the workaround I mentioned before on this thread [1] where
> I added a new repository ? It was actually for other jars, but might
> help in this case as well...
>
> [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg31727.html
>
> On Fri, Jun 6, 2008 at 4:56 AM,
ution. Yes, you are absolutely right, the felix framework should use
> scope "provided" since SdoBundleActivator is only used when SDO is running
> inside an OSGi container, and the framework classes are provided by the
> container.
>
>
> On 6/3/08, kelvin goodson &l
Sounds good to me.
Kelvin.
2008/6/3 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 2:24 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > As mentioned elsewhere on this list in the discussion about respinning
> the
> > SDO 1.1.1 RC, I'm h
As mentioned elsewhere on this list in the discussion about respinning the
SDO 1.1.1 RC, I'm hoping to drop the "incubating" tag in the release name.
This has led me to look at the parent pom, and I guess we need a new
version of parent pom that doesn't reference the incubator repo, and then
ope
..ant
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:57 AM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > Just a thought, would I be right in guessing that if ever our
> > SdoBundleActivator is touched in the runtime, then the environment would
>
declaring a "provided" scope for the felix dependency
would be the right way to do things
Kelvin.
2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thanks Ant, that looks like progress, but the felix framework jar is now
> not in the list of distributed jars.
>
> Kelvin.
&g
gt; tuscany-sdo-impl-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> tuscany-sdo-lib-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> tuscany-sdo-tools-1.1.1-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar
> wstx-asl-3.2.1.jar
> xsd-2.2.3.jar
>
>...ant
>
> On Tue, Jun 3, 2008 at 11:31 AM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
binary distro. Rajini's going to take a look when she gets some time.
Kelvin.
2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The felix jars were introduced in the fix for "SDO does not work with
> OSGi" [1] in commit 620763 [2]. I don't know if this is expected
rg/viewcvs?view=rev&rev=620763
2008/6/3 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> The required libraries are
>
> sample-sdo-%RELEASE%.jar
> sdo-api-r2.1-%RELEASE%.jar
> tuscany-sdo-lib-%RELEASE%.jar
> tuscany-sdo-impl-%RELEASE%.jar
> tuscany-sdo-tools-%RELEASE%.jar
> co
that should be
> included?
>
> ...ant
>
> On Mon, Jun 2, 2008 at 6:02 PM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> > This failure also occurs with the 2.1 version and the 2.2-beta-1 version.
> > The current trunk version is 2.2-beta-3-SNAPSHOT, which I haven&#
JIRAs, but
it's hard to trawl that since so many JIRAs reference the word dependency.
It's not clear to me whether we benefited from a freak bug that was to our
advantage in the 2.2-SNAPSHOT version or whether all the other versions have
a bug/bugs.
Kelvin.
2008/6/2 kelvin goodson &l
version we should be using please pipe up.
Kelvin.
[1]
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/tuscany/java/sdo/pom.xml?r1=628691&r2=642349&pathrev=642349&diff_format=h
Kelvin.
2008/5/19 kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running
2008/5/22 ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 9:31 AM, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Scott Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> That 'generate-sdo' only generates the Java types from the schema types,
> >> right?
> >>
>
I'm looking at fixing a problem wrt running the samples at the moment.
Also, I found that with a combination of using IBM JDK 1.5 and maven 2.0.7 I
got hit by http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/MJAVADOC-135 when trying to build
from the top. We say in our BUILDING doc that 2.0.7 is OK, perhaps if w
cany Project:
>
>* Adriano Crestani
>* ant elder
>* Brady Johnson
>* Frank Budinsky
>* Ignacio Silva-Lepe
>* Jean-Sebastien Delfino
>* kelvin goodson
>* Luciano Resende
>* Mark Combellack
>* Matthieu Riou
>* Mike Edwa
+1 Looks good to me. Thanks very much for doing this Ant.
Kelvin.
On 26/03/2008, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please review and vote on the SDO 1.1 release RC3 artifacts at
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/sdo/1.1-rc3/<
> http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/s
I traced back the origins of the commented out line [1], and it was
introduced in commented out form (in a different file). That would tend to
suggest that it was there as a reminder of the right thing to do one other
infrastructure was in place, rather than being commented out because it
wasn't
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2110?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-2110.
-
Resolution: Invalid
If you set the containment of parentProp2 to true the test passes
I find the RSS feed facility for customised JIRA queries a very helpful way
of keeping up with JIRAs. It gives much more control than a mail filter
does. I still get the notifications in my inbox, but when I want to get a
quick overview of recent activity the RSS feed is preferable.
If you have
se is
> there.
>
> Regards,
>
>
> Miro Kandic
> (408) 525-2596
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Kelvin Goodson (JIRA) [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 2008 5:03 AM
> To: Miro Kandic (mkandic)
> Subject: [jira] Issue Comment Edited:
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1725?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12529388#action_12529388
]
kgoodson edited comment on TUSCANY-1725 at 3/18/08 5:03 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2098?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-2098.
-
Resolution: Duplicate
Surinder, you have uncovered a known problem. It was reported
Sorry, in my recent post I gave the wrong link for the general thread -- it
should have been
http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg16971.html
Kelvin.
On 18/03/2008, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This release candidate turned out to have a few issues when
management.
Kelvin.
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg28403.html
On 29/02/2008, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Please review and vote to release the 1.1-incubating release of Tuscany
> SDO for Java
>
> The distribution files are a
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-2080.
-
Resolution: Later
The implementation is behaving as per the 2.1 spec.
There is a spec
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12578823#action_12578823
]
kgoodson edited comment on TUSCANY-2080 at 3/14/08 8:59 AM:
---
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12578823#action_12578823
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2080:
-
This issue seems to be restricte
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12578674#action_12578674
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2080:
-
I knocked up a quick test for
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12578666#action_12578666
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2080:
-
I just re-read your report, and
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2080?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12578643#action_12578643
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2080:
-
This symptom is seen when there
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12576145#action_12576145
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2058:
-
Having consulted, it seems that
One possibility in the SDO domain that I have heard a request for recently
from more than one source is an ECMAScript/JavaScript implementation of
SDO. This could be started by a GSoC activity. I opened a Wish List item
for it a few days ago as TUSCANY-2065. I don't have deep skills in this
area,
On 05/03/2008, Scott Kurz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> I didn't follow all of the discussion about removing SDO from the Tuscany
> charter... but if SDO is no
> longer a special part of the Tuscany project then what would happen to the
> W2J/J2W tools built around
> SDO support?
The WSDL/WSDL
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2065?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-2065:
Component/s: Java SDO Implementation
> An ECMAScript version of
An ECMAScript version of SDO
Key: TUSCANY-2065
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2065
Project: Tuscany
Issue Type: Wish
Reporter: Kelvin Goodson
--
This message is automatically
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2062?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-2062:
Component/s: (was: Java SDO Tools)
Java SCA Tools
> WSDL2Java c
I believe it's important when entering a community to try as best you can to
adopt its culture. I believe both things are important. I can't say in
general I've deliberated long enough to come to a personal conclusion about
which is more important, but in no light hearted fashion I am happy to
s
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2058?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12575016#action_12575016
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2058:
-
This makes me wonder whether the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12575008#action_12575008
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2031:
-
Hello Joseph. I'm sor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2031?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-2031.
-
Resolution: Invalid
Suspect user error as per comment above.
> Error encountered w
tain SDO and others implicitly. Or, does this have a different
> interprettation ?
>
> - Venkat
>
>
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2008 at 10:00 PM, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > kelvin goodson wrote:
> > > Implicit in this rewording is the under
I have restarted this vote as requested.
Kelvin.
On 29/02/2008, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> kelvin goodson wrote:
> > Please vote to alter the wording of the existing draft Tuscany charter
> as
> > discussed in
> >
> >
> h
Brady Johnson
Frank Budinsky
Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Jean-Sebastien Delfino
kelvin goodson
Luciano Resende
Mike Edwards
Pete Robbins
Raymond Feng
Please review and vote to release the 1.1-incubating release of Tuscany SDO
for Java
The distribution files are at [1]
Maven artifacts for the release candidate are available at [2]
The tag for the release is at [3]
The rat report is at - [4], [5]
Here's my +1
Kelvin.
[1] http://people.apache.
Amita,
such a shame when you are so nearly there, however, I am happy to pick
it up from here. Many thanks for getting it so far.
Kelvin.
On 29/02/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi All,
> I will not be able to continue doing the release management activities
> from
> n
;
> On Tue, Feb 26, 2008 at 9:31 AM, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> wrote:
>
>
> > Implicit in this rewording is the understanding within the Tuscany
> > community
> > that there would be one Apache home for SDO Java development.
>
>
>
> Ma
creating a TCK for JSR 235.
Kelvin
[1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg02487.html
On 28/02/2008, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> kelvin goodson wrote:
> ...
>
> > implicit in this change to the charter is the
> > understanding
to be prepared to act in the spirit of these discussions,
if the new project is to stand a chance of being accepted into incubation.
Kelvin.
On 28/02/2008, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> kelvin goodson wrote:
> > Implicit in this rewording is the unders
member section,
and related technologies.
2) Andy Grove removed as initial member as per his request to step down from
PPMC
3) Mark Combellack added as member by virtue of PPMC membership
Kelvin.
On 28/02/2008, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> kelvin goodson wrote:
> &
al members of the
Apache Tuscany Project:
Adriano Crestani
Andrew Borley
ant elder
Brady Johnson
Frank Budinsky
Ignacio Silva-Lepe
Jean-Sebastien Delfi
implement SDO anymore --- yes
- and still allows Tuscany to implement SDO --- yes
- and still allows Tuscany to use SDO or any other related technology? ---
yes
Kelvin.
On 25/02/2008, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> kelvin goodson wrote:
> > There's b
There's been a discussion thread going for a while [1] in the Tuscany
community with regards to shifting the Apache home for SDO Java work to a
new project. This has been going on in parallel to the discussion on the
incubator general list on establishing a new project, originally aimed to
be tig
s="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema";>
so I had assumed xsd:Name was referencing
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-2/#Name
Perhaps we can see the original schema or verify that the above is the true
contents.
Kelvin.
On 20/02/2008, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
oops, I see you have removed them from the notes, sorry, however, it's
better that they are now tidied up in JIRA too ;-)
On 20/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Author: amita
> Date: Wed Feb 20 01:49:40 2008
> New Revision: 629397
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1272?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1272:
Component/s: (was: Java DAS RDB)
Java SDO Implementation
Was
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-829?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-829:
---
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-1.1)
Java-SDO-CTS-Next
> Investig
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1079?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1079:
Fix Version/s: (was: Java-SDO-1.1)
Java-SDO-CTS-Next
> Possi
There has been a few occasions in the SDO spec meetings where issues
associated with raising exceptions have been resolved in favour of not
requiring the implementer to incur the performance overhead of exception
translation or decoration. There are no exceptions defined by the SDO API,
and only ru
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1063?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1063.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Added print stack trace for any Exception (note one mod for this
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568499#action_12568499
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
The patch seems to have fixed
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568126#action_12568126
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
I have applied your 2nd patch, a
This commit seems to be causing problems in continuum and elsewhere, but
not in my env. See comments in the JIRA (1293) Investigating.
On 12/02/2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Author: kelvingoodson
> Date: Tue Feb 12 03:13:53 2008
> New Revision: 620763
>
> URL: http://sv
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568099#action_12568099
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
So it would seem that the failur
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568083#action_12568083
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
Amita, I get clean build fr
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-257?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12568064#action_12568064
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-257:
Thanks Amita, I took a scan of
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1293.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Thanks for the patch Rajini.
> SDO does not work with O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12567667#action_12567667
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1293:
-
Rajini,
sorry to take so lon
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1688?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1688:
I did a check for EMF bugs raised for this issue, but couldn't find one. Do
you kn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1689?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1689:
I did a check for EMF bugs raised for this issue, but couldn't find one. Do
you kn
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1831?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12567578#action_12567578
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1831:
-
I guess we could parallel the
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-182?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-182:
---
Component/s: Java SCA Assembly Model
There's too much assumed context in this
The chat will take as input the fruits of Amita's and my recent labours
documented at ...
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/SDO+Java+Project
and give you a chance to adjust the priorities we placed on issues, and to
say where you can contribute to help make this a useful relea
My top 3 in
http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Graduation+Next+Stepsare
11,12,13,19,22,32/33,38 and 18 but modified to have a policy of being
vocal early when no-one has the bandwidth to address an incoming JIRA. I
know that's not 3, but hey!
I can't see on the wiki page the
I like to be able to look at a JIRA and readily find the discussion relating
to it, so I find having technical discussion as a series of comments in the
JIRA helpful. In this pattern it makes sense to copy JIRA comments to the
dev list, as it forms the substance of our technical communication. I k
[I'm cross posting to tuscany-dev and tuscany-user again, to be sure all the
Tuscany community sees this. Please use"reply" rather than "reply-all" so
that we keep responses to the user list, to help make following the thread
easier and continue to reach the wider audience]
Some of you may be aw
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1514?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1514:
Component/s: (was: Java DAS RDB)
Java SDO Implementation
This JIRA
This is a follow-up invitation for you to influence the current SDO Java
release content that Amita is managing. We tried having an IRC slot in
Amita's "working" day (actually starting at 9:30PM her time; summary posted
at [1]), but didn't get participation, which may have been due to the
early
Looks fine to me
On 1 Feb 2008, at 16:09, Mike Edwards
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1
Simon Laws wrote:
I'm looking at copying the 1.1 release artifacts up onto the new
distribution infrastructure at
www.apache.org/dist/incubator/
We need to make a decision about how this will be structu
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1527?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1527.
-
Resolution: Fixed
I applied something very similar to what I had in my sandbox to the
I had an instant messaging chat with Amita, covering issues of release
management, including
license compliance, cutting tags/branches, sample programs, using the
distribution project, building and deploying a release candidate, pgp
signing, maven staging repositories
appended is the transcript
Having seen the version from sebb I note there's just a [miscellany]
introducer required. I'll fix it.
Kelvin.
On 29/01/2008, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Substituting the contents of this file into my config file causes the
> error
>
>
Substituting the contents of this file into my config file causes the error
svn: C:\Documents and Settings\Administrator\Application
Data\Subversion\config:4: Section header expected
when using svn command line version ...
svn, version 1.4.5 (r25188)
compiled Aug 22 2007, 20:56:15
or Tortoise
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1293?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson updated TUSCANY-1293:
Patch Info: [Patch Available]
> SDO does not work with O
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12561997#action_12561997
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1483:
-
Your most recent patch (
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1026?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1026.
-
Resolution: Invalid
The passage of time has made this JIRA invalid. Improvements will
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-2009?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12561304#action_12561304
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-2009:
-
I'm surprised that the Ecore
On 18/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Assuming name of the release as Tuscany SDO Java 1.1-incubating and
> keeping
> ref. to the
> old mail thread -
> http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg27168.html.
> I am starting a new thread now.
>
> Web Site documen
namic tests as static tests
>
> Is anybody working on any from the above list? Also please take a look at
> the cwiki link above to see if any other JIRAs from
> there are of interest and can be made part of the release. Any other
> issues/features missed so far in above which can
lvin.
On 20/11/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> What should we be concentrating our efforts on in SDO Java. I posted
> a while back to suggest we think about the content of a next release.
> We've had a few fixes go in recently, but I'd like to see mor
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1483?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12559045#action_12559045
]
Kelvin Goodson commented on TUSCANY-1483:
-
Amita, thanks for looking at
Amita, that sounds great thanks. It would be good to have more people
understanding this stuff. I'm happy with javajet setup to help if you need
it. There's an FAQ in the SDO Java part of the website for getting started
that you may have already found.
Kelvin.
On 11/01/2008, Amita Vadhavkar <
e the dependency of EMF on the Eclipse runtime.
>
> You could apply the patch as is, and remove the code that modifies the
> manifest entries in the EMF jars when the issue is resolved.
>
>
> Thank you...
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
>
> On 1/9/08, kelvin goodson &
r().getOpenContentProperty(uri, name);
> > if (property == null)
> > {
> > property = SDOUtil.createOpenContentProperty(hc, uri, name,
> > ((ModelFactoryImpl)ModelFactory.INSTANCE).getString());
> > }
> > }
> > return property;
[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1935?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel
]
Kelvin Goodson resolved TUSCANY-1935.
-
Resolution: Fixed
Patch applied, thanks David.
> Conversion of Bytes to/from Str
est to apply the patch which enables SDO to run under
> Equinox without modifying EMF, and with Felix with modified EMF jars. If
> there is a wider interest in running SDO under Felix, an alternative may
> be
> needed. Redistributing EMF with SDO with different manifest entries
> do
e list in the new year after
> I
> take a more detailed look.
>
>
> Thank you...
>
> Regards,
>
> Rajini
>
> On 12/10/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > I'd kind of hoped to be in a position to have a release before the en
reUtil.createFromString
> ((EDataType)dataType,
> literal);
> and assumed that DataObjectUtil.getGlobalProperty() checks for enum and
> does
> SDOUtil.createOpenContentProperty() for Strings.
>
> Suggestions?
>
> Regards,
> Amita
>
> On Dec 17, 2007 4:10 PM, kelvin goodso
s wouldn't seem
to be the whole answer, since others of the files are under the "src"
hierarchy.
Kelvin.
On 20/12/2007, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>I have inspected the two svn version of the sdo files you reference,
> and both are a
Hi,
I have inspected the two svn version of the sdo files you reference,
and both are as I would expect; no inserted script tags etc. I have
created md5 sum CRC digests of the files. If you could repeat these checks
and verify you get the same answer then I think your virus checker is
repo
that's a big gap. I guess its not so obvious because of the java reflection
that's used to get to the methods in question. If you could go some way to
fill in the gap that would be great.
Kelvin.
On 19/12/2007, David Adcox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> The unit test case org.apache.tuscany.sdo
1 - 100 of 1127 matches
Mail list logo
