[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/5/2005 10:38:46 PM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH:
My latest post is in GREENblue
for JD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a
message dated 4/5/2005 8:54:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAI
In a message dated 4/6/2005 5:31:56 AM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jd in bold print
JD writes:
Paul tells us that we are "justified" by faith apart from obedience to [moral and ceremonial] law. That occurs because of the faith
In a message dated 4/5/2005 10:38:46 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: My latest post is in GREENblue for JD
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/5/2005 8:54:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: If you really don't want to
DAVEH: My latest post is in GREEN
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In a message dated 4/5/2005 8:54:19 PM
Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: If you really don't want to continue, John...so be it. But I
would still like to know why you do not consider your
David Miller wrote:
DaveH wrote:
> Or could they have been (metaphorically) driven out.
> IOWPerhaps they were a little more sensitive than
> me to the pressure of some to exclude from TT those
> who have opposing opinions.
Good point, maybe kind of like the o
In a message dated 4/5/2005 8:54:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: If you really don't want to continue, John...so be it. But I would still like to know why you do not consider yourself a Protestant. Which of the reasons mentioned in your definition.
a mem
In a message dated 4/5/2005 8:54:19 PM Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
DAVEH: If you really don't want to continue, John...so be it. But I would still like to know why you do not consider yourself a Protestant. Which of the reasons mentioned in your definition.
a mem
DAVEH: If you really don't want to continue, John...so be it. But I
would still like to know why you do not consider yourself a
Protestant. Which of the reasons mentioned in your definition.
a
member of any of several church denominations denying the universal
authority of the Pope
We have an earlier post (this evening) that is a much better start than this one. You want me to be a Portestant, no argument. Call me anything you want -- just don't don't call me late to dinner. Let's trash this post -- shall we?
Jd
In a message dated 4/4/2005 10:38:55 PM Pacific
DaveH wrote:
> Or could they have been (metaphorically) driven
out.> IOWPerhaps they were a little more sensitive than
> me to the pressure of some to exclude from TT those
> who have opposing opinions.
Good point, maybe kind of like the other Mormons who no longer post
here. How d
DAVEH: Or could they have been (metaphorically) driven out.
IOWPerhaps they were a little more sensitive than me to the
pressure of some to exclude from TT those who have opposing opinions.
David Miller wrote:
Lance wrote:
> To my knowledge there are no Roman Cat
ubject: Re: [TruthTalk] Loving and
Merciful God of Justice
Lance wrote:
> To my
knowledge there are no Roman Catholic
> or Orthodox participants.
Just for the record, we have had both Roman
Catholic and Orthodox participants on TruthTalk, but none of them lasted very
lon
Lance wrote:
> To my knowledge
there are no Roman Catholic
> or Orthodox participants.
Just for the record, we have had both Roman
Catholic and Orthodox participants on TruthTalk, but none of them lasted very
long. :-) I think people in those sects of Christianity embrace
authority and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My only frustration with Dave's response is that it includes an
insistence that (1) "protestants" are those who are not Mormon
DAVEH:
Nonsense, John. Well, I stand corrected. I guess my may concern,
here, is that Mo
Lance Muir wrote:
Dave:You've been reading TT'ers for
a looong time.
DAVEH: It has only been about 5 years now..
To my knowledge there are no Roman
Catholic or Orthodox participants.
You ask 'how many Protestants do
think alike?" I believe I've witnessed more t
DAVEH: Lance...As much as I'd like to respond to you and John
right away, I'm headed to Las Vegas for a few dayshope to get back
to you next week.
Lance Muir wrote:
Dave:You've been reading TT'ers for
a looong time. To my knowledge there are no Roman Catholic or
Orthod
level of
diversity exists withink the Mormon community.
- Original Message -
From:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: TruthTalk@mail.innglory.org
Sent: March 30, 2005 09:52
Subject: Re: [TruthTalk] Loving and
Merciful God of Justice
In a message dated 3/29/2005 10:00:42 PM
Pa
In a message dated 3/29/2005 10:00:42 PM Pacific Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the length of this exchange caused some to move on without reading the full exchange, perhaps a second look will be worth the effort. Much food for thought regarding hell, tor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If the length of this exchange caused some to move on without reading
the full exchange, perhaps a second look will be worth the effort.
Much food for thought regarding hell, torture, the singleness of the
sin event contrasted with the eternity of the punishmen
What is "heretical Momron literature?" Why is it heretical?
ANYthing written by the LDS Church or it's followers. They have tainted all aspects of Christianity; practise anything but christianity, have put down christianity in the past and of late (since G. B. Ninckley has been in power) have d
-- "Charles Perry Locke" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
DaveH, if you were to stop reading that heretical Momron literature and
forming your own personal opinions of how you would like for God to be, and
to begin to study the Bible in light of itself, not extrabiblical LDS
references, you would c
If the length of this exchange caused some to move on without reading the full exchange, perhaps a second look will be worth the effort. Much food for thought regarding hell, torture, the singleness of the sin event contrasted with the eternity of the punishment.
My only frustration with Da
DAVEH: Why is the Bible necessary, Perry? Is it not possible for one
to get a clear understanding of the evidence of God's nature from his
creations
Paul
says that God is evident in all of creation, so no man is without
excuse.
.From my LDS perspective, I don't have to re
DaveH, if you were to stop reading that heretical Momron literature and
forming your own personal opinions of how you would like for God to be, and
to begin to study the Bible in light of itself, not extrabiblical LDS
references, you would come to a clear understanding of what God has revealed
24 matches
Mail list logo