Hello Chris,
On Fri, 8 Nov 2013 15:12:05 + GMT (08-Nov-13, 22:12 +0700 GMT),
Chris Wilson wrote:
>> I believe the templates are contained in the file account.qtn or
>> account.qtb - but these files are binary.
> Would Ritlabs divulge what the various root files are please, for
> curiosities'
> Hello Richard,
> On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 17:54:18 -0500 GMT (05-Nov-13, 05:54 +0700 GMT),
> Richard Newman wrote:
>> I reinstalled TB and changed accounts. How can I recover New Message,
>> Reply and Forward templates for particular directories? I guess the
>> other way to ask that is what file
Hello Richard,
On Mon, 4 Nov 2013 17:54:18 -0500 GMT (05-Nov-13, 05:54 +0700 GMT),
Richard Newman wrote:
> I reinstalled TB and changed accounts. How can I recover New Message,
> Reply and Forward templates for particular directories? I guess the
> other way to ask that is what files contain
Hello Bat People,
I reinstalled TB and changed accounts. How can I recover New Message,
Reply and Forward templates for particular directories? I guess the
other way to ask that is what files contain the New Message, Repy and
Forward templates for particular directories (rather than accounts)
Hallo Carren,
On Sun, 5 Jul 2009 08:49:27 +1200GMT (4-7-2009, 22:49 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CS> Which is the recommended/best way to set these up for things like
CS> mailing lists? Is it better to use a folder template or an address
CS> book template or does it make no difference as long
Hello all,
Saturday, July 4, 2009, Carren Stuart wrote:
> P.S How can I make my sig darker/more readable? I can't find anywhere
> within template set ups to change the font size/colour.
use Options | Preferences | Viewer{Editor | Profile layout
--
Bye
Marek Mikus
Czech support of The Bat!
htt
Hello Roelof,
Sunday, July 5, 2009, 4:13:17 AM, you wrote:
Roelof> Hallo Carren,
Roelof> On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 14:13:53 +1200GMT (4-7-2009, 4:13 +0200, where I
Roelof> live), you wrote:
CS>> However it doesn't work. If I reply to a list email (filtered to
CS>> that common folder) - I get a blank
Hallo Carren,
On Sat, 4 Jul 2009 14:13:53 +1200GMT (4-7-2009, 4:13 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
CS> However it doesn't work. If I reply to a list email (filtered to
CS> that common folder) - I get a blank message with no quoted message,
greeting or anything.
You wouldn't be using an addres
Hi
Since spending several years away from TB! I seem to have forgotten everything
I ever knew about creating templates.
I have a common folder set up for a mailing list and have the following reply
template set up:
Hello %OFromFName,
%ODateEn, %OTimeLongEn, you wrote:
%Quotes
%Cursor
--
Thu, 29 Apr 2004 00:15:57 +0200 (6:15 PM Wed here) MAU wrote:
>> I was just wondering if I was imagining that there was a cut-paste
>> option on previous versions.
> No, I don't think there ever was. Just Ctrl+C, Ctrl+X and Ctrl+V.
From TheBat! Help:
Copy the block to the ClipboardCtr
Hello Terry,
> I was just wondering if I was imagining that there was a cut-paste
> option on previous versions.
No, I don't think there ever was. Just Ctrl+C, Ctrl+X and Ctrl+V.
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.10.01
Hello Thomas,
Wednesday, April 28, 2004, 11:39:03 AM, you wrote:
> Mark the text and use crtl-C for copy, crtl-V for paste. I do it all the
> time.
Yes...that is what I did. I was just wondering if I was imagining
that there was a cut-paste option on previous versions.
--
Thanks for your help
Hello Terry,
On Tue, 27 Apr 2004 08:59:42 -0700 GMT (27/04/2004, 22:59 +0700 GMT),
Terry G. Munson wrote:
TGM> I just tried to copy information from a folder template so that I
TGM> could past the information into a new folder. When I click the right
TGM> mouse button there is no copy-cut-paste o
Hi All
I just tried to copy information from a folder template so that I
could past the information into a new folder. When I click the right
mouse button there is no copy-cut-paste options.
I could swear that I was able to do this in previous versions of
TB!
Is there an easy way to cut and past
Hallo Martin,
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 19:41:10 +0100GMT (2-10-03, 20:41 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
MW> I'd still like to know the difference between %HDR and %SETHEADER.
Well, these are the definitions of %addheader en %setheader
ADDHEADER("RFC Name","Value") add Value to a message header
SETH
re's definitely something left to be desired.
I noticed that too. But it does work if you already have folder
templates (see mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]).
I'd still like to know the difference between %HDR and %SETHEADER.
- --
As ever,
Martin Webster
The Bat! 2.00.22 w/ BayesIt! 0.4fm (Windows X
Hallo Roelof,
On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 10:29:45 +0200GMT (2-10-03, 10:29 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO> X-Folder-Id: TBUDL
RO> it actually shows an X-Folder-ID header. So you're right.
Yikes, it shows 'Id' instead of 'ID', all my definitions ask for 'ID'
so there's definitely something left to
Hallo Samson,
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 18:53:55 -0700GMT (2-10-03, 3:53 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
S> So far I'm setting this "Setheader" macro in each of my project sub
S> folder one by one. seems no way to change once and apply to all...
There's one thing I didn't mention before. When all of y
Hallo Samson,
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 18:56:30 -0700GMT (2-10-03, 3:56 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO>> Apart from that, I can't get any of them to work. :-(
S> I think the key is, before you specify your own header, you must first
S> define this header in option/preference/message-headers. othe
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 10:54:16 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
RO> Samson wanted to filter his message back to the folder where they were
RO> created. To do that, you need to identify to the folder. That's done
RO> with the macro I suggested. You place the macro on a single line,
RO>
Hello Roelof,
RO> Apart from that, I can't get any of them to work. :-(
%Setheader works for me (i didn't try %HDR because %setheader is good
enough).
I think the key is, before you specify your own header, you must first
define this header in option/preference/message-headers. otherwise
%sethea
Hello Roelof,
RO> Samson wanted to filter his message back to the folder where they were
RO> created. To do that, you need to identify to the folder. That's done
RO> with the macro I suggested. You place the macro on a single line,
RO> doesn't matter where in your templates. (New message, Reply, F
Hallo Martin,
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:24:01 +0100GMT (1-10-03, 23:24 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO>> %SetHeader("X-Folder-ID","%FolderName")%-
MW> What if you already have folder templates?
Then you're without luck.
MW> And how does this differ from
rs inherit this parent template so i don't have
S>> to edit them one by one?
RO> No.
RO> However if you use the %FolderName macro, you can insert it in your
RO> account macro and as long as you haven't yet created folder templates,
RO> all folders will use this.
RO> %
Hallo Gerrit,
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 22:17:37 +0200GMT (1-10-03, 22:17 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
RO>> %SetHeader("X-Folder-ID","%FolderName")%-
GK> This sounds like a trick I'd like to use, but unfortunately I don't
GK> understand it. I know I can create templates at account level, and
GK> th
Hallo Edgar,
On Wed, 1 Oct 2003 21:51:22 +0200GMT (1-10-03, 21:51 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
>> However if you use the %FolderName macro, you can insert it in your
>> account macro and as long as you haven't yet created folder templates,
>> all folders will use
Hallo Roelof,
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 9:14:22 PM, Roelof Otten wrote:
RO> However if you use the %FolderName macro, you can insert it in your
RO> account macro and as long as you haven't yet created folder templates,
RO> all folders will use this.
RO> %SetHeader("X-F
Hello Roelof,
Wednesday, October 1, 2003, 9:14:22 PM, you wrote:
> However if you use the %FolderName macro, you can insert it in your
> account macro and as long as you haven't yet created folder templates,
> all folders will use this.
> %SetHeader("X-Folder-ID",&q
No.
However if you use the %FolderName macro, you can insert it in your
account macro and as long as you haven't yet created folder templates,
all folders will use this.
%SetHeader("X-Folder-ID","%FolderName")%-
--
Groetjes, Roelof
__
Hello tbudl,
if i have a folder tree like this:
- projects
+-- project_a
+-- project_b
+-- ...
is it possible to only modify the reply template of "projects", and
let project_* sub folders inherit this parent template so i don't have
to edit them one by one?
thanks.
(Using The Bat! v2.0
Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 12:31:57 PM, MAU wrote:
M> You owe me a beer ;-)
Anytime! Next time you're in Atlanta, give me a holler and your
preference of dark or light is on me. :)
--
Dave Kennedy
Current version is 2.00 | "Using TBUDL" inform
Hello Dave,
> Good suggestion! I've already implemented it.
If you have been around this list for at least a couple of weeks, you
probably know what saying something like that means:
You owe me a beer ;-)
--
Best regards,
Miguel A. Urech (El Escorial - Spain)
Using The Bat! v2.00.6
Winamp OF
Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 9:59:22 AM, MAU wrote:
>> How do I tell if a folder has templates set for it rather than
>> defaulting to the account-level templates?
M> There is no direct and easy way to tell
M> I have used the %ACCOUNT macro with the account name (i.e.
M> %ACCOUNT="MAU", which is
Tuesday, September 23, 2003, 9:03:15 AM, Roelof wrote:
R> That's because when you don't define folder templates, you
R> still see them, but they're identical to your account
R> templates.
Right. Which begs my main question:
How do I tell if a folder has template
to the recommendations some TBUDL members, because of the risks
involved in using them, I do use folder templates quite a bit and what I
have done is to include some "redundant and transparent" information in
my default account templates. In some accounts, like in the one I'm
using now, I h
Hallo Dave,
On Tue, 23 Sep 2003 07:28:00 -0400GMT (23-9-03, 13:28 +0200, where I
live), you wrote:
DK> What surprised me is I couldn't tell the difference between the
DK> folder templates for the rest of my folders, including TBOT, and
DK> the account-level templates.
That'
How do I tell if a folder has templates set for it rather than
defaulting to the account-level templates?
Details... In cleaning up my TBUDL & TBOT templates, I was
checking the folder templates for each. Before I learned about AB
templates, I had set up folder templates for TBUDL, so I expe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Marek Mikus, [MM] wrote:
MM> but there is an easy solution for using folder templates with
MM> protection to send messages to list if is mailto: link used.
It's OK. I was just answering the question:
,-
| Just another question:
use the %To macro in the new message template.
> When I wish to write a new message to TBUDL, I open a new message, type
> tbudl in the To: field. Message addressed. When I tab into the message
> body, the tbudl template is auto-applied.
but there is an easy solution for using folder te
alternative to folder templates? I too use
MW> these for my mailing lists.
:-) due to personal circumstance, Leif is currently only
participating in TBBETA and TBTECH.
The usual alternative to folder templates is address book templates.
They kick in once there is already a destination addre
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Martin Webster, [MW] wrote:
MW> Just another question: what's the alternative to folder templates? I
MW> too use these for my mailing lists.
For discussion lists where mail from the list server includes the
header:
Reply-To:
you can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hello tbudl,
Leif Gregory recently posted the following on tbbeta:
,- [ Re: Test Animated Gif ]
| If you insist on using folder templates for the list. put the
| appropriate macro in all of your New Message templates for folders for
| lists
ON Wednesday, October 30, 2002, 5:29:58 PM, you wrote:
JN> You both have sounded amusing alarms about avoiding folder templates.
JN> I'm curious, but not stupid. Avoided they will be.
Hi Joseph,
Mission accomplished ;-)
--
Best regar
Marck and Gerard,
Thanks for the info on templating. I'll try it all today. Still, it
would be easier if TB! had a dedicated "reply to list" button or menu
option, as it appears that some other MUA's have.
You both have sounded amusing alarms about avoiding folder templat
Hello Paula,
On Sun, 29 Sep 2002 14:14:31 -0400 GMT (30/09/02, 01:14 +0700 GMT),
pmf wrote:
p> Long live folder templates.
This was the first time that I learned about a very good use for
folder templates. Due to your needs, you have arranged the folders in
TB different from the rest (or
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Sudip Pokhrel [SP] wrote:'
SP> Yes. And while using AB templates, and if you use multiple
SP> accounts, its a good idea to add %Account macro to your new
SP> message templates. This way your messages are
Hi Allie,
On Sunday, September 22, 2002 06:52 your local time, (17:37 my local
time), you wrote:
> If you use address book templates it doesn't matter where the
> recipients message resides or which folder is currently selected.
> The correct template will always be used.
Yes. And while using A
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Ravi [R] wrote:'
R> Can anyone think of anything else that can go wrong with it?
Just remember the folder templates basic weakness being that it
needs to be selected for the tem
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
In <[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Leif Gregory [LG] wrote:'
LG> No, I do agree with you Marck. Taking a stock folder and just
LG> dumping a %TO macro in it seems like the logical thing to do,
LG> and that's where the problem lies. But as
> %IF:"%TOLIST%CCLIST%BCCLIST"="":"%TO='[EMAIL PROTECTED]'"
> But I would imagine that since they haven't defined a recipient
> yet, they'll notice the list address in the TO field when they
> go to add one.
This seems like an idea (nice one Leif) that will solve the
problems I've had so far.
C
me I say this, someone takes
MDP> exception to something I've said with comments like "'danger' is
MDP> a bit harsh" or "I've used Folder templates for ages and it's
MDP> never gone wrong for me".
Like me!
No, I do agree with you Marck. Tak
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, August 08, 2002, Jonathan Angliss wrote...
> Why would I need to split it up? I don't see any need for two filters
> as TB! can handle the double action (or even more actions) at the same
> time.
And I just found out why... ... when se
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, August 08, 2002, Marck D Pearlstone wrote...
JA>> If not, is there any way to stop the TBUDL filter from adding my
JA>> email address to the "TB Lists" group?
> Yes.
> Oh, you wanted to know how? . The filter that adds the addresses
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thursday, August 08, 2002, Thomas F. wrote...
JA>> If not, is there any way to stop the TBUDL filter from adding my
JA>> email address to the "TB Lists" group?
> I don't have a TB lists group. I have an AB entry (with templates)
> for this list a
t, it ignores the fact it came from that list, and
JA> uses the standard account formating. Without adding everybody that
JA> emails that list to my address book, is this one of those rare
JA> cases where folder templates are needed over address book
JA> templates?
Yes, it is.
iling list for the reply to
include the original sender. When I reply to the email sent to the
list, it ignores the fact it came from that list, and uses the
standard account formating. Without adding everybody that emails that
list to my address book, is this one of those rare cases where f
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Allie C Martin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You could create an address book group and then use the group
> templates. The %To addressing would be sorted out as it is for me. I
> however use the same signatures in my group. However, a nice %IF macro
> could sort
s
checking by going into the account properties/options/'ignore check
all accounts request' and also disabling periodic checking. At the
account level, create your generic list templates. It will always be
included in the folder templates for any folder you create within the
account. I have su
but things
RD> like TO: fields and sigs set separately.
There's a minor point about folder templates with %to macros. Every
once in a while they turn out to be very embarrassing for someone.
When you've left your focus on a folder with such a template and you
start composing a personal me
Hi ,
I've set up all my mail lists in separate sub folders, all inside a
Common Folder called Mail Lists.
I can set the Identity and Templates for each mail list separately
using the Properties of the individual folders. Is there any way I can
get the sub folders to inherit the templates of th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Sunday, May 12, 2002 7:20 PM (Pacific Std Time) GMT -0800
Greetings TheBat! Users,
Does anyone know if starting with v2.x will no longer have TheBat
registry key. I seem to remember that someone said that in place of
the registry key, their will be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Eddie,
@01 May 2002, 07:22:33 +0200 (06:22 UK time) Eddie Castelli wrote in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">mid:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> BTW - another mistake in such templates is to use the construct
>> %TO="[EMAIL PROTECTED]" without a "%TO=''" before it.
Hello Nick
Thank you for your email dated Thursday, March 28, 2002, 8:14:45 PM, in which you
wrote:
NA> she
She?
--
Regards
William
PGP spoken here - email me for my Public Key
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Flying with The Bat! 1.60
Cu
Hello William,
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 12:26:53 PM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to "Why folder templates are dangerous (was Re: Clarification
requested on list reply headers)":
NA>> she
> She?
Absolutely! Something as refined yet temperamental as Th
Hello David,
On Thursday, March 28, 2002, at 04:15:54 AM -0700, you wrote
the following in regards to "Why folder templates are dangerous (was Re: Clarification
requested on list reply headers)":
>> I've seen Marck's warnings about using folder templates, along wit
Thursday, March 28, 2002, 12:15:54 PM, David van Zuijlekom wrote:
> This is a quote from Marck a few months ago (a very good explanation
> why folder templates are dangerous):
---
I'm guilty of this. However, I have fifty-odd folders, most of which
I've set with custom properti
ensitive" subjects i
might say ;-))
>>I've seen Marck's warnings about using folder templates, along with
>>comments from several others. What I have not seen is an
>>explanation why this is a Bad Idea.
Cheers
Ray
___
Hello Dave,
On Wednesday, March 27, 2002 at 17:39:28 -0500, Dave Goodman [DG]
wrote concerning 'Clarification requested on list reply headers':
...
> I've seen Marck's warnings about using folder templates, along with
> comments from several others. What I have not se
nt (let's not waste bandwidth, okay?).
Except in one aspect.
Many TB fans warn others about the use of folder templates.
Now, I made the opposite error: I have quite a few address
book entries ( > 500) plus I rely on the history, knowing
that either the handle or somebody or some list that
Hello jsvrp.gw,
Wednesday, May 30, 2001, 11:41:51 PM, you wrote:
jg> Wait know I see what you mean. It's when you click on a mailto:
jg> link located in a message in the TBUDL folder (holding the macro).
jg> It adds the %TO adress to the To: field of the new message.
No. It was when I clicked
Hello Ottar,
jg> click on a mailto link in my IE5.5 browser and there is a new message
Wait know I see what you mean. It's when you click on a mailto: link
located in a message in the TBUDL folder (holding the macro). It adds the %TO
adress to the To: field of the new message.
Is there not an e
Hello jsvrp.gw,
Wednesday, May 30, 2001, 10:37:17 PM, you wrote:
jg>> Not confirmed. You must enable your main account for ACCOUNT
jg>> PROPERTIES-"general"-"default for mailto:URL's". When enabling
jg>> this in one account it will disable in other account.
OG> I have enabled this in default p
Hello jsvrp.gw,
Wednesday, May 30, 2001, 9:25:45 AM, you wrote:
jg> Not confirmed. You must enable your main account for ACCOUNT
jg> PROPERTIES-"general"-"default for mailto:URL's". When enabling
jg> this in one account it will disable in other account.
I have enabled this in default properti
Hello The,
Monday, May 28, 2001, 11:32:41 PM, you wrote:
OG> I just discovered why folder templates could be dangerous.
OG> I have made folder templates for a norwegian maillist I participate
OG> in. I had just finished reading my mail and had still the focus on
OG> the fol
Peter,
Wednesday, May 30, 2001, 12:13:03 AM, you wrote:
MDP>> A mailing list manager which doesn't set the "Reply-To" address
MDP>> "properly".
PP> cannot confirm ... using it with out problems ... *wondering*
Well, by default ezmlm doesn't set the reply-to; there are even
ranting articles to
Hello Silviu,
On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 at 7:53:40 PM you wrote:
SC> The qmail (MTA) and ezmlm are a winning combo' :)
DEFINETELY CONFIRMED :-)
--
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Using The Bat! v1.53 Beta/11 on Windows 98 4.90 Build 3000 (Windows
Hello Marck,
On Tuesday, May 29, 2001 at 8:00:08 PM you wrote:
OG>> ezmlm ??
MDP> A mailing list manager which doesn't set the "Reply-To" address
MDP> "properly".
cannot confirm ... using it with out problems ... *wondering*
--
Regards
Peter Palmreuthermailto:[EMA
Hi Ottar,
@ 10:50:31 AM on 5/29/2001, Ottar Grimstad wrote:
--(snip)--
BC>> It'll almost make you detest ezmlm.
OG> ezmlm ??
Yeah, sorry. @:) Stands for Easy Mailing List Manager (I think). It
works with qmail.
--
-Brian Clark | PGP is spoken here: 0xE4D0C7C8
[SB! 1.53 Beta/11/iKey1000, Win
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Ottar,
On 29 May 2001 at 16:50:31 +0200 (which was 15:50 where I live)
Ottar Grimstad wrote to Brian Clark and made these points:
BC>> It'll almost make you detest ezmlm.
OG> ezmlm ??
A mailing list manager which doesn't set the "Reply-To" add
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Tuesday, May 29, 2001, 5:50:31 PM, Ottar Grimstad wrote:
BC>> It'll almost make you detest ezmlm.
> ezmlm ??
It's a mailing-list manager from the Linux world, and it's cool
IMO. The qmail (MTA) and ezmlm are a winning combo' :)
- --
PGP Key: m
Hello Brian,
Tuesday, May 29, 2001, 1:31:09 AM, you wrote:
BC> It'll almost make you detest ezmlm.
ezmlm ??
--
Best regards,
Ottar Grimstad, Norway
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://home.online.no/~ottgrims
Using The Bat! 1.52c on Windows 98 version 4,10
--
Hi Ottar,
@ 5:32:41 PM on 5/28/2001, Ottar Grimstad wrote:
OG> I just discovered why folder templates could be dangerous.
--(snip)--
Indeed. Join the club. :))
It'll almost make you detest ezmlm.
(I still use a few though, and I've been bitten once)
--
-Brian Clark | PGP i
Hello TBUDL:
I just discovered why folder templates could be dangerous.
I have made folder templates for a norwegian maillist I participate
in. I had just finished reading my mail and had still the focus on
the folder for this list. I then went to a travel site to order a
travel
83 matches
Mail list logo
