garym wrote:
> 2. Regarding wifi vs ethernet. I like to use ethernet whenever possible
> as it just removes certain variables (interference, etc.). That said,
> some of my SBs are wifi and have no issues with FLAC files. And there
> are many people on this forum that use FLAC and wifi, even
blueye wrote:
Thank you to all the posters. Thoroughly entertaining. Just one
question.
Where can I get my bits cryogenicly frozen and once frozen what
improvements can I expect:-)
Blue
Cryogenic treatment works best for cool jazz.
garym wrote:
I've seen a number of situations over the years where leaving one of
these things unplugged overnight has solved problems.
Is there any way to unplug the US Congress?
ralphpnj's Profile:
dasmueller wrote:
I think they already are. They are also out of Touch.
True they are unplugged in the sense that they get nothing done and
they are most definitely out of touch but I was hoping that unplugging
them for few days might help to get Congress working again.
garym wrote:
We need erland to write a plugin!
I like that idea! However would erland be willing to write a plugin that
does nothing?
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
View this
cjfreitag wrote:
I'm experiencing an intermittent problem with one of my SBTs. It will
spontaneously display Connecting to [my LMS server]. It's connected
wirelessly to my network (at 100% strength...it sits about 4 feet from
the router]. It happens even when the unit is sleeping/powered
Plenty of really good responses and lots of positive things being said
about the Touch. One thing to keep in mind is that you can use the
Touch's analog outputs for the time being and while doing so you can
start a leisurely search for an external DAC to use with the Touch. If
one is not in a
Zombie wrote:
So what's wrong with the Controller, then? Have used mine for some four
years now, no problem at all...
My main complaint with the Controller is the lack of a text based
search. While scrolling is okay for limited collections, for large
collections nothing is faster than a good
sportflyer wrote:
Yes, both Squeezeplay and LMS web interface works on my old Toshiba
Laptop. Tks
I would like to try the Moose but the setup procedure seems a bit
complicated for a non network person like me .
If you are happy with Squeezeplay and the LMS web interface than don't
bother
I don't have much experience or knowledge about sound bars other then
the one sound bar I own and would recommend:
http://www.amazon.com/Sony-HT-CT150-Sound-Bar-System/dp/B003C1AO2I/ref=lh_ni_t
Plus it's not all that expensive!
azinck3 wrote:
You can use virtually any device with a web browser.
Such as a laptop or netbook computer. If using a computer you can also
use of several very good Squeezebox front end programs, such as Moose
(http://www.rusticrhino.com/drlovegrove/) or Muso
(http://klarita.net/muso.html), to
sportflyer wrote:
Does Squeezeplay , Moose or any Web interface degrade the quality of
the music stream to the SBT ?
Absolutely NOT! The data is streamed for the computer running Squeezebox
server (SBS) or LMS to the Touch. All Squeezeplay, Moose or any Web
interface does is tell the
jhonsber...@msn.com wrote:
Well what are you gonna do when your computer craps out and you have to
buy a new one , then you find out with your computer's new operating
system won't run LMS ? Then you go back and search for an older LMS
version and they don't work either .
I believe that
jhonsber...@msn.com wrote:
Buying a discontinued product that relies on bug fixes to maintain its
functionality when there is some doubt as to whether Logitech will put
forth the effort to correct those problems Is ludicrous IMO .
Nonsense. Sure there are some slight issues and minor
mlsstl wrote:
Just curious, what bug do I need fixed to keep playing my music on the
Touch just as I've been doing for the past 2 1/2 years? (And, yes, I
just bought another for a spare.)
I know there will always be someone that wants this change or that one,
but that is true of any
travelfotografer wrote:
Sold out and marked discontinued on Crutchfield
Sold out and no indication of restocking on Amazon.com (except third
party sellers)
Sorry to hear that. I must have gotten one of the last ones because the
Touch arrived on this past Wednesday and it is up and running
SBGK wrote:
funny how other forums look at hydrogenaudio as a bunch of kooks and
here they are revered, nuff said !!!
What other forums?
The almost dead Stereophile forum?
The just about dead Absolute Sound forum?
The only pattern I see here is that the forums which have a decidedly
Mnyb wrote:
No no silver is best for USB1.0 copper is better for USB2.0 .2.0 is
faster and must be tamed with the more mellow copper ;) and is there
synthetic material in those ? Asphalt saturated hemp is the best.
But I'm actually astonished that there is no paper/oil/lead/asphalt
SBGK wrote:
bits are either 0 or 1
can't argue with that, not in this forum anyway, if that is the level of
your thinking then it is quite legitimate to compare that dogma to that
of a primitive cult.
so the take away is that the Touch is the perfect digital audio device,
at least in
Soulkeeper wrote:
Pah, you're just being sucked into the religion of those dogmatic idiots
who invented digital computing. You should free yourself from that kind
of primitive thinking, and go live in the woods without electricity. You
know, out in the woods, bits can be whatever they want,
All this talk about whether or not to buy a Touch got me to thinking
that now would be a good time to pick up another Touch before they are
all gone since Logitech no longer appears to be manufacturing or
offering the Touch. Luckily I was able to find a new Touch from
Crutchfield (here in the
Mnyb wrote:
With quantum problems you must seek out all cryogenic tweaks to get
it sorted ,maybe you can freeze your bits, put the post on an USB stick
keep it in the freezer for 24 hours :)
It's funny that you should state this because after reading SBGK's post
I did exactly that, i.e. I
As Tim stated, if you're happy as is then there is no need to buy a
Touch.
However, that said, the main reason to get a Touch would be use the
Touch rather than your current computer/Squeezeplay combo to play your
music. This would mean that you would no longer need a computer as part
of your
toby10 wrote:
This thread is like a train wreck. We know we shouldn't watch, the
outcome is predictable and ugly, yet we watch anyway. :)
+1 (really should be +1,000,000)
ralphpnj's Profile:
dbPowerAmp is an excellent program and offers many ways to customize how
songs are tagged. In addition to dbPowerAmp I would recommend the free
program mp3tag (http://www.mp3tag.de/en/) which also many very powerful
tagging tools.
While LMS uses very basic tags, as outlined by Osamede in the
lovejoy wrote:
I tend to avoid the vast majority of stuff that carries the word
'remastered' as it seems to be an excuse just to make everything LOUD
and completely sap the life and dynamics out of a recording - the only
exception to this I can think of has been the Nick Drake albums which
trott3r wrote:
They still are holding on to the 80s and early 90s model of them acting
as a monopoly.
I think at this point it is the iTunes store that is closer to a
monopoly than any of the record companies.
trott3r wrote:
Yes that was my point it will sound just as bad.
My point is i
trott3r wrote:
But with a bit of googling consumers are realising that they can get a
24bit
96khz high res rip from vinyl that hasn't been butchered by the
loudness
wars. Thus the monopoly falls (at least for older music).
Martin
Luckily I still have most of my old (and some new) vinyl
lovejoy wrote:
Will it do 24/192 over USB? My Audiolab will only do up to 24/96 over
USB as it's a class 1 USB device, but will do 24/192 over coax. The main
problem at the moment is having anything meaningful to listen to at
24/192 - The only recording I currently have at this rate is
Viventis wrote:
Wow! I am so sorry to disagree, but what I have just read sounds like a
bunch of techno-babble published by the manufacturers of high end cables
to attempt to justify their exorbitant prices.
Digital is binary. Binary is a sequence of 0's and 1's. If 100
different
lovejoy wrote:
As I said at the bottom of my message, just posting my *EXPERIENCE*
based upon many hours of listening and enjoying or not enjoying music.
If you can't hear any difference then all the best to you, you've
achieved the best sound for your system and I'm jealous and wish you all
saeyedoc wrote:
Due to where I wanted to located the Touch, I ended up using coax since
that's all I had around that was long enough. Because of the location of
the router, I have the touch hooked up with ethernet and the server
using wifi.
I take by the above quote that your setup is
lovejoy wrote:
It's a curse. Oh to be able to enjoy music as much from a tinny micro
system ;-).
That's is the rub! Music can be enjoyed using an iPod boombox but if one
wants to immerse oneself fully into the music then a somewhat nicer
playback system is needed.
lovejoy wrote:
I agree
garym wrote:
Anyhow, at my house more SB players is always better than less. So in
your shoes, I'd buy the TOUCH, use it and find another use for the duet
receiver (back patio with some powered Audioengine A2s or A5s. ;-)
Exactly! Replacing the Duet with the Touch just means that you
stop-spinning wrote:
Goldenote DAC-7 (Italian DAC but superb).
LOL!
Am I missing something or are Italian audio manufacturers not known for
making decent DACs?
ralphpnj's Profile:
jdt7385 wrote:
You are absolutely right. The problem was with artistsort, which on one
of the albums did show Harris, Emmylou. Until you advised me, I did not
know about the extended tags section. I was puzzled because the basic
information for all the albums did reflect Emmylou Harris as
jdt7385 wrote:
Thanks for your quick reply. I did not do a good job of describing the
artist listing issue. Here is an example: The artist listing for
Emmylou Harris appears as Emmylou Harris (not Harris, Emmylou as I
said in my post...sorry about that). However, the artist listing appears
jdt7385 wrote:
You are far more advanced that I at this point in time. For now it
appears that I will wind up with dBpoweramp and mp3tag. For now I will
be quite happy if I can get those programs to give me well tagged rips
to flac, then be able to convert them to wav or some other format in
garym wrote:
dbpa is mostly a CD ripper but there is a program included that can
also burn CDs from digital files. Frankly, I've not once needed to
ever use it as there is no longer any use case I have for music on a
physical CD
The dbPowerAmp CD Writer (as it is properly called) is
jdt7385 wrote:
The albums used in my example (Emmylou Harris and Holly Cole) were
ripped using Windows Media Player and the artist names input exactly the
same way (first name first last name last). When the information is
viewed in Windows Media Player the artist information is displayed
Things needed for successful ripping and maintenance of a music
library:
dbPowerAmp: worth every penny of its low price.
Back up: A full mirrored back up is a must. If you think ripping a CD
collection once is a pain, just think how painful re-ripping that
collection will be if your hard drive
TheOctavist wrote:
what the max size you would reccomend?
500x500 just to be safe?? what is large?
I store all the cover art as a cover.jpg file in the same
folder/directory as the flac files. Rather than go by pixel size I go by
file size and keep all the cover.jpg files under one MB. I
TechHome wrote:
Just got the Touch presets configured: Settings - Advanced - Beta
Features - Shortcuts Only six presets available; I mapped press-hold
numeral keys 1 - 6 to presets 1 - 6, which are the same as my Favorites
1 thru 6. Now my touch presets match my SB 2/3s except numeral keys
!
+---+
|Filename: Low.jpg |
|Download: http://forums.slimdevices.com/attachment.php?attachmentid=13152|
+---+
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter
to decode them.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com
?
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid
.
By the way both of these statements can be easily proven by simply
listening.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
yourself but keep your unfounded beliefs to yourself
as well.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's
, use it without a DAC and then
decide if adding an external DAC will be worthwhile.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
garym;664059 Wrote:
I do very much like the transporter balanced outs. But my benchmark has
these as well as do many DACs.
Funny thing with balanced outputs is that they are only useful if one's
preamp/integrated amp/receiver has balanced inputs ;)
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking
of the Receiver. You
are in for a very nice treat.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile
Looking at the DEQX site it is unclear as to whether or not their
devices can accept a 24bit/88.2kHz or 24bit/96kHz input. I would try
checking with their customer support to get a definitive answer.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2
.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
1000.9.99,
along with the bug fix for the light sensor and the scanning of large
(200K+ tracks) music libraries. It's comforting to know that at least
the SB Touch in my coffin will work as advertised.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops
players, at any price points!
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http
fine.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php
Sinkdrain;640044 Wrote:
I have my touch volume set at about 95%. I'm glad you mentioned
that...I'm definitely setting it to full volume. How interesting. Thank
you.
You are most welcome! Glad I could help.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter
plain annoying and really, really
stupid.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http
the Touch will pass both of these through the digital
output. Please note that the volume of Touch must be set at 100% for
the encoding to be to be passed through correctly.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http
computer to the external DAC.
2) A certified pair of golden ears (certification available only from
the great and powerful HP).
3) Absolutely firm belief in the one's ability to fool oneself into
hearing differences where none exist.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch
to play 24 bit files but only using
20 bits. I would check with EAD about how your DAC handles 24 bit
files. then again if you don't have any 24 bit files then you have
little to worry about.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops
in the music section. I could
say much of the same regarding the wildly popular American Idol and
it's talentless, endless parade of singers (calling them singers is
an insult to all singers).
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
or 96 kHz)
are the future of high quality audio playback and the Touch fully
supports these hi-rez files. You will not be disappointed.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
(number, please) will this fixed problem
actually be fixed?
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's
sSNICKERSs;624222 Wrote:
Thank you for yourn answer.
So, for the fisrt point, it is certainly a bug.
I have log a bug for that :
http://bugs.slimdevices.com/show_bug.cgi?id=17138
Every one can vote for it !!
Done!
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch
art usually requires a full clear and rescan. Which of
course raises the question of when will SBS,s scan function be updated
to handle new and revised cover art without having to do a full clear
and rescan?
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter
improved handling of cover art :)
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http
paulster;622724 Wrote:
...without relying on SBS 7.6 being a panacea.
I think SBS 7.6 with respect to improved handling of cover art is more
of pipedream than a panacea.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm
in that directory.
Thanks! I'll give it a little test run before to see how I like the
results before I run it on my entire music library.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
to is internet radio or background music, then getting an
external DAC may be overkill.
Guido F.
Absolutely agree and very well stated.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
to
control a UPnP streaming device.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http
can now listen to my first
concert again!
So did you attend SMU or did you just live in Dallas in 1969?
But more importantly: Was it a good show and was Jerry on that night?
In other words, had he drank the Kool-Aid? Had you?
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch
before they closed the door
in the spring of 1971.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile
of a
network switch and the sound of the Touch.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http
.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid
!
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid=10827
Next time this happens (which I hope is never) try just turning the
Touch on and off, if you haven't tried that already.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
digital output is also
equal to, if not better than, the Squeezebox Classic's digital output.
Also please bear in mind that the Touch, unlike the Squeezebox Classic,
can natively play up to 24bit/96kHz files and they sound great.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch
.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com/member.php?userid
Just to eliminate the most obvious:
Do your files play on your computer?
What kind of files are they? flac, mp3, etc.
Are they standard 2 channel stereo audio files and not multichannel
audio files?
Is the volume set at 100%?
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch
now have music.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com
. Throw in the ability to play up to 96kHz files and the Touch
is a very worthwhile upgrade.
Note: I run SBS on a separate, dedicated computer (Window 7 Home
Premium) with two Drobo external hard drives. Works great, even with my
rather large music library.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking
souwalker;603225 Wrote:
Thanks.
Will try this 1st.
Rgds
Patrick
Please let us know if this fixes the problem.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
the cover art is not properly scanned and added to the library
database. I would file a bug report but as with many other bugs
Logitech doesn't seem to feel that this an actual bug but rather that
it is a problem with my hardware.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch
Another option is to use Moose
(http://www.rusticrhino.com/drlovegrove/) to control your Touch from
your laptop. I find Moose to be much faster then the SBS web interface,
especially when dealing with a very large music library.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch
is a very big pain.
By the way, if you have any doubts just Google Wild Tangent and
you'll see exactly what I mean.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
is controlled
in the digital or analog stage is that if it is in the digital stage
then using too low a volume (under 50% or so) will cause deterioration
of the sound. In the analog stage this is not a problem.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2
, there can often be a steep learning curve, especially if
one starts running into seemingly unsolvable problems. So please, ask
away and we will do our best to help get the questions answered and the
problems solved.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter
is NOT the same as the pretty much useless booklet
that comes with the Touch.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
a given section is.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http://forums.slimdevices.com
and have
correct cover art will be rewarded ten fold when using the Touch and
listening to music.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
to compare (A-B test), and
see if the improvement is worth the $.
Completely agree - very wise and sage advice.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
You might also want to try Moose:
http://www.rusticrhino.com/drlovegrove/
I have a very large music collection and with Moose I am able to do
very fast searches of my library. But that's just one of Moose's many
features. Worth a look.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels
them then this may be the cause of the
problem. Please check the software to verify whether or not it may be
modifying the files.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann
money making opportunities available :)
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http
Phil Leigh;586003 Wrote:
On a (slightly) serious note regarding hi-fi air, it is worth getting an
ioniser or two in the room...
Phil, since I highly value your pragmatic, fact based approach, could
you please briefly explain why one might need an ionizer?
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two
of many of these people.
So please, do tell us just how HUGH is the difference with some
specific examples, like deeper bass, clearer midrange, etc. TIA!
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user
ralphpnj;585363 Wrote:
HUGH? - just how how HUGH? HUGH enough that anyone can hear the
difference?
It's statements like IMHO there is a huge sonical difference that
throw many people all into a tissy. Especially what such statements run
counter to the experience of many of these people
when aiming for a minimalist setup.
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter -
Transporter 2 (oops) - Touch
'Last.fm' (http://www.last.fm/user/jazzfann/)
ralphpnj's Profile: http
You may also want to double check the file tags to make such that the
tracks all have proper track numbers.
If you're not using file tags then make sure that the file names have
numbers, as in 01 - Track Name.flac
--
ralphpnj
Lock, Stock and Two Smoking Barrels - Snatch - The Transporter
1 - 100 of 175 matches
Mail list logo
