DAVEH: Hmmm..And ain't it coincidental that both of us
them are TT subscribers! ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No
one is completely wrong. I only know of two people who seem to fit
that categorty ... tow out of thousands , over the years.
J
--
~~~
Dave
In a message dated 2/3/2005 9:27:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Just curious, how many of these do you agree with?
Also: Which agrees more with Nestle's The NASB or the KJV?I use NASB -- but probably already know why.
1. There is NO FINAL AUTHORITY but God. God in
In a message dated 2/3/2005 9:28:30 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Men" may not get closer and closer to the truth, but perhaps women do. [Joke! Just alerting you to non-inclusive language! "Men" has stopped meaning "people" for several generations now.]
May I offer an
In a message dated 2/4/2005 12:03:20 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: Hmmm..And ain't it coincidental that both of usthem are TT subscribers! ;-)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one is completely wrong. I only know of two people who seem to fit that
You've a contributor for some time. Please
illustrate 'headway' using yourself as an example.Tell us what you've learned
from TT.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 03, 2005 17:53
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On
I believe it's in the same passage as that which
supports SP'S vitriolic approach to pretty much everything. Given the
latitudin(arian)ismreflected in the founder of this chat room, I suspect
he just might not have a problem with identifying Mormons as those with whom he
will fellowship in
When the 'K' man's impact in Utah is found to be
comparable to that of Wilberforce in Britain then, you just may have a
point.
- Original Message -
From:
Kevin
Deegan
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 03, 2005 21:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] On
Don't employ excessive and primarily hyperbolic
vocabulary 'K' man as it only exacerbates the 'Bishop'. That is, unless you mean
to do something other than hurl epithets, KEVIN.
PS:The 'E' territory is mine so, keep
out.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ATTENTION 'G':I just stocked the
following:
1. Chronicles Volume One - Bob Dylan - Read by Sean
Penn
2. Younger Than That Now - The Collected Interviews
With Bob Dylan
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 03,
Having just viewed 'Unforgiveable Blackness:The
Rise and Fall of Jack Johnson', I couldn't help but wonder...what
if..?
It(Mormon history) is one of America's important
stories. He is THE documentarian of record.(on film)
Would LDS grant unlimited access? If not,
why?Could he be cajoled
I've seen a lot of talk on TT about the centrality of
the person of Jesus and how being in
"relationship" and hanging with him is what will unify
the Church.
My questions are:
1. Who is Jesus aside from the doctrine of Christ
- since He is not a doctrine?
2. How can we be surewe are
- Original Message -
From: David Peck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: February 04, 2005 07:46
Subject: FW: The gospel is bigger than the Religious Right's - Comedy
Central's Jon Stewart and Jim Wallis! (B)
Thought you might want to see this Jon Stewart clip.
Debbie Sawczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not talking about conversion below, becoming a new creature,
which is definitely the work of the Holy Spirit. I'm talking about
believersinteracting with believers about the way we understand
things. Not that such
I am composing this before reading this mornings posts because it was in
my head when I awoke. It may turn out to be a non sequitur to more recent posts.
It always astounds me how many messages are posted in the wee hours.
Kevin: I do not believe the Bible is infinitely interpretable.
Please
read the message. Believers.
Not
cleaning the stove. Important stuff.
Debbie
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:02
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re:
Lance,
you may be right.
Kev -- you should write for Disney. You do "Goofy" better than most. :-)My comments in orange.
Well I will have to defer to G on this one I know how tuff these moderators are![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kev -- you should write for Disney. You do "Goofy" better than most. :-)My comments in orange. In
G! G! Where is G when you need him?
Maybe he is asleep.
Now how does this work again?
I guess only Izzy JT can be Reprimanded
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
DAVEH: Hmmm..And ain't it coincidental that both of us them are TT subscribers! ;-) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No one
Of course, Lance is always right - where have you been
Debbie?
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:38:36 -0500 "Debbie Sawczak" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Lance, you may be right.
What don't you understand?
Where would one find the message
Believers?
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:37:05 -0500 "Debbie Sawczak" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Please read the message.
Believers.
Not
cleaning the stove. Important stuff.
Debbie
From: Judy Taylor
The Creed of the Alexanderian CultI was just wondering how many of it's Tenets you hold.
Please show me where I do not Believe the Bible.
The reason we have this discussion is you believe in the Original Autographs, not the Bible,do you not?
If you do not hold to the "original Autograph" Theory,
Good
questions.
There
is no knowledge that isn't faith.
Regarding your other post: Were you saying that there is no room for
learning/changing one's mind about anything important?
Debbie
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 04,
in the
paragraph right above your other response below.
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:35
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] On occupying
antithetical
I was
wondering where Hegelian dialect [sic] came from.
OK,
I'm gone for the day.
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 8:35
AMTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSubject: Re: [TruthTalk] On
My question is when do you think the SPs
should knock the dust off their feet? After how many years of arguing? Izzy
Matthew
10:14
Whoever does not receive you, nor
heed your
words, as you go out of that house or that city, [Acts 13:51] shake the dust off your feet.
From:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 08:56:23 -0500 "Debbie Sawczak" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Good
questions.
There is no knowledge that isn't faith.
What
about "scientific knowledge" -that which must be seen to be
believed? Biblical faith is the "substance of things hoped
for"
butis
Thanks but I understood you were taking about believers
interacting with the Holy Spirit. I just thought the
Hegelian concept out of place in such a gathering. The example we are left
withis Paul persuading people byscripture but when people are
unfamiliar with the scriptures and/or do not
G, if you want to post an ad hominem
on me, go right ahead. Where did we get all these new rules about re-stating
what was said as to be more politically correct? And you want me to
apologize for quoting Jesus? Jesus referred to those who trample the holy
underfoot as dogs and swine
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin Deegan wrote:
Be glad to discuss this with you.
To start let's look at John chapter 3 verse 13
And no man hath ascended up to heaven, but he that came down
from heaven, even the Son
Charles Perry Locke wrote:
G,
My question to Blaine was in response to his knocking SP's,
particularly those at the LDS GC and their methods. I thought it would
be interesting to find out what he thinks would be the best way to
evangelize Mormons. While sending out missionaries two by
In a message dated 2/4/2005 5:44:54 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Creed of the Alexanderian Cult
I was just wondering how many of it's Tenets you hold.
Please show me where I do not Believe the Bible.
The reason we have this discussion is you believe in the Original
TESTING
THE FAITH
Judge rules against
Christians who preached to homosexuals
'Philly 5' lose round in
federal court, prosecutors get away with calling defendants' words 'hateful'
www.wnd.com/news/article.asp?ARTICLE_ID=42705
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
*note changed subject line
Gary wrote:
there's no reason to think of Mormonism
as derived from Protestantism
There would be a historical reason. Joseph Smith was baptized a Protestant
(Baptist), and affiliated closely with Methodist Bible Studies and worship
services. His family was
Izzy wrote Where did we get all
these new rules about re-stating what was said as to be more politically
correct?...PS
Please unsubscribe me until such time as Gary is no longer Moderator. Thank
you.
In his introduction of G as moderator, David
Miller wrote I suspect
Gary will try to
Answer the question and stop diverting.
If you had any actual first hand evidence of the thigs that you tell tales about, THEN:
You would know we never use Bull Horns at GC They are not allowed nor do we need them when the crowd is but a few feet away.Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Charles
DAVE: ??? I consider it important to consider what Son of man means. Try separating Son from man. Think of the man part as being a heavenly man, who is exalted rather than a lowly earth type man who is a sinner.
Show me just ONE time in the Bible, where the Son of Man refers to the Father I will
Yes the hammer will only come down when Judy or Izzy violate.Bill Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Izzy wrote Where did we get all these new rules about re-stating what was said as to be more politically correct?...PS Please unsubscribe me until such time as Gary is no longer Moderator.
So John you can get off the ressusitator now Izzy obviously has a different view of it than you.
That is whyI said you have a Dirty Mind, you project your "ONE ONLY TRUE" view onto her thoughts.ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My question is when do you think the SPs should knock
Debbie wrote:
There is a characteristic quickness and
aggressiveness to responses on TT.
I am not saying it is immoral, but it makes
me a little jittery. There seems to be a
tendency to try to catch people out rather
than find a meeting-place with them. I think
we should err on the side of
This moderation stuff is a farce, it is never applied even handedly
I could care less what someone calls me get some skin; Sissies
Can anyone pretend that Izzy Judy have been treated fairly as far as moderation recently?
No answeres from those that have TWO STANDARDS pleaze.
The thing that bugs
AH so you are from CanucKastan!
Wierd court rulings up there lately.
Don't take it personal, if you want warm fuzzies, hold hands sing Kumbyah at some "community"
I believe that you meet with such "resistance" because some of your ideas may be Repugnant to some!
This then leads to "quick" and
Much of the documentation is Hidden in one of the worlds largest storage sites locked away in a vault deep under the mountains in Utah. Big Cottonwood canyon.Not even church historians are allowed to read up.
That is one reason why the Prophet got duped multiple times for Multiple millions of
G comments?
Dave comments?
I feel like the fox is in the henhouse, it is real quiet. Can't find a hen.Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This moderation stuff is a farce, it is never applied even handedly
I could care less what someone calls me get some skin; Sissies
Can anyone pretend that
pastorally spkg, 'crying wolf's a
curious childhood obsession
(ftr,the
pastor'sauthoritative reply
herejettisonstwangingfeedback, e.g.,
"areyou'crying wolf', boy")
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 21:37:30 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[note to pouncers: in conjunction with
ftr, some good advicemay
betorecognize this; that..
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 21:29:22 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
..TT[has] a
Pastoral Authority..
||
certainly--thx for the
considerate question, Kevin
let me give it some
morethought while practicng with my baseball team this a.m.; i'll try to
reply (to his and some other select posts)later today, Lord
willing
G
On Thu, 3 Feb 2005 21:38:43 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I am not playing your game it must be in your head.
I would be happy to answer your questions
As they may relate to a somewhat technical issue, they require more time to formulate an answer. I hope to send alog some shortly.
I do not thinkI have your stancefigured out, possibly because of your
some good advice may be to
continuereflecting on this latest exchange betw us, Iz; and, when there's
some ability for usto move thoughtfully withina world view
inclusiveof TT pastorally moderated, lightly we'd hope, pls inquire abt
being reinstated(!)--i would like to be able to converse
John wrote to Kevin:
Can you name me a single biblical doctrine that
is effected by the variations in the Greek text ...
The justification of lying might be one doctrine effected by these
variations.
One of my daughters attends the University of Florida. Her Hebrew
Scriptures professor
In a message dated 2/4/2005 5:44:54 AM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The Creed of the Alexanderian CultI was just wondering how many of it's Tenets you hold.Please show me where I do not Believe the Bible. The reason we have this discussion is you believe in the Original
pastorally moderated
No thanks count me out I have a pastor already.
If you are trying to butt in with his God given authority, that is out of line
Do I misunderstand your thoughts here? [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
some good advice may be to continuereflecting on this latest exchange betw
probably, Kevin--world view is
everything..i'm still getting a feel for yours relative to, e.g., street
preaching
later,
G
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:53:23 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
Do I misunderstand your thoughts
here?
Thank you David, there are many more examples.
I am strapped for time right now.
As this is in the reading of the USB (26 27 ed) I wonder if it is so in the 24th or say the 25th edition of Nestle's Aland? The previous incarnations of the same but different text line.
This is the PukeI was
Kevin wrote:
This moderation stuff is a farce, it is never applied
even handedly ...
Kevin, please be patient. Gary has just taken over the moderation of the
list, and he has not issued any reprimand yet, so lighten up. He solicited
discussion of his perspective concerning Izzies post and I
Kevin wrote:
I believe that you meet with such resistance
because some of your ideas may be Repugnant
to some! This then leads to quick and aggressive
measures by those that Hold certain beliefs dearly.
...
If you would like maybe we can change TT to
Barney talk or Kumbyah Circle of Friends
One (this one) has the sense that the 'Izmeister' is a gracious and comely
damsel in her daily life. One also senses a less than modest metamorphosis
when she places fingers on the keyboard. I believe her intent to have been
closer to 'G's' reading than 'the David's' but her brusqueness is most
David Miller wrote:
Kevin wrote:
This moderation stuff is a farce, it is never applied
even handedly ...
Kevin, please be patient. Gary has just taken over the moderation of the
list, and he has not issued any reprimand yet, so lighten up. He solicited
discussion of
Terry wrote:
Izzy quoted the Bible. She gave her opinion
as to how that quote applied to a cult. That
is not ad hominem. The moderator and the
ex pastor are too easily offended by the truth.
Well said, Terry. I agree.
I wonder if Izzy had said hardened Christians instead of hardened
David, you bemoan the fact that you can't keep a moderator. But no more than
get one and you start undermining his authority. Please, either back your
man or correspond with him in private when you think he's misappropriated
himself.
Bill
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL
I am not trying to bash G
Due to the recent bashing of Judy Izzy I am probably overacting to his silence and thinking here we go again.David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin wrote: This moderation stuff is a farce, it is never applied even handedly ...Kevin, please be patient. Gary has just
Sanity Check...
Thank you TerryTerry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
David Miller wrote:
Kevin wrote:
This moderation stuff is a farce, it is never applied
even handedly ...
Kevin, please be patient. Gary has just taken over the moderation of the
list, and he has not issued any
David: I don't know which came first, this or Bill's post suggesting you
shouldn't be doing this very thing. You do note it's inappropriateness,
don't you?
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 04, 2005 15:06
Subject:
Amen Bill! And one wonders at Slade's departure???
- Original Message -
From: Bill Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: February 04, 2005 15:30
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Ad Hom Farce
David, you bemoan the fact that you can't keep a moderator. But no more
than
To clarify My Barney Talk comment it has to do with the General Flavor (my Term) of TT lately
I am not saying anything about Debbie, except that I and perhaps others take Great exception to some of the philosophies put forth on TT. Ido not look to be careful in such matters.
Like I said Deb don't
Flags fly
Whistle blows
We need an "instant replay" on this one!
Debbie what who are the pouncers?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
pastorally spkg, 'crying wolf's a curious childhood obsession
(ftr,the pastor'sauthoritative reply herejettisonstwangingfeedback, e.g., "areyou'crying wolf', boy")
On
http://www.lds-mormon.com/sepsix.shtml
In his research Quinn discovered that for a number of years after the 1890 Manifesto, which the Church claims was supposed to stop the practice of plural marriage, a number of prominent Church leaders and others were secretly given permission to take plural
From: "Bill Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED]David, you
bemoan the fact that you can't keep a moderator. But no more thanget one and
you start undermining his authority. Please, either back yourman or
correspond with him in private when you think he's misappropriatedhimself.
Bill
Lance writes:
myth [reductionistic at best;
pointedly: 'simply' denies falsely; pastorally speaking, the 'new'
moderator's issue partic withthat issue will remain public, constant; if
Izzy agrees totake the opportunity to interactpeacefully on the
subject, as requested,we can waiveanypending apologies
Learning is, among other things, changing your mind.
That is not how I learned mathematics by changing my mind
1 + 1 has always been 2
The whole may be greater; but all the parts always add up supportthe whole
If they do not that in itself is a good indication there is a problem.
In my field of
'we'? evidence points to
'you'
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 14:21:37 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
||
We need an "instant replay" on this
one!
Judy Judy Judy
These guys all come from AUTHORATATIVE Cultic movements
it has nothing to do with the visible church. It has to do with the pride of those that think themselves leaders.
Like the saying goes you can take the mormon out of his church, but it takes some time to get the mormon out of
and change some
of*our thinking*in the process..'generosity' transcends
arithmetic
Debbie Sawczak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote re:
find[ing] a meeting-place ... I *think we* should err
on the side of generosity...
Bill wrote:
David, you bemoan the fact that you
can't keep a moderator.
I don't recall bemoaning this. I've simply asked for volunteers. I bemoan
the idea of running the list without a moderator.
Bill wrote:
But no more than get one and you start
undermining his authority.
I do not
please specify your reference to
'all', Kevin--including whom, by name please; so far it's lookin'
likeanother inconsiderate backhanded swipe
G
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:00:47 -0800 (PST)
Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
These guys all come from AUTHORATATIVE
Cultic movements
(cut the manipulative backhanded
swipes pls)
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 18:05:10 -0500 "David
Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Gary..he [has yet] to discuss this with me over the
phone
'generosity' transcends arithmetic
May I remind you this is TRUTH Talk
The stement above is almost NON Sensical
Maybe you have not studied Math
It is all full of Proofs, rules laws
What does generosity have to do with the Pythagorean Theorem?
Are you talking New Age Math where the sum of the
myth (shecloakedin
emailabackhanded swipe at Mormons, by name, via manipulation of JCs
word/s--there is no truthful wayshe cantrace her
'artful'conclusionto the mind of Christ--some good advice may be
cancel trying to make a silk purse out of a sow's ear:)
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 18:05:10
Thanks, Judy, I had a good day.
Your
response belowseems to me a little like the "random acts of kindness"
thing. Nobody has a monopoly on any word; Hegel doesn't have a monopoly on the
words "thesis" and "antithesis". But if the words ring such a loud Hegelian bell
for you, I understand.
[Debbie]'S all good, Kevin!
Like I said Deb don't take it
personal.David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Kevin
wrote: I believe that you meet with such "resistance"
because some of your ideas may be Repugnant to some! This then leads
to "quick" and aggressive measures by
learning the algorithms of a
person's world view often takes some time and patience,
Kevin
..moving on,mayone
suggest that'truth transcends arithmetic'?
hypothetically, what would be the
implication for your mind set while it doesn't?
G
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:22:50 -0800 (PST) Kevin
Scientific knowledge involves faith too.
I
agree faith is not blind.
And I
agree that Christ is the most important of all, and that we don't want to be
misled by impostors.
-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Friday, February 04, 2005 9:21
Gary wrote:
myth (she cloaked in email a backhanded swipe
at Mormons, by name, via manipulation of JCs
word/s--there is no truthful way she can trace
her 'artful' conclusion to the mind of Christ--
some good advice may be cancel trying to make
a silk purse out of a sow's ear:)
Cloaked? Are
Debbie wrote:
Scientific knowledge involves faith too.
Theologians often claim this, but they are wrong. Scientific knowledge, by
definition, eliminates faith. That is why creationism is not allowed in
science class.
For example, when we drop a ball from the top of a building and measure
acknowleged (meaning no more, no
less than precisely this)
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 18:51:37 -0500 "David
Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:||
I don't see where she cloaked
anything.
Hey Kevin I'm sure Debbie will answer when she returns;
I may be wrong but Ibelieve her adjective coversyou and I (and
possibly others). Anyone too quick to respondwho backs what they say
with scripture -but I'venever thought of itthis
way;to me it ismore like "being ready to give an answer
what are you willing to
demythologize with us ?
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:08:07 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..and shall be turned unto
fables
She didn't manipulate a thing she printed the whole
verse verbatim and she was not manipulating Jesus' words either. He called the
Syrophoenician woman a "dog" which is someone outside the
covenant.Swine are pagans/unbelievers.
Why wouldn't Mormons qualify with all of their extra biblical
Another possible explanation for why creationism is not allowed in science
class is that it threatens the faith of many scientists.
Do you mean that science yields total certainty about its conclusions?
As to the ball: You have to have faith that the ball will fall the same way
every time. And
Bible Bible Bible
2 Sam 22:27 With the pure thou wilt show thyself pure; and with the froward thou wilt show thyself unsavory.
Prov 17:11 An evil man seeketh only rebellion: therefore a cruel messenger shall be sent against him.Plese show where the Manipulation of words occured[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Truth is not White black Grey shaded area.
Christ said you are for me or against me No Neutral zoneOf course if you are a New Ager than Truth is relative in your mind.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
learning the algorithms of a person's world view often takes some time and patience, Kevin
..moving
Debbie wrote: Scientific knowledge involves faith too.
Maybe you think of Evolution it is faith based But it is not science!David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Debbie wrote: Scientific knowledge involves faith too.Theologians often claim this, but they are wrong. Scientific knowledge, by
Being ready means being quick to answer if you have done your homework in the past and studied a certain subject out. What is left to mull over?
Evil men seducers shall wax worse wose decieving and being decieved.
Question what do SEDUCING SPIRITS SEDUCE?
"Set a strong guard about thy outward
Meaning?[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
what are you willing to demythologize with us ?
On Fri, 4 Feb 2005 19:08:07 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..and shall be turned unto fables__Do You Yahoo!?Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best
FEELINGS Woa Woa Woa FEELINGS
Facts have nothing to do with it!
The unmistakable teachings of scripture do not apply inLaodecia Christian Church
It's a Touchy Feely Thang!
welcome to Barney World.
Woof Woof; roll around on the floor; gimme some more
That is the "spirit" that just has to get some
Science means that we can predict every single time where the ball will be How fast it is going and we can apply the LAW that we have learned to predict all other behavoirs of accelaration to ALL Other Objects
Science IS Reproducable Results Every Time!
What is True for one ball can not be UNtrue
http://answers.org/apologetics/relativism.html
Protagoras: Truth is relative. It is only a matter of opinion.
Socrates: You mean that truth is mere subjective opinion?
Protagoras: Exactly. What is true for you is true for you, and what is true for me, is true for me. Truth is subjective.
In a message dated 2/4/2005 3:06:39 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Izzy's post fails the ad hominem argument on many fronts. She was not
speaking to a Mormon, but to Lance.
She actually raised the disgusting questions as to whether one was disobeying her god's command
In a message dated 2/4/2005 3:53:00 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The ad hominem rule concerns only attacking a specific list member. It is
meant to keep discussions from degrading into a one on one personal spat.
Criticism of doctrines and sects is allowed.
Your
In a message dated 2/4/2005 3:57:28 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Debbie wrote:
Scientific knowledge involves faith too.
Theologians often claim this, but they are wrong. Scientific knowledge, by
definition, eliminates faith. That is why creationism is not allowed in
In a message dated 2/4/2005 4:22:49 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
She didn't manipulate a thing she printed the whole verse verbatim and she was not manipulating Jesus' words either. He called the Syrophoenician woman a "dog" which is someone outside the covenant. Swine are
1 - 100 of 117 matches
Mail list logo
