R] in [EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: R> I am new to the bat! and to this email list. hopefully I am R> emailing the right place. Welcome and yes, you are. ... R> So all

Re: archiving

2002-08-19 Thread Allie C Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Razgo [R] wrote:' R> I am new to the bat! and to this email list. hopefully I am R> emailing the right place. R> I was wondering about different ways of archiving emai

archiving

2002-08-19 Thread Razgo
Hi tbudl, I am new to the bat! and to this email list. hopefully I am emailing the right place. I was wondering about different ways of archiving email but still being able to search access the email itself. I came from Eudora and used to keep around 120 thousand emails, but trimed it all back

Re: Archiving mail

2002-05-05 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello Paul, Sunday, May 5, 2002, 5:12:22 PM, you wrote to TBUDL: PS> I've put the filter in the Account's Read messages - is this PS> right? Just make sure that read filter is ticked in the refilter messages dialogue -- Best regards, Ottar Grimstad, Norway http://home.online.no/~ottgrims

Re[2]: Archiving mail

2002-05-05 Thread Paul Shave
On 05 May 2002 at 13:37:03 Ottar wrote: PS>> with no filtering strings, OG> Try to filter for @ i Sender. As every mailaddress contains an @, this OG> will select all mail before applying these other conditions. I tried with @ in sender, then in recipient. Still no luck with either. I've put th

Re: Archiving mail

2002-05-05 Thread Ottar Grimstad
Hello Paul, Sunday, May 5, 2002, 1:44:17 PM, you wrote to TBUDL: PS> with no filtering strings, Try to filter for @ i Sender. As every mailaddress contains an @, this will select all mail before applying these other conditions. -- Best regards, Ottar Grimstad, Norway http://home.online.no/

Re[4]: Archiving mail

2002-05-05 Thread Paul Shave
On 04 May 2002 at 20:00:21 Joseph wrote: JN> E. While you are logged in as the group_name which includes the archive JN> account, set up filters (Account/Sorting Office/Filters) JN> under your primary account so that the messages you'll want to JN> archive get filtered *manually*

Re[3]: Archiving mail

2002-05-04 Thread Joseph N.
Here are two different ways. Which one to use depends on how often you will want to archive your mail and refer to the messages. 1. A separate account: A. Create a new account. Go into Options/Network & Administration. B. Go into the Groups tab. Create a group comprising your current

Re[2]: Archiving mail

2002-05-04 Thread Paul Shave
Thanks Joseph, that's helpful. On 04 May 2002 at 18:53:52 you wrote: JN> A variation on that is to move the messages to a separate set of JN> folders, perhaps with a different user name. That way, they would JN> remain in the .TBB format, but not be on your screen or available all JN> the time.

Re: Archiving mail

2002-05-04 Thread Joseph N.
You can archive in at least four ways using TB!. One way is to keep the messages in the active message bases. That's the way a lot of users on this list do it; they have tens of thousands of messages. TB! could be unique in its ability to handle that type f load in a stable way. A variation on

Archiving mail

2002-05-04 Thread Paul Shave
In Outlook, you can auto-archive mailbox folders, according to criteria you set, eg more than 60 days old. The archived data goes to a separate .pst file, which you can open in Outlook alongside your regular mail. This is very useful if you need to refer back to an old message. Can The Bat do any

Re[2]: Archiving

2001-11-29 Thread Geoff Lane
Thursday, November 29, 2001, 11:02:55 AM, Allie C Martin wrote: > I personally use a specialised application for this. It's called > MailBag Assistant. It handles TB! message bases and offers all sorts > of ways to search for messages. It's however shareware. A quick search revealed that MailBag

Re: Archiving

2001-11-29 Thread Allie C Martin
In a message dated, Thu, 29 Nov 2001 09:43:51 +, Geoff Lane [GL] wrote: ... GL> Export/Import -- I can't find a way automatically to export only those GL> messages older than a certain date (although I can find switches to GL> export newer than the set date). It looks as though exporting would

Archiving

2001-11-29 Thread Geoff Lane
Using The Bat! v1.53d on Windows NT 4.0 Build 1381 Service Pack 5 Hi All, I'm trialling TB with a view to replacing MS Outlook. So far, so good. However, I need to archive messages so that they can be temporarily "mounted" at a later date. For info, in Outlook, I do this using the auto-archive f

Re: Archiving messages and attachments

2001-10-31 Thread Mrten
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Op woensdag 31 oktober 2001 schreef Joseph N.: > I am assuming the following, but please let me know if this is > correct or not. I am assuming that incoming attachments will > continue to be stored in the archived Unix-style files even after > the

Archiving messages and attachments

2001-10-31 Thread Joseph N.
I am archiving my messages and attachments by exporting them to Unix-style files and, when necessary, appending additional messages. My question concerns attachments. My system is configured to store incoming attachments within message bodies, and also to delete attachments when the related

Re: Automatically Archiving into subdirs

2001-09-05 Thread David van Zuijlekom
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hello Clemens, On Wednesday, September 05, 2001 at 09:11:48 +0200, Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer [CGS] wrote concerning 'Automatically Archiving into subdirs': CGS> Hi, I have several ML Directorys. Most of them are >1

Automatically Archiving into subdirs

2001-09-04 Thread Clemens 'Gullevek' Schwaighofer
Hello The Bat! ML, Hi, I have several ML Directorys. Most of them are >10.000 mails. although loading is very quick, I'd like to split them, in monthly subdirs (eg thebat-2001-09, etc ...). are there anyways to do this automatically via "The Bat"? Or do I have to do it manualla ? Best re

Re: copying thread messages for archiving

2001-07-06 Thread A Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Fri, 6 Jul 2001 21:27:20 +0800, A. wrote these words of wisdom: ... ARS> so how can i copy a thread with *all* the messages and not only the ARS> first message from that thread? hopefully, what i'm trying to say ARS> here is clear enough to unders

copying thread messages for archiving

2001-07-06 Thread A. R. S.
hello all... i am subscribed to a high traffic mailing list and have 10's of thousands of messages in one of the folders. i realized that i need to archive these messages into another blank account. so... i've just tried to copy a thread message to another account/folder but it seems that

Re: Archiving Messages - A btt off topic

2001-02-23 Thread Brian Clark
Hi Ron, @ 6:24:19 AM on 2/23/2001, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Does anyone know of a Windows program which generates searchable, html-based > message archive of e-mail messages. This is quite a step up, but if you needed something hefty, you could *try* MHonArc. http://www.oac.uci.edu/indi

Re: Archiving Messages - A btt off topic

2001-02-23 Thread Kevin Tea
Ron Erik Fookes who wrote NoteTab has an arching program called Mailbag that might do what you ask - I don't use HTML mail, but if that's what you messages are stored in I can't see why it won't work. Go www.fookes.com Regards Kevin -- __

Archiving Messages - A btt off topic

2001-02-23 Thread Ron Carson
Hello All: Does anyone know of a Windows program which generates searchable, html-based message archive of e-mail messages. I host a mailing list which is currently archived at the Mail Archive (Same location as the The Bat's archive) but I wish to have an archive on my web page and to have a

Re: Archiving Question

2000-11-16 Thread A . Curtis Martin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 16 November, 2000, 6:50 AM, I saw Manfred's comments made on Thu, 16 Nov 2000 09:39:56 +, and thought I'd add my $0.02 worth: >> Here's what I do, I have two list folders, TBUDL and TBUDLArchive. I >> have one incoming filter to put

Re: Archiving Question

2000-11-16 Thread Manfred Ell
On 15-11-2000 at 14:29:54GMT -0800 (which was 22:29 where I live) Januk Aggarwal wrote regarding the subject of "Archiving Question" > Here's what I do, I have two list folders, TBUDL and TBUDLArchive. I > have one incoming filter to put everything into the TBUDL folde

Re: Archiving Question

2000-11-16 Thread Manfred Ell
On 16-11-2000 at 07:44:00GMT GMT (which was 7:44 where I live) Kevin Tea wrote regarding the subject of "Archiving Question" > The more I delve into The Bat! The more I'm impressed by the superior > functionality it has. It's a bit daunting at first, but well worth

Re: Archiving Question

2000-11-15 Thread Kevin Tea
Hi Januk > If you don't mind a little duplication of data, your method works well. I ran some tests last night and it does work (much to my surprise, not because of The Bat! But because I worked it out ). This way I can keep the mailboxes lean and fast and save the important material on my Io

Re: Archiving Question

2000-11-15 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Kevin, On Wed, 15 Nov 2000 at 15:13:19 GMT GMT (which was 7:13 AM where I live) witnesses say Kevin Tea typed: > Looking at the actions facilities within the filter, would it be > possible to choose to extract the incoming emails to a continuously > appended text file at a specified lo

Re: Archiving Question

2000-11-15 Thread Kevin Tea
Hi Looking at the actions facilities within the filter, would it be possible to choose to extract the incoming emails to a continuously appended text file at a specified location and then choose to delete them from the main list after 30 days or whatever? Regards Kevin Batting along with 1

Archiving Question

2000-11-15 Thread Kevin Tea
Hi I've looked through the FAQ and Help file, so ... Has anyone worked out a way that you can automatically remove emails from a folder after so many days (that part's easy) and then transfer and store them in a specified directory? TIA Kevin -- ---

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-22 Thread Steve Lamb
Saturday, July 22, 2000, 8:46:23 AM, Jamie wrote: BP>>> Would A Large Unix file be easier to search than the individual msgs? MDP>> ... If you have a plain text editor with good search capabilities, MDP>> then yes. > Such as www.ultraedit.com Sorry for advertising a commercial product > b

Re[3]: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-22 Thread Alex P. Madarasz, Jr.
On Saturday, July 22, 2000, 11:46:23 AM, Jamie Dainton wrote: BP>>> Would A Large Unix file be easier to search than the individual msgs? MDP>> ... If you have a plain text editor with good search capabilities, MDP>> then yes. > Such as www.ultraedit.com Sorry for advertising a commercial

Re[2]: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-22 Thread Jamie Dainton
BP>> Would A Large Unix file be easier to search than the individual msgs? MDP> ... If you have a plain text editor with good search capabilities, MDP> then yes. Such as www.ultraedit.com Sorry for advertising a commercial product but as a software engineer I use it every day. -- >From

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-21 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Ming-Li, On 21 July 2000 at 09:31:44 GMT -0700 (which was 17:31 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Archiving old mail messages": ML> The downside for this approach is you loose everything done in the ML> main folder. Replied,

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-21 Thread Ming-Li
Hi Marck, > I keep them all and have 64k+ in my message base at present. IMHO > The best method for handling high volume folders to have come up > so far is to have a main and archive folder and let a filter copy > incoming mail to both. Give the "main" folder a size or time > limit to keep th

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-21 Thread Nick Andriash
On Friday, July 21, 2000, 6:50:20 AM, Marck D. Pearlstone wrote: MDP> I never need to do this - I just took Nick's word for it that it MDP> didn't happen... that'll teach me to check. Well, I must admit that I _am_ at fault... I was only going by what the originator of this thread was stat

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-21 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Ming-Li, On 21 July 2000 at 06:20:01 GMT -0700 (which was 14:20 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Archiving old mail messages": >> What is needed is a new option - to save multiple messages to a >> single file. >&g

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-21 Thread Ming-Li
Hi Marck, Nick and others, > What is needed is a new option - to save multiple messages to a > single file. > This is a wish-list issue :-) I have no idea what you guys are whining about. ;-) TB can do this now. I've just use ctrl-+ to expand this whole thread from Lawrence down, select all of

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-21 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Nick, On 21 July 2000 at 01:52:49 GMT -0700 (which was 09:52 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Archiving old mail messages": NA> Is there some way to eliminate all of the above headers being NA> included... through use of the Save

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-21 Thread Nick Andriash
July 21, 2000, 1:06:59 AM Subject: Archiving old mail messages Files: The text of the message follows the above headers. OTOH, if I save the message as a Unix Mailbox... which according to some is the most efficient way to save a large number of messages... then all of the following headers are in

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-21 Thread tracer
wrote and made these points on the subject > of "Archiving old mail messages": ML>>> Don't select the "Message files (.MSG)" option when you export. Use ML>>> the "Unix Mailbox" option instead. The output would be a perfectly ML>>> read

Re: Archiving old mail messages -- Threading

2000-07-21 Thread Nick Andriash
On Friday, July 21, 2000, 12:36:32 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: nnn> I have found some threading is totally out of whack -- totally unrelated nnn> messages appear under one thread -- they are not from mailing list, from nnn> different senders with different subjects, etc. Yes, very strange behav

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-21 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Nick, On 21 July 2000 at 23:28:30 GMT -0700 (which was 07:28 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Archiving old mail messages": NA> It would be nice if there was some method to strip that header NA> information off the messages,

Re[2]: Archiving old mail messages -- Threading

2000-07-21 Thread net5zero
Friday, July 21, 2000, Nick Andriash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > On Thursday, July 20, 2000, 8:18:56 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote: > PS... My initial response to Januk's message on this thread somehow got > applied to an altogether different thread... titled "Filtering Trash", > and it seemed to be

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Nick Andriash
On Thursday, July 20, 2000, 8:18:56 PM, Januk Aggarwal wrote: >> Two problems that I experience. First, all the headers are included when >> you save messages *.msg. CO> Sorry, I don't understand. Why is this a problem? This is what TB CO> *should* be doing. All of the headers are included

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Januk Aggarwal
Hello Nick, On Thursday, July 20, 2000 at 19:31:06 GMT -0700 (which was 7:31 PM where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] typed: > Two problems that I experience. First, all the headers are included when > you save messages *.msg. Sorry, I don't understand. Why is this a problem? This is what TB

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Nick Andriash
On Thursday, July 20, 2000, 2:17:22 PM, Ming-Li wrote: ML> Don't select the "Message files (.MSG)" option when you export. Use ML> the "Unix Mailbox" option instead. The output would be a perfectly ML> readable plain text file with all the messages you select. Two problems that I experience. Fir

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Thomas Fernandez
Hi SRNA, On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 21:59:09 -0400GMT (21/07/2000, 09:59 +0800GMT), SRNA wrote: C>> I created another account solely for archiving purposes. Since I C>> can filter based on message age, I can archive messages by using read C>> message filters to move messa

Re[2]: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread SRNA
her account solely for archiving purposes. Since I C> can filter based on message age, I can archive messages by using read C> message filters to move messages to the archive account folders.I run C> them manually at interval periods. How do you

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Curtis
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 22:18:51 +0100, Miguel Anjo wrote: MA> I created two sub-folders for Inbox and Sent and then I also use MA> read message filters like Curtis. MA> Is there any advantage to use a separate account instead of a separate MA> folder in the same account? MA> I speak in t

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Ben, On 21 July 2000 at 17:07:59 GMT -0600 (which was 00:07 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Archiving old mail messages": ML>> Don't select the "Message files (.MSG)" option when you export. Use ML>> the &quo

Re[2]: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Ben Pugsley
Hello Ming-Li, Thursday, July 20, 2000, 3:17:22 PM, you wrote: >> In the short time that I have been using TB!, I have managed to >> accumulate over 6000 messages, some of which I would like to >> off-load to an archive-type file. One of the few features that >> I liked about Outlook 98

Re[2]: Archiving old mail messages + suggestion

2000-07-20 Thread Miguel Anjo
I'm using The Bat! Version 1.44 Serial Number EC7D7F61 under Windows 98 4.10 Build 1998 . MDP> to both. Give the "main" folder a size or time limit to keep the size MDP> down. This makes it easy to browse "current" mail yet still have an MDP> easily accessible archive. One good suge

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Lawrence, On 20 July 2000 at 15:05:47 GMT -0400 (which was 20:05 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points on the subject of "Archiving old mail messages": LK> I have tried exporting the messages but that gave me hundreds of LK> individual message files cryp

Re[2]: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Miguel Anjo
C> I created another account solely for archiving purposes. Since I C> can filter based on message age, I can archive messages by using read C> message filters to move messages to the archive account folders.I run C> them manually at interval periods. I created two sub

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Ming-Li
Hi Lawrence, > In the short time that I have been using TB!, I have managed to > accumulate over 6000 messages, some of which I would like to > off-load to an archive-type file. One of the few features that > I liked about Outlook 98 was its ability to archive old/selected > messages.

Re: Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Curtis
On Thu, 20 Jul 2000 15:05:47 -0400, Lawrence Kalmakoff wrote: LK> What have users been doing (if anything) to off-load old messages LK> while still being able to view them, if necessary? I created another account solely for archiving purposes. Since I can filter based on messa

Archiving old mail messages

2000-07-20 Thread Lawrence Kalmakoff
I'm sure this subject has probably been discussed at one time, but I can't find anything on it. It's a simple situation and the answer will probably involve filters or some such thing but here goes anyway: In the short time that I have been using TB!, I have managed to accumulate o

Re: Archiving Question

2000-03-24 Thread Marck D. Pearlstone
Hi Jeff, On 24 March 2000 at 10:33:36 GMT -0600 (which was 16:33 where I live) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote and made these points: > Is there a way to archive old messages automatically by date? We were discussing this issue a couple of weeks back and I honed in on the following construct: use

Archiving Question

2000-03-24 Thread Jeff Worley
Hello Fellow Bat-ty People, Is there a way to archive old messages automatically by date? For instance setting a filter on a folder that moves messages to another folder once they are more than 60 days old. I was unable to find an archive function per se in any of TB's menus or documen

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-10 Thread Steve Lamb
Thursday, February 10, 2000, 5:37:42 AM, Jast wrote: > Morning Steve Lamb, >>> This causes a slight amount of redundance, but IMHO it's even better this >>> way, as you always have a fully searchable archive in one folder. >> Alternatively you could just click that darned "include subfolder

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-10 Thread Jast
Morning Steve Lamb, >> This causes a slight amount of redundance, but IMHO it's even better this >> way, as you always have a fully searchable archive in one folder. > > Alternatively you could just click that darned "include subfolders" > button. :P I was referring to the quicksearch f

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-10 Thread Steve Lamb
Wednesday, February 09, 2000, 5:41:43 AM, Dieter wrote: > I normally delete all messages within TB after they have been archived > with MBA. This keeps TB lean and fast. I never understood this. TB! currently handles... 876 messages in my personal account. 569 messages in my work account.

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-10 Thread Steve Lamb
Tuesday, February 08, 2000, 8:51:29 PM, Jast wrote: > . make the folder you want to move your messages in (duh) I suggest a >subfolder of the sent mail. Actually, I do it as a sub-sub-folder of sent in an "archive" account. > This causes a slight amount of redundance, but IMHO it's eve

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-09 Thread Paula Ford
Hi, Instead of setting up a separate account, could I do something with setting up another user? If so, how could I relocate messages that I want to archive from one 'user' to the other 'user'? I haven't looked at multiple user features (it's only me!). I'd prefer to get the archived messages out

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-09 Thread Allie Martin
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 14:41:43 +0100, Dieter Hummel wrote: > For archiving I use a neat utility called Mailbag Assistant. This also > allows me to quickly search thru all mailboxes. I'm surprised at TB!'s performance with a lot of mail. I have a couple folders with 40

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-09 Thread Dieter Hummel
Hello Listmembers, On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 at 07:15:23 [GMT -0500] Allie Martin wrote: > I have all my archives in a separate account as Steve so aptly For archiving I use a neat utility called Mailbag Assistant. This also allows me to quickly search thru all mailboxes. I norma

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-09 Thread Allie Martin
On Wed, 9 Feb 2000 14:28:38 +0900, John De Hoog wrote: > 1. Configure the folder options to leave messages in the base > for only 8 days. This can be done for the Send folder as well. > Let it purge messages automatically after that period. > 2. Use an automated backup program to

Re[2]: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-09 Thread Mark R Harding
an tweak this downwards later...) Thus what I have now is a snappy and responsive 'Sent' mail filter that allows me to review a message I sent recently without the annoying delay associated with my larger archive folder. Thanks to Jast for the advice here... JDH> Here&

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-08 Thread John De Hoog
Earlier I wrote: JDH> 1. Configure the folder options to leave messages in the base for JDH> only 8 days. This can be done for the Send folder as well. Let it JDH> purge messages automatically after that period. JDH> 2. Use an automated backup program to save the mail database, J

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-08 Thread John De Hoog
Hello, Jast, On Wednesday, February 09, 2000, you wrote: J> Of course doing it manually like Steve suggested isn't a bad way to do it. J> But if you're happy with one large folder for old messages you can J> automate it fully Here's how I handle the archivin

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-08 Thread Jast
Morning Mark R Harding, > I wish not to lose my old 'sent' messages (stored by default in 'Sent') > but because I currently have just over 1600 messages in this folder I > find it slow to access. Since I commonly only refer to recent messages my > idea was to set up some kind of filter or expiry

Re: Archiving old messages...

2000-02-08 Thread Steve Lamb
Tuesday, February 08, 2000, 2:22:59 PM, Mark wrote: > However, I could not see a route to doing this through either the Sorting > Office Filters or the properties tab of the 'Sent' folder. Also, I > drew a blank on the FAQ and (as far as I could see) previous threads > of this discussion list.

Archiving old messages...

2000-02-08 Thread Mark R Harding
Hi TBUDL, Here's a quick question and it's probably bad form that I pose it now because I'm just off home for the day but hopefully you'll all be generous and forgive me... My problem... - I wish not to lose my old 'sent' messages (stored by default in 'Sent') but because I currentl

Re: Message Archiving

2000-01-07 Thread Andrew K. Lovetski
er mailbox in TB. You don't need to specify any transport settings for it - it will be your archiving account. Moreover, you can lock this mailbox with a password - it won't be scanned upon startup. d> Then use Account/Sorting filters. Use the Read filter actions. You d> ca

Re: Message Archiving

2000-01-03 Thread dMb
AG wrote: > How do I best set up an archive where I can move older messages but > still be able to pick them up and view them easily. > I do not want them to be loaded at the usual start-up. > Presently I have the older ones stored on a zip.drive but it is a bit > inconvenient to pick t

Re: Message Archiving

2000-01-02 Thread Roel
1000-3000 messages which to reside so that they can be A>accessed with a few mouse/key clicks in The Bat environment. A> 3. Over 3000 which I will move over to the zip.drive or other. A> Anyone who has a good set-up. A> FYG rcving some 100 per day average. i also have lots of mails

Message Archiving

2000-01-02 Thread AG
Tips please: How do I best set up an archive where I can move older messages but still be able to pick them up and view them easily. I do not want them to be loaded at the usual start-up. Presently I have the older ones stored on a zip.drive but it is a bit inconvenient to pick them up

Re: Archiving?

1999-11-13 Thread tracer
Sunday, November 14, 1999 Hello Soth, Saturday, Saturday, November 13, 1999, you wrote: Soth> I was wondering... does TB! support archiving? As far as I know (having Soth> used this wonderful client for 2 years(?) now...) it doesn't, and I Soth> believe that it should

Archiving?

1999-11-13 Thread Soth
I was wondering... does TB! support archiving? As far as I know (having used this wonderful client for 2 years(?) now...) it doesn't, and I believe that it should... would make manipulating email databases with over 20,000 messages a bit easier... Maybe this could be done as simply as add

<    1   2