[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-753?page=all ]
Rajith Attapattu updated TUSCANY-753:
-
Attachment: jms-binding-JIRA_753-01-11-06.patch
Hi All,
Finally I managed to redo the jms binding (I lost about a weeks worth of code,
due to hard
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-753?page=all ]
Li Shen updated TUSCANY-753:
Attachment: helloworldws.zip
> JMS Binding
> ---
>
> Key: TUSCANY-753
> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-753
>
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-753?page=all ]
ant elder updated TUSCANY-753:
--
Fix Version/s: Java-Mx
Affects Version/s: Java-Mx
> JMS Binding
> ---
>
> Key: TUSCANY-753
> URL: http://issues.apa
AMQP would be awesome. BTW, maybe you or Carl could mention if it
supports callbacks and conversational id propagation?
Jim,
With RPC protocols they typically return an object for callbacks,
typically in messaging a reply-to queue and correlation id is
used for conversational state. AMQ
ActiveMQ even allows receiving and sending messages from a Telnet prompt
:-)
-Original Message-
From: Jeremy Boynes [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 26 September 2006 21:40
To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-753) JMS Binding
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:34 PM
As soon as we come to an agreement on the databinding stuff I will finalize
the JMS binding.
(We had long discussion on irc about it and Raymond posted the chat log)
As soon as Qpid is available we can have a working sample out there.
The prospect of Tuscany C (amqp binding) working with Tuscany
Jim Marino wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hmm, maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK there is no interop in
JMS across providers, not to mention programming languages.
I believe I can use a JMS API to ActiveMQ
On Sep 26, 2006, at 7:12 PM, Carl Trieloff wrote:
Maybe we could also do a AMQP binding too for portability :-)
Will do, however I think it makes sense to work out some of the
details with JMS in the next few days, before we add AMQP
binding so that we can learn for it.
Yea that makes
Maybe we could also do a AMQP binding too for portability :-)
Will do, however I think it makes sense to work out some of the details
with JMS in the next few days, before we add AMQP
binding so that we can learn for it.
There's no guarantee that there is Java on the far end - JMS is just
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:55 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Ah, so I took the bait. So then the question is what does ActiveMQ
do when it gets a Java serialized message, e.g., an ObjectMessage?
It should be able to handle it, otherwise it would be subsetting
the JMS spec.
I think it delivers i
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:57 PM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Once I sort out the JMS binding I will do an AMQP binding :-)
AMQP would be awesome. BTW, maybe you or Carl could mention if it
supports callbacks and conversational id propagation?
Jim
I need to understand the databinding framework a b
Once I sort out the JMS binding I will do an AMQP binding :-)
I need to understand the databinding framework a bit more to sort this out.
Then I can concentrate on getting the test cases done.
Regards,
Rajith.
On 9/26/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Je
OTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:40 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-753) JMS Binding
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hmm, maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK there is no interop in JMS
across providers, not to mention programming languag
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:40 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hmm, maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK there is no interop in
JMS across providers, not to mention programming languages.
I believe I can use a JMS API to ActiveMQ to send a message
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:34 PM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
Hmm, maybe I'm missing something, but AFAIK there is no interop in
JMS across providers, not to mention programming languages.
I believe I can use a JMS API to ActiveMQ to send a message to a C
or .NET program. I think some commercial pr
Comment inline.
- Original Message -
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, September 26, 2006 4:26 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Updated: (TUSCANY-753) JMS Binding
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
XML serialization is better than ja
On Sep 26, 2006, at 1:06 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
XML serialization is better than java serialization - more portable.
Yes agreed it is more "portable" and should be an option but with
JMS were are not invoking across providers and we are dealing with
Java on the receiving end. Also, I think
On Sep 26, 2006, at 9:47 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
1. Some of the exception handling does printStackTrace() and
exceptions derive directly from things like RuntimeException (I
realize this is probably just for expediency). Eventually these
should probably be converted into descendants of T
XML serialization is better than java serialization - more portable.
Yes agreed it is more "portable" and should be an option but with JMS
were are not invoking across providers and we are dealing with Java
on the receiving end. Also, I think we need to support streaming.
Maybe we could
Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Hi Jim,
Thank you very much for the feedback I really appreciate it.
Please see my comments inline marked with [RA]
On 9/26/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rajith,
Thanks for the patch. I had a couple of quick questions, mostly
related to things that coul
Hi Jim,
Thank you very much for the feedback I really appreciate it.
Please see my comments inline marked with [RA]
On 9/26/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Rajith,
Thanks for the patch. I had a couple of quick questions, mostly
related to things that could be done to evolve the c
Hi Rajith,
Thanks for the patch. I had a couple of quick questions, mostly
related to things that could be done to evolve the code (It's before
I have had enough coffee so bear with me ;-) ):
1. Some of the exception handling does printStackTrace() and
exceptions derive directly from thin
[ http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-753?page=all ]
Rajith Attapattu updated TUSCANY-753:
-
Attachment: jmsbinding_jira753_25sep06.patch
The basic design is as follows.
I have tried to follow the spec as much as possible eventhough it is sti
23 matches
Mail list logo
