Other than being about 25 years out of date
(Francis Schaeffer a 'giant'?) it is good to note that people know who he
was.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 03, 2005 23:21
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Warning!!!
Excuse me Gary... It is in the NT. In fact Jesus
Himself said that unless one is born again they can not even see
the KOG much less be part of it... or haven't you read
this part of the Bible yet?
On Sat, 3 Dec 2005 22:46:14 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
myth (this ain't
in the NT;
What did I get wrong? I remember you speaking of
some young fellow you were trying to mentor who is
homosexual. Is the one Kevin refers to a new
one?
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 01:13:32 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Off line Judyand you have not one single thing correct.
Off line.
Schaeffer has lots of company Bill. What is to
misunderstand when we have Barth's own words on the subject and how could such a
great voice say something like this:
The Bible Not the Word of God Barth was right to speak about a distance
between the Word of God and the text of the Bible
The gift is Jesus Christ NOT Sturday! I believe the SDA have replaced Jesus with the SATURDAY Sabbath only In fact one of the doctrines of Devils is "commanding to abstain" from meats. Any SDA preach such?Do you think everyone who goes to Church on Sunday is worshipping the BEAST? AFA a
and its oneobviousreaosn why there's an ACLU LOL Now that is funny! To SAVE US from the New Birth![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: myth (this ain't in the NT; its the fount ofAm Fundamentalist culticlegalism--its how legalism works to maintain partic racist exclusivity..its why evangelism in
ToNOT "name call" a False teacher is to SIN! You already practice such are you inaccurate? Charles Perry Locke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I guess if we were Christ, or his Apostles, then we would be able to exercise "Accurate name-calling". But, since we are not, IMO we can not, and therefore, we
Amen!
Each of the 10 Commandments can be recognized in the
teachings of the NT except for the 4th which is the Sabbath.
That was between God and Israel. Under the New
Covenant there is a rest for the ppl of God that we must strive
(against unbelief) to enter. See Hebrews
4:9-13)
On Sun, 4
Bill writes: "It will take many years, I'm
sure, before Barth will be allowed to speak for himself to the conservative
community. In the meantime Evangelical Christians will be missing out on one of the greatest voicesthe Church has ever
known.
I'm curious about what you find so great
Someone who has never taken the time to actually read with a heart to understand Barth, has written the following: Most of these young professors were infected with neo-orthodoxy; the then fashionable "reformed" liberalism of Swiss theologian Karl Barth. Neo-orthodoxy claims that the human
I wrote you off line, Judy, yesterday ! You have nothing correct and I have spelled that out to you. let's keep it in the private domain. I am not going to discussion this in detail on TT. PERIOD.
For one thing, it will appear that I am defending myself and I neither have the need to do this
Sorry I didn't notice that anything was off line or
that you spelled out anything to me.
However, if you don't choose to discuss this - it's
fine with me.
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 08:43:36 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I wrote you off line, Judy, yesterday ! You
have nothing
This is a very good understanding, in small part, to what I see in Barth - and I think Barth is correct:
From 1932 to 1967 he (Barth)worked on his Church Dogmatics, a multivolume work that was unfinished at his death. It consists of 13 parts in four volumes, running altogether to more than
Do you have some kind of problem with "off line?" I am not going to discuss here , on TT. If we start doing that, then where do we draw the line? TT has it's own worries. I didn't say that I did not want to discuss it. I said that I do not want to discuss it publicly. You have my address.
Judy, let's assume that we could take all the words
you've posted to TT and bind them together in a book. What would it number, say,
maybe 9000 pages? Would a single one of them be worth reading? What were you
attempting to do with those words, if not to unfold the revealed word attested
in
JD why do you think Barth is correct?
Have you ever asked yourself why a God who promised
through the prophet Jeremiah 2631yrs ago and later through the prophet Ezekiel
2602yrs ago that He would make a New Covenant with His ppl and that this New
Covenant would include writingHis Law in their
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 07:36:51 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Judy, let's assume that we could take all the words you've
posted to TT and bind them together in a book. What would it number, say,
maybe 9000 pages? Would a single one of them be worth reading? What were you
You know, it just amazes me. One could stand up and
preach for a lifetime and maybe, just maybe, be considered a great man of God
(although that is even doubtful). But put those words in a book andOh
NO!now he's a theologian. Christians are so stupid.
Bill
- Original Message -
Not a very loving evaluation of God's workmanship
Bill
Lots of men have spent a "lifetime" preaching some
agenda or another - only those who 'in obedience' are speaking God's oracles
will receive a reward and I don't hold much hope for those who add to or take
from THE WRITTEN RECORD.
The
It's not God's fault.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 8:20
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
Not a very loving
What is not God's fault?
The words youspeak concerningHis ppl?
IYO could Barth smarten them up?
Or should we listen to Paul who writes that we already
have the mind of Christ?
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 08:35:22 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It's not God's fault.
From: Judy
Were you talking to me? I wasn't
listening.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 8:32
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
What
In all sincerity, Judy, don't you see the irony in
your endeavor? When you write or speak, you want others to listen to you. You
feel entitled to that. The proof of this: when they don't listen, you feel like
you have been dissed. Why? because you think you have something important and
That is about the stupidest thing you have
ever said, Gary.
Congratulations. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, December 03, 2005
11:46 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On
Judy once
Oh, must one be up to date
on the trendy side of Christianity, Lance? Give me that old time religion! iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005
2:36 AM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Judy, Bill has correctly cast the shadow -- you believe that you are one of the few who is not doing theology !!!Barth's reverence and high regard for faith as the "x" factor that brings all The Faith together is the most startling concept presenting itself as one reads Barth for the first time
Kevin, I cant speak for the SDAs
as Ive never met one. I can only speak for myself, and I have not
replaced the gift of Jesus with the Saturday Sabbath. I just read the ten
commandments and there it was. I tried it. I liked it. I
still do. I cant find anywhere that Gods word revoked
it.
Judy, would you say that the less you have
the Holy Spirit to teach and guide you, the more you need Barth and others? iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Judy Taylor Was Barth inspired or
misguided in his belief that the task of theology is to
Hi Iz. I have a question for you: How is it that
God intends us to keep the Sabbath?
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 9:43
AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Emailing:
sda.htm
For some time I have been studying, not
Barth, but some of his students on TT. Overall, they seem like a cranky bunch
at best. iz
You will try in vain to get me into an argument over Karl
Barth. I just simply won't do it. If you are interested in the man, then read his works
Very good, John.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 9:38
AM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
Judy, Bill has correctly cast the shadow -- you believe
Ex 20:8Remember the
sabbath day, to keep it holy. 9Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: 10But the seventh day is the sabbath of the LORD thy God:
in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy
son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor
thy
Imagine that! I've already read this. Judy is
right: you are irrelevant.
Bill
- Original Message -
Hi Iz. I have a question for you:
How is it that God intends us to keep the Sabbath?Bill
Ex
20:8Remember the sabbath day, to
keep it holy. 9Six days shalt
If if if you really need to ask this question, you know nothing of the Holy Spirit.-Original Message-From: ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:49:45 -0600Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"
Judy, would you say
In spite of the fact that you have already
read it, you asked me how God intends us to keep the Sabbath I give
you Gods verbatim guidelines as an answer. For that you insult
me. This is what becomes of Barth followers? Not trendy, or up-to-date, or
intellectual, or relevant enough for you?
WHY IN THE WORLD WOULD ANYONE WHO TRULY KNOWS THE lORD ONLY WORSHIP HIM
ONE DAY A WEEK? We are free to worship any day, any place, any time.
Live it up!
Kevin Deegan wrote:
The gift is Jesus Christ NOT Sturday!
I believe the SDA have replaced Jesus with the SATURDAY Sabbath
only
In
L K J
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 11:35
AM
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Emailing:
sda.htm
In spite of the fact
that you have already read it, you asked me how God intends us to
The Holy Spirit will guide us as we
allow. Some things can be a hindrance to that, including who/what we read.
It appears to me that those who revere Barth dont become more like Jesus,
but thats just from my personal experience on TT. Im not
here to hurt your feelings by bashing someone
I listened to and, transcribed some 550 hrs of FS
lectures. I do believe myself to be in a position to pass comment on
FS.
- Original Message -
From:
ShieldsFamily
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 04, 2005 11:38
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Warning!!!
Then why dont you pass comment,
Lance, instead of passing judgment? What specifically is out of date
about that godly man IYO? izzy
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005
12:59 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Remarks
by Rabbi Daniel Lapin on December 1, 2005
at The National Press
Club, Washington DC
Rabbi
Daniel Lapin
Jews Fighting for
Christmas
Good afternoon Ladies and Gentlemen. I appreciate you
being here today to hear what I, an Orthodox rabbi, have to say about
No Bill. My message is "READ THE BIBLE" and then
we can talk.
the Golden Rule is good but can't apply to most of the
ppl you mention because they have gone on to their reward
whatever that might be.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 09:34:49 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In all sincerity,
That 'godly man' was, is, will be a 'godly man' His
work in some areas was far superior than in others. His supreme achievement,
IMO, was the establishment of L'abri Fellowship. He opened it to all, he engaged
culture wholly and, he invited believers to embrace their faith thoughtfully and
Judy: When you go on to your reward 'whatever
THAT might be' you can ask 'em how it is that they got THERE WHEREVER THAT might
be!
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 04, 2005
When did I ever say she is irrelevant Bill? These
are your words not mine, please retract them.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:40:22 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Imagine that! I've already read this. Judy is
right: you are irrelevant.
Bill
- Original Message -
Yes. I know many, including myself. I am surprised that you do not.
ShieldsFamily wrote:
I dont know
anyone who does that,
Terry. Do you? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, December
04, 2005
Did Jesus say that after He had gone to the Father he
would send a real smart theologian by the name of
Barth to "unfold the revealed work attested in the
scriptures" JD?. Of course not - and we have the Bereans
for an example - they were able to search the
scriptures daily to see if what
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:11
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
In all sincerity, Judy, don't you see the irony
Agreed. But once again you have ducked
the question which you stirred up. What do you find out of date
about FS work? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005
1:14 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: Re:
Yes, I think it an astute observation Iz. Kind of
like when God thundered and roared from the Mount
and Israel quaking told Moses - You go up and see what
He is saying
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 10:49:45 -0600 "ShieldsFamily" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
Judy, would you say
that the
Some theologians are relevant; e.g., Judy. And
others are not; e.g., not Izzy.
Bill
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:18
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk]
Not any true followers of Christ. And what
does that have to do with Sabbath keeping? Please re-read Ex 20:8 and see if
it says there to only worship God on one day a week. Have you not known me
long enough, even on TT, to know that I worship the Lord every minute of every
day? And I dont
His work in philosopjhy was weak. An excellent
philosopher, Tom Morris, did a rather detailed appraisal a year or two after his
death. By the by, there's no 'ducking' going on here. Were I or others to
discuss his work at any length you would be bored; as David said just yesterday
he was
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 04, 2005 14:24
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
Did Jesus say that after He had gone to the Father he
would
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: December 04, 2005 14:16
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
Yes, I think it an astute observation Iz. Kind
of like when
It just seems to me that if FS spoke
truth, then that cannot be out of date. Worldly dross can be, but not truth. FS
did not seem full of the world to me. iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance Muir
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005
1:36 PM
To:
Are you now joined at the hip with Gary and
Lance?.
I said neither and you need to state this plainly.
These are your thoughts and your words entirely
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 12:36:09 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Some theologians are relevant; e.g., Judy. And
others are not;
Why do you have to have anyone at all
Lance?
I know it's a slam but really - to be so dependent on
men is idolatry.
Just think if you spent all those hours transcribing
God's Word it it would have benefited you.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:37:04 -0500 "Lance Muir" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So you do see the irony?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:50
PM
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the
"greatest voices"
So now you have
conservative
constraint constrains comprehension, callit
constriction
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 04:07:46 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
unless one is born again they can not even see the KOG
--new birth of the Spirit..[is]
required..[to] have fellowship with others in the body
..like a bull snake
on a fat cat, ablack belt on th' butter
ball'sbaloney
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:23:01 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
conservative
constraint constrains comprehension, callit
constriction
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 04:07:46 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
9,000 pages of his Dogmatic Barth can say less with more words than any manI know! Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Bill writes: "It will take many years, I'm sure, before Barth will be allowed to speak for himself to the conservative community. In the meantime Evangelical Christians
This afternoon I checked my copy of Barth - Evangelical THEOLOGY. I noticed something Strange, in the whole book there is a total of about 6 pages that have ANY Scripture References on the page! The absence of Scripture is stunning. In fact there are two references to scripture in the WHOLE
Hardly the kind of atmosphere where faith grows.Maybe that is why barth Devotes a WHOLE chapter to "DOUBT" in Evangelical THEOLOGYJudy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 07:36:51 -0700 "Taylor" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:Judy, let's assume that we could take all
..just thinkin'
howJCs word of Wisdom nourishes the soul (even of the
strangled and stranded:)
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:37:31 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
..like a bull
snake on a fat cat, ablack belt on th' butter
ball'sbaloney
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:23:01 -0700 [EMAIL
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:16:35 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
||
[rather,] barth Devotes a WHOLE chapter to
[eradicating]"DOUBT" in Evangelical
THEOLOGY||
Now you are confusing me. Firsy you say you do not know anyone who
worships any place, any day, and now you say you worship every minute,
eery day.
I wouldn't know much about Sabbath keeping. It doesn't apply to me.
I don't even know much about some of the stuff that does apply to me.
You did not answer the question. Do you think everyone who goes to Church on Sunday is worshipping the BEAST?ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Kevin, I cant speak for the SDAs as Ive never met one. I can only speak for myself, and I have not replaced the gift of
God does not need the gymnastics of your theology to make clear what it is that we are to believe. He would have simply said (God speaking ex-cathedra !!) believe this and do not believe that - the impact of this doctrine is this and you are hell bound if you believe that. He spoke that way in
Evangelicals know that their doctrine of verbal/plenary only effects the original documents.So it is a MOOT point there is NO Verbal/Plenary Inspirations since there are NO "Originals" Gods word is NOT Verbal/Plenary Inspired in your eyes,except MAYBE in the NON Existant LONG ago LOST
There are those that try. But is that really "worship"?ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I dont know anyone who does that, Terry. Do you? izFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Terry CliftonSent: Sunday, December 04, 2005 12:37 PMTo:
IHO see the web site.ShieldsFamily [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:Then why dont you pass comment, Lance, instead of passing judgment? What specifically is out of date about that godly man IYO? izzyFrom: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Lance
apparently Jesus
saideverything he needed to say back then, but you sound more like his
parrot than his sheep, Bro; why not try interacting with us, like you're one of
us on the planetrather thanthe Voicefrom
above?
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:35:26 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(listen to yourself
sometime, Bro--sometimes its even interesting:)
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:46:31 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
sometimes God Orders the destruction
of THE "ORIGINAL" so that what we have is nothing but a
copy.
Sorry Bub, he has loosed my stammering tongue!And his mouth was opened immediately, and his tongue loosed, and he spake, and praised God. And NOW My tongue shall speak of thy word: for all thy commandments are righteousness. PS 45 my tongue is the pen of a ready writer. His word Name will
This is a BIG problem for your 'god', not mine![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (listen to yourself sometime, Bro--sometimes its even interesting:)On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:46:31 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:sometimes God Orders the destruction of THE "ORIGINAL" so that what
:-)-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 13:23:01 -0700Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Re:On Judy once again employing the ad hom (Barf for Karl Barth)
conservative constraint constrains comprehension, callit constriction
On Sun, 4 Dec
So what? Beats quoting one proof text after another without any understanding.
His Dogmatics have something around 800 scriptural refereces per volume regardless of the sizes of the volume. That's something like 9000 to 10,000 scriptures . But you don't really care whether he uses scripture or
:-)-Original Message-From: Terry Clifton [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 04 Dec 2005 15:22:36 -0600Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Emailing: sda.htm
Now you are confusing me. Firsy you say you do not know anyone who worships any place, any day, and now you say you
You call what you do here "interacting with others"
Gary? Now this is really interesting.
I'd say Lance is the voice from above and Kevin's is
like "regular folk"even ifhis subject matter is re another
Kingdom.
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:53:03 -0700 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
apparently Jesus
verbal plenary is unnecessary if we accept God's providence both in the preservation of scripture and in the receiving of His word into our lives. This is not the same as being inspired to receive, by the way. Being "inspired to receive" offers no reasonto revisit a thoroughly studied passage of
actaully he did. he placed apostles, evangelists, prophets, pastors and teachers in the Chruch. Barth would be a teacher. You would be a member.
jd-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005
See my comments below:
Blainerb
Who are the Sabbath-keepers?
The main Sabbatarian faith groups (religious groups that currently worship on
Saturday) are:
Branch Davidians
(Students of the Seven Seals)
Church of God (7th
Day)
House of
jd in red. -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:48:03 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 11:38:23 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Read for yourself. But you really don't care if he usesscripture or not. Just a phony concern. Just another phony concern.
jd-Original Message-From: Judy Taylor jandgtaylor1@juno.comTo: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:50:56
In a message dated 12/4/2005 10:00:11 A.M. Mountain Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ex
20:8Remember the sabbath day, to
keep it holy. 9Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work:
10But the seventh day is the sabbath of the
LORD thy God: in it thou shalt not do any
Good post. By the way, I am not arguing Barth - I am explaining him to the best of my knowledge. That's all. Look -- what are we going to discuss here on TT? Wehave pretty much said all that can be said about any number of subjects. As long as we keep the biblical message at the center of the
my God is the God
of parrots and poets, Bro; he's made noproblems likeyou wanna
create
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 14:11:34 -0800 (PST) Kevin Deegan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
This is a BIG problem for your 'god', not
mine![EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
(listen to
yourself sometime,
sure--good
questions get positive responses requests: my style interests
you--eh?
On Sun, 4 Dec 2005 17:30:55 -0500 Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You call what you do here "interacting with others"
Gary? Now this is really interesting.
||
Of course not. iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Kevin Deegan
Sent: Sunday, December 04, 2005
3:39 PM
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Subject: RE: [TruthTalk] Emailing:
sda.htm
You did not answer the question.
Do you think everyone
You need to go back and read the
scripture, Terry. Its not about worshipping only one day; I repeat. True
Believers live a life of worship. Get it? Do you only worship
the Lord on Sunday? iz
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent:
a theology of
'sincere'works in the works?
On Sun, 04 Dec 2005 18:21:53 -0500 [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We should not belittle the
sincere efforts of each
other..
JD, you and the other followers of Barth
are testimony enough of that. iz
There is simply nothing
that has been presentedon TT
thatevidences Barth as aliberal.
Whered you get that quoteJsmith?
iz
-therefore it hath an end in me.
Blainerb
JD wrote:
I find it humorous that you do not include yourself
in the following critical review relating to ad hom
comments.
I do not believe that I should be making ad hominem arguments on this list.
I try very hard not to do so. If you EVER think that I have, please write me
privately off
Barth as even more Christ centered than you, IMO. -Original Message-From: Judy Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgCc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 4 Dec 2005 18:57:17 -0500Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] One of the "greatest voices"
What?? Not arguing Barth??
I
This is my story and I'm stickin to it.Whether or not I approach privately will have to do with the nature of the offense, real or imagined , and my view of yourreceptiveness. In the past , you have been confused as to the nature of "ad hom," making a private complaint a poor expense of energy.
I thought that I had made that clear in prior posts
ShieldsFamily wrote:
Do you
only worship
the Lord on Sunday? iz
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On
Behalf Of Terry Clifton
Sent: Sunday, December
04, 2005
3:23 PM
To:
DAVEH: May I suggest another topic of interest to me? I am curious as
to if any of you folks ever consider what would have happened IF Adam
and Eve had not transgressed. Does that discussion ever come up with
you folks?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Look -- what are we going to discuss
No.Actually, I have never heard this question discussed. You asked me to comment on a question -- perhaps a week ago, now. Aaaahh, was it "were A E predestined to sin?
jd-Original Message-From: Dave Hansen [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent: Sun, 04 Dec 2005
1 - 100 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
