In a message dated 11/20/2004 4:44:59 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Thank you Bill and slade for the posts on this topic today.
JBH
Yes -- and Gary, thanks for the suport,. I will do less defending.
John
That is absolutely amazing. For the
first time ever G wrote something that I actually understand. Wonders never
cease. Thank you! Izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004
6:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
Isn’t that what we’re supposed to do on TT? Iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Slade Henson
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004
5:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
This has been the most retarded set of
posts
got it--let's see
what else's postd
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 22:51:28 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
One
could say (1) he was awake from verses 1 through the middle of verse 12.
Others might say (2) he was awake from the end of verse 11 until the middle of
verse 12.
One
could say (1) he was awake from verses 1 through the middle of verse 12. Others
might say (2) he was awake from the end of verse 11 until the middle of verse
12. I prefer the former because having a "vision" does not necessarily insist
upon closed eyes and horizontal positioning.
--
s
in what verses was
Abe awake in Gen 15?
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:52:04 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
The
text tells us..
Avraham is called a prophet, that is true, in the Avimelekh drama. Where
does he prophesy? He prophesies on his way up Mt. Moriyah with the wood strapped
onto Isaac's back. THAT, as a matter of fact, is one of the most powerful
prophesies in the Bible!
--
slade
As far
as Avraham's slee
:)
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 21:13:53 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
hahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaha
--slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTE
Jeff in red:
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 20:02
Subject: [TruthTalk] Two Covenants
> Jeff
wrote:>> You must include Romans 7:7-8:3 at the very
least.>> And the whole book to grasp the context of
slade and/or
Bill--How would you guys evaluate Abe's prophetic status with
God before and after the 'deep sleep', below?
G
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 19:44:01 -0500 "Jonathan Hughes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
||
I like the fact that
Avraham was in a deep sleep.
||
F
hahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahahahahahahhaha
--slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 20 November, 2004
19.43To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Two Cove
Jonathan wrote:
I like the fact that Avraham was in a deep sleep.
I am going to ponder the significance of that.
Do not overlook the fact that God was in deep communication with Abraham
during this sleep concerning the fate of his descendants as a result of his
covenant that he was now cutting wi
Slade wrote:
... as far as Galatians 4, are you referring specifically to the
two women/two covenants or some other aspect of the passage?
Yes, Galatians 4:21-5:6. I specifically am interested in you recognizing
that Paul identifies two covenants here. Verse 24 says, "two covenants" and
Paul ar
David Miller wrote:
I had asked in that post if Slade considered a widow
who had married another man to have a "renewed"
marriage contract or a new one.
Slade wrote:
The logic is wrong here. We are the widow who are then
able to marry our True Husband. We are not divorced from
Torah of Moses to mar
John wrote:
I don't remember Perry being ignored by those on this list.
For the record, Perry had complained to me how people ignored his posts of
instruction and he did not know what to do to get people to comply. Perry
and I both have desired people to quote only portions of people's posts, a
Jeff wrote:
You must include Romans 7:7-8:3 at the very least.
And the whole book to grasp the context of this Epistle.
That is why I dislike Cut and Paste Theology, as I said
before, it allows one to make any passage of Scripture
say what ever is in that persons personal agenda.
You are doing the
who is
it?
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 18:24:12 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
You
are arguing with someone who's been arguing the point you're
arguing.
One way I use (and for the sake of a
disclaimer I do not think this is the only way, nor is it the only way I use)
to determine if what one says is of God is the response I feel within me.
When I read this post all my senses gathered up to a zinging point. And
yes I think I just made up t
true,
John--the content of a post is
unique to the poster--one strength of TT is in leaving it at that,
e.g.:
most posts on TT are significant partic while taken as a
whole; like yours, they're simple inquiries and responses which also,
collectively, reflect the mind of a certain Int
I was going to complain to you about wanting a commentary on HEB 7:1-5...
For some reason, every time I looked at the post, my eyeballs saw "Heb" in
stead of "Rom."
I think I accomplished that in some other post in some other thread. Now, as
far as Galatians 4, are you referring specifically to th
Oh..
the consequence...
God
uses the culture of the person to His benefit and still His Plan comes to
fruition. What does this mean? He can even use the Western mindset to accomplish
His Goal.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
Perhaps the significance of "walking thorugh the pieces" needs to be
understood, and the consequence is rather disturbing.
In the
culture of the area and at the time, when a covenant was to be made between two
people, animals (owned by BOTH parties) would be cut in half and the pieces
plac
ï
No
need to moderate here.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 20 November, 2004
16.32To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] On TOE -- Relational Theology
ask the
moderator
O
Bill wrote: "And it came about when the sun had set, that it was very
dark, and behold, there appeared a smoking
oven and a flaming torch which passed between these pieces"
(v. 17). Two parties
passed through the pieces, but neither of them was Abraham. It is my contention
(i believe tha
Dave
I had asked in
that post if Slade considered a widow who had married another man to have a
"renewed" marriage contract or a new one. Maybe you can answer this question for
me, and perhaps you also can exegete the passage above (Rom. 7:3-6). Perhaps you
have another translation you th
This
has been the most retarded set of posts ever on TruthTalk. You are arguing with
someone who's been arguing the point you're arguing.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 20 November, 2004
16
In a message dated 11/20/2004 6:15:07 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: What list were you on John? What I noticed was that when Perry
spoke nobody did things any different than before. Could this be how
he got discouraged and stopped saying anything? I don't remember
Per
ï
jt: Lance our local churches picketed "The Life of
Brian" in Virginia Beach. I can't imagine paying money to see a
parody of the crucifixion (ie a homosexual being
crucified) for entertainment The way you use the word
'incarnation', TOE, and what you call Relational
Theology I find very
In a message dated 11/20/2004 1:29:08 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
jt: How does one reconcile the mind of Monty Python with the mind of Christ?
Probably the best avenue of reconciliation in this case is the through the means of laughter.
John
In a message dated 11/20/2004 12:11:56 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
A young man named John received a parrot as a gift. The parrot had a bad attitude and an even worse vocabula
ï
jt: Jeff how is it you don't see any conflict between
what you wrote below and your love for MP?
Rom 12:2, Don't be conformed to this world, but be
transformed by the renewing of your mind, so that you may prove what is the
good, well-pleasing, and perfect will of God.
I could add: "They a
ï
I think that MP is the best comedy to come out of Great
Britian and those 2 are probably the VERY best!
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004
16:14
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On TOE --
Relational Theolog
ï
then incarnationsl
theology is relatively myopic
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:45:17 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
THE ENTIRETY OF IMMANUEL'S LIFE (from his birth
through his ascension) accomplishes..redemption
ï
My 'Life of Brian' quote was simply an attempt to
clarify not to suggest dvd's to rent.
In LOB Brian was being crucified. This
accomplishes nothing for HK, whereas THE ENTIRETY OF IMMANUEL'S LIFE (from his
birth through his ascension) accomplishes the redemption of
HK.
The question of W
ï
ask the
moderator
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:27:05 -0500 Judy Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
jt: How does one reconcile the mind of Monty Python
with the mind of Christ?
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:14:24 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Jeff:I laugh every time I
David:Do a 'google' or an 'Amazon' (yikes, did I just say that?) on Alvin
Plantinga. Look at his work on warrant. I don't know but that there might
exist some similarity between this and 'Strong Inference'.Further, do you
possess any understanding of a particular brand of rationalism associated
wit
ï
jt: How does one reconcile the mind of Monty Python
with the mind of Christ?
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 16:14:24 -0500 "Lance Muir" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Jeff:I laugh every time I watch the 'dead parrot
sketch' or the 'department of silly walks'.
- Original Message -
myth (re: the
Prophets, JC, the Ap Paul and the KoG, a definition emerges--not
definitions)
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 14:50:38 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
..the power of opinion supercedes Biblical definitions
.
--
slade
||
ï
Jeff:I laugh every time I watch the 'dead parrot
sketch' or the 'department of silly walks'.
- Original Message -
From:
Jeff
Powers
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 20, 2004 16:06
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On TOE --
Relational Theology
Very cute Lance!
ï
Very cute Lance! I like the Monty Python
reference!!
Jeff
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004
15:58
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On TOE --
Relational Theology
Jt:HIS cross Judy, thus the significanc
Jeff in
red:
Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants
David MillerWed, 17 Nov 2004 06:12:27 -0800
Jeff wrote:
I see one covenant. God's covenant with man, begun with Abraham,
amended with Moses, Again amended with David. Jeremiah prophesied a renewal,
as did Isaiah, etc. That renewal was accom
ï
Jt:HIS cross Judy, thus the significance of the
Incarnation. There I go being abstruse again.
Sorry, sensitive types but, it's the difference
between who is on the cross in 'The Life of Brian' and, Who is on the Cross at
the conclusion of the LIFE of Jesus.
- Original Message -
ï
A young man named John received a parrot as a gift. The parrot
had a bad attitude and an even worse vocabulary. Every word out of the bird's
mouth was crude, obnoxious, and laced with profanity. John tried and tried
to change the bird's attitude by consistently saying only polite words, play
Lance Muir wrote:
Terry:How right you are in
saying:'When God is right there is no wiggle room.' So, allow me to
AMEN that then, leave it right there.
thanks brother,
Lance
===
U be welcome. ( I don't have a handl
Exactly, but the power of opinion supercedes Biblical definitions -- that
is my point.
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Saturday, 20 November, 2004
13.20To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
Terry:How right you are in saying:'When God is
right there is no wiggle room.' So, allow me to AMEN that then, leave it right
there.
thanks brother,
Lance
- Original Message -
From:
Terry Clifton
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: November 20, 2004 13:13
Subject: Re:
Lance Muir wrote:
Terry:Are these the only two
possibilities?
'God will lead you into truth' vs
'There is no such thing as truth' (Therefore, either God or the author
of this _expression_ is a liar)
'Multiple covenants' vs 'One
unilateral covenant'(Therefore either G
(If) it is truly misapplied (then it will) lead to erroneous ideas of God's
covenant with us' The following is not some debate point, David: IFF you
misunderstand this point then, to some extent, you are not speaking the
truth of God when you speak the truth you speak. Is this correct?
- Origin
myth (there aren't
two or more definitions--that's the beauty of biblical
language)
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 10:34:13 -0500 "Slade Henson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
Perhaps in your definition of Kingdom... but that's the beauty of
opinion!
--
slade
-Original Message--
ï
myth [not the
issue; its your bias toward a partic of type of lie/liar in
action]
On Sat, 20 Nov 2004 09:09:26 -0500 "David Miller"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:>Characterizing someone as a "left-winger" is not [wrong].
If you think >she is wrong to characterize a theologian as "liberal"
If I didn't know better, I would say that Bill has been
studying under one of my professors!! Beautiful explanation, John
hopefully the light gets much brighter.
Jeff
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2
David states > I recently read an article that said marriage was a
unilateral covenant and not a bilateral contract. Would you agree with that
idea too?
Not initially anyway. I would want to see how it defines the terms. I do
think there is much to be appreciated from a study of covenants vs.
c
Bill wrote:
And so we see that the covenant with Abraham was
fulfilled not by Abraham but by his Representative,
Jesus Christ, and in this the covenant is unilateral in
that God's promise was contingent upon God's
fulfillment of the covenant -- enter Emanuel.
Thanks for the explanation, Bill. I ha
--
"Let your speech be always with grace, seasoned with salt, that you may know
how you ought to answer every man." (Colossians 4:6) http://www.InnGlory.org
If you do not want to receive posts from this list, send an email to [EMAIL
PROTECTED] and you will be unsubscribed. If you hav
In a message dated 11/20/2004 8:42:24 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The only way I could "prove" my assertion would be to list almost every
professor and show them to be liberal in a belief or two.
David, your explanation on liberal, one with which I am in some agreement,
In a message dated 11/20/2004 8:33:42 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
From this we see that it was the passing through the pieces that caused the covenant to be binding. In the case of the covenant cut between God and Abraham, we discover that it involved Abraham's participatio
'when I speak truth...' Is that a tautology?
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: November 20, 2004 11:03
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Tearing down?
> Lance wrote:
> > 1. Do you, David, have biases?
>
> Yes.
>
> Lance wrote:
> > 2. Do yo
Fair enough David. 1. You place yourself in good company. 2. It may well be
that you, like Paul, simply go to the SR crowd bearing the good news then,
some in the crowd say 'praise God' while others rip shirts to shreds.
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[E
Lance wrote:
One occasionally gets the idea that you either seek out
or actually intentionally precipitate 'shirt ripping' responses.
Such a "One" would be wrong. I seek it out no more than the apostle Paul
sought out such reactions.
Peace be with you.
David Miller.
--
"Let your speech
You should be able to construct such a list right off the top of your head.
There's no WORK whatsoever in constructing such a list but, as I don't
disagree with your definition of liberal we'll just let this rather slovenly
'un David Miller' like post go without a challenge..
- Original Messa
ï
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 4:10
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On TOE --
Relational Theology
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:14:41 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL
Lance wrote:
Preliminary response: It matters not to me that you do
not see the point in supplying names. I do see the point.
So, please back this up with an array of names
throughout the centuries who fit your description.
It (the list) functions as insight into David Miller and,
to the named theo
David wrote > 1. Nobody has established the idea
of a "unilateral covenant." From my perspective, the phrase is
nonsense. It is like saying, "unilateral agreement." There is
no such thing as an agreement if it is unilateral. I may be all mixed
up in my thinking here, but until someone ex
I, for one, do not.
I'd still appreciate a response to my other query for the reasons given.
I saw a 'piece' on last nights news concerning rather violent opposition on
the part the other kind of liberals toward republicans at a California
University.(no shirts ripped off that I noticed)
One occ
Lance wrote:
1. Do you, David, have biases?
Yes.
Lance wrote:
2. Do you believe that God will lead you
out of all them prior to your demise?
No. Some biases are godly and desirable.
Lance wrote:
3. Does the truth you speak completely (read
exhaustively) overlap with the truth God speaks
in all cas
Preliminary response:It matters not to me that you do not see the point in
supplying names. I do see the point. So, please back this up with an array
of names throughout the centuries who fit your description. It (the list)
functions as insight into David Miller and, to the named theologians.
-
David Miller wrote:
'In my opinion, almost every professor of theology is liberal.'
Lance wrote:
I'm energized by this charge of yours, David.
Finally! A passionate response from Lance. :-) I like it.
Lance wrote:
Will you kindly do the following?:
1. Define liberal
2. Supply us with a few dozen
In a message dated 11/19/2004 10:15:42 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Unfortunately my lunch break is over :)"
You're amazing, Jonathan. You do on lunch break what takes me a
Maybe David, we should allow Terry to speak for himself. However, as it's
too late for that without him being influenced by your response why not
address a couple of the points: 1. Do you, David, have biases? 2. Do you
believe that God will lead you out of all them prior to your demise? 3. Does
the
Perhaps in your definition of Kingdom... but that's the beauty of
opinion!
--
slade
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, 19 November, 2004
22.56To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] Tw
In a message dated 11/19/2004 8:50:44 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
No problem, John, givn some impartiality, balance, relevant, even proactive, input, etc. -- 600 more rules arn't necessary:)
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:33:50 EST [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
..we should res
In a message dated 11/19/2004 11:41:39 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know that a lot of churches have this symptom. But I
would like to think that this group could hold to a
higher standard.
Suzy
I agree but what we can do and what we will do may be two very different t
Wherefore I give you to understand, that no man speaking by the Spirit
of God calls Jesus accursed: and
that no man can say that Jesus is
the Lord, but by the Holy Ghost.
There
are some translations of the Greek Newer
Testament who attempt to place the Sacred Name of YHVH back in
I am writing this short post to explain a little further about my scientific
approach to knowledge. The ideas I am expressing here come from philosopher
Karl Popper and scientist J.R. Platt. It has been years since I have read
them, but they had a big impact on my early thinking processes so I
DM said:'In my opinion, almost every professor of theology is liberal.' Now,
I'm not acquainted with 'almost every professor of theology' but I've read,
listened to and, carry many of them.
I'm energized by this charge of yours, David. Will you kindly do the
following?:1. Define liberal 2. Supply
jt: I'm not taking up an offence for Terry because he
can take care of himself but I don't believe the
statement below is kind or loving. What would make you
say such a thing just because Terry's thoughts
are different from yours Lance? You know that
suggestion cuts both ways. judyt
On Sa
Terry wrote:
When God says that the Holy Spirit will lead you to truth,
and one says that there is no such thing as truth because we
all have bias, either God has lied, or the person who made
that claim has lied. When God says that there were multiple
covenants, and one says there was only one uni
Good morning Judy,
A quick note on how we use the word
incarnation (incarnate means to embody in human form). We should have
cleared this up earlier. You are correct in that it is often just used in
association with the birth of Jesus. When I use the word incarnation I am
speaking of
John Smithson wrote:> ... a word from the moderator, ex-cathedral,
should be enough.> When Perry spoke, the list complied.
jt: What list were you on John? What I noticed
was that when Perry
spoke nobody did things any different than before.
Could this be how
he got discouraged and sto
Gary wrote:
moderatg the list requires some wisdom--like why
quibble with this [issue?] while you say nothin' abot,
e.g., Izzy constantly slanderg moderates (both politcl
and theolgicl) as left-wingrs, etc; she plainly lied in her
characterzation of Ryrie--you postd zero abt/to her!
I quibble with
That should read: J The Elder
:0
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
23:08
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
In a message dated 11/19/2004 11:00:16 AM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PRO
I think the truth is in there somewhere. Slade wouldn't
you prefer to spank your wife? Instead of some of us blockheads?
Jeff
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Henson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004
7:14
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
C
Hasn't she done that several times?
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Henson
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
17:27
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Two
Covenants?
Please ignore my wife. She could incite nuns to
rebel.
I've
receiv
Slade wrote:
HOW do you want me to moderate the list? I've looked into the
list tools and there is no way for me to peruse [specific] people's
emails BEFORE they're posted, so I can't do that. I would love
to be able to put some people on that kind of moderated status
to "star-out portions of a po
for Slade: SALUTE!
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
23:33
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Tearing
down?
In a message dated 11/19/2004 6:23:55 PM
Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writ
Jonathan wrote:
I do not think we are on TruthTalk to debate
or attack anything.
Some are. Some are not. TruthTalk is to talk about Truth and it is open to
everyone. Therefore, we should expect a lot of variety in why people are
here and a lot of variety in how people approach truth. Such dis
there isn't a pc alternative
Jeff
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
23:39
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Tearing
down?
What is the
politically correct/Christian love alternative to Left , please
And how do I place an order?
Jeff
- Original Message -
From:
Lance
Muir
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
18:00
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A title for
Slade & friends
$24.00 U.S.
- Original Message -
From:
Slade
Terry:Are these the only two
possibilities?
'God will lead you into truth' vs 'There is no such
thing as truth' (Therefore, either God or the author of this _expression_ is a
liar)
'Multiple covenants' vs 'One unilateral
covenant'(Therefore either God or the author of this teaching is a
I'll second this! Good points David
Jeff
- Original Message -
From: "David Miller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004 16:00
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Kabbalah
Izzy wrote:
Then what is Biblical Kabbalah? Is it also occult?
Some might quibble about w
Hi Jeff,
If you ever felt it to be appropriate I would
like to hear the story of your wife.
JBH
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeff Powers
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004
8:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A
birthday
I am a Widower, do ya still think its me?
Jeff
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, November 19, 2004
22:48
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] A birthday
request.
In a message dated 11/19/2004 9:52:44 AM
Pacific Standard
Jonathan
in Green.
Jonathan: There
are a few things one
can say here. To tell a lie is to be a liar. To believe a lie is
not.
So Terry says that next time he sees a lie on the list he will call it
a
lie. The implication is that I am telling a lie, not that I believe a
li
Slade.
K.
-Original Message-From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]On Behalf Of
[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, 19 November, 2004
22.48To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re:
[TruthTalk] A birthday request.In a message dated 11/19/2004 9:52:44 AM Pacific Standard T
Hehhee...nope, don't feel bad at all, Iz. He gave me a great
ideainciting NUNS to rebel...might have to try it! I was rolling about it. I
thought the thread was hysterical. Slade and I don't always agree...but we get
along pretty well! You guys can rest easy...he'll even spank his
wife..
ï
On Fri, 19 Nov 2004 23:14:41 -0700 "Bill Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
"Unfortunately my lunch break is over
:)"
You're amazing, Jonathan. You do on lunch break what takes me a snow
day to consider.
Judy asked, Why is it important?
For this reason we also ..
jt: Just wondering if you carry this book at your store
Lance. Looks like it would be interesting with regard to roots of the
Kaballah and some other issues. judyt
Judaism's Strange Gods by Michael A. Hoffman
II
In this scholarly and deeply considered work, the author documents his
pro
97 matches
Mail list logo
