IFO see almost no comparison between the ministry of Jesus and the ministry
of Hinn.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 22, 2006 17:25
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
cd:
I think
Lance wrote:
IFO see almost no comparison between the ministry
of Jesus and the ministry of Hinn.
I don't know about your extreme view of NO comparison, but I certainly
don't find enough in the anecdotes that come my way to warrant me making too
much of an effort to know this man. At the
Thanks for the insight..into David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 23, 2006 09:14
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
Lance wrote:
IFO see almost no comparison between
cd:
I think the Street Preachers understand
B. Hinn quite well.
I see it differently.
CD wrote:
I have no problem with laying on hands to heal
the sick-heck-I am even for this-but to travel
great distances to believe Hinn has some special
insite/power with God is error-it is suppose to be
]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 15, 2006 23:10
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
The problem with the word Trinity is that it assume Three. What do you
do
with texts that speak about the Seven Spirits of God?
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL
5, 2006 23:10Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and "biblical
language"
The problem with the word "Trinity" is that it assume Three.
What do you do with texts that speak about the Seven Spirits of
God? David Miller. - Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] T
Please check your sources on this, Judy. I believe
he claimed to be speaking under 'inspiration'.
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: truthtalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 16, 2006 07:25
Subject: Fw: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance
and "biblical lan
[Original Message]
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/16/2006 5:36:40 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
Benny Hinn, another 'inspired' teacher/evangelist, once said that each of
the Father, Son and Spirit was a trinity
ard to his
hearers.
- Original Message - From: "David Miller" [EMAIL PROTECTED]To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent:
January 15, 2006 23:10Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and "biblical
language"
The problem with the word &qu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 9:57 PM Subject: Re: Fw:
[TruthTalk] Lance and "biblical language" I do not
agree. "Trinity" is as much a translation of the
OTECTED]To:
TruthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent:
January 15, 2006 23:10Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and
"biblical language"
The problem with the word "Trinity" is that it assume
Three. What do you do with texts that speak abo
- Original Message -
From: Judy Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: 1/16/2006 8:37:32 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and "biblical language"
No Dean, Benny learned this from the Dakes Bible. Finis Dake wrote that
uthTalk@mail.innglory.orgSent:
January 15, 2006 23:10Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and
"biblical language"
The problem with the word "Trinity" is that it assume
Three. What do you do with texts that speak about
]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 15, 2006 23:10
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
The problem with the word Trinity is that it assume Three. What do you
do
with texts that speak about the Seven Spirits of God?
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From
ing to his statement and not
mine.
Perhaps that is why it was so
civil.
- Original Message -
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:21
AM
Subject: Re: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance
an
From:
Dean
Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:21
AM
Subject: Re: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance
and "biblical language"
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylo
Yeah, but is it true?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 8:59
AM
Subject: Re: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance
and "biblical language"
This
Perhaps that is why it
was so civil.
- Original Message -
From:
Dean Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 7:21
AM
Subject: Re: Re: Fw:
Where IS that interim moderator now?
- Original Message -
From:
Judy
Taylor
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Cc: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: January 16, 2006 11:33
Subject: Re: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance
and "biblical language"
Poss
sage -
From:
Dean Moore
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006
7:21 AM
]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 8:22 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
[Original Message]
From: Lance Muir [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/16/2006 5:36:40 AM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
cd: David I understood you to support B.Hinn-Is your Mother still part of
His choir?
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/16/2006 2:28:52 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
Dean wrote:
Should have left
understand. See Lam. 3:36.
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: Dean Moore [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Monday, January 16, 2006 3:38 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
cd: David I understood you to support B.Hinn-Is your Mother still
[Original Message]
From: David Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Date: 1/16/2006 3:58:26 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
Dean, I have never been a supporter of Benny Hinn. I have never been to
any
meeting of his or met him. I did
, 2006 4:08 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
Your response has nothing to do with my comments, near as I can see.
My point is this: every English word in our bible is added to the
original text. so you like godhead and I like trinity. They are both
translations
slation whereas "Trinity" is not. The root for "three" is not found in the Greek language for this word. David Miller - Original Message - From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Saturday, January 14, 2006 4:08 PM S
PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
I do not agree. Trinity is as much a translation of the concept of
divine essence as is godhead but for theological and contextual
reasons. Call it philosophy if you will. The inclusion of trinity is a
sound choice if it , in fact
om: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 9:57 PM Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and "biblical language"I do not agree. "Trinity" is as much a translation of the concept of "divine essence"
Have you considered the temple menorah too?
David Miller.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 11:32 PM
Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and biblical language
I don't use apocalytic
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org ; TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org Sent: Sunday, January 15, 2006 11:32 PM Subject: Re: Fw: [TruthTalk] Lance and "biblical language"I don't use apocalytic literature to construct my doctrine. I do have an answer and it ha
Here is an approximation of the [NT] biblical language"
gar nomoz tou pneumatoz thz swhzev Cristy
All other words [in [English] translation] are "non-biblical."
"Incarnate" is no less a "biblical word" than "in the flesh" -- nor "trinity " in the place of "Godhead."
Our translations are
Here we go again - And who is the one who denied
staking everything on translational and Gk
arguments - very, very, recently?.
judyt
On Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:54:47 + [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here is
an approximation of the [NT] biblical language"
gar nomoz tou pneumatoz
Your response has nothing to do with my comments, near as I can see.
My point is this: every English word in our bible is "added " to the original text. so you like godhead" and I like "trinity."They are both translations of the orgiinal word and/or thought.
jd
-- Original message
33 matches
Mail list logo
