On 3/27/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry for late replies Simon, I am offsite in India for the next two
weeks.
Regarding the SCDL, there was a post earlier in the list with the SCDL
(from
me). You can use the calculator scdl in core-samples and remove the client
componen
+1.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts.
When
replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original
auth
Sorry for late replies Simon, I am offsite in India for the next two weeks.
Regarding the SCDL, there was a post earlier in the list with the SCDL (from
me). You can use the calculator scdl in core-samples and remove the client
component, also each component needs to be targeted with a runtimeI
+1
On 3/26/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Touché :)
>
> On 3/26/07, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +1, and here's a first test case of saying what I "really think". I
hope
> > nobody is going to "slam" me :-)
Hi,
I'm poor with colors :-(. I was trying to use different colors to represent
related pieces.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 2:58 PM
Subject: Re: [Discussion] Tuscany kernel modulization
On 3/26/07,
On 3/26/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
By reading through a bunch of e-mails on this mailing list and adding my
imagination, I put together a conceptual diagram at the following wiki
page
to illustrate the kernel modulization.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCAN
On 3/26/07, Antollini, Mario <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon,
I had had the same problem than you. I solved it starting ActiveMQ
first.
The final steps are:
1 - Donwload ActiveMQ:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/active
mq/apache-activemq/4.1.0-incubator/apac
Hi,
By reading through a bunch of e-mails on this mailing list and adding my
imagination, I put together a conceptual diagram at the following wiki page
to illustrate the kernel modulization.
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Kernel+Modulization+Design+Discussions
This diagr
On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Touché :)
On 3/26/07, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +1, and here's a first test case of saying what I "really think". I hope
> nobody is going to "slam" me :-)
>
> I think Ant's suggestion should go without saying. The fact t
ant elder wrote:
On 3/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
>> For example, the "variant implementation of the assembly model" has a
>> number of changes that coupled with what you describe above will
>> basically require a re-write of k
Touché :)
On 3/26/07, Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1, and here's a first test case of saying what I "really think". I hope
nobody is going to "slam" me :-)
I think Ant's suggestion should go without saying. The fact that we need
to have a vote as juvenile as this one, makes it har
+1, and here's a first test case of saying what I "really think". I hope
nobody is going to "slam" me :-)
I think Ant's suggestion should go without saying. The fact that we need
to have a vote as juvenile as this one, makes it hard for any of us to
"maintain our dignity".
Frank.
"kelvin go
+1 from me.
Davanum Srinivas wrote:
+1 from me.
On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's
posts. When
replying to email we need to do it in a way tha
+1
On 3/26/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 26/03/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany
> mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts.
> When
> replying to email we need t
+1
On 26/03/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts.
When
replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original
authors dignity.
We'v
+1.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2007 10:25 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Adopt a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't
+1
On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts.
When
replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original
authors dignity.
We've
On 3/24/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/24/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, I give up on this, and I'll try not bring this subject up anymore
> !!!
Don't give up, its important to get to the build we think is the best for
Tuscany.
I think the crux of the
Simon,
I had had the same problem than you. I solved it starting ActiveMQ
first.
The final steps are:
1 - Donwload ActiveMQ:
http://people.apache.org/repo/m2-incubating-repository/org/apache/active
mq/apache-activemq/4.1.0-incubator/apache-activemq-4.1.0-incubator.zip
2 - uncompress it somewhere
Simon,
You get this error, when one or more of the eager init web services fail to
start. If you debug the exception thrown, will include the causes for the
eager init failure.
Ta
Meeraj
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.or
On 3/26/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/26/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Simon,
>
> Did you start ActiveMQ before you started the master?
>
> Ta
> Meeraj
>
>
> >From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
> >To: tuscany-
+1
On 26/03/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> +1 from me.
>
> On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany
> > mailing lists where we don't
+1
On 3/26/07, Davanum Srinivas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 from me.
On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany
> mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts.
When
> replying to email we
+1 from me.
On 3/26/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. When
replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original
authors dignity
I'd like to have a near-zero-tolerance "Be Nice" policy on the Tuscany
mailing lists where we don't allow participants to slam anyone's posts. When
replying to email we need to do it in a way that maintains the original
authors dignity.
We've some tough things to work out over the next days and w
On 3/26/07, Meeraj Kunnumpurath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Simon,
Did you start ActiveMQ before you started the master?
Ta
Meeraj
>From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
>To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Tag for TSSS demo code
>Date: Mon, 26 Ma
Simon,
Did you start ActiveMQ before you started the master?
Ta
Meeraj
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: Tag for TSSS demo code
Date: Mon, 26 Mar 2007 17:35:24 +0100
On 3/22/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTE
Raymond,
I've wondered that before too. Your case 2 would have been answered by the
SCA spec if the @Reference annotation were defined to be, annotated itself
with:
java.lang.annotation.Inherited.Since it's not annotated, I'm not sure
what to think from the SCA perspective, (though it's clea
On 3/22/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've created a tag corresponding to the code used to build the demo
(r520715) and added a trivial pom to build the lot. To build:
$ svn co https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/
java/tsss-demo
$ mvn install
I did not c
It's looking great and show good progress... I'll update my sandbox with
this patch.
I'll try to look into the issues you mentioned and send some updates
later...
--
Luciano Resende
http://people.apache.org/~lresende
On 3/26/07, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Luciano,
Yes, it is
On 3/22/07, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> > Hi Meeraj
>>
>> From my perspective having demonstrable code in June would be spot
>> on as
>> I have to speak on SCA then and would consider a demo if we could
>> do it.
>>
Maybe we can even get something earlier - I'm also speaking at Jav
Kelvin,
Did you update? I fixed a problem in DataGraphResourceImpl.
Frank.
"kelvin goodson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 03/26/2007 09:35:53
AM:
> Frank,
> I don't see any failures with any of the other samples, but I'm still
> having a problem with the ObtainingDataGraphFromXml. I'm curre
I think we should hold off calling this IPMC vote till we can show the IPMC
that we've made a bit of progress on the community issues being discussed on
other threads. Hopefully that wont take too long.
...ant
On 3/25/07, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thank you all.
This vote is p
Frank,
I don't see any failures with any of the other samples, but I'm still
having a problem with the ObtainingDataGraphFromXml. I'm currently trying
to understand why I get
**
SDO Sample ObtainingDataGraphFromXml
*
Hmm, I'm using 2.0.4. I'll upgrade and see if that fixes it.
Regards, Kelvin.
On 23/03/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I see the same thing as Raymond (except for the timestamped api), What
maven
release you are using ? I believe Raymond and I are using maven-2.0.5.
--
Luciano
Improve SCA SDO databinding serialization performance
-
Key: TUSCANY-1194
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1194
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Improvement
Componen
Hi Luciano,
Yes, it is based on the sandbox, but js , jsp and servlet will have many
changes.
I have posted a patch to JIRA-800. Please take a look.
Regards,
Amita
On 3/22/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thanks Amita, this is very good news...
Is this based on the initial patch
Hi All,
I am trying to create a prototype for supporting XQuery-DAS. Below are
some points I have gathered so far.
Please give your comments, add to the points.
1) Basic Features that can be supported:-
Need to support associating path expression to xml data source.
Parameter passing in path
On 3/25/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[snip]
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
>
>> For example, the "variant implementation of the assembly model" has a
>> number of changes that coupled with what you describe above will
>> basically require a re-write of kernel.
>
> I have
Hi,
When promoting a component reference to the composite level, the specs says
that if an interface is specified in the composite reference it must be a
superset of what is specified for the component reference that is being
promoted. To do this I reused the CheckCompatibility method in the
'Wi
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1191?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Andy Grove updated TUSCANY-1191:
Attachment: XMLWithoutSchemaTest.java
Updated version of test with bugs fixed.
> Test case for 2
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-800?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Amita Vadhavkar updated TUSCANY-800:
Attachment: JIRA-800-Mar23-Amita.jar
Hi Luciano,
Please see the note included in attachmen
42 matches
Mail list logo
