Release vote has passed with 6 binding +1s, 1 non-binding +1 and no -1s.
Votes from:
Ant Elder
Luciano Resende
Raymond Feng
Venkata Krishnan
Jean-Sebastien Delfino
Simon Laws
Simon Nash (non-binidng)
...ant
On 5/24/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please review and vote on the 0.90
I successfully built the source distribution (including the distribution
module). I reviewed the contents of the binary distribution and I ran
and built all the samples using the instructions in the READMEs.
I have a few minor comments but nothing too serious, so here's my
+1 (non-binding).
Min
I confirmed that the sample runs OK after producing the error messages.
The unexplained part of this (to me) is why the war that I built with
ant consistently gave an error but the pre-built war in the binary
distro was consistently OK. And even more bizarrely, I rebuilt the
war again with ant to
I think thats: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1268. If you
ignore the unsightly error on the tomcat console the sample should still
actually be working fine. I have started fixing this in the trunk code, will
try to get it committed shortly.
...ant
On 5/26/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL
I compared the distro war file with one produced by the ant script
and they appear to have identical contents except for 2 additional
pom files in the distro version.
The failure only occurs when hot-deploying the war into a Tomcat
server that is already started and running. If I do a cold start
I am trying out the samples for RC2. All went well until I came to
helloworld-jsonrpc. The pre-built war file deployed and ran fine.
I then used "ant package" to rebuild the war, and the war that was
built did not deploy successfully. Here is the error that I got.
INFO: Server startup in 1813
Simon Laws wrote:
From a clean install of RC2 and an empty local repo...
I tried a selection of the samples in the binary distro using ant scripts.
All OK
I built the source distiribution. It took a lng time (3 hours!) to get
through it all told. In my case this seemed to be primarily th
From a clean install of RC2 and an empty local repo...
I tried a selection of the samples in the binary distro using ant scripts.
All OK
I built the source distiribution. It took a lng time (3 hours!) to get
through it all told. In my case this seemed to be primarily that the repo
hosting E
I restarted the build without clearing out my local repo, and it ran to
completion. So it does look like an intermittent maven problem and not
a problem with the rc. It's strange that I seem consistently unable to
build the whole distro from a clean repo, though.
Simon
Simon Nash wrote:
I
I tried again (empty maven repo, rc2 source distro). This time I was
using a different network connection. I got a similar but slightly
different error while building the SDO data binding:
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO]
ant elder wrote:
Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/0.90-rc2/
This includes the binary and source distributions, the RAT reports,
and the
Maven staging repository.
Hi,
I tried building the source disb and the samples from the binary and all
works well.
+1 for the release.
Thanks
- Venkat
On 5/24/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for revie
I'd guess that this is one of those intermittent maven repository problems,
could you just try again?
...ant
On 5/24/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I tried building the source distro from an empty local maven repo.
The build failed in the Axis2 binding with the following error:
[
I tried building the source distro from an empty local maven repo.
The build failed in the Axis2 binding with the following error:
[INFO]
[ERROR] BUILD ERROR
[INFO] ---
Hi,
I tried the binary distro too and the samples worked well.
+1 to release it!
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:19 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating RC2
P
Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:19 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating RC2
> Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
> Java.
>
> The artifacts are available
AIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:19 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating RC2
Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany
; [ERROR] BUILD FAILURE
> [INFO]
>
> [INFO] There are test failures.
> [INFO]
> ----------------
> [INFO] For more information, run Maven with the -e switch
> [INFO]
> -
] Final Memory: 38M/69M
[INFO]
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:19 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating RC2
> Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
>
uot; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:19 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating RC2
> Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
> Java.
>
> The artifacts are available for review at:
> http://people.apach
src\samples\binding-echo>
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:19 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating RC2
Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany S
at: Thu May 24 09:04:57 PDT 2007
[INFO] Final Memory: 38M/69M
[INFO]
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:19 AM
Subject: [VOTE] Release Tu
Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/0.90-rc2/
This includes the binary and source distributions, the RAT reports, and the
Maven staging repository.
The SVN tag for the
On 5/24/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
OK, below is an errata based on the points that people have highlighted as
important in this thread. Anything else need to be added? Anyone have any
better words for installing samples from the binary distro in Eclipse or
any
words at all for IDE
I was looking for the javadoc issue, and the issue is that
maven-dependency-plugin:unpack-javadoc just copy and unpack each
module javadoc files, overriding files with same name from previous
modules javadoc, this is why we only see the index.html from the last
module processed, instead of having
OK, below is an errata based on the points that people have highlighted as
important in this thread. Anything else need to be added? Anyone have any
better words for installing samples from the binary distro in Eclipse or any
words at all for IDEA. Now we have most people's comments in, this is qu
Thanks for the patch Simon, I have applied it on the 0.90 branch and
in trunk as well and have resolved the JIRA.
On 5/23/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I found a serious problem in the calculator-web sample in the 0.90
release candidate. The ant script for this sample builds a war t
ant elder wrote:
On 5/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
> Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA
for
> Java.
>
> The artifacts are available for review at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/0.90-rc1/
>
> This incl
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
> (cut)
>
3) In docs/, wer'e missing Javadoc for a number of SPI packages listed
in CHANGES, and more importantly, Javadoc for the SCA Java APIs .
The javadoc for org.osoa.sca.* is there but these packages aren't being
included in the top-level index.
> (cut)
8
I fixed the sample problems when we mentioned them before (that's 5 and 6
from Sebatien's list). I can look at other things first thing as it sounds
like we are going to respin. Too tired now to get it right.
I still don't think we wait for a fix for my build problem. It's the first
time it's com
I found a serious problem in the calculator-web sample in the 0.90
release candidate. The ant script for this sample builds a war that
is not deployable because of two missing files. The pre-built war file
that is shipped as part of the binary distro is fine. I discovered
this as a last-minute
On 5/23/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
ant elder wrote:
> Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
> Java.
>
> The artifacts are available for review at:
> http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/0.90-rc1/
>
> This includes the binary and
ant elder wrote:
Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/0.90-rc1/
This includes the binary and source distributions, the RAT reports,
and the
Maven staging repository.
I didn't. I looked at both versions of maven-jaxb-plugin at
https://maven-repository.dev.java.net/repository/com.sun.tools.xjc.maven2/poms/and
both have the odd characters in. There seem to be other
implementations
of the maven-jaxb-plugin around and I tried the ones I could find but got
NPEs in m
Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating
OK, so I can't get the compile to work on my linux box with a simple
change
to the version/location of the maven-jaxb-plugin that the build uses. I'm
going to upgrade my JDK and see if that has a positive effect but of
course
that has no bear
I think the "shop window factor" is an important consideration.
The cumulative effect of the issues that people have reported seems
to be significant enough from this perspective that a respin is
desirable. In particular, the build and sample README problems
could be quite off-putting to a novice
seconds
[INFO] Finished at: Tue May 22 17:03:52 PDT 2007
[INFO] Final Memory: 2M/5M
[INFO]
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Relea
e May 22 17:03:52 PDT 2007
[INFO] Final Memory: 2M/5M
[INFO]
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating
> Another very d
-
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, May 21, 2007 1:13 PM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating
Another very detailed review, thank you! Comments in line, but to
summarise
- there's an u
OK, so I can't get the compile to work on my linux box with a simple change
to the version/location of the maven-jaxb-plugin that the build uses. I'm
going to upgrade my JDK and see if that has a positive effect but of course
that has no bearing on the SCA release. As this problem is restricted to
Hi,
I've give the distros a shot on windows xp.
- The src disb. builds clean
- The tried all the samples from the binary dist just following the
READMEs. Like the others I do find the README for the rmi samples out of
sync and also the crud-client app does not run. But all the other samples
r
JAXB
> classes
> >> for
> >> the unit tests. So if we fix it, the scope of testing shouldn't be a
> big
> >> deal. All we have to do is to run the maven build on the environments
> we
> >> have tested so far.
> >>
> >&g
n tried to assure
him
that the usage of the plugin is fairly isolated and the risk should be
minor.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-inc
of the plugin is fairly isolated and the risk should be
> minor.
>
> Thanks,
> Raymond
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To:
> Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 9:01 AM
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0
m
that the usage of the plugin is fairly isolated and the risk should be
minor.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "ant elder" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating
> I'
Tuesday, May 22, 2007 9:01 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating
I'm not clear what you're saying - "Build failure seems to be a
show-stopper
to me" and "So if we fix it..." - surely we must fix it if its a
showstopper
and we want to have
houldn't be a big
deal. All we have to do is to run the maven build on the environments we
have tested so far.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" < [EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 3:37 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java
n the environments we
have tested so far.
Thanks,
Raymond
- Original Message -
From: "Simon Laws" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, May 22, 2007 3:37 AM
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Tuscany Java SCA 0.90-incubating
I've given the src and binary d
On 21/05/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have done necessary updates to STATUS page [1], and the Incubator
Tuscany
page [2]. Note that the changes on the incubator page takes a little while
to get reflect on the live website.
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tusca
I've given the src and binary distros a spin on linux. My configuration is
Fedora Core5
IBM JDK 1.5.0
Maven 2.0.6
Binary:
I concur with Luciano that the READMEs for
calculator-rmi-reference
calculator-rmi-service
implementation-crud
now don't match the way that the samples are currently organ
I checked out the source from the 0.90 tag and it builds fine from an empty
mvn repository on Mac OS X and the reactor summary is clean. I also
randomly chose several of the samples from the distribution binaries
(calculator-script, supplychain, simple-bigbank, implementation-composite)
and they
I have done necessary updates to STATUS page [1], and the Incubator Tuscany
page [2]. Note that the changes on the incubator page takes a little while
to get reflect on the live website.
[1] https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/STATUS
[2] http://incubator.apache.org/projects/tuscany
Another very detailed review, thank you! Comments in line, but to summarise
- there's an unclear sample readme, a broken sample readme, and some missing
Javadoc. This isn't perfect, but are any of those blockers requiring the
delay of another RC? I think not and its better to get this release out
Here are my findings around the 0.9 Release Candidate, my main concern is
with the issues I mentioned in the modules directory of the source.
Samples:
I have tried the standalone samples and the web samples (in jetty and
tomcat).
All samples look OK, with the exceptions of the ones mentioned belo
I don't think that document says we MUST include the STATUS document. It
says "Check status document" meaning check that the STATUS doc doesn't say
there are outstanding legal issues that may prevent a release. Even if that
releasemanagement doc did say we must, the doc is still under development
Regarding the STATUS document, I think the policy say we must include them,
check [1] on the "Release Documentation" and "STATUS document" sessions.
Also our STATUS file is not up to date, and I can take care of helping
updating that after I finish reviewing the rest of the release candidate.
[1]
Hey many thanks for the prompt and detailed review.
I can't remember exactly about the STATUS file, i think it may be an old
requirement that is no longer necessary. I can find this incubator-general
email [1] about the recent CXF release which included and old and incorrect
status file, and the
Ant,
I've had a good poke around and built the source distro and run the tests
successfully. The only potential blocking issue I have found is that absence
of a STATUS file, which it was my understanding should be copied in from
the project's STATUS file into every distribution, but I haven't b
Please review and vote on the 0.90 release artifacts of Tuscany SCA for
Java.
The artifacts are available for review at:
http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/0.90-rc1/
This includes the binary and source distributions, the RAT reports, and the
Maven staging repository.
The SVN tag for the
59 matches
Mail list logo
